NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Dra-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1177111 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1177111 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits_preview.png'
Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits

renamed 'Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits_preview.png'
Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.2949 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 562.0851 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2177.0754 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 601.0775 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2140.9837 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 612.4312 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.78428 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.019 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T03:21:07.3466102' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T08:21:07.3466102' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.3480016897 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T08:21:17.2494576' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.348116308 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 269.995688348958 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 84.9995543285577 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.7541666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 359.933888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.59511784889692 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '18 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29422 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29422 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 87.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.98 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 326.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/d_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits :) Spent 0.693024 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/d_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T03:24:16.7430235' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T08:24:16.7430235' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.3501937846 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T08:24:26.6435998' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.350308368 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 269.995687695331 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 84.999554109087 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.7527777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 359.845277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.59516579249542 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '18 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 87.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.98 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 326.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/d_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits :) Spent 0.781388 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/d_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits


fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.84811743 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 Second-epoch image center 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0388 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 Second-epoch image center 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 Second-epoch second image center 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00315 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qW4KIye5fq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bs35Rt7doY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3JCJcVLAD1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Thp2DykhdY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec +77.0227 to +89.8981 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec 77.0227 to 89.8981 deg Loaded 27814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6710 out of 7010 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7010 out of 10444 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.763400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.763400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec +77.0227 to +89.8981 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec 77.0227 to 89.8981 deg Loaded 27814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6710 out of 7010 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7010 out of 10444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (aperture=7.6) Read 10002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2329 to 359.9636 deg, Dec +77.0229 to +89.8983 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2329 to 359.9636 deg, Dec 77.0229 to 89.8983 deg Loaded 27813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6636 out of 6928 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6928 out of 10002 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 3.0 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 2.3 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 5.0 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 2.7 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 3.0 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 15.0 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.qW4KIye5fq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, passed=10444 Got 10444 stars (including 9727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0280 through 0 to 179.9697, gap 179.9697 to 180.0280 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0250 through 0 to 179.9668, gap 179.9668 to 180.0250 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=239 n_q2=275 n_q3=206 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bs35Rt7doY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=10002 Got 10002 stars (including 9298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10002 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0274 through 0 to 179.9682, gap 179.9682 to 180.0274 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9673, gap 179.9673 to 180.0260 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=249 n_q2=264 n_q3=210 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3JCJcVLAD1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=226, passed=5294 Got 5294 stars (including 5066 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5294 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0253 through 0 to 179.9685, gap 179.9685 to 180.0253 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0244 through 0 to 179.9694, gap 179.9694 to 180.0244 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=246 n_q2=184 n_q3=295 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.487 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Thp2DykhdY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=6126 Got 6126 stars (including 5756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6126 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0300 through 0 to 179.9687, gap 179.9687 to 180.0300 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0284 through 0 to 179.9673, gap 179.9673 to 180.0284 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=264 n_q2=199 n_q3=285 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.093 ref2=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.136 new1=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.487 new2=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.259 reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.1145 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02428_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 02428_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    9.50    20:11:26.14 +80:10:41.3   1434 4870   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits **** FOUND 20:11:26.28 +80:10:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Image size: 940.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 Second-epoch image center 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0388 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 Second-epoch image center 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 18:01:39.000 +84:59:13.83 Second-epoch second image center 18:01:47.530 +84:59:15.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00315 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RwGFIUVoTg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OFEkHIQefj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lHj2zlXcX0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0EoHFJTnG5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 55164 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 28180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6233 out of 7281 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7281 out of 55164 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.591700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.591700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 55164 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 28180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6233 out of 7281 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7281 out of 55164 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (aperture=5.7) Read 60532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0306 to 359.9920 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9627 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0306 to 359.9920 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9627 deg Loaded 28179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6371 out of 7307 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7307 out of 60532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.7 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 2.2 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 4.3 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 2.5 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 2.7 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 15.2 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.RwGFIUVoTg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4211, passed=55140 Got 55140 stars (including 50844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55140 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0289 through 0 to 179.9987, gap 179.9987 to 180.0289 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54827 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0247 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0247 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=242 n_q2=270 n_q3=212 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.OFEkHIQefj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3804, passed=60521 Got 60521 stars (including 56618 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60521 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0274 through 0 to 179.9981, gap 179.9981 to 180.0274 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60134 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0256 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0256 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60134 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60133 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=249 n_q2=256 n_q3=222 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lHj2zlXcX0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1339, passed=22930 Got 22930 stars (including 21577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22930 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0095 through 0 to 179.9964, gap 179.9964 to 180.0095 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22766 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0043 through 0 to 179.9996, gap 179.9996 to 180.0043 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22768 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22768 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=234 n_q2=180 n_q3=302 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.370 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0EoHFJTnG5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1324, passed=35803 Got 35803 stars (including 34438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35803 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0020 through 0 to 179.9950, gap 179.9950 to 180.0020 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0263 through 0 to 179.9973, gap 179.9973 to 180.0263 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=256 n_q2=199 n_q3=290 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:24:08.10 +83:00:51.1: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 21:11:06.68 +79:51:45.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 21:11:59.01 +84:14:28.8: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 19:05:47.52 +80:30:30.5: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:10:00.47 +84:34:31.7: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 15:36:17.19 +83:12:37.0: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:20:59.31 +82:23:25.9: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:24:08.10 +83:00:51.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 21:11:06.68 +79:51:45.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:08.10 +83:00:51.1: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0960 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:06.68 +79:51:45.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0643 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 21:11:59.01 +84:14:28.8: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:59.01 +84:14:28.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5954 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 19:05:47.52 +80:30:30.5: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:47.52 +80:30:30.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1284 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:10:00.47 +84:34:31.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 15:36:17.19 +83:12:37.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:20:59.31 +82:23:25.9: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:17.19 +83:12:37.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2819 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:59.31 +82:23:25.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9987 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:00.47 +84:34:31.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8959 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73778_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73778_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.20    13:06:18.79 +82:34:36.9   9271 1850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73791_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73791_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    13.16    21:11:06.26 +79:51:44.0   0181 3895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.04    21:11:07.10 +79:51:46.1   0184 3896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73816_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73816_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    12.30    23:24:07.21 +83:00:49.9   0845 0462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.06    23:24:08.99 +83:00:52.3   0847 0464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73845_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73845_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    10.27    14:14:04.13 +81:00:43.0   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73851_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73851_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    10.62    17:42:45.29 +82:08:30.7   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73861_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73861_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    11.07    19:25:21.94 +86:56:39.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73872_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73872_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    11.61    19:17:38.61 +81:59:55.0   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73882_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73882_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    11.80    22:01:15.84 +82:41:50.3   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73883_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73883_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    11.77    18:11:52.19 +80:27:26.4   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73889_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73889_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.02    22:39:32.01 +84:46:11.3   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73890_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73890_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    11.81    13:09:49.16 +84:26:49.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73910_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73910_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.63    15:44:28.22 +80:57:35.7   7704 4977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits **** FOUND 15:44:28.46 +80:57:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73923_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73923_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.46    15:12:31.28 +83:32:25.7   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73924_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73924_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.66    18:42:26.39 +80:00:47.9   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73926_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73926_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.72    18:01:41.49 +79:54:39.4   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73934_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73934_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    12.59    21:11:59.28 +84:14:30.0   2302 2274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.60    21:11:58.73 +84:14:27.5   2304 2276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73946_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73946_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.10    13:42:23.40 +82:43:33.2   8871 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits **** FOUND 13:42:22.96 +82:43:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73951_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73951_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    13.01    19:05:47.73 +80:30:30.7   2978 5514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.22    19:05:47.31 +80:30:30.4   2981 5515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73957_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73957_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    13.00    20:20:58.83 +82:23:23.2   2109 3689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.00    20:20:59.79 +82:23:28.6   2112 3689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73958_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73958_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    12.90    17:10:01.19 +84:34:32.5   5498 3430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    12.89    17:09:59.76 +84:34:30.8   5500 3431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73986_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73986_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.09    21:44:17.69 +83:30:33.9   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 73998_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 73998_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 28.34812    2461188.84812    13.23    15:36:17.22 +83:12:38.5   7174 3708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.32    15:36:17.15 +83:12:35.5   7176 3709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74001_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74001_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.10    11:39:37.44 +82:58:45.5   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74003_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74003_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.13    16:31:57.55 +87:19:17.1   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74011_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74011_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.82    16:56:57.62 +80:50:44.6   6098 5616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits **** FOUND 16:56:57.58 +80:50:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74012_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74012_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.64    18:39:27.46 +81:45:56.