######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1265417 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1265417 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits

renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 479.8656
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 557.7404
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5488.9333
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1198.1010
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5556.0985
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1196.1153
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 11.4385
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-26T00:29:36.7526450' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-26T05:29:36.7526450' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61186.2288975925 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-26T05:29:46.6546987' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61186.2290121992 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 148.231892006671 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999820415231 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.7619444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 315.9575 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.7503955157013 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20392 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20392 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 340.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 22.00176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :)
Spent 0.744030 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-26T00:30:14.3496464' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-26T05:30:14.3496464' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61186.2293327432 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-26T05:30:24.2518842' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61186.2294473494 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 148.231892068486 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999820401012 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.67 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 315.98 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.75443055261522 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20392 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20392 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 340.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 22.00176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits :)
Spent 0.720897 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/d_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits

fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Last image: 2461186.72901333 26.05.2026 05:29:36.752 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3279.0 5428.0 3281.0 5430.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 24 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3279.0 5428.0 3281.0 5430.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 24 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3279.0 5428.0 3281.0 5430.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 24 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.4,6.4,5.7,7.0,7.6,8.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.2,6.2,5.5,6.8,7.4,8.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-12T07:30:16.1094936
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-12T07:30:16.1094936
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-12T07:30:16.109
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 12.02.2026 07:30:16.109 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461083.81280219 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8355.538 36.694 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9348.901 7.381 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8754.329 2.065 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9193.431 16.563 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7938.354 21.733 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8579.877 27.594 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8264.356 31.720 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8003.032 43.646 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8732.447 43.473 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8532.294 47.022 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 6024, (6024 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2231
* rejected close to frame edge: 33
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 6
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will not be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.42
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -9.7
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -10.4
Selected detection limit= -10.4
Final detection limit= -10.4 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.06.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
6153 * detected, using 510/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000163, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000163, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1
5748 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000163, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1
5748 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000163, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1
5748 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -0.053
6153 stars detected, 5748 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 5330, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 5330 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 5325 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.46
6429 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 101440 kB used, 112448 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-26T05:29:36.7526450
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-26T05:29:36.7526450
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-05-26T05:29:36.752
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
The star 7955.648 60.478 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7672.358 103.243 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9205.822 126.355 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7565.736 528.242 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7581.943 617.282 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7632.835 871.700 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9409.393 918.471 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8087.664 1135.640 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7857.168 1294.844 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9114.045 2603.409 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 117
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 19
* rejected close to frame edge: 1
* rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
117 * detected, using 100/ 117 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
112 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
112 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
112 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 4.417
117 stars detected, 112 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 39 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 15, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.75
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
6429 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 103872 kB used, 112448 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-26T05:30:14.3496464
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-26T05:30:14.3496464
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-05-26T05:30:14.349
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
The star 7953.650 59.331 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9203.881 125.249 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7580.041 616.160 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7630.823 870.580 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9407.275 917.435 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7855.214 1293.685 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9111.933 2602.311 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8055.086 2935.656 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7568.065 3237.089 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9285.157 3300.258 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 109
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 15
* rejected close to frame edge: 1
* rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
109 * detected, using 100/ 109 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
105 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
105 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
105 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 4.416
109 stars detected, 105 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 36 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 13, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.79
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
6429 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 100408 kB used, 112448 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 12177 (12177 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1224 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2102 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 535 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 484 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1403 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found?
Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list
ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
.........................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 5713 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
Variability index idx00_STD is enabled
Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled
Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled
Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled
Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled
Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled
Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled
Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled
Variability index idx21_eta is enabled
Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled
Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled
Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude
..........
..........
..........
..........
Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ..........................................................................................................................................
