This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3621 2461192.8621 12.79 16:22:51.07 -04:35:57.2
9.41026 29.94262 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 2 -1 2 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:51.07 -04:35:57.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:51.07 -04:35:57.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8621,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3621 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3621 2461192.8621 13.38 16:30:05.97 -02:22:56.0
12.69533 29.69131 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 2 1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:30:05.97 -02:22:56.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:30:05.97 -02:22:56.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8621,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3621 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461192.86235889 01.06.2026 08:41:37.808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8796
Objects passed selection criteria: 8785
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6596.25
Average stars matched: 6424.75 (97.4 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 04:01:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461192.86235889 01.06.2026 08:41:37.808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 42
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55538
Objects passed selection criteria: 55427
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42783.5
Average stars matched: 41363 (96.6798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157468 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 04:03:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.86182817
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01301 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BNLp8CnINA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AbN863XIaZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4lxRYDHno7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cg43lkCubr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 5101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4301 out of 4502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4502 out of 9216 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
3.4 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
3.4 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BNLp8CnINA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=9303
Got 9303 stars (including 8762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=303 n_q2=239 n_q3=203 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AbN863XIaZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=594, passed=9216
Got 9216 stars (including 8610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=305 n_q2=238 n_q3=206 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4lxRYDHno7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, passed=4022
Got 4022 stars (including 3732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4022 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=312 n_q2=225 n_q3=213 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cg43lkCubr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, passed=4047
Got 4047 stars (including 3760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3996 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=310 n_q2=226 n_q3=214 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.357
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.393
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.133
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.090
reference average sigma_overall=0.4615 worst_q_ratio=1.375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 20584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:17.26 -01:56:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20017_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 20017_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:09.09 -05:55:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20009_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 20009_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:38.15 -06:23:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.13 +02:10:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:21.019 -02:01:03.28
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:18.658 -02:00:32.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01301 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PTU3etCi7l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mG5uR7L2Nd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YYJjYWIQHo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LBDteMqGrd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.505400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.505400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 59865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to +3.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to 3.2660 deg
Loaded 5107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4056 out of 4537 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4537 out of 59865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 37 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PTU3etCi7l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3582, passed=62840
Got 62840 stars (including 59191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=305 n_q2=240 n_q3=206 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mG5uR7L2Nd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3984, passed=59855
Got 59855 stars (including 55797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=315 n_q2=230 n_q3=221 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.413
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YYJjYWIQHo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=740, passed=24801
Got 24801 stars (including 24023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=313 n_q2=224 n_q3=212 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LBDteMqGrd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=730, passed=24929
Got 24929 stars (including 24150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=313 n_q2=225 n_q3=211 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-40-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_034522_TTUQ1b1x1_2435707_FNgJJHgi/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:02:06.12 -00:48:04.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:36.67 -01:12:32.0: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:47:20.88 -01:57:42.9: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:10.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:04.01 -03:08:28.0: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:47:03.31 -01:55:51.3: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:51.07 -04:35:57.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:54.60 -03:00:12.0: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:36.67 -01:12:32.0: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:02:06.12 -00:48:04.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:36.67 -01:12:32.0: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5515 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:47:20.88 -01:57:42.9: 12.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:47:03.31 -01:55:51.3: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:06.12 -00:48:04.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7171 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:10.5: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:04.01 -03:08:28.0: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:20.88 -01:57:42.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2464 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:03.31 -01:55:51.3: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7218 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:10.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2028 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:04.01 -03:08:28.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1251 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:39.16 -06:16:28.3: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:54.60 -03:00:12.0: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:51.07 -04:35:57.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:54.60 -03:00:12.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1070 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:47.76 -00:33:21.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:39.16 -06:16:28.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:39.16 -06:16:28.3: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0575 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:30:05.97 -02:22:56.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:48:25.48 +01:28:30.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:47.76 -00:33:21.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:47.76 -00:33:21.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2249 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:48:25.48 +01:28:30.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:25.48 +01:28:30.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:30:05.97 -02:22:56.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78029.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77569_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77569_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:00.36 -03:14:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77827_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77827_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77849_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77849_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:21.34 -01:57:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77903_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77903_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77917_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77917_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:05.22 -05:43:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77944_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77944_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77994_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 77994_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:10.70 -04:16:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78007_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78007_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78018_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78018_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.35 -05:49:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78029_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 78029_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:27.59 +00:19:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78178_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78178_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:40.94 -02:39:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78193_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78193_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78222_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78222_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78280_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 78280_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78290_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 78290_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73090_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73090_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:07.58 -04:31:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73216_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73216_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:44.52 -04:12:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.13 +02:10:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 46445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:24.38 -05:56:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 49576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:46.48 -04:52:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.29 -06:11:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48980_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 48980_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:39.10 -05:34:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 53269_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:53.59 -03:26:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73325_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73325_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:38.14 -06:23:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73252_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73252_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:37.08 -05:03:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73242_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73242_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:18.81 -06:23:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73241_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73241_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:09.38 -01:37:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73184_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73184_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:05.95 -01:48:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73171_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73171_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:19.14 -04:53:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73142_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73142_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:25.71 -06:10:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73135_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73135_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:46.03 -03:20:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73118_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73118_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:17.87 -04:33:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73069_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086
The candidate 73069_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_03-41-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086 did not pass the final checks