Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.6951,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.1951 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-08-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-08-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-08-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1194458 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1194458 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits

renamed 'Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 654.4630
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.3422
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5543.2830
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1074.7949
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5565.4159
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1078.1242
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 8.46997
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.5400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T23:40:30.7051588' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T04:40:30.7051588' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.1947998265 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T04:40:40.6083266' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.1949144443 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 167.139623198833 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -1.99947846892208 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.4327777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 240.328611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8110476394544 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.5400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.5400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/d_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits :)
Spent 0.697934 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/d_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T23:41:08.6532164' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T04:41:08.6532164' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.1952390391 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T04:41:18.5550467' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.1953536458 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 167.13962322262 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -1.99947847633282 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.3180555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 240.46 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.81652564196501 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/d_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits :)
Spent 0.793739 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/d_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits

fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.69491557
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0913 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00387 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wqXhzOwoqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vVwVtWYCp4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yXpQ4Bnb8z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vR0j0zztq1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.753300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.753300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wqXhzOwoqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, passed=6012
Got 6012 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=220 n_q2=241 n_q3=237 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.460
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vVwVtWYCp4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=218 n_q2=241 n_q3=230 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yXpQ4Bnb8z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=226, passed=2007
Got 2007 stars (including 1779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2007 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=228 n_q2=229 n_q3=247 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.358
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vR0j0zztq1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=207, passed=1992
Got 1992 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=227 n_q2=229 n_q3=251 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.460
ref2=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.358
new2=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.452
reference average sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.374
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0897 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0913 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:55.070 -01:58:22.89
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:55.173 -01:58:09.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00387 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vynbL0vRsY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WFLLMjI3sH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GEfPqmm9KP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AdhIC0ZtHw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vynbL0vRsY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1557, passed=31973
Got 31973 stars (including 30370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31973 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=221 n_q2=228 n_q3=239 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.427
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WFLLMjI3sH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1524, passed=33863
Got 33863 stars (including 32293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=214 n_q2=238 n_q3=229 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GEfPqmm9KP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=572, passed=12725
Got 12725 stars (including 12139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.575 n_q1=247 n_q2=208 n_q3=260 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AdhIC0ZtHw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=582, passed=12410
Got 12410 stars (including 11818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=244 n_q2=209 n_q3=262 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.442
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:03:03.67 -02:38:04.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:05:54.37 -05:06:10.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:13:18.93 +00:58:26.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:03:03.67 -02:38:04.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:03.67 -02:38:04.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9000 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:54.37 -05:06:10.2: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:13:18.93 +00:58:26.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:54.37 -05:06:10.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3737 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 10.46 | 11:32:41.42 -04:48:44.5 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 10.68 | 10:53:27.78 +00:43:15.5 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52742_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 12.00 | 11:07:47.71 -04:37:37.9 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52754_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 12.42 | 10:57:37.90 -00:06:15.9 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52778_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 12.82 | 11:34:50.19 -02:14:53.4 | 0854 3406 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
**** FOUND 11:34:50.11 -02:14:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52807_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 13.00 | 11:27:18.15 +01:22:49.1 | 1982 1187 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
**** FOUND 11:27:18.26 +01:22:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52826_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.19492 | 2461188.69492 | 12.97 | 11:03:03.69 -02:38:05.6 | 5676 3588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 12.84 | 11:03:03.65 -02:38:03.8 | 5676 3590 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52842_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 12.91 | 10:55:39.56 +00:08:10.5 | 6787 1904 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:39.57 +00:08:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 52970_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.19492 | 2461188.69492 | 13.42 | 11:05:54.47 -05:06:10.3 | 5257 5085 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-40-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 13.33 | 11:05:54.26 -05:06:10.0 | 5258 5087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.19535 | 2461188.69535 | 10.67 | 10:57:45.05 -04:33:24.3 | 6487 4749 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_023510_TTUQ2b1x1_4125393_r0Y76i9Q/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_23-41-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0075.fits |
**** FOUND 10:57:45.05 -04:33:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:13:18.93 +00:58:26.5
########### Completed Leo-08-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:13:18.93 +00:58:26.5
