NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Dra-10-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 935984 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 935984 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits_preview.png'
Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits

renamed 'Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits_preview.png'
Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 409.1086 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 569.8782 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 964.6533 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 546.5213 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 962.3873 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 546.2775 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.35794 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T02:55:31.6513315' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T07:55:31.6513315' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.3302274421 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T07:55:41.5511225' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.3303420255 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 254.120432100838 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.0000185963802 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.4002777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.515277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06808340147158 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 56 28' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.6399993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 359.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/d_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits :) Spent 0.554424 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/d_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.6100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T02:56:07.2056656' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T07:56:07.2056656' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.330638947 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T07:56:17.1065488' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.3307535416 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 254.120432085817 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 54.0000185576312 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.3794444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.270833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06822913476258 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 56 28' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.6100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.6100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 359.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/d_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits :) Spent 0.626925 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/d_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits


fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.83034318 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 Second-epoch second image center 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00172 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oo3RcESbbm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.43ZvneZ7Pe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I1rB13wTjJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yZCqa0QEec Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 11389 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.5543 to 269.5915 deg, Dec +47.7287 to +59.3751 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.5543 to 269.5915 deg, Dec 47.7287 to 59.3751 deg Loaded 8076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5347 out of 5675 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5675 out of 11389 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.871800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.871800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 11389 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.5543 to 269.5915 deg, Dec +47.7287 to +59.3751 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.5543 to 269.5915 deg, Dec 47.7287 to 59.3751 deg Loaded 8076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5347 out of 5675 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5675 out of 11389 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 10100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.1612 to 269.0247 deg, Dec +48.1098 to +59.2672 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.1612 to 269.0247 deg, Dec 48.1098 to 59.2672 deg Loaded 7638 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5394 out of 5618 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5618 out of 10100 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=7.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 2.5 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.4 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.4 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 15.2 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Oo3RcESbbm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=765, passed=11389 Got 11389 stars (including 10611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11389 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=218 n_q2=234 n_q3=248 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.43ZvneZ7Pe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=597, passed=10100 Got 10100 stars (including 9496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10100 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9985 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9985 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=250 n_q2=252 n_q3=228 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.I1rB13wTjJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=596, passed=9554 Got 9554 stars (including 8949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9554 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=258 n_q2=246 n_q3=228 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.yZCqa0QEec (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=609, passed=9470 Got 9470 stars (including 8853 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9470 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=259 n_q2=251 n_q3=225 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.213 ref2=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.101 new1=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.162 new2=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.129 reference average sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.157 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:02:18.58 +52:53:11.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:02:18.58 +52:53:11.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:18.58 +52:53:11.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5173 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22830_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 22830_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    10.94    16:48:35.89 +55:08:06.1   5479 2511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 16:48:35.95 +55:08:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22864_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 22864_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    12.35    16:50:09.75 +51:00:55.6   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22874_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 22874_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    12.52    17:00:27.07 +57:58:30.5   4504 0783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 17:00:27.09 +57:58:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22875_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 22875_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    12.54    17:02:18.61 +52:53:11.3   4248 3855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    12.50    17:02:18.56 +52:53:11.3   4248 3856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:56:27.569 +53:59:39.22 Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:56:28.196 +54:00:02.77 Second-epoch second image center 16:56:28.415 +54:00:08.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00172 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qgSfgTPj6U Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eYD4ITf6sx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fwvt1ruwwI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zqFG70ovnf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 67167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.5544 to 269.5914 deg, Dec +47.6659 to +59.3764 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.5544 to 269.5914 deg, Dec 47.6659 to 59.3764 deg Loaded 8114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4859 out of 5690 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5690 out of 67167 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.745500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.745500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 67167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.5544 to 269.5914 deg, Dec +47.6659 to +59.3764 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.5544 to 269.5914 deg, Dec 47.6659 to 59.3764 deg Loaded 8114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4859 out of 5690 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5690 out of 67167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 55428 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.1058 to 269.0617 deg, Dec +48.1098 to +59.2671 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.1058 to 269.0617 deg, Dec 48.1098 to 59.2671 deg Loaded 7657 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5045 out of 5653 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5653 out of 55428 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 2.3 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.2 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 2.1 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 15.3 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.qgSfgTPj6U (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=4061, passed=67134 Got 67134 stars (including 62957 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67134 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66343 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=229 n_q2=230 n_q3=250 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eYD4ITf6sx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3009, passed=55404 Got 55404 stars (including 52328 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55404 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=240 n_q2=263 n_q3=217 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fwvt1ruwwI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=2922, passed=55430 Got 55430 stars (including 52427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55430 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55066 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=254 n_q2=257 n_q3=209 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zqFG70ovnf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=2980, passed=56028 Got 56028 stars (including 52969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56028 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55531 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55530 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55529 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=255 n_q2=264 n_q3=207 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:51:06.59 +58:01:20.3: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:24:55.37 +52:39:30.4: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:14:03.11 +57:36:47.9: 15.00 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:38:55.62 +53:09:12.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:47:44.44 +55:52:40.1: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:53:20.18 +55:50:36.1: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:51:06.59 +58:01:20.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:06.59 +58:01:20.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4454 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:14:03.11 +57:36:47.9: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:03.11 +57:36:47.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8081 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:24:55.37 +52:39:30.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:55.37 +52:39:30.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7938 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:47:44.44 +55:52:40.1: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:38:55.62 +53:09:12.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:55.62 +53:09:12.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6166 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:44.44 +55:52:40.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9113 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:53:20.18 +55:50:36.1: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:20.18 +55:50:36.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0124 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:07:13.23 +57:33:37.9: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:07:13.23 +57:33:37.9: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:13.23 +57:33:37.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2658 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:34:21.42 +55:04:41.4: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:21:23.63 +57:23:49.1: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:34:21.42 +55:04:41.4: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:57:38.05 +55:59:05.8: 15.02 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:21.42 +55:04:41.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4246 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:31:31.56 +55:48:36.9: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:21:23.63 +57:23:49.1: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:23.63 +57:23:49.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7805 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:28:37.70 +54:07:17.5: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:42:21.78 +57:57:25.6: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:57:38.05 +55:59:05.8: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:38.05 +55:59:05.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9116 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:31:31.56 +55:48:36.9: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:25:25.12 +56:50:39.6: 15.13 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:31.56 +55:48:36.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8905 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:28:37.70 +54:07:17.5: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:37.70 +54:07:17.5: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9821 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 16:31:46.98 +50:34:45.9: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:42:21.78 +57:57:25.6: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:21.78 +57:57:25.