This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.87 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5
78.57140 1.79255 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 5731699
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.650 R1 11.150 R1 M6/8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5731699,2461186.7220,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5731699 20260526.2220 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.94 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6
78.33038 -9.95427 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX22" Gaia DR3 1865309420560696960
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.400 G 16.450 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1865309420560696960,2461186.7220,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1865309420560696960 20260526.2220 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.69 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8
78.41314 -10.34350 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in ASASSN-V 3" ASASSN-V J211041.89+325047.8
Type: L
MeanMag 13.09 m Amp. 0.11 m Period d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461186.7220,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260526.2220 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.58 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6
80.08851 -4.73997 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 2.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1882 Cyg
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.900 B 16.800 B 2458653.90220 105.471053700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1882 Cyg,2461186.7220,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1882 Cyg 20260526.2220 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.73 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3
79.00556 -10.33626 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1866779227087209600 | 21:12:32.39 +33:16:59.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.894+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1866779227087209600,2461186.7220,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1866779227087209600 20260526.2220 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 12.14 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1
74.20372 1.05453 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 8471320
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.623 g Y 0.400 R1 2458236.76390 72.146757600000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8471320,2461186.7220,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8471320 20260526.2220 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 10.51 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1
80.66395 -2.14662 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSV 25332
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.729 g Y 0.536 g 2458379.25230 162.341686400000 em
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 25332,2461186.7220,10.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 25332 20260526.2220 10.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.64 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7
77.47683 -4.22733 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J204506.66+360505.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 V 13.920 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204506.66+360505.9,2461186.7220,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204506.66+360505.9 20260526.2220 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.06 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7
77.97189 -10.35266 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J210921.07+323100.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.050 g Y 0.160 g 2458805.68900 256.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J210921.07+323100.5,2461186.7220,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J210921.07+323100.5 20260526.2220 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 12.15 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7
75.77121 -5.74172 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1840 Cyg
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.000 B 18.000 B 2458457.22760 462.879130000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1840 Cyg,2461186.7220,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1840 Cyg 20260526.2220 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 10.89 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7
73.94083 -2.85109 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2029207+340545
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.101 g Y 0.459 g 2458378.43800 99.002726800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2029207+340545,2461186.7220,10.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2029207+340545 20260526.2220 10.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.36 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2
78.26277 -10.28935 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1865243411198623488 | 21:10:01.68 +32:46:19.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1865243411198623488,2461186.7220,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1865243411198623488 20260526.2220 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.54 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5
75.05392 -5.91172 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0373 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.690 V 13.880 V 2427303.00000 297.171700000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0373 Cyg,2461186.7220,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0373 Cyg 20260526.2220 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.70 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2
78.20547 -10.33925 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1865236371755272576 | 21:10:01.68 +32:41:52.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.277+/-0.027 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1865236371755272576,2461186.7220,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1865236371755272576 20260526.2220 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 10.43 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4
77.84155 -5.16005 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J204949.81+354711.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.010 V 12.400 V 2457509.00000 41.910000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204949.81+354711.5,2461186.7220,10.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204949.81+354711.5 20260526.2220 10.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.96 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7
76.00825 -4.81746 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J204257.72+343407.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.740 V 15.160 V 2458652.73430 206.190957000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204257.72+343407.0,2461186.7220,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204257.72+343407.0 20260526.2220 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.63 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5
78.15264 -10.65731 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1853216785522870144 | 21:10:59.55 +32:26:46.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1853216785522870144,2461186.7220,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1853216785522870144 20260526.2220 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.91 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8
77.73992 -9.99565 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J316.8343+32.5835 | 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.705+/-0.026 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J316.8343+32.5835,2461186.7220,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J316.8343+32.5835 20260526.2220 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.74 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3
77.90633 -10.14473 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX13" ZTF J210825.11+323638.0
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.536 r Y 0.346 r 2458388.73480 0.416531200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J210825.11+323638.0,2461186.7220,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J210825.11+323638.0 20260526.2220 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 12.34 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2
83.04548 -1.32183 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J312.8723+42.2373 | 20:51:29.36 +42:14:14.2 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.831+/-0.038 (Very red!)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J312.8723+42.2373,2461186.7220,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J312.8723+42.2373 20260526.2220 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.89 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6
77.55257 -9.60141 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 2.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J210522.85+324218.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.730 V 14.540 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J210522.85+324218.7,2461186.7220,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J210522.85+324218.7 20260526.2220 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.86 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0
79.11785 -10.37733 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1866780322293788032 | 21:13:02.42 +33:20:13.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.609+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1866780322293788032,2461186.7220,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1866780322293788032 20260526.2220 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.71 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9
79.24058 -10.52650 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J211357.62+331929.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.260 V 13.710 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J211357.62+331929.7,2461186.7220,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J211357.62+331929.7 20260526.2220 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.24 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2
