######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 702928 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 702928 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 526.5434
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8510
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4016.7936
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1028.2351
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3961.6686
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 963.1619
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.62861
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.068
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T03:27:20.1491311' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T08:27:20.1491311' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3523165393 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T08:27:30.0497480' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3524311227 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998438505867 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997379058627 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.8675 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 345.111111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.88941639615393 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 75.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits :)
Spent 0.637834 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T03:27:59.6054522' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T08:27:59.6054522' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3527732058 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T08:28:09.5098009' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3528878358 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998438664253 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997379014708 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.8319444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 345.120277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.89129161264956 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 75.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits :)
Spent 0.780765 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.85243228
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00599 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ElcsZFVBCP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.msJWsPDreh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X04bIVuTDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EX3Mz6HnWt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.6526 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.6526 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5483 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ElcsZFVBCP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=208 n_q2=238 n_q3=265 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.msJWsPDreh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=586, passed=9473
Got 9473 stars (including 8874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=198 n_q2=243 n_q3=270 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X04bIVuTDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=226, passed=2991
Got 2991 stars (including 2761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=313 n_q2=281 n_q3=195 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EX3Mz6HnWt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=238, passed=3100
Got 3100 stars (including 2858 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=295 n_q2=297 n_q3=188 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.104
ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.1045
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:01:03.938 +77:29:02.68
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:05.244 +77:28:41.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00599 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q5NhU6Z2zO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wAS4FzILWS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DZDg2pntSV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AeKBlWdKVk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 48409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec +70.5310 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec 70.5310 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5749 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5749 out of 48409 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q5NhU6Z2zO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=215 n_q2=234 n_q3=257 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wAS4FzILWS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2526, passed=48390
Got 48390 stars (including 45783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=209 n_q2=239 n_q3=259 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DZDg2pntSV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=510, passed=20338
Got 20338 stars (including 19795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=304 n_q2=289 n_q3=198 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AeKBlWdKVk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=519, passed=20978
Got 20978 stars (including 20422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=289 n_q2=300 n_q3=191 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:44:00.00 +80:26:25.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:55:25.56 +79:40:16.1: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:38:57.79 +80:04:30.7: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:36:48.52 +75:42:52.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:35:09.27 +75:45:17.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:33:19.97 +79:31:34.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:38:57.79 +80:04:30.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:44:00.00 +80:26:25.1: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:55:25.56 +79:40:16.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:35:09.27 +75:45:17.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:00.00 +80:26:25.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4381 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:57.79 +80:04:30.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7192 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:36:48.52 +75:42:52.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:25.56 +79:40:16.1: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0908 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:33:19.97 +79:31:34.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:09.27 +75:45:17.4: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0495 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:48.52 +75:42:52.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0907 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:19.97 +79:31:34.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6877 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:12:26.43 +78:05:13.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:00:26.63 +77:42:09.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:57:28.98 +80:45:42.2: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:12:26.43 +78:05:13.9: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:26.43 +78:05:13.9: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4066 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:00:26.63 +77:42:09.4: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:57:28.98 +80:45:42.2: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:26.63 +77:42:09.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7202 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:28.98 +80:45:42.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1617 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:07:25.47 +77:52:21.0: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.49 +74:50:11.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:07:25.47 +77:52:21.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:25.47 +77:52:21.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6907 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:32:00.49 +74:50:11.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.49 +74:50:11.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7164 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53374_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53374_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 13.72 | 11:38:57.68 +80:04:30.2 | 5464 1648 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.72 | 11:38:57.89 +80:04:31.3 | 5465 1644 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53377_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.57 | 10:36:42.76 +78:48:31.0 | 7281 2112 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 10:36:42.91 +78:48:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53378_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.69 | 13:33:19.99 +79:31:34.9 | 2441 1312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.68 | 13:33:19.94 +79:31:34.4 | 2442 1309 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53452_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53452_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 11.40 | 09:47:03.87 +76:17:12.4 | 9379 2877 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 09:47:03.88 +76:17:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53472_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 11.99 | 09:11:14.04 +79:50:50.0 | 9136 0448 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 09:11:14.04 +79:50:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53490_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53490_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.09 | 11:55:25.43 +79:40:16.3 | 5027 1889 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.09 | 11:55:25.70 +79:40:16.0 | 5028 1886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53513_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.09 | 10:36:48.53 +75:42:52.2 | 7820 3906 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.09 | 10:36:48.51 +75:42:53.0 | 7821 3902 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53520_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53520_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.66 | 09:34:16.63 +80:20:13.2 | 8463 0558 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 09:34:16.59 +80:20:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53521_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53521_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.45 | 10:44:00.00 +80:26:25.2 | 6818 1223 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.43 | 10:44:00.00 +80:26:25.0 | 6819 1219 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53538_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.26 | 10:35:09.26 +75:45:17.2 | 7873 3865 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 11.98 | 10:35:09.28 +75:45:17.7 | 7874 3861 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53542_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.74 | 14:33:05.11 +79:38:44.7 | 1111 0333 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 14:33:05.26 +79:38:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.81 | 13:41:02.02 +80:11:22.6 | 2442 0857 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 13:41:01.91 +80:11:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.87 | 13:11:43.61 +80:27:50.8 | 3189 1020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 13:11:43.64 +80:27:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53564_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.01 | 13:10:12.09 +80:00:35.5 | 3128 1291 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53568_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.60 | 11:12:26.45 +78:05:13.4 | 6319 2774 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.32 | 11:12:26.42 +78:05:14.4 | 6320 2771 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53584_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 12.72 | 11:00:26.44 +77:42:09.1 | 6732 2939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.72 | 11:00:26.83 +77:42:09.7 | 6733 2936 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53608_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 13.16 | 09:57:29.07 +80:45:41.9 | 7827 0626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.16 | 09:57:28.89 +80:45:42.5 | 7828 0622 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.26 | 10:55:00.67 +80:44:48.0 | 6510 1105 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:00.80 +80:44:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.62 | 14:54:20.75 +79:10:52.8 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53734_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 13.70 | 13:07:25.38 +77:52:22.2 | 2756 2532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.69 | 13:07:25.57 +77:52:19.8 | 2757 2529 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 14.26 | 14:00:56.49 +77:22:05.3 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.35243 | 2461192.85243 | 13.70 | 12:32:00.35 +74:50:10.9 | 3477 4628 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 13.73 | 12:32:00.63 +74:50:12.3 | 3478 4625 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53762_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 14.27 | 12:01:04.27 +80:46:29.1 | 4919 1213 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 38227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.35289 | 2461192.85289 | 12.78 | 12:57:26.05 +81:06:31.4 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_034930_TTUQ1b1x1_2467196_JhneligS/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-27-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.85243228 -observatory V36
05:57:16.05 +25:35:34.0 Mercury (-0.5mag)
07:07:59.19 +24:27:32.0 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:29:48.63 +14:06:36.1 Mars (1.3mag)
