This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.3837 2461185.8837 12.35 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8
130.03870 -8.33716 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ET Per
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 pg 13.700 pg 2428183.25100 0.394013700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.3837* 01 39 22.18 +53 52 18.8 12.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ET Per,2461185.8837,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ET Per 20260525.3837 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.3837 2461185.8837 11.93 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8
124.09858 -7.53561 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0059342+551904
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.004 R1 Y 0.612 R1 440.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.3837* 00 59 34.16 +55 19 03.8 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0059342+551904,2461185.8837,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0059342+551904 20260525.3837 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.3837 2461185.8837 13.37 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8
131.46487 -7.03212 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" KU Per
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.000 pg < 17.500 pg 2429165.00000 256.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.3837* 01 50 43.54 +54 51 15.8 13.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KU Per,2461185.8837,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KU Per 20260525.3837 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 3
Ref. image: 2461032.71737459 23.12.2025 05:12:51.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461032.71737459 23.12.2025 05:12:51.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461185.88394435 25.05.2026 09:12:42.792 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24100
Objects passed selection criteria: 23928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 3
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 3
Average stars detected per image: 19480
Average stars matched: 17941.7 (92.103 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 06:52:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
***** IMAGE PROCESSING ERROR (less than 4 images processed) *****
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.71737459 23.12.2025 05:12:51.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461032.71737459 23.12.2025 05:12:51.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461185.88394435 25.05.2026 09:12:42.792 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 185884
Objects passed selection criteria: 185311
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125291
Average stars matched: 114024 (91.0071 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2008948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 06:56:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Last image: 2461185.88337006 25.05.2026 09:11:53.173 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Cas-05-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 23.12.2025 05:12:51.165 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461032.71737459 ap= 6.0 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 25453 *matched= 25453 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
exp_start= 21.01.2026 01:38:29.318 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461061.56851063 ap= 5.8 rotation= -0.138 *detected= 26503 *matched= 24064 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
exp_start= 25.05.2026 09:11:53.173 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461185.88337006 ap= 6.3 rotation= -174.375 *detected= 6394 *matched= 4393 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
exp_start= 25.05.2026 09:12:42.792 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461185.88394435 ap= 6.4 rotation= -174.364 *detected= 6484 *matched= 4308 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.88337006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
NOT SAVING wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/ as this is the run with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:49.977 +54:00:10.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Image size: 939.0'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:36.799 +54:01:28.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:49.977 +54:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 01:24:36.799 +54:01:28.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0389 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:40.536 +54:00:46.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:49.977 +54:00:10.09
Second-epoch image center 01:24:40.536 +54:00:46.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:24:36.799 +54:01:28.15
Second-epoch second image center 01:24:40.536 +54:00:46.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01472 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uHpEOYQlGS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bJrUV1r6wa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O5erTdXtLI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nFoA9ujokZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 225651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6067 to 36.6854 deg, Dec +47.6932 to +59.3762 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6067 to 36.6854 deg, Dec 47.6932 to 59.3762 deg
Loaded 24697 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9669 out of 15216 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15216 out of 225651 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.822900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.822900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 225651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6067 to 36.6854 deg, Dec +47.6932 to +59.3762 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6067 to 36.6854 deg, Dec 47.6932 to 59.3762 deg
Loaded 24697 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9669 out of 15216 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15216 out of 225651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 240111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.4052 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.5529 to 36.6409 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.4052 deg
Loaded 24754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2494 out of 3869 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3869 out of 240111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
1.9 pix Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
15.6 mag. Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uHpEOYQlGS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=36389, passed=225598
Got 225598 stars (including 188870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 225598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 219893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 219894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 219892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=215 n_q2=281 n_q3=205 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bJrUV1r6wa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=39769, passed=240082
Got 240082 stars (including 199972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 240082 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013054 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010443 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 199554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.28"
Excluding outliers - 848 stars left (next iteration limit 894)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=848 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.787 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.143 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.949 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.017 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.231 n_q1=130 n_q2=291 n_q3=214 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.800
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O5erTdXtLI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=5424, passed=77180
Got 77180 stars (including 71651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013042 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010433 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.813 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.821 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.882 n_q1=153 n_q2=297 n_q3=212 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nFoA9ujokZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5305, passed=77934
Got 77934 stars (including 72524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.758 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.802 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.753 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.999 n_q1=145 n_q2=304 n_q3=226 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-11-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_042759_TTUQ2b1x1_292430_RvvGJ06o/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:41:16.31 +55:50:13.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:42:22.47 +53:56:49.4: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:43:59.79 +55:08:32.9: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:35:59.33 +56:00:49.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:21:37.49 +57:52:33.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 00:55:06.68 +54:55:36.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:29:07.78 +51:41:48.1: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:41:59.96 +54:30:49.7: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 00:58:38.25 +54:05:16.5: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:33:23.12 +58:01:43.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:58:38.25 +54:05:16.5: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:21:37.49 +57:52:33.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:35:59.33 +56:00:49.7: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:59.79 +55:08:32.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:29:07.78 +51:41:48.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:41:59.96 +54:30:49.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:41:16.31 +55:50:13.1: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:42:22.47 +53:56:49.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:37.49 +57:52:33.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8176 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:59.33 +56:00:49.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0093 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:38.25 +54:05:16.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6125 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:29:07.78 +51:41:48.1: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9287 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:16.31 +55:50:13.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6078 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:59.96 +54:30:49.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1492 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:59.79 +55:08:32.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3887 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:33:23.12 +58:01:43.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:55:06.68 +54:55:36.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:22.47 +53:56:49.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9653 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:23.12 +58:01:43.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4708 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:06.68 +54:55:36.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7351 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:45:09.54 +51:35:26.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:45:09.54 +51:35:26.2: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:01:32.76 +55:07:51.