79.33643 -10.30101 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J318.3671+33.5512 | 21:13:27.92 +33:32:48.5 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.723+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J318.3671+33.5512,2461186.7220,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J318.3671+33.5512 20260526.2220 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 11.79 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4
77.25487 -9.40966 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J210346.67+323634.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.150 V 13.240 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J210346.67+323634.8,2461186.7220,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J210346.67+323634.8 20260526.2220 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 26.2220 2461186.7220 12.15 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2
76.43187 -5.47040 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1845 Cyg
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.200 B 18.000 B
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1845 Cyg,2461186.7220,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1845 Cyg 20260526.2220 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.86820926 16.04.2026 08:50:03.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
First image: 2461146.86820926 16.04.2026 08:50:03.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Last image: 2461186.72221700 26.05.2026 05:19:49.549 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31469
Objects passed selection criteria: 31266
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19620.2
Average stars matched: 19088.2 (97.2885 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 26 00:23:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.86820926 16.04.2026 08:50:03.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
First image: 2461146.86820926 16.04.2026 08:50:03.280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Last image: 2461186.72221700 26.05.2026 05:19:49.549 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 287
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 185928
Objects passed selection criteria: 185377
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 119782
Average stars matched: 115244 (96.211 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2008248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 26 00:29:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461186.72179796
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91
Second-epoch image center 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91
Second-epoch image center 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36
Second-epoch second image center 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YHVibnTtFh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s1ukGxYvK1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EUZ3NK7E9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dDrFwGPuwT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33696 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.6154 to 321.8903 deg, Dec +31.8833 to +43.4290 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.6154 to 321.8903 deg, Dec 31.8833 to 43.4290 deg
Loaded 30230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 19717 out of 21424 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21424 out of 33696 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33696 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.6154 to 321.8903 deg, Dec +31.8833 to +43.4290 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.6154 to 321.8903 deg, Dec 31.8833 to 43.4290 deg
Loaded 30230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 19717 out of 21424 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21424 out of 33696 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 33738 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5924 to 321.8922 deg, Dec +31.8846 to +43.4355 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5924 to 321.8922 deg, Dec 31.8846 to 43.4355 deg
Loaded 30281 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 19548 out of 21241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21241 out of 33738 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.4 pix Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
14.9 mag. Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YHVibnTtFh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3427, passed=33696
Got 33696 stars (including 30227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=251 n_q2=233 n_q3=235 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s1ukGxYvK1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3423, passed=33738
Got 33738 stars (including 30270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33738 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=255 n_q2=235 n_q3=228 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -region wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1EUZ3NK7E9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, passed=5810
Got 5810 stars (including 5561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5810 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.710 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=315 n_q2=131 n_q3=338 n_q4=121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dDrFwGPuwT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, passed=5726
Got 5726 stars (including 5482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5726 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=306 n_q2=135 n_q3=342 n_q4=117 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.113
ref2=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new2=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.515
reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.141
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109_astrometric_residuals.png (900 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52089_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 52089_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:19.95 +32:08:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52101_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 52101_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:39.51 +33:45:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 52115_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:23.14 +32:45:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03710_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 03710_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:13.47 +33:58:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01665_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 01665_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:09:40.16 +32:39:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08945_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 08945_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:36.92 +35:33:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03195_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 03195_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:03.72 +33:04:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91
Second-epoch image center 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0337 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:43:27.656 +37:59:13.91
Second-epoch image center 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:43:35.870 +38:00:26.36
Second-epoch second image center 20:43:35.311 +38:00:19.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KCz1Dwsvjj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ebaNCbju2O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BLm3oAlING
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iDErLWfbWF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits and wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 201967 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5969 to 321.9130 deg, Dec +31.8833 to +43.4300 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5969 to 321.9130 deg, Dec 31.8833 to 43.4300 deg
Loaded 30291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16290 out of 22956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22956 out of 201967 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.675800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.675800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.99
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 201967 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5969 to 321.9130 deg, Dec +31.8833 to +43.4300 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5969 to 321.9130 deg, Dec 31.8833 to 43.4300 deg
Loaded 30291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16290 out of 22956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22956 out of 201967 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 204233 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5762 to 321.9124 deg, Dec +31.8846 to +43.4366 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5762 to 321.9124 deg, Dec 31.8846 to 43.4366 deg
Loaded 30343 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16043 out of 22718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22718 out of 204233 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 185 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.4 pix Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
15.0 mag. Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KCz1Dwsvjj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=32003, passed=201946
Got 201946 stars (including 169674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 201946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=261 n_q2=219 n_q3=238 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ebaNCbju2O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=32236, passed=204199
Got 204199 stars (including 171661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 204199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 196784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=271 n_q2=220 n_q3=229 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -region wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BLm3oAlING (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1812, passed=38337
Got 38337 stars (including 36482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.786 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=305 n_q2=126 n_q3=346 n_q4=125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.432