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9885 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:25:25.12 +56:50:39.6: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:25.12 +56:50:39.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9063 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0335.fits at 17:32:23.80 +51:40:46.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 16:31:46.98 +50:34:45.9: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:46.98 +50:34:45.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9986 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 17:32:23.80 +51:40:46.8: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:32:23.80 +51:40:46.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4973 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82181.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90521_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90521_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.83    17:24:55.29 +52:39:30.8   2170 3841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.77    17:24:55.44 +52:39:30.0   2170 3842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90526_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90526_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.86    17:14:03.08 +57:36:48.4   3395 0941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.78    17:14:03.15 +57:36:47.3   3395 0943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90561_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90561_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.33    16:51:06.62 +58:01:19.3   5254 0762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.68    16:51:06.56 +58:01:21.2   5255 0763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90562_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90562_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.19    16:34:58.07 +51:30:21.6   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90573_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90573_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.13    17:20:36.71 +56:10:53.7   2778 1759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 17:20:36.69 +56:10:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90575_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90575_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    11.30    16:54:23.22 +54:53:10.0   4978 2663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 16:54:23.21 +54:53:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90603_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90603_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    11.65    16:30:25.20 +57:32:29.4   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90683_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90683_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.49    17:14:07.05 +56:26:41.9   3336 1650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 17:14:07.01 +56:26:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90689_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90689_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.30    17:13:05.45 +54:20:48.4   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90706_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90706_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.66    17:05:06.32 +56:56:49.2   4103 1393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 17:05:06.39 +56:56:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90708_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90708_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.34    17:16:43.74 +49:53:40.5   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90714_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90714_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    13.59    16:38:55.62 +53:09:12.1   6371 3681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.64    16:38:55.63 +53:09:12.9   6372 3682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90720_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90720_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.54    17:22:12.26 +54:18:25.7   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90737_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90737_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    13.88    16:47:44.48 +55:52:41.0   5545 2060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.97    16:47:44.40 +55:52:39.2   5546 2061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90738_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90738_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.92    17:03:54.16 +56:44:27.7   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90773_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90773_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.99    17:30:10.94 +57:28:27.1   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90777_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90777_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.03    16:53:20.15 +55:50:36.5   5071 2084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.00    16:53:20.20 +55:50:35.6   5071 2085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90780_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90780_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.06    17:22:03.50 +52:39:11.6   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90791_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90791_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.90    16:32:05.80 +54:19:06.3   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90807_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90807_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.04    16:42:08.65 +50:05:57.9   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90823_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90823_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    13.95    17:24:37.90 +53:14:54.9   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90827_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90827_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.18    16:35:02.81 +57:49:10.8   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90832_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90832_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.28    17:07:13.41 +57:33:37.6   3947 1011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.25    17:07:13.05 +57:33:38.2   3948 1012   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90836_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90836_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.23    17:07:01.29 +54:32:04.7   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90874_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90874_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.34    17:14:52.92 +57:39:04.9   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90875_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90875_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.57    17:17:19.15 +57:58:49.