Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 28.1891  2461188.6891  13.21  11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4
258.78567  65.94502 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
326 Tamara                  -1     -0       1  13.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4:  16.00 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -crosshair 2953.01074 6144.14746 image    wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -crosshair 2954.57959 6148.54248 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18906 11 44 37.40 +08 58 44.4          13.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18884 11 44 37.40 +08 58 45.0          13.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18929 11 44 37.40 +08 58 43.8          13.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 28.1891*  11 44 37.40 +08 58 44.4  13.2 U             Vir       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.6891,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.1891 13.21CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 28.1891  2461188.6891  13.78  11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0
251.05712  64.12830 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
595 Polyxena                -1      2       2  13.8    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -crosshair 5180.21875 5775.59375 image    wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -crosshair 5181.85449 5779.80176 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18906 11 29 53.26 +09 49 05.0          13.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18884 11 29 53.27 +09 49 05.1          13.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 28.18929 11 29 53.25 +09 49 04.9          13.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 28.1891*  11 29 53.26 +09 49 05.0  13.8 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.6891,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.1891 13.78CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last  image: 2461188.68928663 28.05.2026 04:32:24.365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  5647
Objects passed selection criteria:  5624
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4041.75
Average stars matched: 3946.5 (97.6433 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   111700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed May 27 23:43:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last  image: 2461188.68928663 28.05.2026 04:32:24.365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  28339
Objects passed selection criteria:  28283
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 22351.5
Average stars matched: 21613.8 (96.6993 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   131532 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed May 27 23:44:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1241056 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1241056 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits_preview.png'

Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits


renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits_preview.png'

Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4133.1279
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 903.6170
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4145.6512
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 909.4143
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.75975
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T23:31:45.5141965' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T04:31:45.5141965' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61188.188721227 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T04:31:55.4153853' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61188.1888358216 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     173.333060795046 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999618824266 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.1877777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     249.402777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.30091212614288 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               898.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits :)

Spent 0.507972 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T23:32:24.3658692' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T04:32:24.3658692' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61188.1891708914 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T04:32:34.2684281' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61188.1892855093 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     173.333060822117 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999618709029 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.0563888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              249.555 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.30339936869804 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               898.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits :)