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461186.72901333
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:56.802 +53:59:54.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.478 +54:00:05.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:56.802 +53:59:54.59
Second-epoch image center 09:53:00.478 +54:00:05.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.159 +53:59:58.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:56.802 +53:59:54.59
Second-epoch image center 09:52:59.159 +53:59:58.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:00.478 +54:00:05.95
Second-epoch second image center 09:52:59.159 +53:59:58.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00379 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CLKiixR0Jh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vq6RbvBDWD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uSQFBPBfwe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m2j5oZNDuh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.6602 to 163.6364 deg, Dec +47.7117 to +59.3684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.6602 to 163.6364 deg, Dec 47.7117 to 59.3684 deg
Loaded 6252 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4426 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 43289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.6602 to 163.6364 deg, Dec +47.7117 to +59.3684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.6602 to 163.6364 deg, Dec 47.7117 to 59.3684 deg
Loaded 6252 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4426 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 43289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7317 to 163.6362 deg, Dec +47.6486 to +59.3564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7317 to 163.6362 deg, Dec 47.6486 to 59.3564 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3922 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
10.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
10.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 10.9 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CLKiixR0Jh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1886, passed=43275
Got 43275 stars (including 41301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=209 n_q2=237 n_q3=231 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-30-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vq6RbvBDWD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2121, passed=43375
Got 43375 stars (including 41181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=219 n_q2=230 n_q3=231 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uSQFBPBfwe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=31, passed=1371
Got 1371 stars (including 1339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.4 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.4 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.833 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.178 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.176 n_q1=330 n_q2=207 n_q3=268 n_q4=143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.414
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m2j5oZNDuh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=34, passed=1219
Got 1219 stars (including 1184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1219 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.4 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.4 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.877 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.725 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.234 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.482 n_q1=341 n_q2=204 n_q3=250 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.689
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-29-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 52182_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 26.22945 | 2461186.72945 | 8.47 | 10:30:34.78 +50:45:42.7 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 52183_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 26.22945 | 2461186.72945 | 8.43 | 09:24:53.72 +56:29:11.6 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52194_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 52194_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 26.22945 | 2461186.72945 | 9.29 | 10:09:32.92 +54:24:11.2 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40806_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 40806_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 26.22945 | 2461186.72945 | 6.59 | 09:34:49.22 +52:03:03.8 | 6488 4303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits |
**** FOUND 09:34:49.19 +52:03:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39200_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 39200_fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 26.22945 | 2461186.72945 | 5.96 | 09:32:48.96 +51:40:26.1 | 6693 4517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_003056_TTUQ2b1x1_2807280_tFe5JyuO/fd_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-26_00-30-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0163.fits |
**** FOUND 09:32:48.94 +51:40:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461186.72901333 -observatory V36
05:07:36.00 +24:43:57.0 Mercury (-1.1mag)
06:36:08.59 +24:58:51.3 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:12:11.06 +12:34:34.4 Mars (1.3mag)
07:38:01.25 +21:56:20.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:18.97 +02:25:58.2 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:04.81 +20:16:20.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:13.95 +00:11:35.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:56.18 -23:00:04.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:21:01.77 -06:01:57.2 Moon (-11.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 26 00:33 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461186.72901333:
07:37:55.93 +21:56:34.6 Io (5.9mag)
07:38:11.40 +21:55:51.8 Europa (6.1mag)
07:37:54.70 +21:56:44.2 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:37:39.18 +21:57:15.0 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:39:06.20 +21:32:41.2 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:38:02.97 +21:56:17.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:39:24.51 +21:53:55.5 Elara (17.5mag)
