######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Dra-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1200638 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1200638 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 410.6105
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 507.5769
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2179.7657
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 596.5598
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2177.4565
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 597.0903
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.3086
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T02:13:25.5876242' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T07:13:25.5876242' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.3009905904 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T07:13:35.4889341' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.3011051854 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.940499115324 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.999644771554 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 65.7116666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 331.905277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.09681347440349 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 261.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits :)
Spent 0.662933 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T02:14:01.7934653' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T07:14:01.7934653' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.3014096413 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T07:14:11.6945202' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.3015242363 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.940499126969 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9996447319096 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 65.6525 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 331.746666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.09732426138425 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 81.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 261.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.00072 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits :)
Spent 0.658047 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.80110633
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96
Second-epoch image center 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96
Second-epoch image center 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0354 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79
Second-epoch second image center 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00437 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OjHQ6zuy7y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qNYul9jehk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits &> /tmp/tmp.95sydYWnBg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rJBBdXvep1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5957 to 248.4303 deg, Dec +47.6678 to +59.3606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5957 to 248.4303 deg, Dec 47.6678 to 59.3606 deg
Loaded 6552 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4428 out of 4636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4636 out of 8825 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.887350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.887350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.5957 to 248.4303 deg, Dec +47.6678 to +59.3606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.5957 to 248.4303 deg, Dec 47.6678 to 59.3606 deg
Loaded 6552 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4428 out of 4636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4636 out of 8825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4701 to 248.4302 deg, Dec +47.6679 to +59.3609 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4701 to 248.4302 deg, Dec 47.6679 to 59.3609 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4416 out of 4631 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4631 out of 8769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.1 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
2.8 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
2.8 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OjHQ6zuy7y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=546, passed=8825
Got 8825 stars (including 8271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.203 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=269 n_q2=203 n_q3=269 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qNYul9jehk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=554, passed=8769
Got 8769 stars (including 8206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=269 n_q2=204 n_q3=268 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.95sydYWnBg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, passed=4782
Got 4782 stars (including 4497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4782 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=262 n_q2=212 n_q3=268 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rJBBdXvep1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, passed=4767
Got 4767 stars (including 4472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=261 n_q2=213 n_q3=263 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.164
ref2=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.178
reference average sigma_overall=0.2655 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96
Second-epoch image center 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:55.763 +53:58:38.96
Second-epoch image center 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0354 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:32:02.113 +54:00:19.79
Second-epoch second image center 15:32:01.704 +54:00:35.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00437 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wxofvPOMfW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UKLifMaIlV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ABJ7OPBcE4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gkddSiVOL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47919 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4698 to 248.4303 deg, Dec +47.6086 to +59.3688 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4698 to 248.4303 deg, Dec 47.6086 to 59.3688 deg
Loaded 6628 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4188 out of 4655 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4655 out of 47919 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.785300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.785300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 47919 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4698 to 248.4303 deg, Dec +47.6086 to +59.3688 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4698 to 248.4303 deg, Dec 47.6086 to 59.3688 deg
Loaded 6628 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4188 out of 4655 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4655 out of 47919 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 48434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4701 to 248.4302 deg, Dec +47.6093 to +59.3772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4701 to 248.4302 deg, Dec 47.6093 to 59.3772 deg
Loaded 6633 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4186 out of 4655 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4655 out of 48434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.0 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
