NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 871367 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 871367 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits

renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1673.3123 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 554.0867 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3523.0130 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 877.1831 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3522.0600 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 876.8124 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.10541 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-31T01:47:30.5427863' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-31T06:47:30.5427863' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61191.2829923844 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-31T06:47:40.4453745' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61191.2831070023 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999545034566 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000983444585 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.5016666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 354.123888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.7187511922313 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 39.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 48.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :) Spent 0.489342 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-31T01:48:07.5011969' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-31T06:48:07.5011969' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61191.2834201506 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-31T06:48:17.4012557' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61191.2835347336 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999545478859 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000983403723 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.4883333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 354.118611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.71930897345639 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 39.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 48.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits :) Spent 0.479563 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits


fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461191.78310812 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 Second-epoch image center 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 Second-epoch image center 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0741 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 Second-epoch second image center 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00133 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00133 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fZztlgutbT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACnh8X1m4H Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LSkJ8oEFY0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.49ZMn7Z4yi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg Loaded 21377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5428 out of 5651 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5651 out of 6845 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852450 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852450 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg Loaded 21377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5428 out of 5651 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5651 out of 6845 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3790 to 319.1648 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3790 to 319.1648 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg Loaded 21376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5418 out of 5646 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5646 out of 6849 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.fZztlgutbT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=6845 Got 6845 stars (including 6311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0302 through 0 to 179.9717, gap 179.9717 to 180.0302 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0230 through 0 to 179.9717, gap 179.9717 to 180.0230 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=254 n_q2=251 n_q3=224 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ACnh8X1m4H (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=6849 Got 6849 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0288 through 0 to 179.9723, gap 179.9723 to 180.0288 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0220 through 0 to 179.9722, gap 179.9722 to 180.0220 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=250 n_q2=256 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LSkJ8oEFY0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=5540 Got 5540 stars (including 5230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5540 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0300 through 0 to 179.9716, gap 179.9716 to 180.0300 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5473 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0262 through 0 to 179.9714, gap 179.9714 to 180.0262 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5473 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5473 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.214 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=233 n_q2=238 n_q3=244 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.49ZMn7Z4yi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=5538 Got 5538 stars (including 5230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5538 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0265 through 0 to 179.9709, gap 179.9709 to 180.0265 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5462 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0258 through 0 to 179.9711, gap 179.9711 to 180.0258 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=232 n_q2=237 n_q3=243 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.137 ref2=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.134 new1=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.267 new2=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.244 reference average sigma_overall=0.4735 worst_q_ratio=1.1355 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 20444_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.64    17:39:17.09 +85:06:53.2   2044 0299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 17:39:17.02 +85:06:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20450_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 20450_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.66    14:54:25.98 +86:43:37.9   3560 1560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:54:26.14 +86:43:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04594_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 04594_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    9.14    08:26:51.11 +85:07:02.0   7254 2113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 08:26:51.18 +85:07:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 03383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    8.53    14:17:51.08 +83:49:53.6   2724 3153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:17:50.96 +83:49:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 Second-epoch image center 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 Second-epoch image center 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0741 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:02:48.864 +85:02:22.61 Second-epoch second image center 12:02:47.809 +85:02:27.