NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-04-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 687529 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 687529 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits

renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3707.5598 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 890.6178 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3713.3078 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 890.9533 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.68056 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T04:00:18.0865821' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T09:00:18.0865821' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3752093287 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T09:00:27.9890818' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3753239466 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.99881913269 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001450814244 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.7972222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 329.810833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.465950971317 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 79.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.100808 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits :) Spent 0.801866 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T04:00:57.6180570' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T09:00:57.6180570' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3756668749 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T09:01:07.5220266' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3757815044 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.99881918812 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001450742788 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.7275 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 329.850833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.47269170160423 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 66.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.600608 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits :) Spent 0.944232 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.87532507 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 Second-epoch image center 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00528 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.50yXmClm1v Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2huPRkDaaf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QlQFoFrHS6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CinuvTf0Uo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec +55.3321 to +67.4949 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec 55.3321 to 67.4949 deg Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3981 out of 4179 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4179 out of 7282 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.50yXmClm1v (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=7332 Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7227 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7225 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7225 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=226 n_q2=229 n_q3=256 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2huPRkDaaf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, passed=7282 Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=228 n_q2=229 n_q3=253 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.QlQFoFrHS6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, passed=2856 Got 2856 stars (including 2589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2856 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2830 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2830 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=239 n_q2=277 n_q3=220 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.CinuvTf0Uo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, passed=2847 Got 2847 stars (including 2581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2847 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=235 n_q2=276 n_q3=225 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.170 ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.258 new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.117 new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.108 reference average sigma_overall=0.3825 worst_q_ratio=1.214 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 Second-epoch image center 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 Second-epoch image center 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:24.306 +61:57:51.44 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:21.619 +61:57:52.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00528 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oQ9bS3DEdZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0uzTpI0uRz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LKAq0ZDZ79 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s8uBeJkY1F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec +55.2659 to +67.4949 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec 55.2659 to 67.4949 deg Loaded 6626 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3751 out of 4193 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4193 out of 37494 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.oQ9bS3DEdZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, passed=37315 Got 37315 stars (including 35483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36727 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36727 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=215 n_q2=233 n_q3=264 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0uzTpI0uRz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, passed=37476 Got 37476 stars (including 35672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37049 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37048 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37047 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=215 n_q2=232 n_q3=263 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LKAq0ZDZ79 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=491, passed=17660 Got 17660 stars (including 17146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17660 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17536 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17536 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=237 n_q2=278 n_q3=225 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.s8uBeJkY1F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=467, passed=17769 Got 17769 stars (including 17273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17769 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=238 n_q2=277 n_q3=226 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:02:21.41 +63:30:09.5: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:41:09.15 +65:56:33.4: 10.85 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:02:21.41 +63:30:09.5: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:21.41 +63:30:09.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4762 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:41:09.15 +65:56:33.4: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:09.15 +65:56:33.4: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2272 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:31:12.49 +66:18:19.2: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:37:44.73 +64:16:40.9: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.63 +61:33:09.