07:42:50.73 +21:45:07.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:19.34 +02:37:19.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:33.98 +20:20:42.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:41.95 +00:14:17.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:41.86 -23:02:05.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:19:57.93 -28:39:58.5 Moon (-12.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 03:56 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.85243228:
07:42:56.99 +21:44:51.3 Io (6.0mag)
07:42:56.17 +21:44:53.9 Europa (6.1mag)
07:42:34.75 +21:45:54.5 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:42:51.88 +21:45:11.7 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:43:33.11 +21:21:12.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:42:54.05 +21:44:58.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:43:43.32 +21:39:43.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:44:39.48 +22:00:32.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:49:43.21 +21:46:20.9 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:26.68 +02:37:39.2 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:23.40 +02:37:12.8 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:47:50.42 +02:38:32.7 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:13.42 +02:37:48.8 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:09.81 +02:40:14.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 03:56 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.85243228:
17:21:51.43 -34:28:13.4 JWST
17:48:42.05 +36:04:52.1 Chandra
09:13:54.65 -52:38:36.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 03:56 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.85243228 -observatory V36
18:47:49.51 -32:08:22.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:46:47.69 -68:09:16.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:33.68 +31:52:54.1 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:27.67 +14:57:59.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:15:23.83 -51:25:50.1 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:52.29 +31:18:58.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:25:37.65 +26:55:25.3 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:58.21 +31:18:33.8 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:00.08 +03:34:43.9 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:35.70 +21:25:44.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:57.09 -11:00:45.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:58.07 +66:05:17.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:02:57.00 -06:03:08.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:24:54.88 +84:30:40.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:01:13.15 +64:05:41.1 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:36:42.62 +27:10:14.7 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:46.65 +12:52:36.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:17:02.58 +29:04:08.2 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:09.78 -16:34:58.7 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:59:29.55 +35:41:50.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:39:23.44 +53:06:14.2 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:35:37.07 -10:32:54.9 13.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:18:52.04 +23:24:14.8 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:07.98 +04:40:50.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:48:16.71 +42:53:57.1 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:23.77 -06:19:44.5 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:11:06.15 -08:13:40.1 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:36.85 -00:53:37.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:55:38.77 -02:37:53.9 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:01:05.56 +24:42:37.9 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:45:23.10 +25:41:24.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:20:47.94 -06:50:30.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:21:20.97 +32:37:07.2 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:52:42.45 +16:17:44.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:05:30.91 +03:18:12.8 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:32:35.70 +29:40:52.2 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:23:57.45 +26:28:26.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:34:21.58 +33:13:59.4 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:38:23.46 +17:35:03.5 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:47:45.21 +18:46:01.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:19:55.13 +18:43:52.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:27:52.38 +19:19:05.9 13.8mag 141P/Machholz
05:30:21.24 +17:09:00.4 13.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:18:59.75 +15:02:41.9 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:52:45.63 -25:41:28.5 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:19:22.81 +20:57:37.9 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:17.53 -00:10:11.0 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
23:59:47.28 +01:05:09.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:57:31.48 -08:52:54.3 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:19:07.43 +35:43:47.1 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:14:30.11 -05:18:49.4 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:45:57.35 +31:10:51.3 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:01:59.39 -19:03:50.5 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:30.75 +08:16:57.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:01:48.60 +20:54:40.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:48:48.63 +42:10:22.2 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 1 03:56 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 03:56 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Jun 1 03:56 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
19:11:59.188 -05:59:29.48 AT 2026nft 2026-05-20.40 20.1465
20:49:19.514 -11:14:29.34 AT 2026nfs 2026-05-15.43 20.3991
17:50:32.577 +03:03:50.91 AT 2026nfr 2026-05-14.42 20.7439
09:56:58.256 +03:14:00.41 AT 2026nfq 2026-05-18.98 23.2429
09:58:28.172 +03:37:48.70 AT 2026nfp 2026-05-18.00 23.6388
01:41:52.654 +49:02:23.74 AT 2026nfo 2026-05-15.49 16.6376
19:48:38.478 -15:49:21.40 SN 2026nfn 2026-05-14.45 20.6205
23:29:50.523 +24:19:16.46 AT 2026nfm 2026-05-16.48 19.4861
00:22:50.994 +32:13:55.02 AT 2026nfl 2026-05-20.48 19.4447
00:19:09.783 +22:55:29.39 AT 2026nfk 2026-05-15.49 18.5774
18:50:22.104 +74:56:01.68 AT 2026nfj 2026-05-20.01 17.95
14:44:27.710 +29:51:15.82 AT 2026nfi 2026-05-05.85 20.76
15:03:26.220 +29:01:29.01 AT 2026nfh 2026-05-05.85 20.56
13:18:06.250 +03:51:41.98 AT 2026nfg 2026-05-17.67 21.83
14:20:14.220 +03:14:46.94 AT 2026nff 2026-05-17.66 22.59
13:59:52.100 +00:18:30.03 AT 2026nfe 2026-05-17.65 22.32
14:01:52.310 +04:31:34.96 AT 2026nfd 2026-05-17.65 22.49
13:51:29.770 -01:31:39.93 AT 2026nfc 2026-05-17.65 22.79
13:19:20.190 +00:23:06.75 AT 2026nfb 2026-05-17.64 22.4
13:13:50.800 +04:45:17.31 AT 2026nfa 2026-05-17.64 22.22
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 03:56 tns_transients_list.txt