07:39:29.20 +22:15:04.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:45:08.27 +21:57:10.6 Carme (18.8mag)
00:45:21.30 +02:25:38.4 Titan (8.7mag)
00:45:14.97 +02:26:05.6 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:45:41.73 +02:26:05.5 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:45:33.67 +02:26:01.4 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:16.56 +02:29:44.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 26 00:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461186.72901333:
17:17:17.64 -33:22:00.4 JWST
16:08:54.72 +51:41:35.9 Chandra
08:28:40.44 -46:36:43.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 26 00:33 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461186.72901333 -observatory V36
13:20:44.50 -27:03:19.8 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:37:27.18 +30:40:14.8 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:26:15.08 +01:21:04.6 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:28:15.21 +24:39:00.4 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:31:41.65 +14:30:15.8 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:59.77 -31:39:39.4 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:40:55.68 -68:15:59.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:44:22.33 +31:48:31.9 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:50.60 +14:33:08.7 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:32.65 +31:02:57.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:18:04.03 +26:51:30.4 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:20:59.53 +31:29:31.3 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:44:02.40 +03:13:16.8 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:36:20.05 +21:12:23.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:24:25.80 -11:02:15.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:12.55 +65:39:57.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:16:59.90 -05:32:22.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:39:38.11 +85:47:28.3 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:53:29.49 +63:55:46.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:26:57.78 +26:29:13.5 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:47:50.62 +12:12:52.0 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:19:46.84 +27:11:18.9 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:05:01.78 -17:11:57.0 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:53:42.27 +36:48:22.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:45:38.11 +53:20:07.6 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:25:00.95 -10:11:29.4 12.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:56.72 +04:37:01.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:36:24.68 +42:23:11.1 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:26.27 -08:57:58.4 16.3mag A/2026 E1
19:59:45.41 -08:07:26.1 9.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:18:44.10 -02:35:51.1 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:43.47 -00:51:55.4 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:51:21.02 -02:34:29.0 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:51:32.06 +23:50:34.2 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:32:20.75 +27:21:20.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:14:55.90 -07:19:06.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:01:47.56 +31:41:34.8 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:38:04.63 +15:23:50.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:51:15.92 +01:49:52.8 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:12:55.39 +28:57:03.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
02:07:32.46 +25:21:43.6 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:20:06.17 +33:19:25.9 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:28:02.15 +20:14:54.8 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:37:40.85 +18:17:35.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:07:39.99 +18:21:05.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:58:55.90 +19:38:37.0 13.0mag 141P/Machholz
05:01:34.48 +16:23:20.5 13.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:46:46.11 +13:43:45.8 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:48:14.00 -26:38:45.7 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:00:02.84 +18:15:14.0 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:45.87 -01:42:00.7 17.6mag 169P/NEAT
17:02:19.07 -09:21:18.2 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
07:05:08.47 +35:51:49.8 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:58:40.53 -07:45:08.1 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:30:07.44 +29:55:57.4 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
22:05:43.22 -27:26:52.7 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:21:43.21 +08:21:36.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:57:15.22 +21:02:15.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:38:50.08 +42:35:03.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 26 00:33 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 26 00:33 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 26 00:33 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:51:00.147 -40:59:30.34 AT 2026myv 2026-05-04.40 19.85
23:01:42.557 -37:41:28.08 AT 2026myu 2026-05-14.36 20.03
17:40:41.796 +55:46:35.59 AT 2026myt 2026-05-13.08 19.76
11:57:21.623 +08:17:50.60 AT 2026mys 2026-05-17.92 20.12
18:08:09.175 +24:46:16.68 AT 2026myr 2026-05-16.11 19.59
19:44:08.720 +05:58:44.85 AT 2026myq 2026-05-18.09 19.96
22:15:03.694 +37:18:03.97 SN 2026myp 2026-05-17.58 17.878
13:28:54.990 -05:49:13.50 AT 2026myo 2026-05-17.76 18.69
13:35:39.060 +60:25:07.59 AT 2026myn 2026-05-17.79 18.94
15:11:37.375 +27:04:22.10 AT 2026mym 2026-05-17.80 19.01
15:45:32.128 +08:10:41.12 AT 2026myl 2026-05-17.84 19.27
16:38:47.743 +40:50:56.52 AT 2026myk 2026-05-17.88 18.14
13:21:16.033 -33:01:10.62 AT 2026myj 2026-05-10.44 20.34
14:04:07.440 +19:21:36.43 AT 2026myi 2026-05-16.96 20.28
12:09:08.262 +13:15:11.92 AT 2026myh 2026-05-05.92 20.33
17:37:21.286 +36:24:32.57 AT 2026myg 2026-05-12.55 19.89
14:40:52.425 +10:22:25.10 AT 2026myf 2026-05-14.32 20.45
21:41:13.013 +64:08:54.76 AT 2026mye 2026-05-17.15 19.242
17:07:33.400 +35:38:40.42 AT 2026myd 2026-05-17.43 20.44
20:38:48.864 -58:53:21.28 AT 2026myc 2026-05-13.27 19.093
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 26 00:33 tns_transients_list.txt