This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4436* 00 46 04.50 +02 30 17.9 7.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,7.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 7.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4436* 00 46 13.92 +02 29 57.7 8.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,8.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 8.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4436 2461188.9436 10.17 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0
114.49268 -59.07379 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas -1 -1 2 10.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,10.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 10.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4436 2461188.9436 9.24 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2
133.79588 -53.38870 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" S Psc
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.200 V 15.300 V 2452968.00000 404.620000000000 M5e-M7e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
S Psc,2461188.9436,9.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
S Psc 20260528.4436 9.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4436* 00 46 04.50 +02 30 17.9 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,7.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 7.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4436* 00 46 13.91 +02 29 57.6 8.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,8.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 8.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4436* 00 46 30.02 +02 30 44.2 12.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.9436,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.4436 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4436 2461188.9436 12.85 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9
118.25156 -57.43401 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" SW Psc
Type: RRAB/BL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.890 CV Y 0.990 CV 2453727.95840 0.521110700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SW Psc,2461188.9436,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SW Psc 20260528.4436 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461188.94377007 28.05.2026 10:38:51.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5910
Objects passed selection criteria: 5881
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3899.25
Average stars matched: 3806.25 (97.6149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111940 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 06:07:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461188.94377007 28.05.2026 10:38:51.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31941
Objects passed selection criteria: 31840
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21800.2
Average stars matched: 21126.2 (96.9083 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 06:09:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.94337054
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQMCFhoeVJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RWFpPaIHVA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fkLLFc2ee6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.414W5buUt2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec +0.7094 to +11.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec 0.7094 to 11.2737 deg
Loaded 4467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3635 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DQMCFhoeVJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6274
Got 6274 stars (including 5838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=207 n_q2=265 n_q3=258 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RWFpPaIHVA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6217
Got 6217 stars (including 5773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fkLLFc2ee6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=128, passed=1606
Got 1606 stars (including 1475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.5 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.5 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=275 n_q2=193 n_q3=298 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.414W5buUt2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=132, passed=1598
Got 1598 stars (including 1462 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.5 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 510 (Dec 0.5 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=274 n_q2=195 n_q3=295 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.210
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.235
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.311
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.25 +02:00:52.5: 9.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:54.40 +01:58:53.6: 9.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.2: 9.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.65 +01:45:50.7: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.25 +02:00:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.25 +02:00:52.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:54.40 +01:58:53.6: 9.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.40 +01:58:53.6: ref_mag=9.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0340 delta=-0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.2: 9.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.2: ref_mag=9.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3835 delta=-0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.65 +01:45:50.7: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.65 +01:45:50.7: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8630 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.2416 delta=2.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20349.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20323_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:35.73 +00:54:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 20326_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.60 +01:09:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20332_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:19.71 +02:29:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20335_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:04.20 +01:14:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.13 +00:58:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:46.20 +00:56:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:33.89 +01:27:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:30.73 +01:02:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2
00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0107 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:34.486 +06:00:07.31
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:33.802 +06:00:07.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oa2ban3TOA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j6FEU9XwMo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sixyw3JV35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TEMEOmRfZ3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec +0.7037 to +11.2806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec 0.7037 to 11.2806 deg
Loaded 4474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3580 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 34111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oa2ban3TOA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1306, passed=34109
Got 34109 stars (including 32755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=210 n_q2=257 n_q3=258 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j6FEU9XwMo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1297, passed=34085
Got 34085 stars (including 32721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=213 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sixyw3JV35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=200, passed=9873
Got 9873 stars (including 9664 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=272 n_q2=189 n_q3=299 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TEMEOmRfZ3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=200, passed=9650
Got 9650 stars (including 9439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=270 n_q2=194 n_q3=296 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_060106_TTUQ1b1x1_1213355_t4t30Si8/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:54.39 +01:58:53.8: 9.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.26 +02:00:52.5: 9.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.0: 9.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:16.70 +03:17:05.0: 9.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:54.39 +01:58:53.8: 9.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.39 +01:58:53.8: ref_mag=9.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4562 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:47.91 +01:54:04.9: 9.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.26 +02:00:52.5: 9.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.0: 9.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:16.70 +03:17:05.0: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.26 +02:00:52.5: ref_mag=9.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5775 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:48.20 +02:54:35.0: ref_mag=9.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8204 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:16.70 +03:17:05.0: ref_mag=9.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8992 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:15.94 +03:07:34.5: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:47.28 +02:03:20.8: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.66 +01:45:50.5: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:47.91 +01:54:04.9: 9.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:47.91 +01:54:04.9: ref_mag=9.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0184 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:15.94 +03:07:34.5: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:47.28 +02:03:20.8: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:15.94 +03:07:34.5: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3001 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:47.28 +02:03:20.8: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3450 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.66 +01:45:50.5: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.66 +01:45:50.5: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3198 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:13.53 +02:35:31.5: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.76 +01:12:32.7: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.47 +01:05:02.5: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:49.21 +01:18:15.8: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.76 +01:12:32.7: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:13.53 +02:35:31.5: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:13.53 +02:35:31.5: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5344 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.76 +01:12:32.7: ref_mag=10.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4415 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.47 +01:05:02.5: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.47 +01:05:02.5: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4778 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:50.68 +02:29:38.7: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:36.11 +02:04:02.6: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:49.21 +01:18:15.8: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:49.21 +01:18:15.8: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7737 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:50.68 +02:29:38.7: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:59.60 +02:35:19.0: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:50.68 +02:29:38.7: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9500 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:36.11 +02:04:02.6: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:36.11 +02:04:02.6: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9294 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:28.85 +02:03:27.3: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:15.64 +02:59:52.4: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:15:52.64 +01:40:19.5: 11.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:43.43 +03:09:37.4: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:59.60 +02:35:19.0: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:59.60 +02:35:19.0: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8415 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.06 +01:47:08.