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:31:12.49 +66:18:19.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:12.49 +66:18:19.2: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2181 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:37:44.73 +64:16:40.9: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:37:44.73 +64:16:40.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6184 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.63 +61:33:09.3: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.63 +61:33:09.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3333 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52594_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52594_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 01.37533    2461192.87533    13.52    12:02:21.40 +63:30:09.2   4717 2263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.45    12:02:21.42 +63:30:09.8   4714 2262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52595_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52595_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.52    12:45:10.58 +65:49:02.1   2194 0454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:45:10.53 +65:49:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52597_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52597_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.10    12:18:15.42 +64:05:30.7   3699 1802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:18:15.45 +64:05:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 01.37533    2461192.87533    11.22    11:41:09.11 +65:56:33.2   6124 0829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    11.23    11:41:09.18 +65:56:33.7   6122 0829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    11.57    11:47:21.97 +64:29:27.0   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52858_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52858_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    11.63    11:45:01.45 +64:47:37.5   5880 1526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:45:01.42 +64:47:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    11.65    12:15:42.39 +57:00:10.9   3341 6071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:15:42.40 +57:00:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52921_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 52921_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    11.95    12:09:51.42 +65:05:24.4   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53019_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53019_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.34    12:21:26.07 +59:23:23.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53027_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53027_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.26    11:51:12.02 +66:53:44.0   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53070_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53070_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.38    12:09:41.24 +64:08:22.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53143_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53143_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.58    11:04:04.25 +61:47:49.1   8794 3111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:04:04.23 +61:47:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53205_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53205_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.75    12:15:28.43 +56:59:08.2   3359 6084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:15:28.44 +56:59:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53235_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53235_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.84    11:59:24.97 +64:47:03.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.91    12:21:19.98 +65:46:28.7   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    12.89    11:40:23.25 +57:57:11.9   6233 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:40:23.24 +57:57:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53385_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53385_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.02    11:23:27.79 +61:43:44.8   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53454_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53454_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.04    11:21:37.00 +57:04:11.8   7788 6118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:21:37.07 +57:04:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53464_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53464_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.29    11:30:26.92 +63:32:60.0   6855 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:30:26.98 +63:33:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53471_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53471_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.36    11:02:30.14 +59:36:00.8   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 01.37533    2461192.87533    13.33    12:35:53.64 +61:33:08.8   2250 3110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.33    12:35:53.62 +61:33:09.8   2246 3110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53477_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53477_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 01.37533    2461192.87533    13.28    11:31:12.56 +66:18:19.2   6727 0587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.17    11:31:12.43 +66:18:19.1   6724 0588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53498_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53498_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.62    12:50:42.19 +62:58:08.2   1421 2039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:50:42.25 +62:58:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53514_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53514_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.21    12:29:45.66 +58:23:48.0   2344 5070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:29:45.54 +58:23:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53583_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53583_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 01.37533    2461192.87533    13.54    12:37:44.72 +64:16:41.0   2457 1472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.73    12:37:44.74 +64:16:40.8   2455 1472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53612_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53612_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.53    11:58:21.23 +61:26:10.6   4913 3521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 11:58:21.24 +61:26:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53685_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53685_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.48    12:43:29.31 +65:57:22.2   2316 0397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:43:29.34 +65:57:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53776_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 53776_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    13.82    12:18:38.42 +63:15:52.8   3608 2293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:18:38.35 +63:15:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 The candidate 13410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 01.37578    2461192.87578    8.10    12:43:56.44 +61:05:35.1   1614 3257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_041524_TTUQ1b1x1_3817503_jPGwmCVK/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0110.fits **** FOUND 12:43:56.47 +61:05:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.87532507 -observatory V36 05:57:26.49 +25:35:35.8 Mercury (-0.5mag) 07:08:06.33 +24:27:22.0 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:29:52.61 +14:06:56.3 Mars (1.3mag) 07:42:51.85 +21:45:04.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:47:19.77 +02:37:22.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:58:34.31 +20:20:43.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:42.05 +00:14:18.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:41.80 -23:02:06.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:20:43.56 -28:39:46.2 Moon (-12.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 04:17 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.87532507: 07:42:58.45 +21:44:47.5 Io (6.0mag) 07:42:57.69 +21:44:50.1 Europa (6.1mag) 07:42:35.94 +21:45:51.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:42:53.26 +21:45:08.3 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:43:34.14 +21:21:10.0 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:42:55.71 +21:44:54.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:43:44.32 +21:39:40.0 Elara (17.5mag) 07:44:40.67 +22:00:29.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:49:44.27 +21:46:18.3 Carme (18.8mag) 00:47:27.04 +02:37:41.8 Titan (8.7mag) 00:47:23.94 +02:37:15.4 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:47:50.88 +02:38:35.3 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:47:13.76 +02:37:51.2 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:48:10.21 +02:40:17.0 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 04:17 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.87532507: 17:21:45.34 -34:28:11.5 JWST 17:49:17.58 +35:35:18.8 Chandra 09:23:27.90 -53:34:26.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 04:17 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.87532507 -observatory V36 18:47:48.69 -32:08:28.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:46:49.03 -68:09:15.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:46:34.18 +31:52:55.1 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:17:27.11 +14:58:04.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:15:33.71 -51:25:42.1 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:52.09 +31:19:02.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:25:39.35 +26:55:26.1 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:24:59.14 +31:18:31.2 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:47:00.78 +03:34:48.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:32:34.83 +21:25:47.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:21:56.54 -11:00:44.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:57.88 +66:05:22.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:02:53.73 -06:03:15.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:24:52.68 +84:30:22.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:01:14.97 +64:05:43.5 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:36:44.80 +27:10:23.3 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:42:45.52 +12:52:44.7 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:17:01.85 +29:04:33.5 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:11:11.17 -16:34:50.8 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:59:30.86 +35:41:35.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:39:22.30 +53:06:10.1 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:35:39.21 -10:32:59.1 13.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:18:53.06 +23:24:14.2 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:07.84 +04:40:50.9 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:48:19.30 +42:54:03.9 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:23.86 -06:19:11.0 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:11:08.60 -08:13:42.7 9.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:00:37.10 -00:53:38.4 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:55:39.80 -02:37:55.2 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:01:07.71 +24:42:49.5 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:45:26.06 +25:41:01.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:20:49.21 -06:50:24.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:21:25.41 +32:37:18.4 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:52:45.76 +16:17:55.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:05:34.05 +03:18:32.1 15.4mag 88P/Howell 04:32:40.14 +29:41:01.0 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:24:01.21 +26:28:40.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:34:24.83 +33:13:57.7 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:38:25.83 +17:34:27.7 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:47:47.49 +18:46:07.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:19:57.89 +18:43:57.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:27:58.73 +19:18:59.7 13.8mag 141P/Machholz 05:30:27.59 +17:09:08.7 13.7mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:19:06.94 +15:02:57.8 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:52:46.65 -25:41:16.2 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:19:27.22 +20:58:13.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:17.68 -00:09:49.4 17.2mag 169P/NEAT 23:59:51.02 +01:05:26.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:57:30.35 -08:52:48.6 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:19:10.59 +35:43:44.8 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:14:33.67 -05:18:16.0 16.6mag 260P/McNaught 03:46:00.98 +31:11:07.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:02:10.70 -19:01:55.3 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:18:30.05 +08:16:55.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:01:49.65 +20:54:38.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:48:50.89 +42:10:16.6 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 1 04:17 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 04:17 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Jun 1 04:17 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 20:41:11.858 +07:30:47.01 AT 2026nfw 2026-05-20.41 19.6773 21:59:44.032 +01:09:25.15 AT 2026nfv 2026-05-20.41 20.2169 19:55:15.987 -12:13:04.06 SN 2026nfu 2026-05-20.40 19.764 19:11:59.188 -05:59:29.48 AT 2026nft 2026-05-20.40 20.1465 20:49:19.514 -11:14:29.34 AT 2026nfs 2026-05-15.43 20.3991 17:50:32.577 +03:03:50.91 AT 2026nfr 2026-05-14.42 20.7439 09:56:58.256 +03:14:00.41 AT 2026nfq 2026-05-18.98 23.2429 09:58:28.172 +03:37:48.70 AT 2026nfp 2026-05-18.00 23.6388 01:41:52.654 +49:02:23.74 AT 2026nfo 2026-05-15.49 16.6376 19:48:38.478 -15:49:21.40 SN 2026nfn 2026-05-14.45 20.6205 23:29:50.523 +24:19:16.46 AT 2026nfm 2026-05-16.48 19.4861 00:22:50.994 +32:13:55.02 AT 2026nfl 2026-05-20.48 19.4447 00:19:09.783 +22:55:29.39 AT 2026nfk 2026-05-15.49 18.5774 18:50:22.104 +74:56:01.68 AT 2026nfj 2026-05-20.01 17.95 14:44:27.710 +29:51:15.82 AT 2026nfi 2026-05-05.85 20.76 15:03:26.220 +29:01:29.01 AT 2026nfh 2026-05-05.85 20.56 13:18:06.250 +03:51:41.98 AT 2026nfg 2026-05-17.67 21.83 14:20:14.220 +03:14:46.94 AT 2026nff 2026-05-17.66 22.59 13:59:52.100 +00:18:30.03 AT 2026nfe 2026-05-17.65 22.32 14:01:52.310 +04:31:34.96 AT 2026nfd 2026-05-17.65 22.49 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 04:17 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C