This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3421 2461192.8421 9.96 19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3
29.70050 -12.54369 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.18 Melpomene -0 -0 0 9.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8421,9.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3421 9.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3421 2461192.8421 11.41 19:36:54.06 -11:26:32.4
27.67085 -15.21040 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.409 Aspasia -2 -1 2 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:54.06 -11:26:32.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:54.06 -11:26:32.4: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8421,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3421 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461192.84238447 01.06.2026 08:12:52.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9911
Objects passed selection criteria: 9887
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8035
Average stars matched: 7848.25 (97.6758 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 03:43:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461192.84238447 01.06.2026 08:12:52.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 66 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 94303
Objects passed selection criteria: 94141
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84401.8
Average stars matched: 81931.5 (97.0732 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1997732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 03:48:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.84184521
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01131 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZcqbF1dBOM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8cjqlvCpYU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.szHYWC3EdI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.82jFYKb0Ng
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8436 out of 8760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8760 out of 13026 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZcqbF1dBOM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=13037
Got 13037 stars (including 12267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=269 n_q2=220 n_q3=230 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8cjqlvCpYU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=765, passed=13026
Got 13026 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=273 n_q2=214 n_q3=232 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.szHYWC3EdI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=505, passed=7013
Got 7013 stars (including 6500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=264 n_q2=225 n_q3=217 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.82jFYKb0Ng (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, passed=6875
Got 6875 stars (including 6347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=258 n_q2=222 n_q3=220 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.570 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.580 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.593 worst_q_ratio=1.215
reference average sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.213
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20730_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 20730_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 05110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.82 -11:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:30:36.39 -08:30:40.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:54.652 -10:00:41.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:57.138 -10:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01131 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dQxT1dR2t4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EebjS4yt0P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lILe0qCgd6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VsvCJ8MaNT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.456700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.456700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 117743 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Loaded 11444 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8582 out of 10248 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10248 out of 117743 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dQxT1dR2t4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=9917, passed=120318
Got 120318 stars (including 110246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=282 n_q2=219 n_q3=215 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EebjS4yt0P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=9576, passed=117729
Got 117729 stars (including 108009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 117729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=276 n_q2=225 n_q3=212 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lILe0qCgd6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4001, passed=76200
Got 76200 stars (including 72100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=278 n_q2=225 n_q3=200 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VsvCJ8MaNT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4083, passed=77962
Got 77962 stars (including 73770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=273 n_q2=223 n_q3=205 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_033418_TTUQ2b1x1_1222813_jMDg76lA/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:44:51.35 -07:31:10.8: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:20:49.44 -11:20:29.9: 12.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:54:59.97 -13:07:41.6: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:42:03.67 -09:45:14.8: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:48:29.72 -10:13:39.7: 13.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:46:07.54 -13:28:27.1: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:37:49.71 -10:00:24.3: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:51:19.78 -12:35:38.6: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:44:51.35 -07:31:10.8: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:54:59.97 -13:07:41.6: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:42:03.67 -09:45:14.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:46:07.54 -13:28:27.1: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:48:29.72 -10:13:39.7: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:37:49.71 -10:00:24.3: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:51.35 -07:31:10.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3666 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:59.97 -13:07:41.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5797 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:20:49.44 -11:20:29.9: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:03.67 -09:45:14.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4249 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:07.54 -13:28:27.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5320 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:29.72 -10:13:39.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7583 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:49.71 -10:00:24.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8309 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:25:55.48 -10:40:51.2: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:18:28.23 -13:38:08.5: 13.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:49.44 -11:20:29.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1721 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:51:19.78 -12:35:38.6: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:19.78 -12:35:38.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4625 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:25:55.48 -10:40:51.2: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:18:28.23 -13:38:08.5: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:28.23 -13:38:08.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2908 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:55.48 -10:40:51.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3011 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:21.79 -13:04:13.8: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:10.62 -10:32:19.9: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:24:24.31 -13:40:37.5: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:41:18.89 -13:02:33.2: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:32:55.22 -11:19:33.4: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:21.79 -13:04:13.8: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:41:18.89 -13:02:33.2: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:24:24.31 -13:40:37.5: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:18.89 -13:02:33.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2687 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:21.79 -13:04:13.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0852 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:24.31 -13:40:37.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0899 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:19:30.94 -09:58:53.6: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:10.62 -10:32:19.9: 12.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:13.33 -10:37:03.0: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:10.62 -10:32:19.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0861 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:32:55.22 -11:19:33.4: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:19:30.94 -09:58:53.6: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:55.22 -11:19:33.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8812 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:31:17.98 -09:59:17.8: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:30.94 -09:58:53.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4002 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:49.2: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:13.33 -10:37:03.0: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:13.33 -10:37:03.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0894 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:31:17.98 -09:59:17.8: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:58:16.93 -12:00:48.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:54.06 -11:26:32.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:17.98 -09:59:17.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3503 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:08.29 -05:53:03.1: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:49.2: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:49.2: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4520 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:08.29 -05:53:03.1: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:08.29 -05:53:03.1: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7357 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:58:16.93 -12:00:48.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:16.93 -12:00:48.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5418 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:54.06 -11:26:32.4: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:18:00.69 -12:44:43.4: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:17:17.12 -10:46:07.6: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:17:17.12 -10:46:07.6: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:18:00.69 -12:44:43.4: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:17.12 -10:46:07.6: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5759 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:00.69 -12:44:43.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0033 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:29:38.70 -11:55:15.1: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:44:16.06 -11:26:19.0: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:44.14 -11:23:01.5: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:01.79 -07:14:10.3: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:29:38.70 -11:55:15.1: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:44:16.06 -11:26:19.0: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:38.70 -11:55:15.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4391 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:16.06 -11:26:19.0: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4079 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:44.14 -11:23:01.5: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:44:16.73 -06:46:47.3: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:44.14 -11:23:01.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2266 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.1: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:01.79 -07:14:10.3: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:01.79 -07:14:10.3: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2455 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:53:09.39 -12:17:51.9: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:57.68 -09:36:14.0: 13.88 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:44:16.73 -06:46:47.3: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:16.73 -06:46:47.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6069 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.1: 13.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4958 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:53:09.39 -12:17:51.9: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:09.39 -12:17:51.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7143 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:57.68 -09:36:14.0: 13.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:24:12.01 -09:36:13.1: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:57.68 -09:36:14.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8220 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:27:05.55 -11:39:06.6: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:24:12.01 -09:36:13.1: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:12.01 -09:36:13.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0048 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:27:05.55 -11:39:06.6: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:05.55 -11:39:06.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7096 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out139812.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139581_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139581_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139592_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139592_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:20.30 -09:21:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139606_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139606_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:50.28 -10:19:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139616_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139616_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139619_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139619_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139621_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139621_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139623_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139623_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139625_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139625_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139626_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139626_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139628_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139628_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139630_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139630_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139631_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139631_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:27.57 -12:20:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139636_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139636_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:12.39 -10:43:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139637_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139637_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139640_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139640_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:37.00 -10:14:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139642_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139642_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139643_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139643_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139644_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139644_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:41.11 -07:28:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139645_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139645_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139648_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139648_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139649_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139649_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:06.77 -11:30:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139650_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139650_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139655_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139655_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:36.53 -12:52:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139657_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139657_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:46.63 -13:24:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139659_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139659_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139660_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139660_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139661_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139661_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:03.94 -11:24:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139662_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139662_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139665_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139665_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139668_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139668_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:36.38 -08:30:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139675_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 139675_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139705_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139705_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139715_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139715_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:15.26 -10:00:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:31.12 -06:43:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139717_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139717_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139726_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139726_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:09.05 -07:36:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139738_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139738_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139742_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139742_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:05.03 -06:47:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139751_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139751_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:54.23 -09:54:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139756_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139756_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:32.18 -08:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139760_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139760_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:58.70 -10:22:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139764_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139764_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:19.52 -05:57:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139767_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139767_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:44.64 -13:57:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139768_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139768_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:44.35 -13:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139770_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139770_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139780_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139780_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139782_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139782_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139790_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139790_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:52.64 -06:08:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139792_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139792_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:05.34 -14:04:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139793_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139793_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:01.61 -09:25:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139796_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139796_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:44.07 -07:29:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139805_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139805_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139812_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139812_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:16.73 -06:46:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.808 4196643365610986368 296.06992228218 -06.77973330630 12.5080 11.1908 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.808#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139813_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139813_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:40.30 -05:46:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139834_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139834_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139836_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139836_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:02.33 -06:12:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139847_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139847_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139858_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139858_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:15.02 -09:59:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139876_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 139876_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42076_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 42076_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.79 -11:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26567_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 26567_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:59.56 -12:35:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105287_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067
The candidate 105287_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_03-12-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0067 did not pass the final checks