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00133 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00133 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HY9McMhk7A Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.APBlfJLc4A Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LnYx7T0fix Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bcWON225vp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 41486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec +77.0895 to +89.9631 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec 77.0895 to 89.9631 deg Loaded 25696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6023 out of 6569 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6569 out of 41486 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.703100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.703100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 41486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec +77.0895 to +89.9631 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec 77.0895 to 89.9631 deg Loaded 25696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6023 out of 6569 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6569 out of 41486 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.7948 to 354.2929 deg, Dec +77.0889 to +89.9622 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.7948 to 354.2929 deg, Dec 77.0889 to 89.9622 deg Loaded 25681 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 6568 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6568 out of 41325 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 2.2 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.HY9McMhk7A (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1816, passed=41469 Got 41469 stars (including 39594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41469 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0093 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0093 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41121 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0091 through 0 to 179.9963, gap 179.9963 to 180.0091 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=255 n_q2=252 n_q3=218 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.APBlfJLc4A (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1852, passed=41308 Got 41308 stars (including 39383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41308 stars from the SExtractor catalog /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0072 through 0 to 179.9944, gap 179.9944 to 180.0072 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0001 through 0 to 179.9976, gap 179.9976 to 180.0001 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=257 n_q2=257 n_q3=213 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LnYx7T0fix (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=847, passed=27503 Got 27503 stars (including 26621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27503 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0218 through 0 to 179.9932, gap 179.9932 to 180.0218 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0239 through 0 to 179.9942, gap 179.9942 to 180.0239 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=238 n_q2=234 n_q3=245 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bcWON225vp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=891, passed=27597 Got 27597 stars (including 26673 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27597 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0055 through 0 to 179.9918, gap 179.9918 to 180.0055 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0038 through 0 to 179.9939, gap 179.9939 to 180.0038 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27272 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27273 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=237 n_q2=235 n_q3=245 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 13:10:19.99 +80:00:30.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 14:38:15.69 +87:13:04.3: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 09:36:29.19 +81:21:20.1: 12.80 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 10:28:16.17 +83:12:43.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 13:10:19.99 +80:00:30.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:19.99 +80:00:30.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1185 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 14:38:15.69 +87:13:04.3: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 09:36:29.19 +81:21:20.1: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 10:28:16.17 +83:12:43.3: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:15.69 +87:13:04.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9791 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:29.19 +81:21:20.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9260 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:16.17 +83:12:43.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4380 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53358_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53358_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 31.28311    2461191.78311    13.12    13:10:19.85 +80:00:30.5   2849 5846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.12    13:10:20.12 +80:00:31.3   2849 5847   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53359_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53359_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.20    14:33:00.13 +78:10:59.7   0246 5574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:32:59.85 +78:10:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53360_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53360_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.93    15:21:40.62 +80:00:47.9   0120 3790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 15:21:40.50 +80:00:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53400_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53400_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    10.65    08:18:01.00 +80:55:49.3   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53408_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53408_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    10.91    11:45:49.31 +82:11:07.3   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53441_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53441_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.47    13:24:30.61 +87:02:19.