This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2775 2461185.7775 14.26 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5
6.38795 40.46528 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1196 Sheba 1 3 3 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5: 15.55 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.2775* 15 43 00.38 +00 22 53.5 14.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7775,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2775 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2775 2461185.7775 12.23 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9
7.33701 43.34424 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 1 0 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.2775* 15 35 29.66 +01 54 43.9 12.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7775,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2775 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461185.77782433 25.05.2026 06:39:54.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6714
Objects passed selection criteria: 6712
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6386.75
Average stars matched: 6281.5 (98.3521 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112500 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 02:07:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461185.77782433 25.05.2026 06:39:54.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41547
Objects passed selection criteria: 41467
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38709.5
Average stars matched: 37850.5 (97.7809 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 02:09:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.77720771
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0605 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0651 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01512 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ENjisoNf8F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0YLN2QhMPs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dktHeKqXME
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sgD8KAtT5N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.882000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.882000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to +3.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to 3.2884 deg
Loaded 4440 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3648 out of 3812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3812 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ENjisoNf8F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=7163
Got 7163 stars (including 6581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.221 n_q1=214 n_q2=242 n_q3=239 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0YLN2QhMPs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=222 n_q2=240 n_q3=243 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dktHeKqXME (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, passed=6107
Got 6107 stars (including 5776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=255 n_q2=239 n_q3=241 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sgD8KAtT5N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, passed=6153
Got 6153 stars (including 5825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6153 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=260 n_q2=236 n_q3=240 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.196
ref2=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.160
reference average sigma_overall=0.3045 worst_q_ratio=1.1705
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:14:44.80 -02:25:38.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:20:16.85 -02:16:50.0: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:10:58.66 -06:21:34.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:31:51.46 -02:31:27.3: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:20:18.80 -03:01:12.9: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:07:31.47 -00:05:34.7: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:14:44.80 -02:25:38.4: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:20:16.85 -02:16:50.0: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:44.80 -02:25:38.4: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1295 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:07:31.47 -00:05:34.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:16.85 -02:16:50.0: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1423 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:10:58.66 -06:21:34.1: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7188 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:20:18.80 -03:01:12.9: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:07:31.47 -00:05:34.7: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9058 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:58.66 -06:21:34.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0694 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:31:51.46 -02:31:27.3: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:18.80 -03:01:12.9: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1309 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:51.46 -02:31:27.3: ref_mag=11.02 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4628 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20107_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20107_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20148_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20148_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.41 +02:06:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20199_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20241_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:47.97 -06:05:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20250_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20268_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20276_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20276_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20277_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20277_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20279_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 20279_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:11:41.32 -06:00:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0605 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0651 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:38.162 -01:56:07.29
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:41.170 -01:55:36.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01512 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h54yjFkkMg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ttrA3Mout4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I5u0Kq2fq6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n5UPb9n0Pl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.755200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.755200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 41513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to +3.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to 3.2945 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3614 out of 3966 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3966 out of 41513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h54yjFkkMg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1904, passed=46633
Got 46633 stars (including 44634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=212 n_q2=244 n_q3=235 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ttrA3Mout4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1690, passed=41498
Got 41498 stars (including 39727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=215 n_q2=243 n_q3=237 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I5u0Kq2fq6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1104, passed=33905
Got 33905 stars (including 32748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=257 n_q2=234 n_q3=241 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n5UPb9n0Pl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1104, passed=33885
Got 33885 stars (including 32740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=257 n_q2=233 n_q3=241 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_020528_TTUQ1b1x1_2764213_mTaMaD9X/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:13:20.95 +01:53:00.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:51:16.86 -01:11:56.4: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:40:36.21 -00:24:00.3: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:09:30.93 +01:49:04.6: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 14:58:33.65 -06:24:54.4: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:08:31.75 -00:59:06.3: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:26:46.95 -05:55:04.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:18:08.25 +00:47:37.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:13:20.95 +01:53:00.6: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:20.95 +01:53:00.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1239 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:09:30.93 +01:49:04.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:51:16.86 -01:11:56.4: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:40:36.21 -00:24:00.3: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:05.13 -01:30:27.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7910 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:16.86 -01:11:56.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1323 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:30.93 +01:49:04.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7789 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:36.21 -00:24:00.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3530 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:08:31.75 -00:59:06.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:31.75 -00:59:06.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4761 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:26:46.95 -05:55:04.6: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:18:08.25 +00:47:37.0: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:46.95 -05:55:04.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4952 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 14:58:33.65 -06:24:54.4: 13.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:08.25 +00:47:37.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6446 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:33.65 -06:24:54.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3005 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:25:49.55 -01:15:42.7: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:25:43.86 -01:13:50.4: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:49:35.97 -07:06:23.6: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:38:52.41 -05:29:58.8: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:14:07.44 -01:53:57.1: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:25:49.55 -01:15:42.7: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:49.55 -01:15:42.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8036 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:27:15.08 +02:03:42.3: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:39:55.54 -00:18:43.3: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:04.05 +00:16:47.3: 15.75 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:37:36.54 +01:59:01.5: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:25:43.86 -01:13:50.4: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:43.86 -01:13:50.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0236 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:49:35.97 -07:06:23.6: 14.74 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:35.97 -07:06:23.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3070 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:38:52.41 -05:29:58.8: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5: 15.55 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:52.41 -05:29:58.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0027 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:43:00.38 -00:22:53.5: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.2468 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:14:07.44 -01:53:57.1: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:07.44 -01:53:57.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0642 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:27:15.08 +02:03:42.3: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:15.08 +02:03:42.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5729 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:39:55.54 -00:18:43.3: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:04.05 +00:16:47.3: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:55.54 -00:18:43.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5592 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:04.05 +00:16:47.3: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8291 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:37:36.54 +01:59:01.5: 15.41 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:36.54 +01:59:01.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5374 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 14:56:15.29 -05:56:51.4: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 14:55:19.48 -05:32:24.1: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:35:29.66 +01:54:43.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2325 delta=1.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 14:56:15.29 -05:56:51.4: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:15.29 -05:56:51.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6487 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 14:55:19.48 -05:32:24.1: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:19.48 -05:32:24.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0932 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51738_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 51738_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 51743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51745_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 51745_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51748_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 51748_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:10.61 -07:04:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51751_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 51751_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52021_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52021_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:24.30 +02:01:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52053_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52053_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:57.70 -05:31:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52114_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:25.70 +02:01:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52148_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52148_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:28.09 -00:08:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52199_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52199_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52276_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52276_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52348_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52351_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52386_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:06.46 -03:46:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52435_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52441_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:50.04 -02:24:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52492_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52680_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52691_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52793_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 52843_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52904_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52904_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52913_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52913_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52951_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52967_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 52967_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35450_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 35450_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:11:41.32 -06:00:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50035_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 50035_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:47.97 -06:05:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07921_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 07921_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-39-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks