This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2808 2461185.7808 14.24 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5
6.38658 40.46527 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1196 Sheba 1 1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5: 15.61 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.2808* 15 43 00.23 +00 22 56.5 14.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7808,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2808 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2808 2461185.7808 12.20 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1
7.33669 43.34464 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 2 -0 2 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 25.2808* 15 35 29.55 +01 54 44.1 12.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7808,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2808 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461185.78104988 25.05.2026 06:44:32.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5978
Objects passed selection criteria: 5963
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4735.5
Average stars matched: 4384.75 (92.5932 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 02:05:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461185.78104988 25.05.2026 06:44:32.710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 52
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39618
Objects passed selection criteria: 39506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31528.5
Average stars matched: 29000.2 (91.9811 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 02:07:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.78062251
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0032 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00350 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n196qnwrRJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YpfpeKb23Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zlsyGc0BLp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jSlMhiXkFT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.875500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.875500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to +3.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to 3.2884 deg
Loaded 4440 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3648 out of 3812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3812 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.n196qnwrRJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=7163
Got 7163 stars (including 6581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.220 n_q1=214 n_q2=242 n_q3=240 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YpfpeKb23Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=222 n_q2=240 n_q3=243 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zlsyGc0BLp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5569
Got 5569 stars (including 5168 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.734 n_q1=255 n_q2=252 n_q3=231 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.645
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jSlMhiXkFT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, passed=5543
Got 5543 stars (including 5137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.778 n_q1=252 n_q2=250 n_q3=234 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.681
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.254 worst_q_ratio=1.155
ref2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.645
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.681
reference average sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.15
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:31:51.49 -02:31:27.9: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:31:51.49 -02:31:27.9: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:51.49 -02:31:27.9: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5183 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 20376_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.33 +02:06:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20822_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 20822_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20944_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 20944_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:48.09 -06:05:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:11:41.45 -06:00:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0032 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.076 -01:59:47.82
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:43.399 -01:59:36.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00350 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nr9GjhGgwA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4RzIkCGnBc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2OqbYSdY2i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bhOR8OHo24
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 41513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to +3.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to 3.2945 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3614 out of 3966 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3966 out of 41513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nr9GjhGgwA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1904, passed=46634
Got 46634 stars (including 44635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46634 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=212 n_q2=244 n_q3=236 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4RzIkCGnBc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1690, passed=41501
Got 41501 stars (including 39730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=214 n_q2=243 n_q3=238 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2OqbYSdY2i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1891, passed=32674
Got 32674 stars (including 30729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.739 n_q1=273 n_q2=231 n_q3=244 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.651
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bhOR8OHo24 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1874, passed=32541
Got 32541 stars (including 30612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32541 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.739 n_q1=277 n_q2=231 n_q3=245 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.692
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-43-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_020158_TTUQ2b1x1_2705662_McD84nqS/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:12.54 -00:58:16.6: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:36:20.41 -02:20:13.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:24:59.40 +01:43:27.8: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:12.54 -00:58:16.6: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:12.54 -00:58:16.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2714 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:36:20.41 -02:20:13.0: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:24:59.40 +01:43:27.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:20.41 -02:20:13.0: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9829 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:59.40 +01:43:27.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1772 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:21:05.76 -00:39:08.0: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:14:07.34 -01:53:58.2: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:21:05.76 -00:39:08.0: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:40:29.24 -03:43:38.5: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:36:27.56 -02:26:30.8: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:05.76 -00:39:08.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8361 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:39:23.55 -04:52:46.7: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:38:36.73 -01:45:23.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:14:07.34 -01:53:58.2: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:07.34 -01:53:58.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9714 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:28:16.31 -05:26:34.2: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5: 15.61 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:36:27.56 -02:26:30.8: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:43:00.23 -00:22:56.5: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.2306 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:34:32.19 +00:26:15.4: 15.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:27.56 -02:26:30.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5257 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:40:29.24 -03:43:38.5: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:29.24 -03:43:38.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3961 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:39:23.55 -04:52:46.7: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:23.55 -04:52:46.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5938 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:38:36.73 -01:45:23.3: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:36.73 -01:45:23.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6485 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:28:16.31 -05:26:34.2: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:16.31 -05:26:34.2: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5696 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:37:06.16 -01:42:40.8: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:42:45.62 -04:20:05.9: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:34:32.19 +00:26:15.4: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:32.19 +00:26:15.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7768 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:27:04.76 -05:22:53.8: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:36:01.34 -03:33:10.5: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:37:06.16 -01:42:40.8: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:06.16 -01:42:40.8: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7863 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:42:45.62 -04:20:05.9: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:45.62 -04:20:05.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7228 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:27:04.76 -05:22:53.8: 15.55 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:04.76 -05:22:53.8: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7521 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:36:01.34 -03:33:10.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:01.34 -03:33:10.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9245 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:35:29.55 +01:54:44.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1958 delta=1.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51303_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 51303_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51304_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 51304_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51307_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 51307_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51312_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 51312_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:05.10 -01:30:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51741_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 51741_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.52 +02:06:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52063_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 52063_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52197_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 52197_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 53118_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:24.35 +02:02:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 53576_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:57.71 -05:31:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 53922_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:25.61 +02:01:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54024_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 54024_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54543_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 54543_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:32.88 -04:28:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55406_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 55406_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55585_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 55585_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:28.63 -04:25:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55636_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 55636_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:49.45 -01:15:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55743_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 55743_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:08.06 +00:47:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55809_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 55809_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:31.76 -00:59:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56024_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56024_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:06.52 -03:46:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56203_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56203_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56504_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56504_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56665_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56665_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56961_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56961_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:43.79 -01:13:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56993_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 56993_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:34:13.18 -02:42:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57040_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 57040_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:03.04 -04:54:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57055_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 57055_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:29.03 +01:57:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57158_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 57158_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57620_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 57620_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57753_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 57753_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57832_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 57832_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58339_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 58339_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58832_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 58832_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58838_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 58838_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58898_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 58898_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58938_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 58938_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59073_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59073_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59104_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59104_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59106_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59106_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59125_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59125_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59148_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59170_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59170_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59229_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 59229_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35450_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 35450_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:48.09 -06:05:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251
The candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-25_01-44-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0251 did not pass the final checks