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iDErLWfbWF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1718, passed=37569
Got 37569 stars (including 35807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.555 n_q1=301 n_q2=128 n_q3=348 n_q4=125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.468
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-26_CI_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_002051_TTUQ1b1x1_2610510_YiqM6r4Y/wcs_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:16:34.58 +34:54:38.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:23.87 +33:21:04.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:34.53 +33:18:10.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:08:31.08 +34:25:51.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:09:51.68 +42:33:38.9: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:52:28.49 +39:59:15.8: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:29:33.96 +39:27:44.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:30:28.21 +35:32:35.1: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:03:40.61 +43:03:03.7: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:29:33.96 +39:27:44.7: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:08:31.08 +34:25:51.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:52:28.49 +39:59:15.8: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:09:51.68 +42:33:38.9: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:34.53 +33:18:10.0: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:23.87 +33:21:04.5: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:30:28.21 +35:32:35.1: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:16:34.58 +34:54:38.2: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:31.08 +34:25:51.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5985 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:33.96 +39:27:44.7: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1034 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:28.49 +39:59:15.8: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9603 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:51.68 +42:33:38.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2316 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:34.53 +33:18:10.0: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6858 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:23.87 +33:21:04.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6390 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:28.21 +35:32:35.1: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6793 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:34.58 +34:54:38.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4704 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:03:40.61 +43:03:03.7: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:40.61 +43:03:03.7: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6310 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:18:54.19 +38:58:53.2: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:12:51.65 +33:07:36.4: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:18:07.79 +32:09:15.9: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:23:20.63 +40:46:46.5: 11.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:19:43.27 +38:20:41.7: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:18:54.19 +38:58:53.2: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:54.19 +38:58:53.2: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4512 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:12:51.65 +33:07:36.4: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:51.65 +33:07:36.4: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3006 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:18:07.79 +32:09:15.9: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:07.79 +32:09:15.9: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4630 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:23:20.63 +40:46:46.5: 11.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:20.63 +40:46:46.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7633 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:19:43.27 +38:20:41.7: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:43.27 +38:20:41.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6437 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:14:19.34 +42:16:43.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:12:38.51 +33:09:03.4: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:14:19.34 +42:16:43.4: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:19.34 +42:16:43.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9908 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:17:21.19 +34:43:07.0: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:52.01 +32:25:04.9: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:19:39.43 +35:00:13.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:56.58 +33:11:48.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:12:38.51 +33:09:03.4: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:12:38.51 +33:09:03.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6172 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:17:21.19 +34:43:07.0: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:52.01 +32:25:04.9: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:19:39.43 +35:00:13.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:21.19 +34:43:07.0: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5551 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:52.01 +32:25:04.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4888 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:39.43 +35:00:13.4: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6223 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:56.58 +33:11:48.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:56.58 +33:11:48.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4387 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:23:02.75 +40:46:26.9: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:21:55.01 +36:34:20.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:10:50.44 +37:12:29.5: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:20:03.93 +35:22:13.5: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:14:28.15 +33:41:16.1: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:23:02.75 +40:46:26.9: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:02.75 +40:46:26.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1485 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:21:55.01 +36:34:20.9: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:10:50.44 +37:12:29.5: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:15:52.49 +33:51:48.6: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:28:43.22 +39:58:01.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:55.01 +36:34:20.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8937 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:50.44 +37:12:29.5: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0161 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:20:03.93 +35:22:13.5: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:03.93 +35:22:13.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9170 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:19:54.22 +41:35:12.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:14:28.15 +33:41:16.1: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:28.15 +33:41:16.1: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6329 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:15:52.49 +33:51:48.6: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:21:14.91 +36:55:13.2: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:52.49 +33:51:48.6: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8994 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:28:43.22 +39:58:01.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:43.22 +39:58:01.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1980 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:19:54.22 +41:35:12.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:54.22 +41:35:12.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2244 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:18:13.18 +35:14:08.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:21:14.91 +36:55:13.2: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:14.91 +36:55:13.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8388 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:18:13.18 +35:14:08.0: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:13.18 +35:14:08.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7020 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:18:16.54 +35:45:42.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:16:27.78 +34:57:56.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:18:16.54 +35:45:42.2: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:16.54 +35:45:42.2: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4906 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8335 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9392 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6872 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:16:27.78 +34:57:56.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:27.78 +34:57:56.4: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6560 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5821 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7290 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1425 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5126 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0582 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6460 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1512 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:44:53.93 +36:43:16.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8922 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3487 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:44:53.93 +36:43:16.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:53.93 +36:43:16.9: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3032 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5313 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6956 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:53:08.66 +39:20:37.9: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:53:08.66 +39:20:37.9: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:08.66 +39:20:37.9: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9612 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4288 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9317 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5833 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8960 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7516 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3289 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8775 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8194 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:12:15.43 +33:18:51.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:12:15.43 +33:18:51.1: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:15.43 +33:18:51.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9172 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:08:15.03 +42:11:13.1: 10.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:08:15.03 +42:11:13.1: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:15.03 +42:11:13.1: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0138 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6709 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2394 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7862 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-50-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0282.fits at 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits at 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1496 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229811.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05772.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07899.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08692.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10440.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13500.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162192.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191569.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24162.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28772.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229543_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229543_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:05.57 +39:18:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229556_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229556_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229563_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229563_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229564_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229564_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229565_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229565_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229569_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229569_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229572_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229572_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229574_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229574_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229576_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229576_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229580_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229580_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229582_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229582_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229584_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229584_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:10.53 +35:12:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229586_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229586_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:03.50 +34:55:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229587_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229587_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:19.95 +32:08:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229595_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229595_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:33.95 +32:46:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229599_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229599_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229601_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229601_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:16.49 +33:39:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229603_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229603_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:39.50 +33:45:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229607_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229607_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229608_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229608_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229615_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229615_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:34.36 +33:39:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229619_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229619_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:17.81 +34:46:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229628_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229628_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:23.20 +32:45:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229630_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229630_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:28.12 +32:47:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229632_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229632_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:04.39 +32:15:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229633_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229633_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:36.45 +35:28:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229636_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229636_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:33.96 +35:07:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229637_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229637_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:21:11.24 +35:43:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229641_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229641_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:52.39 +35:16:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229642_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229642_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:45.51 +35:40:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229646_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229646_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:02.58 +33:31:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229647_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229647_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229649_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229649_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:10.26 +40:13:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229651_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229651_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229656_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229656_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:46.19 +35:02:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229657_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229657_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:50.95 +33:27:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229668_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229668_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229675_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229675_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:42.35 +33:39:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229678_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229678_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:30.62 +32:17:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229681_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229681_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:20.09 +33:42:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229682_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229682_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:26.27 +40:15:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229684_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229684_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:20.58 +34:01:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229685_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229685_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:07.13 +34:10:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229687_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229687_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:26.97 +33:27:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229689_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229689_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:21.11 +34:38:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229690_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229690_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:00.24 +33:27:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229691_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229691_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:10.86 +34:09:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229693_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229693_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:46.02 +35:19:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229694_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229694_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:24.61 +40:13:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229696_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229696_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:15.95 +33:58:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229697_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229697_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229699_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229699_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:15.69 +32:44:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229703_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229703_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229710_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229710_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:05.06 +32:40:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229711_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229711_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:45.69 +33:46:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229712_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229712_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229715_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229715_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:12.60 +35:27:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229720_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229720_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:02.42 +32:17:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229725_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229725_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:39.03 +35:03:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229727_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229727_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:42.24 +38:00:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229730_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229730_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:26.72 +33:16:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229735_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229735_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:04.23 +33:48:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229740_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229740_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:14.60 +33:50:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229746_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229746_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229748_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229748_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229752_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229752_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229754_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229754_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:22.51 +39:23:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229756_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229756_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:04.54 +33:28:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229759_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229759_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229763_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229763_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:52.90 +38:28:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229766_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229766_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229771_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229771_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:46.92 +33:52:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229775_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229775_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:58.32 +40:46:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229776_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229776_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:08.01 +33:54:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229783_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229783_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:46.75 +33:29:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229785_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229785_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229787_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229787_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:42.98 +33:29:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229791_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229791_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:09.70 +33:42:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229796_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229796_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229800_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229800_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229801_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229801_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:38.05 +35:33:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229803_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229803_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:34.45 +33:14:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229806_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229806_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:47.94 +33:48:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229811_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229811_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:38.51 +33:09:03.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.723 1866753766520131584 318.16060208946 +33.14963804902 12.1569 11.4367 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.723#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229819_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229819_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:15.38 +35:11:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229820_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229820_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:27.85 +33:59:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229827_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229827_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:21.77 +34:36:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229833_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229833_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229836_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229836_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:15.08 +34:37:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229837_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229837_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229839_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229839_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229841_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229841_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:38.46 +42:43:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229843_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229843_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229845_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229845_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:20.26 +35:14:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229846_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229846_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:09.47 +32:54:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229857_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229857_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:51.52 +33:52:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229862_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229862_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:45.79 +33:51:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229864_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229864_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:43.61 +35:10:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229867_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229867_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229868_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229868_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229871_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229871_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229872_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229872_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229876_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229876_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229878_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229878_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229884_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229884_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:02.09 +34:37:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229885_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229885_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229886_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229886_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229891_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229891_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229894_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229894_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:17.50 +32:54:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229899_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229899_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229902_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229902_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:25.81 +42:04:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229906_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229906_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:52.53 +32:17:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229910_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229910_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229915_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229915_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:45.38 +40:22:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229919_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229919_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:19.14 +33:28:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229924_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229924_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:41.97 +41:52:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229926_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229926_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:15.15 +33:46:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229928_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229928_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229942_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229942_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229947_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229947_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229951_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 229951_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24987_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 24987_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:11:11.56 +33:25:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113670_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 113670_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:49.28 +38:13:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191569_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 191569_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46221_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 46221_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:52.59 +34:57:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81093_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 81093_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16474_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 16474_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103239_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 103239_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:05.28 +37:27:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13500_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 13500_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61109_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 61109_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113128_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 113128_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08418_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 08418_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:59.74 +32:48:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22752_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 22752_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152152_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 152152_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:03.26 +43:10:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75326_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 75326_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198640_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 198640_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70234_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 70234_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06854_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 06854_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21370_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 21370_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23680_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 23680_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12149_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 12149_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84762_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 84762_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08692_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 08692_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10440_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 10440_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144814_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 144814_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66974_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 66974_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35970_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 35970_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06414_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 06414_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92125_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 92125_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:15.24 +37:14:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06922_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 06922_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19491_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 19491_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:03.71 +33:04:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07899_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 07899_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162192_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 162192_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08147_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 08147_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107333_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 107333_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:19.08 +37:55:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24162_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 24162_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213491_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 213491_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:54.46 +35:41:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23240_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 23240_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133359_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 133359_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:54.51 +38:11:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24757_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 24757_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:25.17 +33:20:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213292_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 213292_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:00.10 +33:46:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213257_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 213257_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24393_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 24393_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199340_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 199340_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:50:41.45 +39:49:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118598_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 118598_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:39.67 +38:25:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28772_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 28772_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 09888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:09:40.17 +32:39:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23108_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 23108_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:22.24 +33:48:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54715_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 54715_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:36.94 +35:33:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 05772_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35603_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
Preparing report for the candidate 35603_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135942_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 135942_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:13.93 +38:37:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12390_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 12390_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:28.78 +33:26:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64457_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 64457_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:12.12 +35:33:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83444_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 83444_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:24.47 +36:29:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 51888_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:54.51 +35:15:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37228_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 37228_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:10.82 +34:22:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29653_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 29653_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:13.46 +33:58:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175052_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 175052_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:57:10.28 +41:09:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196324_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 196324_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:14.11 +40:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63405_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 63405_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:17:55.09 +34:53:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113677_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 113677_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:47.59 +38:01:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132808_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 132808_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:47.70 +38:02:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83872_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109
The candidate 83872_fd_Cyg-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-26_00-19-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:32.47 +36:48:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 46s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1
########### Completed Cyg-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2
###################################################################################
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1 -- a known variable star
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5 -- a known variable star
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7 -- a known variable star
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7 -- a known variable star
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5 -- a known variable star
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7 -- a known variable star
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7 -- a known variable star
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2 -- a known variable star
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1 -- a known variable star
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4 -- a known variable star
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2 -- not a known variable star
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6 -- a known variable star
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4 -- a known variable star
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6 -- a known variable star
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8 -- not a known variable star
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3 -- a known variable star
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6 -- a known variable star
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7 -- a known variable star
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2 -- not a known variable star
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2 -- not a known variable star
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8 -- a known variable star
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5 -- not a known variable star
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3 -- not a known variable star
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0 -- not a known variable star
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2 -- not a known variable star
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9 -- a known variable star
Found 8 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
26 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
20:14:20.64 +36:32:17.1
20:23:49.16 +40:33:38.5
20:29:20.76 +34:05:46.7
20:42:57.59 +34:34:07.7
20:44:18.35 +33:08:48.5
20:45:06.54 +36:05:06.7
20:45:46.55 +33:48:47.7
20:46:43.11 +34:29:50.2
20:46:54.38 +39:52:14.1
20:49:49.75 +35:47:11.4
20:51:29.23 +42:14:14.2
20:55:19.53 +37:46:50.6
21:03:46.44 +32:36:36.4
21:05:22.62 +32:42:20.6
21:07:21.76 +32:35:02.8
21:08:24.50 +32:36:28.3
21:09:03.25 +33:02:46.6
21:09:20.93 +32:31:03.7
21:10:01.75 +32:41:52.2
21:10:01.90 +32:46:23.2
21:10:41.65 +32:50:48.8
21:10:59.21 +32:26:47.5
21:12:32.25 +33:17:00.3
21:13:02.36 +33:20:14.0
21:13:27.99 +33:32:50.2
21:13:57.37 +33:19:30.9
21:12:38.51 +33:09:03.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461186.72179796 -observatory V36
05:07:32.26 +24:43:50.1 Mercury (-1.1mag)
06:36:06.32 +24:58:52.6 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:12:09.81 +12:34:27.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:38:00.91 +21:56:21.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:18.82 +02:25:57.4 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:04.70 +20:16:20.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:13.91 +00:11:34.8 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:56.20 -23:00:04.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:20:49.41 -05:59:33.7 Moon (-11.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 26 00:23 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461186.72179796:
07:37:55.67 +21:56:35.1 Io (5.9mag)
07:38:11.15 +21:55:52.4 Europa (6.1mag)
07:37:54.26 +21:56:45.2 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:37:38.90 +21:57:15.7 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:39:05.89 +21:32:42.0 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:38:02.39 +21:56:18.8 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:39:24.21 +21:53:56.5 Elara (17.5mag)
07:39:28.84 +22:15:05.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:45:07.95 +21:57:11.3 Carme (18.8mag)
00:45:21.12 +02:25:37.6 Titan (8.7mag)
00:45:14.82 +02:26:04.9 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:45:41.57 +02:26:04.6 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:45:33.53 +02:26:00.5 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:16.42 +02:29:44.0 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 26 00:23 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461186.72179796:
17:17:19.04 -33:21:45.0 JWST
16:08:00.52 +51:48:14.1 Chandra
08:26:47.81 -46:15:56.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 26 00:23 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461186.72179796 -observatory V36
13:20:44.89 -27:03:22.5 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:37:26.41 +30:40:15.5 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:26:15.49 +01:21:03.6 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:28:14.50 +24:38:59.5 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:31:38.63 +14:30:39.6 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:59.97 -31:39:37.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:40:55.27 -68:15:59.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:44:22.17 +31:48:31.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:50.77 +14:33:06.8 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:32.68 +31:02:55.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:18:03.49 +26:51:30.1 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:20:59.26 +31:29:32.1 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:44:02.20 +03:13:15.2 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:36:20.30 +21:12:22.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:24:25.99 -11:02:15.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:12.53 +65:39:55.7 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:17:00.86 -05:32:20.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:39:39.66 +85:47:33.6 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:53:28.96 +63:55:45.6 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:26:57.08 +26:29:10.5 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:47:50.99 +12:12:49.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:19:47.01 +27:11:10.9 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:05:01.34 -17:11:59.7 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:53:41.86 +36:48:27.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:45:38.64 +53:20:08.5 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:25:00.08 -10:11:27.6 12.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:56.79 +04:37:01.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:36:23.81 +42:23:08.8 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:26.31 -08:58:10.2 16.3mag A/2026 E1
19:59:44.61 -08:07:25.9 9.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:18:44.31 -02:35:46.8 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:43.42 -00:51:55.3 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:51:20.74 -02:34:28.9 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:51:31.38 +23:50:30.5 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:32:19.83 +27:21:27.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:14:55.46 -07:19:08.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:01:46.18 +31:41:30.6 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:38:03.60 +15:23:47.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:51:14.89 +01:49:46.4 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:12:54.00 +28:56:59.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
02:07:31.31 +25:21:38.8 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:20:05.16 +33:19:26.2 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:28:01.43 +20:15:06.3 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:37:40.13 +18:17:33.2 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:07:39.12 +18:21:03.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:58:53.79 +19:38:37.8 13.0mag 141P/Machholz
05:01:32.40 +16:23:16.7 13.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:46:43.80 +13:43:39.6 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:48:13.66 -26:38:49.9 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:00:01.47 +18:15:02.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:45.73 -01:42:06.8 17.6mag 169P/NEAT
17:02:19.41 -09:21:20.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
07:05:07.48 +35:51:50.3 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:58:39.40 -07:45:18.2 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:30:06.33 +29:55:51.9 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
22:05:38.85 -27:27:25.2 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:21:43.45 +08:21:36.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:57:14.90 +21:02:16.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:38:49.37 +42:35:04.8 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 26 00:23 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 26 00:23 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 26 00:23 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:51:00.147 -40:59:30.34 AT 2026myv 2026-05-04.40 19.85
23:01:42.557 -37:41:28.08 AT 2026myu 2026-05-14.36 20.03
17:40:41.796 +55:46:35.59 AT 2026myt 2026-05-13.08 19.76
11:57:21.623 +08:17:50.60 AT 2026mys 2026-05-17.92 20.12
18:08:09.175 +24:46:16.68 AT 2026myr 2026-05-16.11 19.59
19:44:08.720 +05:58:44.85 AT 2026myq 2026-05-18.09 19.96
22:15:03.694 +37:18:03.97 SN 2026myp 2026-05-17.58 17.878
13:28:54.990 -05:49:13.50 AT 2026myo 2026-05-17.76 18.69
13:35:39.060 +60:25:07.59 AT 2026myn 2026-05-17.79 18.94
15:11:37.375 +27:04:22.10 AT 2026mym 2026-05-17.80 19.01
15:45:32.128 +08:10:41.12 AT 2026myl 2026-05-17.84 19.27
16:38:47.743 +40:50:56.52 AT 2026myk 2026-05-17.88 18.14
13:21:16.033 -33:01:10.62 AT 2026myj 2026-05-10.44 20.34
14:04:07.440 +19:21:36.43 AT 2026myi 2026-05-16.96 20.28
12:09:08.262 +13:15:11.92 AT 2026myh 2026-05-05.92 20.33
17:37:21.286 +36:24:32.57 AT 2026myg 2026-05-12.55 19.89
14:40:52.425 +10:22:25.10 AT 2026myf 2026-05-14.32 20.45
21:41:13.013 +64:08:54.76 AT 2026mye 2026-05-17.15 19.242
17:07:33.400 +35:38:40.42 AT 2026myd 2026-05-17.43 20.44
20:38:48.864 -58:53:21.28 AT 2026myc 2026-05-13.27 19.093
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 26 00:23 tns_transients_list.txt