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90879_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90879_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.27    16:39:57.91 +52:58:59.3   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90887_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90887_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.26    17:03:33.35 +50:21:36.1   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90891_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90891_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.25    16:42:26.17 +50:02:12.3   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90892_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90892_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.32    17:22:46.86 +50:43:58.5   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90898_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90898_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.59    16:30:32.80 +55:58:34.9   7001 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.40    16:35:28.92 +51:40:56.5   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90922_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90922_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.21    17:07:44.13 +49:48:20.3   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90929_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90929_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.21    17:02:50.24 +49:54:00.4   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90998_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 90998_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.72    17:08:42.04 +57:01:23.4   3809 1331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91024_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91024_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.58    16:34:21.41 +55:04:41.4   6712 2496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.34    16:34:21.44 +55:04:41.4   6712 2497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91072_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91072_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.74    17:21:23.66 +57:23:48.9   2787 1017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.84    17:21:23.60 +57:23:49.3   2787 1018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91177_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91177_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.70    16:57:21.89 +51:19:59.4   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91213_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91213_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    15.12    16:25:53.67 +57:56:02.0   7286 0709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91230_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91230_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.56    17:16:53.18 +52:34:15.7   2903 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91303_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91303_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.95    16:26:41.13 +52:54:43.0   7497 3752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 16:26:41.20 +52:54:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91321_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91321_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.84    17:07:59.84 +57:19:43.9   3877 1149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91408_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91408_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.89    16:57:38.01 +55:59:05.3   4708 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.94    16:57:38.10 +55:59:06.3   4708 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91435_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91435_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.90    16:31:31.57 +55:48:37.0   6925 2036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.89    16:31:31.55 +55:48:36.7   6925 2037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91451_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91451_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.89    16:25:23.25 +55:22:49.0   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91523_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91523_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.93    17:27:22.48 +55:47:45.8   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91528_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91528_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.98    16:28:37.83 +54:07:17.6   7257 3036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.98    16:28:37.57 +54:07:17.4   7258 3037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91537_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91537_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.63    16:37:25.30 +58:10:21.8   6349 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91557_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91557_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    14.99    16:42:21.88 +57:57:26.4   5958 0786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.99    16:42:21.67 +57:57:24.9   5958 0787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91602_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91602_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.91    17:15:36.57 +55:32:00.8   3167 2190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91672_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91672_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    15.00    17:25:25.08 +56:50:38.4   2420 1313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.85    17:25:25.17 +56:50:40.8   2420 1314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91770_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91770_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.70    17:20:32.39 +54:26:36.2   2680 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91839_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91839_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.90    17:05:26.16 +56:55:41.0   4075 1403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91909_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91909_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.33034    2461185.83034    15.00    16:31:47.01 +50:34:46.9   7135 5201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-55-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0322.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    15.00    16:31:46.94 +50:34:44.9   7135 5202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91934_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 91934_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.60    16:29:03.68 +51:25:11.8   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92005_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 92005_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.80    16:44:41.06 +51:04:13.8   5884 4962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92128_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 92128_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    14.79    16:45:04.30 +49:56:18.0   5866 5650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82181_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 82181_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    12.48    17:32:23.82 +51:40:46.6   1400 4345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits **** FOUND 17:32:23.80 +51:40:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.886 1416405692244486784 263.09884124238 +51.67980748763 13.0952 12.7352 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09753_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 The candidate 09753_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.33075    2461185.83075    12.90    16:33:48.91 +50:18:59.7   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_030755_TTUQ2b1x1_296002_IplSoYfr/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_02-56-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0323.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Dra-10-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 17:32:23.80 +51:40:46.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.83034318 -observatory V36 04:59:49.46 +24:28:22.3 Mercury (-1.2mag) 06:31:26.30 +25:01:13.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:09:36.48 +12:20:38.1 Mars (1.3mag) 07:37:19.75 +21:57:54.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:45:00.59 +02:24:12.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:56:51.70 +20:15:41.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:09.53 +00:11:08.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:57.96 -22:59:48.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:39:42.42 -00:41:12.7 Moon (-10.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 25 03:10 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.83034318: 07:37:26.86 +21:57:36.5 Io (5.9mag) 07:37:26.80 +21:57:37.2 Europa (6.1mag) 07:37:04.05 +21:58:39.2 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:37:05.82 +21:58:25.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:38:28.03 +21:34:19.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:37:17.31 +21:58:01.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:38:47.36 +21:55:56.8 Elara (17.5mag) 07:38:44.59 +22:17:07.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:44:28.84 +21:58:40.9 Carme (18.8mag) 00:44:58.90 +02:23:56.6 Titan (8.7mag) 00:44:59.35 +02:24:28.0 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:45:21.63 +02:24:10.2 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:45:15.93 +02:24:09.1 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:45:59.19 +02:28:06.9 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 25 03:10 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.83034318: 17:15:56.97 -33:11:56.8 JWST 19:52:40.65 -00:30:25.9 Chandra 19:54:51.27 +17:29:48.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 25 03:10 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.83034318 -observatory V36 13:21:30.20 -27:08:52.1 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:35:52.88 +30:41:37.7 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:27:04.59 +01:18:48.4 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:26:48.63 +24:37:03.6 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 09:25:21.52 +15:19:06.4 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:51:23.92 -31:35:24.9 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:40:04.69 -68:17:06.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:44:03.35 +31:47:54.4 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:20:11.03 +14:29:10.8 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:36.58 +31:00:31.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:16:57.49 +26:50:50.5 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:25.96 +31:31:01.0 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:43:37.41 +03:09:55.7 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:36:51.91 +21:10:08.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:24:48.22 -11:02:34.6 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:16:09.43 +65:36:10.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:18:58.66 -05:28:10.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:42:53.68 +85:58:14.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:52:24.12 +63:54:26.0 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:25:30.56 +26:22:42.5 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:48:35.62 +12:06:39.5 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:20:07.01 +26:54:41.8 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:04:07.96 -17:17:36.9 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:52:51.29 +36:58:18.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:46:45.03 +53:21:31.8 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:23:11.96 -10:07:35.1 12.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:41:05.79 +04:36:12.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:34:36.58 +42:18:25.0 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:31.13 -09:22:45.7 16.2mag A/2026 E1 19:58:04.73 -08:07:20.5 9.5mag 10P/Tempel 14:19:08.52 -02:26:58.6 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:37.35 -00:51:51.1 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:50:45.50 -02:34:20.2 17.7mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:50:07.82 +23:42:47.2 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:30:26.22 +27:35:43.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:14:02.55 -07:23:32.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:58:56.85 +31:32:28.4 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:35:56.55 +15:15:36.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 00:49:07.68 +01:36:30.6 15.3mag 88P/Howell 04:10:02.97 +28:49:48.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 02:05:10.76 +25:11:36.8 18.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:18:02.00 +33:19:50.4 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:26:32.03 +20:38:29.3 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:36:12.43 +18:13:13.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:05:52.09 +18:17:26.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:54:33.52 +19:40:03.6 12.9mag 141P/Machholz 04:57:15.08 +16:15:10.4 12.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 03:41:59.93 +13:30:47.5 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:47:33.80 -26:47:29.7 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:57:15.11 +17:50:44.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:34:27.07 -01:54:46.5 17.6mag 169P/NEAT 17:02:59.99 -09:25:57.6 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 07:03:05.20 +35:52:36.5 17.3mag 240P/NEAT 23:56:21.93 -08:06:04.4 16.8mag 260P/McNaught 03:27:50.66 +29:44:35.9 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 21:56:38.72 -28:34:33.3 17.7mag 320P/McNaught 15:22:12.31 +08:21:52.2 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:56:36.22 +21:03:16.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:37:22.49 +42:38:35.8 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 25 03:10 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 25 03:10 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 25 03:10 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:32:29.870 +24:17:28.39 AT 2026mxe 2026-05-07.78 20.84 18:52:28.230 +41:35:58.05 AT 2026mxd 2026-05-06.77 20.29 16:01:49.510 +16:19:54.29 AT 2026mxc 2026-05-03.86 20.43 13:07:34.620 +48:36:49.59 AT 2026mxb 2026-04-28.84 21.35 12:41:13.920 +28:45:38.69 AT 2026mxa 2026-04-28.86 20.83 17:59:59.500 +26:37:11.25 AT 2026mwz 2026-04-27.89 21.34 12:28:50.550 +41:12:21.53 AT 2026mwy 2026-04-24.82 20.86 14:02:54.920 +52:50:36.73 AT 2026mwx 2026-04-19.86 21.51 12:33:02.940 +24:34:37.91 AT 2026mww 2026-04-15.87 21.01 16:40:46.740 +26:54:33.05 AT 2026mwv 2026-04-12.76 21.07 13:03:52.940 +23:49:42.82 AT 2026mwu 2026-04-03.87 20.84 17:45:23.200 +33:15:24.68 AT 2026mwt 2026-03-30.83 20.98 13:11:30.630 +21:00:44.67 AT 2026mws 2026-03-23.71 21.69 12:21:33.740 +27:53:15.15 AT 2026mwr 2026-03-23.70 21 14:26:34.570 +01:19:55.58 AT 2026mwq 2026-05-11.69 22.6 13:16:20.230 +02:48:58.63 AT 2026mwp 2026-05-03.68 21.84 13:17:52.545 -50:04:09.72 AT 2026mwo 2026-04-12.49 19.69 11:28:16.230 +42:22:52.41 AT 2026mwn 2026-05-12.89 19.9 11:41:30.831 -38:28:36.99 AT 2026mwm 2026-05-15.38 19.89 12:21:50.967 -07:22:18.86 AT 2026mwl 2026-05-10.42 20.48 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 25 03:10 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C