15.7 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wxofvPOMfW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=2115, passed=47894
Got 47894 stars (including 45696 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.200 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=269 n_q2=206 n_q3=263 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UKLifMaIlV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2158, passed=48410
Got 48410 stars (including 46175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=263 n_q2=206 n_q3=267 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ABJ7OPBcE4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=700, passed=25117
Got 25117 stars (including 24386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=256 n_q2=204 n_q3=269 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0gkddSiVOL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=688, passed=25140
Got 25140 stars (including 24416 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=258 n_q2=207 n_q3=266 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 14:54:07.13 +52:18:05.9: 11.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:34:45.15 +51:30:43.4: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:12:15.22 +53:51:00.8: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 14:54:07.13 +52:18:05.9: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:07.13 +52:18:05.9: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3093 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:34:45.15 +51:30:43.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:12:15.22 +53:51:00.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:45.15 +51:30:43.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2053 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:15.22 +53:51:00.8: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8439 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:21:21.50 +52:21:33.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:31:52.20 +54:30:01.0: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:38:38.50 +57:02:24.5: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:19:17.61 +50:12:13.6: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-56-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 15:46:54.59 +53:36:29.7: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:31:52.20 +54:30:01.0: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:21:21.50 +52:21:33.0: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:52.20 +54:30:01.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8125 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:21.50 +52:21:33.0: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6872 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:38:38.50 +57:02:24.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:38.50 +57:02:24.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7396 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:19:17.61 +50:12:13.6: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:17.61 +50:12:13.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0061 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0333.fits at 15:46:54.59 +53:36:29.7: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:54.59 +53:36:29.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0368 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53979_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 10.65 | 14:41:33.72 +53:10:50.1 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53982_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 11.03 | 15:28:27.03 +51:10:08.1 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53983_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 11.30 | 14:54:07.10 +52:18:05.6 | 8225 4221 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 11.32 | 14:54:07.16 +52:18:06.1 | 8225 4223 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53985_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 11.32 | 15:39:21.99 +56:11:08.5 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53990_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53990_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 11.81 | 15:49:11.47 +51:27:17.4 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53992_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 11.83 | 16:07:21.44 +57:01:15.2 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53993_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53993_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.03 | 15:35:28.61 +49:30:05.9 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53998_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 53998_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.12 | 14:52:18.49 +56:49:39.2 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54015_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.64 | 15:48:14.24 +57:50:12.7 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54020_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.93 | 15:43:41.52 +49:12:39.0 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54022_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.87 | 14:41:07.86 +57:56:08.0 | 9046 0710 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 14:41:07.88 +57:56:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54023_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.79 | 16:01:59.65 +58:31:49.9 | 2618 0183 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 16:01:59.63 +58:31:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54026_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54026_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 12.94 | 15:12:15.24 +53:51:01.8 | 6539 3343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.77 | 15:12:15.20 +53:50:59.9 | 6538 3345 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54031_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.25 | 15:25:39.76 +50:07:17.0 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54035_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54035_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.01 | 15:20:05.01 +51:59:24.9 | 5816 4459 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:20:04.98 +51:59:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54038_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54038_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.85 | 16:27:59.98 +57:50:14.9 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54040_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54040_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.21 | 16:06:04.14 +50:10:42.7 | 1362 5099 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 16:06:04.10 +50:10:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54043_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.16 | 16:09:18.73 +55:09:30.1 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54046_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 13.23 | 15:34:45.21 +51:30:43.2 | 4436 4676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.18 | 15:34:45.10 +51:30:43.6 | 4436 4678 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54047_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54047_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 12.99 | 14:47:53.58 +56:21:32.2 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54055_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.29 | 14:36:25.26 +58:43:38.0 | 9367 0177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54057_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.39 | 16:15:24.16 +48:59:14.1 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54059_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.38 | 15:38:33.70 +50:23:49.9 | 4020 5320 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:33.71 +50:23:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54062_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.41 | 15:31:58.92 +54:43:11.6 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54067_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.53 | 15:26:16.40 +52:02:57.7 | 5243 4403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:26:16.45 +52:02:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54069_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54069_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.44 | 15:22:04.98 +55:39:49.8 | 5698 2242 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:22:04.99 +55:39:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54073_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.39 | 15:53:25.68 +53:09:24.5 | 2833 3508 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:53:25.77 +53:09:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54074_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.52 | 16:17:53.16 +50:21:34.9 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54076_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54076_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.53 | 15:46:09.87 +49:45:12.7 | 3246 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:46:09.80 +49:45:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54078_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.59 | 15:31:20.50 +56:49:44.5 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54082_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.59 | 16:17:01.63 +49:21:10.7 | 0193 5382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54086_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.73 | 16:16:06.60 +54:13:28.4 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54089_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.66 | 16:24:12.18 +55:00:24.4 | 0352 1876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54091_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.75 | 16:04:44.03 +51:22:22.1 | 1623 4408 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 16:04:44.08 +51:22:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54094_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54094_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.61 | 15:36:04.41 +59:01:26.2 | 4674 0150 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54095_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54095_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.78 | 15:42:32.72 +54:32:50.1 | 3896 2795 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:42:32.97 +54:32:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54096_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 13.79 | 15:21:21.50 +52:21:32.5 | 5704 4231 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.62 | 15:21:21.51 +52:21:33.5 | 5704 4233 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54098_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 13.82 | 15:31:52.21 +54:30:01.2 | 4823 2899 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.80 | 15:31:52.19 +54:30:00.8 | 4822 2902 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54100_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54100_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.74 | 14:44:49.04 +51:52:39.0 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54101_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54101_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 13.74 | 15:38:38.50 +57:02:22.8 | 4369 1329 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.74 | 15:38:38.50 +57:02:26.1 | 4368 1331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54107_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54107_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.67 | 15:41:10.10 +50:55:09.4 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54109_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 13.94 | 15:19:17.66 +50:12:14.4 | 5868 5538 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.10 | 15:19:17.55 +50:12:12.7 | 5867 5540 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54112_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.87 | 15:01:33.60 +49:12:44.8 | 7615 6134 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:01:33.53 +49:12:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54117_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54117_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.78 | 15:43:13.24 +51:26:07.0 | 3640 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:43:13.27 +51:26:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54119_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.04 | 16:10:52.67 +56:53:06.0 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54123_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.07 | 16:03:33.85 +48:17:52.8 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54126_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.93 | 16:11:13.61 +49:26:52.8 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54129_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.30111 | 2461188.80111 | 14.11 | 15:46:54.52 +53:36:29.6 | 3451 3312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-13-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.98 | 15:46:54.65 +53:36:29.8 | 3450 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54132_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54132_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.78 | 16:20:41.57 +56:37:16.3 | 0884 0997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54133_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.01 | 16:17:38.76 +50:50:51.4 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54134_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.52 | 16:16:29.25 +52:55:14.4 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54135_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.22 | 16:21:15.00 +57:56:29.0 | 1029 0203 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54139_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54139_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.07 | 15:23:35.70 +55:57:43.8 | 5576 2058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54150_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 54150_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 14.23 | 16:09:05.65 +53:23:21.6 | 1455 3133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39893_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245
The candidate 39893_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.30153 | 2461188.80153 | 13.34 | 15:04:27.25 +51:52:05.3 | 7273 4530 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_021621_TTUQ1b1x1_3563123_eO3rO6Sb/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_02-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0245.fits |
**** FOUND 15:04:27.30 +51:52:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.80110633 -observatory V36
05:25:07.20 +25:11:45.7 Mercury (-0.9mag)
06:46:58.24 +24:51:09.5 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:18:08.35 +13:06:18.1 Mars (1.3mag)