###################################################################################
11:13:18.93 +00:58:26.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.69491557 -observatory V36
05:24:14.03 +25:10:37.2 Mercury (-0.9mag)
06:46:24.86 +24:51:38.8 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:17:49.88 +13:04:41.3 Mars (1.3mag)
07:39:32.95 +21:52:51.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:58.58 +02:29:44.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:33.49 +20:17:45.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:23.34 +00:12:30.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:52.00 -23:00:42.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:51:18.94 -16:39:31.9 Moon (-11.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 28 02:39 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.69491557:
07:39:27.20 +21:53:07.7 Io (6.0mag)
07:39:27.41 +21:53:08.7 Europa (6.1mag)
07:39:50.79 +21:52:03.6 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:39:03.18 +21:54:12.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:40:30.64 +21:29:04.0 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:39:32.72 +21:52:53.4 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:40:46.56 +21:49:26.4 Elara (17.5mag)
07:41:07.68 +22:10:31.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:46:35.40 +21:53:48.3 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:08.32 +02:29:27.6 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:03.96 +02:29:41.1 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:46:24.68 +02:30:13.1 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:09.05 +02:30:02.2 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:53.91 +02:33:14.2 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 28 02:39 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.69491557:
17:19:12.65 -33:44:21.6 JWST
01:56:48.72 -50:08:59.6 Chandra
08:21:13.75 -45:11:07.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 28 02:39 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.69491557 -observatory V36
13:19:10.35 -26:51:07.4 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:40:54.97 +30:37:02.0 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:24:27.04 +01:25:29.5 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:31:24.98 +24:43:05.4 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:45:19.42 +12:41:52.5 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:03.38 -31:48:55.9 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:42:47.90 -68:13:38.7 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:04.12 +31:49:54.5 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:05.34 +14:41:32.1 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:46:48.28 -51:35:28.2 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:22.29 +31:08:11.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:20:29.72 +26:52:52.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:22:14.34 +31:26:08.7 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:44:58.05 +03:20:25.8 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:35:09.33 +21:17:05.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:23:37.26 -11:01:38.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:14.74 +65:48:12.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:12:35.30 -05:41:51.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:33:38.15 +85:23:25.4 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:55:55.05 +63:58:47.8 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:30:07.38 +26:43:00.7 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:46:12.41 +12:26:06.9 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:59.21 +27:47:38.5 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:06:59.75 -16:59:46.4 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:55:33.89 +36:26:49.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:43:22.69 +53:16:24.4 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:28:43.79 -10:19:11.8 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:38.53 +04:38:35.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:40:17.99 +42:33:23.6 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:19.75 -08:05:09.7 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:03:24.74 -08:08:20.3 9.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:55.80 -02:55:17.0 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:58.38 -00:52:14.2 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:52:40.81 -02:35:07.3 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:54:36.34 +24:07:28.3 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:36:31.64 +26:49:36.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:16:51.13 -07:09:36.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:08:02.56 +32:00:39.1 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:42:45.60 +15:41:34.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:55:54.06 +02:18:46.3 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:19:13.51 +29:12:10.8 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:12:45.03 +25:43:34.9 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:24:39.12 +33:18:11.8 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:31:20.30 +19:23:26.3 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:40:54.59 +18:26:57.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:11:36.11 +18:28:47.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:08:23.44 +19:34:08.6 13.3mag 141P/Machholz
05:10:56.88 +16:39:53.1 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:57:10.52 +14:10:55.8 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:49:41.74 -26:19:57.2 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:06:12.07 +19:08:15.1 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:22.20 -01:13:28.7 17.5mag 169P/NEAT
23:48:25.41 +00:13:03.4 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
17:00:47.85 -09:11:32.4 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:09:38.12 +35:49:45.4 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:03:44.45 -06:58:50.9 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:35:09.06 +30:20:29.0 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:24:53.92 -24:51:37.1 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:20:40.15 +08:20:38.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:58:41.55 +20:59:57.4 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:42:01.99 +42:27:13.5 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 28 02:39 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 28 02:39 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 28 02:39 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28 AT 2026nat 2026-05-17.28 19.023
10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29 AT 2026nas 2026-05-16.99 23.35
08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80 AT 2026nar 2026-05-18.88 19.333
12:51:56.470 +16:16:53.47 SN 2026naq 2026-05-19.19 19.6515
08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39 AT 2026nap 2026-05-15.16 19.132
12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40 AT 2026nao 2026-05-16.27 20.0531
11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57 AT 2026nan 2026-05-08.18 20.1914
11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49 AT 2026nam 2026-05-16.20 20.4814
02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67 AT 2026nal 2026-05-18.43 15.4
12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23 SN 2026nak 2026-05-18.88 19.67
13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14 AT 2026naj 2026-05-17.91 19.77
15:46:38.025 -55:50:28.50 AT 2026nai 2026-05-17.00 19.04
11:40:58.130 +28:13:30.16 AT 2026nah 2026-05-17.94 19.877
23:21:04.257 +34:14:10.38 SN 2026nag 2026-05-13.19 18.36
14:12:48.859 +54:00:36.42 AT 2026naf 2026-05-18.36 18.96
09:57:42.622 +27:44:09.60 AT 2026nae 2026-05-17.90 20.056
00:31:01.441 -13:38:51.90 SN 2026nad 2026-05-18.40 15.715
19:56:03.307 -21:50:03.06 AT 2026nac 2026-05-17.54 19.217
16:20:28.851 +36:44:11.28 AT 2026nab 2026-05-18.05 19.657
13:52:38.978 -42:27:39.20 AT 2026naa 2026-05-16.89 19.587
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 28 02:39 tns_transients_list.txt