Spent 0.517850 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits



fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.68883697
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0748 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0814 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00735 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TmtTQuBVNv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DCIjY7ouHg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.psgOO2IP5z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vvSdi0RzWQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.2 pix  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 15.3 mag.  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.1 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TmtTQuBVNv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=249 n_q2=272 n_q3=235 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DCIjY7ouHg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=257 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.psgOO2IP5z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=262, passed=2291
Got 2291 stars (including 2023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=203 n_q2=213 n_q3=277 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vvSdi0RzWQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, passed=2282
Got 2282 stars (including 2023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=205 n_q2=211 n_q3=275 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new1=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.233
new2=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.135
reference average sigma_overall=0.42 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    9.83    11:23:40.09 +16:51:05.3   6324 1593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:40.10 +16:51:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0748 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0814 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:33:35.162 +14:02:53.98
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:35.904 +14:03:18.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00735 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.khkCbEyrdj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uNfV6gDX6G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IjNTcHuyxp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6l2kLSTNyc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.khkCbEyrdj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=244 n_q2=273 n_q3=235 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uNfV6gDX6G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=273 n_q3=231 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IjNTcHuyxp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=440, passed=15044
Got 15044 stars (including 14581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=207 n_q2=216 n_q3=278 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6l2kLSTNyc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=413, passed=14822
Got 14822 stars (including 14383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=211 n_q2=216 n_q3=273 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:34:54.81 +10:21:04.5:  13.67 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:51:17.58 +11:59:15.3:  12.32 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4:  16.00 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:05:49.84 +18:29:12.7:  12.45 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:34:54.81 +10:21:04.5:  13.76 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:05:49.84 +18:29:12.7:  12.52 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:54.81 +10:21:04.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6700 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:51:17.58 +11:59:15.3:  12.33 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:49.84 +18:29:12.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4936 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:17.58 +11:59:15.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8097 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0:  15.95 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52655.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52100_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 28.18884    2461188.68884    13.64    11:34:54.86 +10:21:03.5   4454 5408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.75    11:34:54.77 +10:21:05.6   4456 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52102_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52102_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.19    12:05:23.17 +17:39:36.3   0333 0639   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  12:05:23.14 +17:39:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52161_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52161_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    10.79    11:25:36.49 +16:28:17.8   6031 1808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:25:36.48 +16:28:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52313_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 28.18884    2461188.68884    12.49    12:05:49.84 +18:29:13.1   0314 0123   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    12.49    12:05:49.84 +18:29:12.3   0315 0127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    12.80    11:56:19.20 +15:43:38.7   1555 1940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:19.14 +15:43:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52389_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 28.18884    2461188.68884    12.92    11:51:17.54 +11:59:15.1   2104 4252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-31-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    12.73    11:51:17.61 +11:59:15.6   2105 4256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52400_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    12.94    11:08:39.16 +17:13:21.1   8513 1451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:08:39.18 +17:13:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52434_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.10    11:15:56.26 +12:49:01.4   7337 4077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:15:56.22 +12:49:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52442_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.29    11:52:39.71 +15:26:06.2   2074 2163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:52:39.73 +15:26:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52456_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52467_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.20    11:38:02.01 +12:59:07.1   4100 3796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:38:01.98 +12:59:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52488_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.43    11:56:28.16 +12:20:22.9   1356 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:28.18 +12:20:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 52494_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    13.20    11:54:05.82 +18:11:15.6   2002 0481   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:54:05.79 +18:11:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 28.18929    2461188.68929    9.97    11:23:40.07 +16:51:05.6   6324 1593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_234120_TTUQ1b1x1_582404_RNLWXxrB/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_23-32-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:40.08 +16:51:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4
11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0
########### Completed Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4
11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0
###################################################################################
11:44:37.40 +08:58:44.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
11:29:53.26 +09:49:05.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.68883697 -observatory V36
05:24:10.99 +25:10:33.3 Mercury (-0.9mag)
06:46:22.95 +24:51:40.5 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:17:48.82 +13:04:35.8 Mars (1.3mag)
07:39:32.67 +21:52:51.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:58.46 +02:29:43.4 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:33.40 +20:17:45.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:23.31 +00:12:29.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:52.01 -23:00:42.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:51:09.27 -16:37:47.2 Moon (-11.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 27 23:43 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.68883697:
07:39:26.88 +21:53:08.4 Io (6.0mag)
07:39:27.03 +21:53:09.6 Europa (6.1mag)
07:39:50.47 +21:52:04.4 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:39:02.89 +21:54:12.8 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:40:30.38 +21:29:04.7 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:39:32.24 +21:52:54.6 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:40:46.31 +21:49:27.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:41:07.38 +22:10:32.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:46:35.13 +21:53:49.0 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:08.18 +02:29:26.9 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:03.83 +02:29:40.3 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:46:24.55 +02:30:12.3 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:08.94 +02:30:01.4 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:53.80 +02:33:13.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 27 23:43 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.68883697:
17:19:13.59 -33:44:07.2 JWST
01:11:34.66 -50:00:42.8 Chandra
08:19:47.39 -44:52:46.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 27 23:43 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.68883697 -observatory V36
13:19:10.64 -26:51:09.6 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:40:54.33 +30:37:02.6 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:24:27.38 +01:25:28.8 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:31:24.39 +24:43:04.6 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:45:16.93 +12:42:12.9 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:03.56 -31:48:54.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:42:47.55 -68:13:39.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:03.99 +31:49:54.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:05.48 +14:41:30.6 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:46:45.97 -51:35:27.2 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:22.33 +31:08:10.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:20:29.27 +26:52:52.6 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:22:14.11 +31:26:09.3 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:44:57.88 +03:20:24.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:35:09.56 +21:17:04.2 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:23:37.42 -11:01:39.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:14.73 +65:48:10.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:12:36.13 -05:41:49.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:33:39.18 +85:23:29.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:55:54.59 +63:58:47.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:30:06.79 +26:42:58.3 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:46:12.71 +12:26:04.5 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:59.37 +27:47:31.7 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:06:59.38 -16:59:48.6 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:55:33.54 +36:26:53.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:43:23.10 +53:16:25.2 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:28:43.13 -10:19:10.5 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:38.58 +04:38:35.1 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:40:17.27 +42:33:21.8 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:19.76 -08:05:19.3 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:03:24.06 -08:08:20.0 9.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:55.95 -02:55:13.4 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:58.33 -00:52:14.1 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:52:40.56 -02:35:07.1 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:54:35.77 +24:07:25.2 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:36:30.87 +26:49:42.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:16:50.77 -07:09:38.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:08:01.39 +32:00:35.7 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:42:44.72 +15:41:31.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:55:53.20 +02:18:40.9 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:19:12.34 +29:12:08.1 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:12:44.05 +25:43:30.9 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:24:38.27 +33:18:12.2 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:31:19.69 +19:23:35.9 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:40:53.99 +18:26:56.2 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:11:35.37 +18:28:46.4 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:08:21.70 +19:34:09.6 13.3mag 141P/Machholz
05:10:55.14 +16:39:50.2 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:57:08.58 +14:10:50.9 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:49:41.46 -26:20:00.7 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:06:10.92 +19:08:05.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:22.10 -01:13:34.1 17.5mag 169P/NEAT
23:48:24.40 +00:12:58.8 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
17:00:48.14 -09:11:34.2 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:09:37.29 +35:49:45.9 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:03:43.50 -06:58:59.6 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:35:08.12 +30:20:24.5 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:24:50.40 -24:52:06.3 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:20:40.35 +08:20:39.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:58:41.28 +20:59:57.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:42:01.39 +42:27:15.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 27 23:43 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10    2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10    2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 27 23:43 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 27 23:43 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28  AT 2026nat  2026-05-17.28 19.023
10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29  AT 2026nas  2026-05-16.99 23.35
08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80  AT 2026nar  2026-05-18.88 19.333
12:51:56.470 +16:16:53.47  SN 2026naq  2026-05-19.19 19.6515
08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39  AT 2026nap  2026-05-15.16 19.132
12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40  AT 2026nao  2026-05-16.27 20.0531
11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57  AT 2026nan  2026-05-08.18 20.1914
11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49  AT 2026nam  2026-05-16.20 20.4814
02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67  AT 2026nal  2026-05-18.43 15.4
12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23  SN 2026nak  2026-05-18.88 19.67
13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14  AT 2026naj  2026-05-17.91 19.77
15:46:38.025 -55:50:28.50  AT 2026nai  2026-05-17.00 19.04
11:40:58.130 +28:13:30.16  AT 2026nah  2026-05-17.94 19.877
23:21:04.257 +34:14:10.38  SN 2026nag  2026-05-13.19 18.36
14:12:48.859 +54:00:36.42  AT 2026naf  2026-05-18.36 18.96
09:57:42.622 +27:44:09.60  AT 2026nae  2026-05-17.90 20.056
00:31:01.441 -13:38:51.90  SN 2026nad  2026-05-18.40 15.715
19:56:03.307 -21:50:03.06  AT 2026nac  2026-05-17.54 19.217
16:20:28.851 +36:44:11.28  AT 2026nab  2026-05-18.05 19.657
13:52:38.978 -42:27:39.20  AT 2026naa  2026-05-16.89 19.587
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 27 23:43 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed May 27 23:43:15 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 23s (0.38 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 41s (0.68 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 69s (1.15 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 17s (0.28 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 59s (0.98 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 86s (1.43 min)
FIELD_Leo-06-Q1b1x1: 167s (2.78 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 170s (2.83 min)
Finished: Wed May 27 23:46:05 CDT 2026