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:28.85 +02:03:27.3: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:15.64 +02:59:52.4: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:28.85 +02:03:27.3: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0199 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:15.64 +02:59:52.4: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0196 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:15:52.64 +01:40:19.5: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:52.64 +01:40:19.5: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1378 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:03.90 +02:35:48.4: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:43.43 +03:09:37.4: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:43.43 +03:09:37.4: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1597 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.06 +01:47:08.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.06 +01:47:08.9: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0204 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.70 +01:14:03.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:03.90 +02:35:48.4: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:52.01 +01:00:41.2: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:03.90 +02:35:48.4: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2445 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.49 +01:11:08.8: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.1: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.70 +01:14:03.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.70 +01:14:03.8: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3276 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:52.01 +01:00:41.2: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:52.01 +01:00:41.2: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2861 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:54.06 +02:09:30.5: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.49 +01:11:08.8: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.49 +01:11:08.8: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4585 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:38.67 +02:31:43.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:11:48.34 +01:02:14.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.1: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.86 +01:19:20.7: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.1: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4719 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:54.06 +02:09:30.5: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:54.06 +02:09:30.5: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6045 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:45.30 +01:01:49.2: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:11:48.34 +01:02:14.4: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:38.67 +02:31:43.6: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:48.34 +01:02:14.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7080 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.67 +02:31:43.6: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6550 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.86 +01:19:20.7: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.86 +01:19:20.7: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5671 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:27.04 +02:18:06.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:20.16 +02:47:42.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:45.30 +01:01:49.2: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:45.30 +01:01:49.2: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6161 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:17.34 +01:08:51.5: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:27.04 +02:18:06.7: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:27.04 +02:18:06.7: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4746 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:08.5: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:40.68 +01:49:10.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:20.16 +02:47:42.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:20.16 +02:47:42.3: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6086 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:17.34 +01:08:51.5: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:17.34 +01:08:51.5: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5568 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:53.37 +00:59:06.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:48.60 +01:52:11.0: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:40.68 +01:49:10.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:08.5: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:40.68 +01:49:10.5: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7801 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:08.5: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6725 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:46.58 +01:59:04.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:53.37 +00:59:06.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:53.37 +00:59:06.2: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6761 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:48.60 +01:52:11.0: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:48.60 +01:52:11.0: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7176 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:23:53.97 +03:45:54.9: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:46.58 +01:59:04.7: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:46.58 +01:59:04.7: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5908 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:24.40 +01:55:45.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:35.74 +03:10:20.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:23:53.97 +03:45:54.9: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:53.97 +03:45:54.9: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5007 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:55.01 +01:38:17.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:24.40 +01:55:45.3: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:24.40 +01:55:45.3: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6192 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:33.61 +02:45:46.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:35.74 +03:10:20.7: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:35.74 +03:10:20.7: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8379 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:46.02 +01:04:51.9: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:55.01 +01:38:17.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:55.01 +01:38:17.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9551 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:33.61 +02:45:46.4: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:33.61 +02:45:46.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8665 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:11.53 +01:25:36.1: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:57.72 +02:10:49.2: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:46.02 +01:04:51.9: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:46.02 +01:04:51.9: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8058 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:11.53 +01:25:36.1: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:08:52.00 +09:13:43.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:11.53 +01:25:36.1: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9919 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:57.72 +02:10:49.2: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:57.72 +02:10:49.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1906 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:27.60 +01:17:56.5: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:08:52.00 +09:13:43.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:52.00 +09:13:43.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0344 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:27.60 +01:17:56.5: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:27.60 +01:17:56.5: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5674 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:41:19.48 +05:20:44.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8465 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19784.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:35.71 +00:54:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:19.47 +01:50:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52260_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.59 +01:09:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52264_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:19.71 +02:29:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:01.48 +01:04:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52266_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:04.21 +01:14:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52270_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52270_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.11 +00:58:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52280_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52280_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52281_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:34:06.16 +03:30:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52284_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52284_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:46.20 +00:56:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52289_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52289_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52291_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:33.89 +01:27:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52294_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52294_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52303_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:30.74 +01:02:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52308_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52310_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52315_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:02.56 +01:09:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:21.35 +00:52:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52323_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52345_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52345_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:38.68 +00:45:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:56.96 +00:49:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52363_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:29.02 +00:44:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:06.43 +00:54:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52382_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:39.91 +00:47:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52404_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52406_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52414_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:24.79 +00:48:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52418_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:39.12 +01:14:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52424_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52433_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:56.37 +00:57:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52439_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52440_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:31.53 +00:47:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52443_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52446_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52447_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52448_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 52449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:06.25 +00:53:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:29.88 +01:56:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52505_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52511_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:14.90 +01:14:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52554_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:32:20.13 +06:58:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52563_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52587_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52617_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52632_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52645_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 52656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50023_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 50023_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22778_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 22778_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