07:39:37.95 +21:52:39.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:00.73 +02:29:56.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:35.05 +20:17:49.8 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:23.86 +00:12:32.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:51.77 -23:00:44.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:54:19.66 -17:06:47.9 Moon (-11.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 28 02:18 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.80110633:
07:39:33.30 +21:52:53.7 Io (6.0mag)
07:39:34.18 +21:52:52.2 Europa (6.1mag)
07:39:56.20 +21:51:50.2 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:39:08.24 +21:54:00.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:40:35.26 +21:28:51.9 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:39:41.17 +21:52:31.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:40:51.05 +21:49:11.5 Elara (17.5mag)
07:41:13.06 +22:10:16.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:46:40.16 +21:53:37.0 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:10.74 +02:29:40.3 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:06.25 +02:29:54.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:46:26.98 +02:30:26.3 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:10.86 +02:30:14.9 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:55.93 +02:33:25.4 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 28 02:18 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.80110633:
17:18:49.02 -33:47:26.7 JWST
09:03:12.19 +29:40:39.4 Chandra
08:51:36.81 -50:06:04.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 28 02:18 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.80110633 -observatory V36
13:19:05.23 -26:50:26.8 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:41:06.32 +30:36:50.5 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:24:21.04 +01:25:42.5 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:31:35.31 +24:43:17.9 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:46:02.95 +12:35:56.9 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:00.12 -31:49:26.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:42:54.03 -68:13:31.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:06.41 +31:49:58.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:02.83 +14:41:58.7 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:47:28.35 -51:35:45.8 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:21.69 +31:08:28.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:20:37.65 +26:52:56.9 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:22:18.43 +31:25:57.1 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:45:01.11 +03:20:48.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:35:05.44 +21:17:19.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:23:34.60 -11:01:37.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:14.71 +65:48:39.8 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:12:20.75 -05:42:23.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:33:20.44 +85:22:05.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:56:03.08 +63:58:57.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:30:17.65 +26:43:43.9 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:46:07.06 +12:26:49.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:56.48 +27:49:36.6 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:07:06.18 -16:59:07.3 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:55:39.99 +36:25:39.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:43:15.66 +53:16:09.6 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:28:55.42 -10:19:34.6 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:37.56 +04:38:39.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:40:30.60 +42:33:56.6 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:19.49 -08:02:21.5 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:03:36.43 -08:08:25.7 9.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:53.13 -02:56:20.0 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:59.22 -00:52:15.6 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:52:45.16 -02:35:10.0 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:54:46.38 +24:08:22.9 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:36:45.23 +26:47:52.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:16:57.36 -07:09:06.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:08:22.98 +32:01:38.2 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:43:00.91 +15:42:31.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:56:09.12 +02:20:19.1 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:19:34.10 +29:12:57.9 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:13:02.14 +25:44:45.3 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:24:53.99 +33:18:06.4 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:31:31.03 +19:20:38.8 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:41:05.15 +18:27:27.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:11:48.96 +18:29:12.0 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:08:53.99 +19:33:50.7 13.3mag 141P/Machholz
05:11:27.20 +16:40:43.3 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:57:44.34 +14:12:20.8 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:49:46.58 -26:18:57.0 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:06:32.25 +19:11:05.6 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:23.85 -01:11:54.9 17.4mag 169P/NEAT
23:48:42.99 +00:14:24.1 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
17:00:42.66 -09:11:02.1 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:09:52.75 +35:49:37.1 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:04:01.02 -06:56:20.1 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:35:25.57 +30:21:47.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:25:54.82 -24:43:07.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:20:36.69 +08:20:34.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:58:46.28 +20:59:49.5 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:42:12.42 +42:26:47.5 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 28 02:18 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 28 02:18 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 28 02:18 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28 AT 2026nat 2026-05-17.28 19.023
10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29 AT 2026nas 2026-05-16.99 23.35
08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80 AT 2026nar 2026-05-18.88 19.333
12:51:56.470 +16:16:53.47 SN 2026naq 2026-05-19.19 19.6515
08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39 AT 2026nap 2026-05-15.16 19.132
12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40 AT 2026nao 2026-05-16.27 20.0531
11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57 AT 2026nan 2026-05-08.18 20.1914
11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49 AT 2026nam 2026-05-16.20 20.4814
02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67 AT 2026nal 2026-05-18.43 15.4
12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23 SN 2026nak 2026-05-18.88 19.67
13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14 AT 2026naj 2026-05-17.91 19.77
15:46:38.025 -55:50:28.50 AT 2026nai 2026-05-17.00 19.04
11:40:58.130 +28:13:30.16 AT 2026nah 2026-05-17.94 19.877
23:21:04.257 +34:14:10.38 SN 2026nag 2026-05-13.19 18.36
14:12:48.859 +54:00:36.42 AT 2026naf 2026-05-18.36 18.96
09:57:42.622 +27:44:09.60 AT 2026nae 2026-05-17.90 20.056
00:31:01.441 -13:38:51.90 SN 2026nad 2026-05-18.40 15.715
19:56:03.307 -21:50:03.06 AT 2026nac 2026-05-17.54 19.217
16:20:28.851 +36:44:11.28 AT 2026nab 2026-05-18.05 19.657
13:52:38.978 -42:27:39.20 AT 2026naa 2026-05-16.89 19.587
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 28 02:18 tns_transients_list.txt