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53455_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53455_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.57    07:26:10.39 +85:44:28.4   7335 1296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 07:26:10.21 +85:44:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53481_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53481_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    11.85    10:02:42.88 +87:14:44.3   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53536_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    12.58    16:46:42.52 +84:54:25.0   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53613_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53613_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.14    14:28:02.76 +88:51:51.3   4558 0733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:28:01.90 +88:51:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53614_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 31.28311    2461191.78311    12.97    14:38:15.87 +87:13:04.9   3860 1441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    12.99    14:38:15.51 +87:13:03.8   3859 1442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53624_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 31.28311    2461191.78311    12.93    09:36:28.73 +81:21:21.7   7801 4619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    12.92    09:36:29.64 +81:21:18.4   7800 4621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53631_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.05    09:44:22.35 +81:36:33.1   7568 4580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53639_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.16    15:14:23.91 +80:15:20.7   0356 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 15:14:24.61 +80:15:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53671_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53671_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.55    14:51:38.81 +79:08:35.8   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53688_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.05    16:17:23.03 +87:34:09.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53723_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53723_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.42    10:26:53.10 +87:19:05.6   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53729_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.58    15:03:46.86 +79:33:21.0   0206 4341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53730_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53730_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 31.28311    2461191.78311    13.43    10:28:16.25 +83:12:42.0   6367 4071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-47-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0224.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.45    10:28:16.09 +83:12:44.6   6366 4071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53739_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.48    11:35:46.40 +81:06:30.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53762_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.72    14:24:34.21 +77:21:29.2   0122 6138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:24:34.14 +77:21:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53764_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53764_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.84    11:54:23.07 +87:51:35.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53767_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.47    14:30:20.23 +78:10:06.9   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53775_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.89    14:27:48.95 +82:30:14.1   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53776_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.56    14:29:51.91 +78:08:37.4   0304 5656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:29:51.90 +78:08:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53786_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53786_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.79    14:34:04.84 +77:57:22.6   0126 5656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:34:04.71 +77:57:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53792_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.59    10:04:07.92 +83:37:54.4   6655 3679   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 10:04:08.02 +83:37:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53804_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53804_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.88    16:27:38.46 +81:51:18.3   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53811_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53811_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    14.00    14:37:50.08 +78:53:53.6   0433 5149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:37:49.59 +78:53:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53818_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53818_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.91    15:59:20.32 +80:59:43.0   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53820_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53820_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    14.05    16:27:08.98 +81:50:55.2   0352 1887   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 16:27:09.02 +81:50:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53840_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.58    15:48:42.29 +82:17:19.3   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53846_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.93    15:50:15.41 +83:38:36.1   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53850_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.59    07:13:05.60 +84:20:06.8   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53852_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.58    12:43:07.96 +81:50:24.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53854_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.86    14:39:41.63 +78:47:38.2   0349 5159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:39:41.45 +78:47:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53857_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53857_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.97    14:31:21.91 +77:46:18.7   0116 5799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:31:21.33 +77:46:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53866_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 53866_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.73    18:26:10.37 +89:26:57.4   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 20356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    8.61    14:17:50.90 +83:49:53.4   2724 3153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:17:50.81 +83:49:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00623_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 00623_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    13.11    14:21:07.64 +77:24:47.9   0234 6183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 14:21:07.85 +77:24:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39800_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 The candidate 39800_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 31.28354    2461191.78354    9.19    08:26:51.09 +85:07:02.0   7254 2113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_015543_TTUQ1b1x1_4064209_EFMndCA5/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_01-48-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0225.fits **** FOUND 08:26:51.10 +85:07:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461191.78310812 -observatory V36 05:49:04.86 +25:32:59.0 Mercury (-0.6mag) 07:02:27.57 +24:34:52.1 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:26:43.48 +13:50:54.7 Mars (1.3mag) 07:41:59.37 +21:47:09.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:58.97 +02:35:25.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:58:18.44 +20:19:57.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:37.33 +00:13:51.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:44.64 -23:01:43.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 16:23:57.34 -27:25:02.8 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 31 01:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461191.78310812: 07:41:58.99 +21:47:08.7 Io (6.0mag) 07:41:49.53 +21:47:38.1 Europa (6.1mag) 07:41:47.43 +21:47:39.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:41:48.59 +21:47:46.1 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:42:45.68 +21:23:15.4 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:42:00.06 +21:47:06.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:42:57.44 +21:42:15.0 Elara (17.5mag) 07:43:44.56 +22:03:09.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:48:54.45 +21:48:18.5 Carme (18.8mag) 00:47:09.44 +02:35:35.5 Titan (8.7mag) 00:46:56.48 +02:35:24.1 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:47:29.07 +02:36:27.5 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:46:57.33 +02:35:56.0 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:47:50.70 +02:38:29.6 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 31 01:58 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461191.78310812: 17:21:24.31 -34:18:15.2 JWST 14:41:58.10 +56:16:57.3 Chandra 19:28:17.25 +03:49:53.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 31 01:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461191.78310812 -observatory V36 18:48:25.84 -32:03:24.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:45:45.70 -68:10:19.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:46:10.50 +31:52:07.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:17:53.04 +14:53:55.8 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:07:37.81 -51:31:33.9 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:14:01.09 +31:16:15.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:24:18.48 +26:54:48.9 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:24:15.33 +31:20:34.1 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:46:28.14 +03:31:09.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:33:15.72 +21:23:41.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:22:22.48 -11:00:55.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:16:05.19 +66:00:56.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:05:28.01 -05:57:30.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:26:44.17 +84:44:27.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:59:50.00 +64:03:50.8 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:35:01.68 +27:03:28.6 13.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:43:39.26 +12:45:59.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:17:34.68 +28:44:31.1 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:10:05.41 -16:41:13.8 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:58:29.00 +35:53:19.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:40:19.10 +53:09:06.9 17.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:33:57.17 -10:29:37.7 13.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:18:05.55 +23:24:35.3 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:14.77 +04:40:23.9 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:46:15.51 +42:48:47.5 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:20.48 -06:46:03.4 16.3mag A/2026 E1 20:09:07.87 -08:11:49.5 9.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:00:26.04 -00:53:10.5 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:54:51.83 -02:37:00.2 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:59:25.54 +24:33:39.9 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:43:06.30 +25:59:05.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:19:47.95 -06:55:17.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:17:54.93 +32:28:14.1 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:50:08.62 +16:08:36.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:03:04.05 +03:03:08.6 15.4mag 88P/Howell 04:29:09.10 +29:33:55.2 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:21:03.04 +26:17:05.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:31:51.10 +33:15:16.7 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:36:34.07 +18:02:52.3 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:45:59.50 +18:41:13.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:17:46.85 +18:40:09.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:22:55.85 +19:23:39.2 13.6mag 141P/Machholz 05:25:25.10 +17:02:15.7 13.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:13:24.72 +14:50:08.0 10.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:51:58.60 -25:51:12.2 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:15:58.14 +20:29:52.1 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:06.30 -00:26:51.8 17.3mag 169P/NEAT 23:56:52.25 +00:51:52.4 18.0mag 220P/McNaught 16:58:22.25 -08:57:26.1 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:16:41.14 +35:45:31.3 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:11:43.68 -05:44:49.5 16.6mag 260P/McNaught 03:43:09.27 +30:58:05.8 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 22:52:55.79 -20:34:28.2 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:19:03.41 +08:18:07.6 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:00:59.93 +20:56:05.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:47:03.96 +42:14:44.6 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K May 31 01:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 31 01:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 31 01:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:15:07.464 +60:42:25.02 AT 2026ned 2026-05-12.37 20.8746 12:24:19.245 +58:53:27.37 AT 2026nec 2026-05-16.28 20.6431 17:56:12.972 +18:10:24.42 AT 2026neb 2026-05-20.06 19.38 14:52:56.305 +52:50:14.00 AT 2026nea 2026-05-16.30 21.2345 14:25:02.106 +32:09:59.37 AT 2026ndz 2026-05-14.38 21.0821 14:52:59.767 +27:53:45.66 AT 2026ndy 2026-05-15.31 20.6613 14:37:16.214 +14:42:45.23 SN 2026ndx 2026-05-16.25 20.6354 14:13:31.790 +04:45:16.38 SN 2026ndw 2026-05-19.26 18.5483 09:55:44.174 +02:45:45.31 AT 2026ndv 2026-05-12.00 22.84 14:43:44.315 +49:43:35.97 AT 2026ndu 2026-05-03.46 20.86 14:45:24.035 +50:25:35.75 AT 2026ndt 2026-05-18.36 20.02 18:04:37.380 -51:12:10.70 AT 2026nds 2026-05-19.19 19.364 17:37:10.989 -81:26:31.03 AT 2026ndr 2026-05-19.25 19.303 10:15:01.129 -45:58:21.05 AT 2026ndq 2026-05-19.04 19.416 19:56:09.761 -48:38:10.36 AT 2026ndp 2026-05-19.32 18.727 00:11:56.324 -43:41:26.71 AT 2026ndo 2026-05-19.40 18.981 16:35:04.502 -82:48:31.63 AT 2026ndn 2026-05-19.22 19.089 21:00:05.607 +22:42:57.52 AT 2026ndm 2026-05-17.57 19.052 21:31:35.637 -74:55:00.14 AT 2026ndl 2026-05-19.18 18.578 00:53:50.253 -67:36:34.49 SN 2026ndk 2026-05-19.40 19.071 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 31 01:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C