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74018_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74018_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.26    23:57:57.54 +89:19:17.4   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74022_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74022_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    14.05    15:26:59.95 +78:21:47.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74025_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74025_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    14.18    18:57:27.42 +80:25:36.5   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74031_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74031_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.51    14:44:30.51 +80:21:20.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 74032_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 The candidate 74032_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 28.35031    2461188.85031    13.97    16:40:11.63 +86:47:39.8   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_1603380_S6q8DTuX/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-24-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Dra-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.84811743 -observatory V36 05:25:30.72 +25:12:15.8 Mercury (-0.9mag) 06:47:13.06 +24:50:56.6 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:18:16.51 +13:07:01.0 Mars (1.3mag) 07:39:40.18 +21:52:34.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:46:01.67 +02:30:01.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:57:35.75 +20:17:51.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:24.08 +00:12:34.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:51.67 -23:00:45.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:55:54.49 -17:17:08.6 Moon (-11.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 28 03:27 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.84811743: 07:39:36.28 +21:52:46.7 Io (6.0mag) 07:39:37.25 +21:52:44.7 Europa (6.1mag) 07:39:58.56 +21:51:44.4 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:39:10.51 +21:53:55.5 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:40:37.32 +21:28:46.5 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:39:44.43 +21:52:22.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:40:53.04 +21:49:04.9 Elara (17.5mag) 07:41:15.45 +22:10:09.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:46:42.28 +21:53:32.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:46:11.80 +02:29:45.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:46:07.23 +02:30:00.3 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:46:28.00 +02:30:32.1 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:46:11.65 +02:30:20.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:46:56.82 +02:33:30.3 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 28 03:27 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.84811743: 17:18:36.40 -33:48:00.8 JWST 10:20:43.53 +43:13:21.1 Chandra 09:08:36.80 -52:05:26.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 28 03:27 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.84811743 -observatory V36 13:19:03.02 -26:50:08.5 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:41:11.37 +30:36:45.6 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:24:18.40 +01:25:48.3 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:31:39.89 +24:43:23.6 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 09:46:22.32 +12:33:19.4 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:49:58.65 -31:49:40.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:42:56.75 -68:13:28.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:45:07.43 +31:50:00.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:19:01.71 +14:42:10.5 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 19:47:45.89 -51:35:51.9 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:14:21.41 +31:08:36.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:20:41.16 +26:52:58.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:22:20.25 +31:25:52.0 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:45:02.47 +03:20:58.6 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:35:03.71 +21:17:26.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:23:33.43 -11:01:36.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:16:14.66 +65:48:52.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:12:14.29 -05:42:37.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:33:12.77 +85:21:30.6 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:56:06.66 +63:59:01.5 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:30:22.21 +26:44:03.1 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:46:04.69 +12:27:07.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:18:55.24 +27:50:28.9 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:07:09.03 -16:58:50.1 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:55:42.70 +36:25:08.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:43:12.61 +53:16:02.9 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:29:00.58 -10:19:44.8 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:40:37.15 +04:38:41.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:40:36.16 +42:34:11.4 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:19.41 -08:01:07.2 16.3mag A/2026 E1 20:03:41.52 -08:08:28.1 9.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:17:51.98 -02:56:47.8 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:59.61 -00:52:16.2 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:52:47.11 -02:35:11.3 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:54:50.82 +24:08:47.1 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:36:51.28 +26:47:06.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:17:00.10 -07:08:53.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:08:32.03 +32:02:04.5 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:43:07.68 +15:42:56.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 00:56:15.76 +02:21:00.2 15.3mag 88P/Howell 04:19:43.21 +29:13:18.9 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:13:09.70 +25:45:16.6 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:25:00.59 +33:18:04.1 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:31:35.83 +19:19:24.7 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:41:09.82 +18:27:41.2 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:11:54.64 +18:29:22.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:09:07.51 +19:33:42.9 13.3mag 141P/Machholz 05:11:40.63 +16:41:05.5 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz 03:57:59.31 +14:12:58.5 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:49:48.71 -26:18:30.6 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:06:41.18 +19:12:21.2 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:35:24.52 -01:11:13.2 17.4mag 169P/NEAT 23:48:50.73 +00:14:59.9 18.0mag 220P/McNaught 17:00:40.35 -09:10:48.5 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:09:59.24 +35:49:33.5 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:04:08.32 -06:55:13.3 16.7mag 260P/McNaught 03:35:32.87 +30:22:22.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 22:26:21.39 -24:39:22.1 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:20:35.16 +08:20:33.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:58:48.38 +20:59:46.0 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:42:17.05 +42:26:36.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 28 03:27 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 28 03:27 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 28 03:27 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:09:12.149 +41:27:00.14 AT 2026naw 2026-05-11.29 20.6337 06:25:45.633 -48:14:58.83 AT 2026nav 2026-05-04.02 18.255 06:58:22.644 -55:50:37.36 AT 2026nau 2026-05-18.96 18.984 08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28 AT 2026nat 2026-05-17.28 19.023 10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29 AT 2026nas 2026-05-16.99 23.35 08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80 AT 2026nar 2026-05-18.88 19.333 12:51:56.463 +16:16:53.32 SN 2026naq 2026-05-19.19 19.6515 08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39 AT 2026nap 2026-05-15.16 19.132 12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40 AT 2026nao 2026-05-16.27 20.0531 11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57 AT 2026nan 2026-05-08.18 20.1914 11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49 AT 2026nam 2026-05-16.20 20.4814 02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67 AT 2026nal 2026-05-18.43 15.4 12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23 SN 2026nak 2026-05-18.88 19.67 13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14 AT 2026naj 2026-05-17.91 19.77 15:46:38.025 -55:50:28.50 AT 2026nai 2026-05-17.00 19.04 11:40:58.130 +28:13:30.16 AT 2026nah 2026-05-17.94 19.877 23:21:04.257 +34:14:10.38 SN 2026nag 2026-05-13.19 18.36 14:12:48.859 +54:00:36.42 AT 2026naf 2026-05-18.36 18.96 09:57:42.622 +27:44:09.60 AT 2026nae 2026-05-17.90 20.056 00:31:01.441 -13:38:51.90 SN 2026nad 2026-05-18.40 15.715 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 28 03:27 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 85 C