NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-04-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    11.44    09:33:20.55 +16:40:58.8   6819 1664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    11.55    09:33:20.58 +16:40:58.7   6824 1658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 30.1544  2461190.6544  11.49  09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8
215.13568  43.18092 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
44 Nysa                    -4      2       4  11.4    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8:  16.07 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    11.95    09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6   4374 4620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    12.04    09:48:56.70 +11:34:00.5   4379 4613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 30.1544  2461190.6544  11.99  09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6
223.76317  44.52518 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
41 Daphne                  -3      1       4  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6:  16.10 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6:  16.07 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    13.20    10:11:58.11 +14:25:31.8   1119 2647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    13.33    10:11:58.13 +14:25:32.0   1123 2641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 30.1544  2461190.6544  13.27  10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9
223.62574  50.81885 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
103 Hera                    -3      2       4  13.3     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9:  16.01 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    13.42    09:57:49.71 +08:58:14.9   2950 6104   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    13.29    09:57:49.75 +08:58:15.8   2954 6097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 30.1544  2461190.6544  13.36  09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3
228.45069  45.21961 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
67 Asia                    -4      2       4  13.8     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3:  15.85 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.china-vo.org
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.china-vo.org)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 991038 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 991038 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits_preview.png'
Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits

renamed 'Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits_preview.png'
Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 560.5437 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.0623 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3937.4216 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 941.7593 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4074.8194 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 984.1719 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.02429 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.043 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-29T22:41:49.9906372' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-30T03:41:49.9906372' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61190.1540508103 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-30T03:41:59.8952686' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61190.1541654514 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 146.665801428603 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000467896262 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.2347222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 261.636111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.64993383191645 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :) Spent 0.495031 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-29T22:42:34.7042112' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-30T03:42:34.7042112' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61190.1545683332 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-30T03:42:44.6085637' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61190.1546829632 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 146.665801448237 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000467882694 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.0766666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 261.760277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.65591976292106 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits :) Spent 0.498874 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits


fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461190.65416655 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0615 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 Second-epoch image center 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0737 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 Second-epoch second image center 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01297 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KzDzmuTnbD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CP28nMqFM5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lB5h9TMlTE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u1XNp2kg9r Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec +8.1771 to +19.5842 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec 8.1771 to 19.5842 deg Loaded 5215 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3899 out of 4084 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4084 out of 7228 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KzDzmuTnbD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, passed=7795 Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7515 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=277 n_q2=221 n_q3=218 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.CP28nMqFM5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=7228 Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=202 n_q2=221 n_q3=206 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lB5h9TMlTE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=245, passed=2682 Got 2682 stars (including 2431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2682 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2604 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2604 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=220 n_q2=230 n_q3=213 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.u1XNp2kg9r (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, passed=2491 Got 2491 stars (including 2253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2491 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2418 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2419 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2419 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 999) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=233 n_q2=198 n_q3=222 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.272 ref2=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.190 new1=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.164 new2=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.179 reference average sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.231 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (906 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 20364_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    9.63    09:35:55.54 +14:22:53.8   6381 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits **** FOUND 09:35:55.51 +14:22:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0615 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 Second-epoch image center 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0737 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.620 +13:58:15.54 Second-epoch second image center 09:46:45.257 +13:57:35.