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:09.54 +51:35:26.2: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6683 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:40:41.46 +54:57:25.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:42:04.61 +52:36:30.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:43:53.74 +55:51:37.7: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:07:26.43 +53:48:35.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:01:32.76 +55:07:51.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:53:06.74 +50:36:54.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:32.76 +55:07:51.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2039 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:40:36.65 +51:01:49.7: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:44:48.14 +56:05:20.8: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:07:26.43 +53:48:35.4: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:42:04.61 +52:36:30.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:53.74 +55:51:37.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:40:41.46 +54:57:25.5: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:53:06.74 +50:36:54.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:26.43 +53:48:35.4: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2866 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:04.61 +52:36:30.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0834 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:53.74 +55:51:37.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0100 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:41.46 +54:57:25.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0038 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:06.74 +50:36:54.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3041 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:40:36.65 +51:01:49.7: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:36.65 +51:01:49.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0460 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:44:48.14 +56:05:20.8: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:48.14 +56:05:20.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2453 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:39:08.71 +52:18:02.1: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:52:48.23 +55:52:03.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:35:52.27 +51:38:58.9: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:39:08.71 +52:18:02.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:08.71 +52:18:02.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5925 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:52:48.23 +55:52:03.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:48.23 +55:52:03.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4263 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-12-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:35:52.27 +51:38:58.9: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:52.27 +51:38:58.9: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4675 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:59:34.16 +55:19:03.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8566 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:39:22.18 +53:52:18.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2758 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_19-38-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:50:43.54 +54:51:15.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3432 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126725.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out237634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260405_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260405_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260407_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260407_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260422_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260422_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260426_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260426_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260436_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260436_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260442_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260442_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260445_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260445_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260449_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260449_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260450_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260450_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260460_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260460_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260468_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260468_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260473_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260473_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:00:55.32 +55:18:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260474_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260474_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:49.40 +58:10:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260476_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 260476_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:20.17 +53:28:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263836_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 263836_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:20.30 +53:46:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264626_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 264626_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:09.26 +55:08:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265367_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 265367_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:48.84 +55:54:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266015_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 266015_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:22.69 +58:15:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266798_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 266798_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:04.68 +50:02:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266894_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 266894_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:50.30 +50:12:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267316_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 267316_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:38.09 +55:52:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267900_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 267900_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:05.60 +58:00:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268610_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 268610_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268959_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 268959_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:10.99 +58:12:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269645_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 269645_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:15.29 +55:50:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269754_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 269754_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:39.08 +55:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269791_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 269791_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:19.15 +57:42:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270158_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270158_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:47.64 +52:12:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270247_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270247_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:53:56.45 +55:34:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270345_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270345_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:12.72 +50:46:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270756_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270756_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270769_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270769_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270792_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 270792_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:34.78 +52:32:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271363_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271363_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271434_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271434_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271502_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271502_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271591_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271591_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:42.02 +56:19:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271785_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271785_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271818_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271818_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:41.87 +51:39:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271905_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 271905_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:53:37.51 +55:36:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272152_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 272152_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272722_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 272722_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:32.55 +57:59:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273410_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 273410_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:13.09 +55:56:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273972_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 273972_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:35:18.30 +56:03:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274509_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 274509_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:23.89 +54:21:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276203_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 276203_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276432_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 276432_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126725_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 126725_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173389_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 173389_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98422_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 98422_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97306_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 97306_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:13.74 +55:19:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239522_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 239522_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:00.82 +51:38:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237634_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 237634_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106302_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 106302_fd_Cas-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_04-12-42_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks