This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 9.62 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3
137.73093 17.98706 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" UW Cam
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 pg 12.900 pg 2429170.00000 544.000000000000 M1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UW Cam,2461188.6294,9.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UW Cam 20260528.1294 9.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 11.93 05:43:53.28 +72:54:51.1
140.46915 21.09410 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0407 Cam
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.370 R 11.680 R 2451571.00000 48.000000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:43:53.28 +72:54:51.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:43:53.28 +72:54:51.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0407 Cam,2461188.6294,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0407 Cam 20260528.1294 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 12.06 04:15:25.99 +67:21:40.2
140.72873 11.84443 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J041526.01+672141.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.380 V 13.560 V 2457825.74000 35.950000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:15:25.99 +67:21:40.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:15:25.99 +67:21:40.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041526.01+672141.0,2461188.6294,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041526.01+672141.0 20260528.1294 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 9.66 04:43:49.54 +70:03:32.0
140.42253 15.55908 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0443493+700333
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.722 R1 Y 0.416 R1 134.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:43:49.54 +70:03:32.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:43:49.54 +70:03:32.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0443493+700333,2461188.6294,9.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0443493+700333 20260528.1294 9.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 12.35 04:48:30.91 +68:59:10.3
141.56145 15.22290 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J044830.90+685910.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.460 V 13.790 V 2457358.00000 308.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:48:30.91 +68:59:10.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:48:30.91 +68:59:10.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044830.90+685910.1,2461188.6294,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044830.90+685910.1 20260528.1294 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 10.46 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1
143.90466 12.07228 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0438053+651356
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.569 R1 Y 0.508 R1 55.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1: 15.70 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1: 15.79 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0438053+651356,2461188.6294,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0438053+651356 20260528.1294 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 8.78 04:54:59.72 +74:17:25.0
137.40020 18.76675 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" AP Cam
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.500 pg 11.300 pg M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:54:59.72 +74:17:25.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:54:59.72 +74:17:25.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AP Cam,2461188.6294,8.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AP Cam 20260528.1294 8.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 11.67 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4
138.27204 15.06141 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 0.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GSC 04336-02265
Type: IB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 R1 10.800 R1 M7III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GSC 04336-02265,2461188.6294,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GSC 04336-02265 20260528.1294 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 12.00 04:09:49.53 +66:41:55.0
140.80152 10.98820 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 0.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0409496+664154
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.462 R1 Y 0.509 R1 185.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:09:49.53 +66:41:55.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:09:49.53 +66:41:55.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0409496+664154,2461188.6294,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0409496+664154 20260528.1294 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.1294 2461188.6294 10.88 04:36:19.91 +66:51:01.5
142.52614 12.98813 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 0.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HK Cam
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 V 12.600 V 69.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:36:19.91 +66:51:01.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:36:19.91 +66:51:01.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HK Cam,2461188.6294,10.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HK Cam 20260528.1294 10.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461188.62959443 28.05.2026 03:06:26.959 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14027
Objects passed selection criteria: 13941
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8654.25
Average stars matched: 8382.75 (96.8628 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 27 22:09:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461188.62959443 28.05.2026 03:06:26.959 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 98304
Objects passed selection criteria: 97943
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61312.2
Average stars matched: 58692.5 (95.7272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1865884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 27 22:12:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.62918541
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00093 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00093 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00161 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ILuUmZzyhp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F4YibTlYtk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AjpI2USvtR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QN4R1HYVPc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec +63.0579 to +75.4657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec 63.0579 to 75.4657 deg
Loaded 13849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 25 out of 34 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 34 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ILuUmZzyhp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 13659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 287 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.14"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.08"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=26.200 sigma_q2_arcsec=7.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=24.743 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.958 n_q1=18 n_q2=140 n_q3=16 n_q4=138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.798
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F4YibTlYtk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 13753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 280 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 214 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.90"
Excluding outliers - 303 stars left (next iteration limit 235)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=303 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.777 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.945 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.183 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.516 n_q1=18 n_q2=137 n_q3=17 n_q4=131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.004
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AjpI2USvtR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=122, passed=2651
Got 2651 stars (including 2526 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.700 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.687 n_q1=370 n_q2=281 n_q3=122 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QN4R1HYVPc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=103, passed=2295
Got 2295 stars (including 2190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.705 n_q1=332 n_q2=323 n_q3=76 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=9.364 worst_q_ratio=2.798
ref2=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=8.580 worst_q_ratio=3.004
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits sigma_overall=0.659 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits sigma_overall=0.667 worst_q_ratio=1.058
reference average sigma_overall=8.972 worst_q_ratio=2.901
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (312 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (303 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02355.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20964_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 20964_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:26.12 +65:33:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21040_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 21040_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.45 +71:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21048_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 21048_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:19.48 +64:51:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21049_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 21049_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:11.49 +64:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00933_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 00933_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:56.28 +74:46:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02355_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 02355_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 01992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:39.74 +73:48:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:30.023 +70:00:08.75
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:29.418 +70:00:07.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00093 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00093 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00161 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DTiyclGl4k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZzFn5Mi2z5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BxYMYncsBW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AK1fIZBNSr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.614600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.614600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec +63.0104 to +75.4891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec 63.0104 to 75.4891 deg
Loaded 14072 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DTiyclGl4k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=48, blended=8978, passed=107709
Got 107709 stars (including 98551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 348 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.20"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.81"
Excluding outliers - 319 stars left (next iteration limit 259)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=319 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=19.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=23.141 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.694 n_q1=18 n_q2=142 n_q3=19 n_q4=140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.670
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZzFn5Mi2z5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8926, passed=108230
Got 108230 stars (including 99122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.99"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 350 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.71"
Excluding outliers - 317 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=317 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=17.933 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.890 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.233 n_q1=17 n_q2=141 n_q3=18 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.663
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BxYMYncsBW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=554, passed=16299
Got 16299 stars (including 15731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.735 n_q1=378 n_q2=280 n_q3=119 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AK1fIZBNSr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=483, passed=14601
Got 14601 stars (including 14108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14601 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.725 n_q1=333 n_q2=321 n_q3=80 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-05-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-27_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_220722_TTUQ1b1x1_3487387_5VeIEmYf/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:26:15.75 +72:11:08.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:43:53.28 +72:54:51.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:15:25.99 +67:21:40.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:43:49.54 +70:03:32.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:15:25.99 +67:21:40.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:26:15.75 +72:11:08.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:43:53.28 +72:54:51.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:43:49.54 +70:03:32.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:48:30.91 +68:59:10.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:48:30.91 +68:59:10.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:54:59.72 +74:17:25.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1: 15.70 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:54:59.72 +74:17:25.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:09:49.53 +66:41:55.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1: 15.79 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:38:05.78 +65:13:57.1: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=10.4506 delta=5.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:09:49.53 +66:41:55.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:56.74 +71:18:48.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.6472 delta=2.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:36:19.91 +66:51:01.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:36:19.91 +66:51:01.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31696.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07595.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64663.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:24.78 +72:34:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127551_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127551_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:26.04 +65:33:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127612_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127612_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127621_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127621_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:06.52 +66:18:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127625_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127625_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127629_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127629_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:19.51 +64:51:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127640_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127640_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.23 +66:08:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127641_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127641_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:11.51 +64:49:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127651_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127651_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:55.34 +64:56:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127670_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127670_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:37.46 +64:50:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127674_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127674_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:38.00 +64:54:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127690_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127690_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:08.20 +65:21:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127719_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127719_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.04 +66:57:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:50.98 +64:53:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127746_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127746_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:26.62 +65:11:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127747_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127747_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:07.68 +65:36:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127795_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127795_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:40.16 +64:49:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127813_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127813_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:19.99 +64:58:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127836_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127836_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:17.56 +64:54:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127838_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127838_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127865_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127865_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:21.82 +65:25:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127872_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127872_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:56.04 +64:56:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127901_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127901_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:35.69 +65:02:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127923_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127923_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127927_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127927_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:32.63 +64:44:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127934_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 127934_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:28.12 +64:55:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128052_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128052_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:23.04 +66:24:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:40.81 +74:39:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128129_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 128129_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11662_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 11662_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:36.67 +66:45:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.49 +71:13:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94539_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 94539_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:08.70 +71:22:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31696_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 31696_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:15.75 +72:11:08.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.48)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 34347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:30.80 +71:49:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 05660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:56.29 +74:46:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 52588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64663_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 64663_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 15174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:28.62 +73:34:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106980_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 106980_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:16.93 +68:42:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 69092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07595_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 07595_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 40703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 88510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:39.25 +68:54:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91170_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 91170_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:48.94 +69:31:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 75239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:03.42 +68:40:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38799_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 38799_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-27_22-06-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