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01297 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lv3hQCXmMx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WBqScqBuWI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SEvmh1zyE0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ky7cxJrNPM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.791850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.791850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 42226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec +8.1221 to +19.5907 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec 8.1221 to 19.5907 deg Loaded 5272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3734 out of 4128 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4128 out of 42226 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 1.9 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 1.9 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lv3hQCXmMx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1984, passed=41202 Got 41202 stars (including 39163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41202 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=280 n_q2=223 n_q3=203 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WBqScqBuWI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1796, passed=42210 Got 42210 stars (including 40354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42210 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=204 n_q2=213 n_q3=207 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.SEvmh1zyE0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=527, passed=18930 Got 18930 stars (including 18378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18930 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=224 n_q2=227 n_q3=207 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ky7cxJrNPM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=440, passed=17970 Got 17970 stars (including 17505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17970 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17534 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17533 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17533 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=237 n_q2=199 n_q3=218 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:54:28.11 +16:30:02.9: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:26:47.35 +12:31:05.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:54:28.11 +16:30:02.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:26:47.35 +12:31:05.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:26:47.35 +12:31:05.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2808 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:28.11 +16:30:02.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9972 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54821.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54836.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 Preparing report for the candidate 54814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    11.95    10:08:08.76 +11:58:15.8   1562 4170   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits **** FOUND 10:08:08.78 +11:58:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 Preparing report for the candidate 54821_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    11.92    09:40:58.95 +09:52:40.5   5496 5703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits **** FOUND 09:40:58.93 +09:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54826_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54826_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    12.78    09:51:35.89 +17:28:59.0   4223 1031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits **** FOUND 09:51:35.86 +17:28:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 Preparing report for the candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    13.10    09:31:21.89 +12:50:09.2   7006 3990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits **** FOUND 09:31:21.90 +12:50:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54847_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54847_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    13.40    09:26:47.42 +12:31:06.4   7670 4218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    13.21    09:26:47.29 +12:31:03.8   7675 4212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 Preparing report for the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 The candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 30.15417    2461190.65417    14.08    09:54:28.07 +16:30:01.6   3766 1601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-41-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 30.15468    2461190.65468    13.95    09:54:28.14 +16:30:04.2   3770 1595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_224826_TTUQ1b1x1_2586220_pwNjIyCG/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-42-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0069.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3 ########### Completed Leo-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3 ################################################################################### 09:33:20.56 +16:40:58.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:48:56.69 +11:34:00.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:11:58.12 +14:25:31.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 09:57:49.73 +08:58:15.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461190.65416655 -observatory V36 05:40:11.69 +25:27:28.6 Mercury (-0.7mag) 06:56:36.41 +24:41:47.2 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:23:28.11 +13:34:10.3 Mars (1.3mag) 07:41:05.52 +21:49:16.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:37.13 +02:33:22.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:58:02.02 +20:19:09.2 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:32.32 +00:13:22.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:47.43 -23:01:20.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 15:27:46.18 -24:32:12.6 Moon (-12.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 29 22:50 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461190.65416655: 07:41:02.29 +21:49:27.1 Io (6.0mag) 07:41:10.02 +21:49:01.8 Europa (6.1mag) 07:41:09.17 +21:49:00.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:40:44.12 +21:50:20.3 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:41:55.97 +21:25:24.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:41:03.57 +21:49:23.3 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:42:09.31 +21:44:54.1 Elara (17.5mag) 07:42:46.90 +22:05:52.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:48:03.31 +21:50:21.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:46:49.16 +02:33:21.6 Titan (8.7mag) 00:46:34.20 +02:33:36.3 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:47:05.96 +02:34:12.8 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:46:40.30 +02:33:51.1 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:47:30.20 +02:36:36.2 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 29 22:50 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461190.65416655: 17:21:01.20 -34:04:11.1 JWST 18:41:53.57 +24:24:11.8 Chandra 08:12:57.27 -43:18:52.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 29 22:50 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461190.65416655 -observatory V36 13:17:45.49 -26:38:58.5 14.3mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:44:23.91 +30:33:34.1 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:22:40.49 +01:29:07.5 14.5mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:34:34.34 +24:46:55.3 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 09:58:33.66 +10:52:43.4 18.0mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:49:02.81 -31:58:07.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:44:40.47 -68:11:29.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:45:46.12 +31:51:18.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:18:19.65 +14:49:30.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 19:59:44.53 -51:34:52.1 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:14:09.52 +31:13:19.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:22:54.84 +26:54:08.7 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:23:30.62 +31:22:38.9 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:45:54.83 +03:27:18.4 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:33:57.60 +21:21:22.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:22:49.63 -11:01:09.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:16:10.49 +65:56:19.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:08:05.85 -05:51:40.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:28:57.63 +84:58:51.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:58:23.19 +64:01:57.9 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:33:14.55 +26:56:10.0 13.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:44:35.10 +12:38:51.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:18:07.00 +28:23:45.1 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:08:57.45 -16:47:55.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:57:24.99 +36:05:31.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:41:22.36 +53:11:58.7 17.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:32:07.12 -10:26:00.5 13.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:40:22.81 +04:39:49.7 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:44:05.98 +42:43:15.0 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:18.76 -07:14:25.9 16.3mag A/2026 E1 20:07:02.71 -08:10:14.0 9.2mag 10P/Tempel 14:17:15.28 -03:14:40.1 18.0mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:00:15.36 -00:52:46.2 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:54:03.18 -02:36:11.5 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:57:39.79 +24:24:08.4 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:40:41.94 +26:17:39.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:18:43.87 -07:00:26.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:14:17.87 +32:18:29.9 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:47:26.35 +15:58:50.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:00:27.74 +02:47:04.0 15.4mag 88P/Howell 04:25:31.10 +29:26:16.0 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:17:59.89 +26:04:57.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:29:12.70 +33:16:29.8 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:34:39.08 +18:32:17.2 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:44:07.91 +18:36:04.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:15:31.30 +18:36:06.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:17:39.60 +19:27:58.0 13.5mag 141P/Machholz 05:20:09.82 +16:54:35.5 13.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:07:29.53 +14:36:18.3 10.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:51:08.63 -26:01:36.1 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:12:22.92 +20:00:16.7 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:35:52.12 -00:44:10.1 17.4mag 169P/NEAT 23:53:47.08 +00:37:45.5 18.0mag 220P/McNaught 16:59:15.86 -09:02:24.8 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:14:06.56 +35:47:13.2 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:08:48.11 -06:12:04.1 16.6mag 260P/McNaught 03:40:12.73 +30:44:29.1 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 22:42:59.13 -22:09:33.8 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:19:38.43 +08:19:11.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:00:08.97 +20:57:32.4 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:45:13.50 +42:19:20.2 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 29 22:50 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 29 22:50 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 29 22:50 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 19:34:37.106 -06:17:48.77 AT 2026ncq 2026-04-28.37 18.94 18:45:36.050 -47:02:22.90 AT 2026ncp 2026-05-16.36 16.3 16:44:58.190 -12:01:14.40 AT 2026nco 2026-05-17.78 16.12 23:45:12.005 +19:33:29.70 AT 2026ncn 2026-05-16.48 18.8237 12:10:09.900 +33:30:34.08 AT 2026ncm 2026-05-09.81 20.47 15:58:04.997 +19:43:47.30 AT 2026ncl 2026-05-09.79 20.37 16:15:45.870 +24:41:26.60 AT 2026nck 2026-05-09.79 20.42 14:54:16.520 +41:08:00.06 AT 2026ncj 2026-05-07.81 21.47 12:39:40.670 +30:20:35.75 AT 2026nci 2026-05-07.79 20.97 13:13:25.460 +25:11:14.24 AT 2026nch 2026-05-07.75 21.52 12:37:45.750 +26:31:30.09 AT 2026ncg 2026-05-07.75 21.31 15:22:43.110 +43:36:13.56 AT 2026ncf 2026-05-02.85 21.33 16:17:17.640 +15:12:51.58 AT 2026nce 2026-04-20.82 21.27 16:10:36.980 +27:29:40.18 AT 2026ncd 2026-04-20.81 20.52 16:21:10.940 +21:07:51.13 AT 2026ncc 2026-04-08.88 21.67 16:04:25.190 +17:44:39.62 AT 2026ncb 2026-04-06.88 21.38 16:17:05.280 +22:11:59.04 AT 2026nca 2026-04-06.84 21.63 16:03:27.180 +26:47:45.36 AT 2026nbz 2026-04-06.79 20.91 12:58:38.740 +25:18:29.00 AT 2026nby 2026-04-03.87 20.73 14:26:24.830 +37:28:28.38 AT 2026nbx 2026-03-29.93 21.17 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 29 22:50 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 56 C