This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3802 2461192.8802 7.62 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0
11.83954 -25.98831 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" RR Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
5.400 V 14.000 V 2456816.00000 334.100000000000 M4e-M9e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0: 8.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0: 8.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.61 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RR Sgr,2461192.8802,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RR Sgr 20260601.3802 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3802 2461192.8802 11.78 19:42:55.82 -25:40:41.0
14.42519 -22.10376 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 -0 1 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:55.82 -25:40:41.0: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:55.82 -25:40:41.0: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8802,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3802 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3802 2461192.8802 11.96 19:36:24.58 -24:57:48.3
14.57706 -20.47220 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 -0 0 12.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:36:24.58 -24:57:48.3: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:36:24.58 -24:57:48.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8802,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3802 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3802 2461192.8802 11.42 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9
9.11032 -21.91233 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" DI Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.500 : pg < 17.500 pg 2422534.00000 475.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9: 12.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9: 12.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DI Sgr,2461192.8802,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DI Sgr 20260601.3802 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3802 2461192.8802 11.94 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6
15.52921 -23.45533 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J195007-2511.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.210 V Y 0.530 V 2452172.00000 63.559322000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195007-2511.6,2461192.8802,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195007-2511.6 20260601.3802 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461192.88039530 01.06.2026 09:07:36.154 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6769
Objects passed selection criteria: 6765
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5949.75
Average stars matched: 5867.25 (98.6134 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 06:09:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461192.88039530 01.06.2026 09:07:36.154 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 65
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53464
Objects passed selection criteria: 53380
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45718
Average stars matched: 44458.8 (97.2456 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 06:13:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.87992892
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01001 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tn59mf3mkV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ObSL2cLXn8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cOaL50DMDD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.60J0HjtxrI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tn59mf3mkV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ObSL2cLXn8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=240 n_q2=208 n_q3=266 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cOaL50DMDD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, passed=4838
Got 4838 stars (including 4511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=257 n_q2=207 n_q3=267 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.60J0HjtxrI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, passed=4830
Got 4830 stars (including 4517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=257 n_q2=205 n_q3=263 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.498 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.177
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.28
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0: 8.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0: 8.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.61 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0: ref_mag=8.61 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=7.6162 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 20189_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.63 -22:18:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.79 -28:47:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:43.183 -25:59:40.78
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:40.912 -25:59:21.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01001 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dRcaxb1Uyy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dQRRwqrgpI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6a6CxtzN1o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j3h7OlS3bj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7592 out of 8135 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8135 out of 55853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dRcaxb1Uyy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dQRRwqrgpI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2424, passed=55844
Got 55844 stars (including 53347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=249 n_q2=207 n_q3=250 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6a6CxtzN1o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1107, passed=34472
Got 34472 stars (including 33319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=240 n_q2=205 n_q3=280 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j3h7OlS3bj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1095, passed=34058
Got 34058 stars (including 32913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=241 n_q2=202 n_q3=278 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-06-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_042722_TTUQ1b1x1_192545_i8VYJ6am/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:22.58 -30:55:32.0: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.6: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:36:24.58 -24:57:48.3: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:38.43 -30:18:27.4: 12.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:41.40 -24:10:12.6: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:19.91 -22:32:01.8: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:23.18 -22:18:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:55.82 -25:40:41.0: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:08.99 -20:35:41.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:34:38.43 -30:18:27.4: 12.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:36:24.58 -24:57:48.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:37:22.58 -30:55:32.0: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:41.40 -24:10:12.6: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:19.91 -22:32:01.8: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:38.43 -30:18:27.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0587 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:22.58 -30:55:32.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0344 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:23.18 -22:18:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:23.18 -22:18:41.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:41.40 -24:10:12.6: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6452 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.6: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:55.82 -25:40:41.0: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:19.91 -22:32:01.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6371 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.6: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7341 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:08.99 -20:35:41.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:08.99 -20:35:41.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:15.5: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:46.01 -22:15:44.0: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:52.6: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:11.53 -23:03:06.4: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:45.45 -30:01:44.7: 13.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:29.47 -21:32:08.3: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:15.5: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:15.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2962 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:29:40.04 -22:20:13.2: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:57.73 -29:45:34.9: 13.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:52.6: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:01:46.01 -22:15:44.0: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:11.53 -23:03:06.4: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.01 -22:15:44.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6291 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:52.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8022 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:11.53 -23:03:06.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7564 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:45.45 -30:01:44.7: 13.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:40:29.47 -21:32:08.3: 12.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:45.45 -30:01:44.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5133 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.47 -21:32:08.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7250 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:29:40.04 -22:20:13.2: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:57.73 -29:45:34.9: 13.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:40.04 -22:20:13.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9677 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:57.73 -29:45:34.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8435 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:08.52 -23:43:16.4: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:01.19 -22:19:09.1: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:44.46 -29:54:37.9: 14.60 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:41.93 -30:15:16.0: 13.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:08.52 -23:43:16.4: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:08.52 -23:43:16.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7716 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:52.40 -29:10:47.2: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:32.02 -27:22:21.4: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:10.62 -22:37:42.9: 13.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:11.15 -26:14:10.5: 13.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:03:01.19 -22:19:09.1: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:44.46 -29:54:37.9: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:01.19 -22:19:09.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9191 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:44.46 -29:54:37.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.6673 delta=1.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:41.93 -30:15:16.0: 13.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:41.93 -30:15:16.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8434 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:52.40 -29:10:47.2: 13.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.40 -29:10:47.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0920 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:32.02 -27:22:21.4: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:10.62 -22:37:42.9: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:11.15 -26:14:10.5: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:32.02 -27:22:21.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2957 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:10.62 -22:37:42.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4695 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:11.15 -26:14:10.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1620 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:39.89 -30:00:09.0: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:41.60 -28:37:43.0: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:00.02 -22:19:00.5: 13.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:37:39.89 -30:00:09.0: 13.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:39.89 -30:00:09.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3515 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:35.23 -28:56:36.5: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:04:40.68 -22:46:27.1: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:10.42 -25:39:37.0: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:18.64 -27:38:42.5: 13.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:41.60 -28:37:43.0: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:41.60 -28:37:43.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4192 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:00.02 -22:19:00.5: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.02 -22:19:00.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5320 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:35.23 -28:56:36.5: 13.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:35.23 -28:56:36.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3202 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:04:40.68 -22:46:27.1: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:10.42 -25:39:37.0: 13.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:40.68 -22:46:27.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3801 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:18.64 -27:38:42.5: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:10.42 -25:39:37.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5794 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:18.64 -27:38:42.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3479 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:32:30.30 -30:54:21.2: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:10.78 -23:48:00.9: 14.67 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:07:55.37 -22:18:15.2: 14.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:32:30.30 -30:54:21.2: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:30.30 -30:54:21.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2119 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:07.78 -26:42:26.7: 13.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:10.78 -23:48:00.9: 14.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:10.78 -23:48:00.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7639 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:43.68 -30:44:33.8: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:07:55.37 -22:18:15.2: 14.69 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:55.37 -22:18:15.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6788 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:30.20 -29:58:21.7: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:07.78 -26:42:26.7: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:07.78 -26:42:26.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6820 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:43.68 -30:44:33.8: 13.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:43.68 -30:44:33.8: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.6147 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:44:06.39 -30:01:15.2: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:30.20 -29:58:21.7: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9: 12.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:30.20 -29:58:21.7: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4585 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:56.39 -30:13:26.7: 12.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:44:06.39 -30:01:15.2: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:06.39 -30:01:15.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9421 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9: 12.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:28.40 -30:14:31.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.4187 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:56.39 -30:13:26.7: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:56.39 -30:13:26.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2664 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:41.80 -29:24:36.7: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:14.45 -29:03:17.4: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:19.18 -30:05:26.5: 12.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:14.45 -29:03:17.4: 12.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:41.80 -29:24:36.7: 12.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:14.45 -29:03:17.4: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8549 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:41.80 -29:24:36.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4904 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:19.18 -30:05:26.5: 12.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:19.18 -30:05:26.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7491 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:50:06.70 -25:11:38.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9353 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74193.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74601.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73676.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73714.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73467_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73467_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73608_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73608_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73676_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 73676_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73714_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 73714_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73715_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73715_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.42 -23:25:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73770_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73770_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73856_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73856_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:05.23 -26:11:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73865_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73890_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73890_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73945_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73945_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73987_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73987_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73996_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 73996_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74054_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74054_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:21.88 -21:39:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74056_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74056_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.85 -21:31:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74077_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74077_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74088_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74088_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74125_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74125_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74129_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74129_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74147_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74147_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74180_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74180_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.01 -28:46:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.46 -29:54:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.236 6751837955393745024 295.68394838433 -29.91019363377 13.0002 10.8950 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.236#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74197_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74197_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:35.53 -21:49:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74199_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74199_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74410_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74410_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74415_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74415_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74418_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74418_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74469_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74469_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74500_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74523_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74523_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74525_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74525_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74551_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74551_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74558_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74558_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74591_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74591_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74601_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 74601_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.37 -22:18:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.436 6853669705837364352 301.98064914758 -22.30411429883 13.6536 12.4358 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.436#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.64 -22:18:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01028_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 01028_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.77 -28:47:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
Preparing report for the candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 03552_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69867_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 69867_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118
The candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-07-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118 did not pass the final checks