This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3203 2461192.8203 10.87 18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4
23.21564 4.38427 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 3 -2 4 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 01.3203* 18 17 55.16 -06 35 53.4 10.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8203,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3203 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1742490-014654,2461192.8203,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1742490-014654 20260601.3203 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3203 2461192.8203 13.05 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4
22.02973 13.30931 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" AR Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 pg 16.000 pg 2425871.00000 277.600000000000 M1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4: 14.18 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AR Oph,2461192.8203,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AR Oph 20260601.3203 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 01.3203 2461192.8203 12.78 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2
24.53951 13.30143 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0560 Oph
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.200 pg < 16.400 pg 2425715.00000 155.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0560 Oph,2461192.8203,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0560 Oph 20260601.3203 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461192.82055731 01.06.2026 07:41:26.152 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7579
Objects passed selection criteria: 7567
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6315
Average stars matched: 6156.25 (97.4861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 02:43:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461192.82055731 01.06.2026 07:41:26.152 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 84
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72941
Objects passed selection criteria: 72824
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60635.2
Average stars matched: 58080.5 (95.7867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1923508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 31 16:54:47 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-84-gccae57d3
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-31)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 02:46:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.82007696
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0775 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0799 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01086 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hXhYOyOHGK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SJlX7XaSUk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1uGZo2ECJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k66ix93VIs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to +3.2727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to 3.2727 deg
Loaded 5309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4205 out of 4363 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4363 out of 7875 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hXhYOyOHGK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=521, passed=7975
Got 7975 stars (including 7444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.815 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.772 n_q1=185 n_q2=158 n_q3=282 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SJlX7XaSUk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, passed=7875
Got 7875 stars (including 7348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.726 n_q1=181 n_q2=158 n_q3=279 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q1uGZo2ECJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, passed=4806
Got 4806 stars (including 4434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=186 n_q2=148 n_q3=320 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k66ix93VIs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=4761
Got 4761 stars (including 4393 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=185 n_q2=147 n_q3=324 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.630 worst_q_ratio=1.293
ref2=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.611 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.458 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.6205 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 20529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:17:55.16 -06:35:53.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0775 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0799 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:18.853 -01:59:58.89
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:19.383 -02:00:37.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01086 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oGxv0ebDeu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t8bSHzunRV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vel3NvpFm6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.coQ0seZhRE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.436000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.436000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to +3.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to 3.2730 deg
Loaded 5316 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4025 out of 4686 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4686 out of 80458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oGxv0ebDeu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5532, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 74979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=187 n_q2=159 n_q3=275 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t8bSHzunRV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5629, passed=80444
Got 80444 stars (including 74689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.800 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.677 n_q1=185 n_q2=156 n_q3=270 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vel3NvpFm6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1734, passed=41791
Got 41791 stars (including 39978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41791 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=171 n_q2=148 n_q3=320 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.coQ0seZhRE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1698, passed=41682
Got 41682 stars (including 39920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=175 n_q2=150 n_q3=318 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_024200_TTUQ1b1x1_2959645_WCb5Syfd/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:59:34.72 +01:45:02.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:50:11.20 -02:24:12.4: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:10:19.83 +02:34:47.9: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:21.90 +01:01:59.2: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:59:34.72 +01:45:02.5: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:21.90 +01:01:59.2: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:34.72 +01:45:02.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3765 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:21.90 +01:01:59.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1744 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:50:11.20 -02:24:12.4: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:10:19.83 +02:34:47.9: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:11.20 -02:24:12.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3575 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:19.83 +02:34:47.9: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5561 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:48:15.53 -00:59:47.3: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:48:15.53 -00:59:47.3: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:15.53 -00:59:47.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6027 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:55:40.64 +02:02:10.6: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:37.57 -02:14:45.2: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:55:40.64 +02:02:10.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:40.64 +02:02:10.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1745 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:37.57 -02:14:45.2: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:37.57 -02:14:45.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0418 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:29:07.51 -06:45:09.5: 13.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:29:07.51 -06:45:09.5: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:07.51 -06:45:09.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2715 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:30:51.43 +02:18:09.9: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:18.46 -02:04:45.5: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:30:51.43 +02:18:09.9: 14.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:51.43 +02:18:09.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7905 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:18.46 -02:04:45.5: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4: 14.18 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:18.46 -02:04:45.5: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9450 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:44:10.30 -03:22:22.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0536 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:48:52.68 -01:13:55.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7717 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17647.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99153_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99153_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:04.89 +02:45:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99155_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99155_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:14.70 -05:51:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99158_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99158_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99162_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99162_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99164_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99164_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:06.15 -06:19:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99167_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99167_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:36.33 +02:52:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99168_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99168_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99169_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99169_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:33.38 +01:08:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99170_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99170_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99276_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99276_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:55.15 -06:35:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99304_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99304_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.95 +02:48:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99309_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99309_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:17.78 +02:29:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99396_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99396_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:17.06 +02:42:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99531_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99531_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:53.19 +02:14:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99545_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99545_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:32.81 +00:02:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99635_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99635_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:23.65 +02:39:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99669_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99669_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.40 -00:37:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99704_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99704_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99722_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99722_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.37 -02:32:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99752_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99752_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:58.16 +02:13:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99831_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99831_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:41.31 -01:42:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99835_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99835_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:19.35 +02:36:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99846_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99846_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:25.08 +00:33:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99892_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99892_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:56.80 -05:39:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:09.89 +01:07:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99937_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99937_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:33.11 -01:52:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99965_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99965_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.70 +01:42:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99974_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99974_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.67 -06:50:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 99977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.43 +00:52:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100023_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100023_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100030_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100030_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.70 +01:44:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100058_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100058_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.83 -00:44:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100081_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100081_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:44.02 -07:12:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100098_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100098_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:46.65 -07:06:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100100_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100100_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:10.66 +01:20:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100101_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100101_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.48 +00:04:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100109_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100109_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100139_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100139_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:08.54 -06:22:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100168_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100168_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:49.02 -06:40:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100202_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100202_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:05.44 -01:14:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100204_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100204_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:35.51 -06:52:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100215_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100215_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:35.90 -06:31:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100224_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100224_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:31.50 -07:03:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100235_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 100235_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100256_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100256_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.68 -02:44:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100274_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100274_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:45.20 -06:45:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100330_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100330_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:17.76 -06:31:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100332_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100332_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:27.19 -01:31:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100341_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100341_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.63 -02:46:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100348_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100348_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:26.46 -01:00:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100357_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100357_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.02 -05:59:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100448_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 100448_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:52.62 -05:27:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91033_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 91033_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:48.16 -05:52:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:11.07 +02:02:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70974_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 70974_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:37.18 +01:32:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 08039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:35.53 -05:23:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03239_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 03239_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:00.80 -06:21:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:51.22 +00:56:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91030_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 91030_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:46.38 -05:02:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.07 -01:31:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90935_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 90935_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:40.36 -06:00:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90917_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 90917_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:05.79 -06:40:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00833_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 00833_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:03.65 -06:55:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 32439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00794_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 00794_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:31.05 -06:56:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06845_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 06845_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_02-41-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks