This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 10.91 15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6
342.65368 29.13243 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 3 1 3 11.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 11.39 14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3
334.17538 37.54717 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.135 Hertha 2 -1 2 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 12.56 15:07:05.60 -15:27:09.7
344.71337 36.18457 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard 4 0 4 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:07:05.60 -15:27:09.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:07:05.60 -15:27:09.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 13.01 14:48:40.73 -21:58:58.6
335.82607 33.29447 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 3 -0 3 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:48:40.73 -21:58:58.6: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:48:40.73 -21:58:58.6: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 13.48 15:18:22.51 -19:30:10.1
344.23881 31.33881 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 4 -1 5 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:18:22.51 -19:30:10.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:18:22.51 -19:30:10.1: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 13.94 14:57:07.99 -14:19:38.0
343.15662 38.53550 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina 3 0 3 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:57:07.99 -14:19:38.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:57:07.99 -14:19:38.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.7574,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.2574 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.2574 2461185.7574 11.83 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2
336.53350 38.00493 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 0.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V Lib
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.000 V 16.000 V 2452783.00000 256.000000000000 M5e-M8.0e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V Lib,2461185.7574,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V Lib 20260525.2574 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.91232279 18.04.2026 09:53:34.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
First image: 2461148.91232279 18.04.2026 09:53:34.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Last image: 2461185.75756683 25.05.2026 06:10:43.774 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6601
Objects passed selection criteria: 6597
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6097.75
Average stars matched: 5937.5 (97.372 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 01:17:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.91232279 18.04.2026 09:53:34.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
First image: 2461148.91232279 18.04.2026 09:53:34.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Last image: 2461185.75756683 25.05.2026 06:10:43.774 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43739
Objects passed selection criteria: 43670
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41905.5
Average stars matched: 40086.2 (95.6587 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144448 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 25 01:20:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.75717769
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42
Second-epoch image center 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 930.5'x627.0' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.83"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.631 -17:56:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.631 -17:56:54.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0944 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:40.631 -17:56:54.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00527 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jsXrgm1g20
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zj2jMrZg68
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.irg2uFOR6F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qHzSRCllX1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2388 to 235.1836 deg, Dec -23.3149 to -12.5972 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2388 to 235.1836 deg, Dec -23.3149 to -12.5972 deg
Loaded 6189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4759 out of 4887 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4887 out of 7185 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.622300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.622300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2388 to 235.1836 deg, Dec -23.3149 to -12.5972 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2388 to 235.1836 deg, Dec -23.3149 to -12.5972 deg
Loaded 6189 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4759 out of 4887 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4887 out of 7185 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 217.8314 to 235.0989 deg, Dec -23.5806 to -12.1388 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 217.8314 to 235.0989 deg, Dec -23.5806 to -12.1388 deg
Loaded 6692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4735 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.4 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
14.6 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jsXrgm1g20 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=7185
Got 7185 stars (including 6761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=249 n_q2=216 n_q3=264 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zj2jMrZg68 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=6979
Got 6979 stars (including 6596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=252 n_q2=206 n_q3=284 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.irg2uFOR6F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, passed=5190
Got 5190 stars (including 4846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=254 n_q2=207 n_q3=281 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qHzSRCllX1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, passed=5201
Got 5201 stars (including 4856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 930.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 930.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012924 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010339 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 611 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.00"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 651 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 646 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.83"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 646 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.11"
Excluding outliers - 646 stars left (next iteration limit 672)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=646 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.171 sigma_q2_arcsec=9.015 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=13.552 n_q1=255 n_q2=66 n_q3=283 n_q4=42 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.885
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.478 worst_q_ratio=1.309
ref2=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new1=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits sigma_overall=3.488 worst_q_ratio=3.885
reference average sigma_overall=0.4805 worst_q_ratio=1.207
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits) flagged: sigma=3.488 (ref avg 0.4805), ratio=3.885 (ref avg 1.207), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5071 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3688571.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3688571.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 44.5295 (2.18223e+19), 40 match, 0 conflict, 116 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (226.703,-17.9349), pixel scale 5.93874 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---++----+---+---------++---+---------+----+-+--+-+--+----++---+-----+---------+----++---+---+----
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3688571.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3688571.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.668798, -17.944956) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:40.512, -17:56:41.842).
Field size: 15.7952 x 10.5782 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.294 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 25 01:19 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 25 01:19 out3688571.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3688571.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3688571.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7267 degrees of RA,Dec (226.668,-17.9457)
log-odds ratio 23.1089 (1.08661e+10), 5 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.681,-17.9645), pixel scale 5.94151 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+-----+-+---+(best)---------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3688571.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3688571.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.697010, -17.967725) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:47.282, -17:58:03.810).
Field size: 15.6926 x 10.6321 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.604 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 25 01:19 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 25 01:19 out3688571.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 29162 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5892, 953.24] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 88.1375 (1.89513e+38), 32 match, 0 conflict, 201 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------------+-+-------+--------+-------+-----+--------+---------++----+--------++--------------+
--> log-odds 88.1375
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 248.911 (1.26137e+108), 64 match, 0 conflict, 257 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+------+-+-----+-+-----+--+-------++------++----+--------+------++-++--+-+-+----+-++------+-------+
--> log-odds 248.911
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 478.654 (7.53332e+207), 113 match, 0 conflict, 345 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+------+-------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-+-----++------++-++--+-+-+------++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 478.654
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 717.228 (inf), 181 match, 0 conflict, 488 distractors, 743 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+----+-------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-++----++------++-+---+-+-+----+-++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 717.228
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1134.95 (inf), 366 match, 0 conflict, 1155 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+------------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-++----++------++-+-----+------+-++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 1134.95
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5892, 953.24] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 88.1375 (1.89513e+38), 32 match, 0 conflict, 201 distractors, 96 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----------------+-+-------+--------+-------+-----+--------+---------++----+--------++--------------+
--> log-odds 88.1375
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 248.911 (1.26137e+108), 64 match, 0 conflict, 257 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+------+-+-----+-+-----+--+-------++------++----+--------+------++-++--+-+-+----+-++------+-------+
--> log-odds 248.911
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 478.654 (7.53332e+207), 113 match, 0 conflict, 345 distractors, 383 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+------+-------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-+-----++------++-++--+-+-+------++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 478.654
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 717.228 (inf), 181 match, 0 conflict, 488 distractors, 743 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+----+-------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-++----++------++-+---+-+-+----+-++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 717.228
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1134.95 (inf), 366 match, 0 conflict, 1155 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-17.9669), pixel scale 5.97268 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+------------+-+-----+--+-----+-++----+-++----+-++----++------++-+-----+------+-++----+-++------+
--> log-odds 1134.95
Got 10 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.667190, -17.945206) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:40.126, -17:56:42.743).
Field size: 15.7908 x 10.5779 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.296 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 943.6'x628.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:39.903 -17:56:45.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5201 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3695327.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, passed=5201
Got 5201 stars (including 4856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.21"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.678 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.217 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.210 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.587 n_q1=254 n_q2=192 n_q3=282 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.946
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits): sigma 3.488->1.678, ratio 3.885->0.946; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits with order-2 result
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.678 -- 3.49x the reference average (0.4805); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:40:22.44 -17:39:28.2: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:40:22.44 -17:39:28.2: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:40:22.44 -17:39:28.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6578 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20634.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20631.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 20626_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:47.85 -16:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20628_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 20634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.44 -17:39:28.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.987 6285053453598483200 220.09238377141 -17.65752461050 11.3640 9.8000 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.987#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 20635_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:12.75 -21:09:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02461_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 02461_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:39.42 -16:19:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:19:36.55 -22:05:00.6
14:34:33.27 -18:59:25.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42
Second-epoch image center 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 943.6'x628.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:39.903 -17:56:45.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:34.428 -18:02:22.42
Second-epoch image center 15:06:39.903 -17:56:45.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0961 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:39.711 -17:56:40.68
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:39.903 -17:56:45.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00155 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00155 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uYI3dMtj8A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EB3068oBm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CH8ItGr7Ij
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lj6mUFi6GV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 46027 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2354 to 235.2109 deg, Dec -23.3223 to -12.5778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2354 to 235.2109 deg, Dec -23.3223 to -12.5778 deg
Loaded 6226 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4886 out of 5322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5322 out of 46027 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.470650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.470650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 46027 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2354 to 235.2109 deg, Dec -23.3223 to -12.5778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2354 to 235.2109 deg, Dec -23.3223 to -12.5778 deg
Loaded 6226 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4886 out of 5322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5322 out of 46027 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 45755 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 217.8161 to 235.0989 deg, Dec -23.6020 to -12.1132 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 217.8161 to 235.0989 deg, Dec -23.6020 to -12.1132 deg
Loaded 6715 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4994 out of 5388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5388 out of 45755 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.4 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uYI3dMtj8A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2450, passed=46021
Got 46021 stars (including 43508 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=256 n_q2=215 n_q3=280 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1EB3068oBm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1929, passed=45747
Got 45747 stars (including 43746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=251 n_q2=210 n_q3=288 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CH8ItGr7Ij (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1174, passed=38480
Got 38480 stars (including 37243 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=253 n_q2=212 n_q3=279 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lj6mUFi6GV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1163, passed=38581
Got 38581 stars (including 37353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.589 n_q1=257 n_q2=192 n_q3=280 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.010
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_011530_TTUQ1b1x1_3640025_J6886Gvp/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:18:27.19 -18:53:51.8: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:27:32.22 -14:28:38.2: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:37:01.91 -20:22:04.0: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:50:02.62 -20:13:30.7: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:35:28.16 -21:38:27.5: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:26:20.70 -15:20:49.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:38:43.42 -17:04:35.3: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:42:29.42 -17:51:54.5: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:18:27.19 -18:53:51.8: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:27.19 -18:53:51.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1153 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:26:20.70 -15:20:49.6: 13.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:27:32.22 -14:28:38.2: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:37:01.91 -20:22:04.0: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:35:28.16 -21:38:27.5: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:50:02.62 -20:13:30.7: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:20.70 -15:20:49.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6650 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:32.22 -14:28:38.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8741 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:01.91 -20:22:04.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4183 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:28.16 -21:38:27.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5364 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:02.62 -20:13:30.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8965 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:38:43.42 -17:04:35.3: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:42:29.42 -17:51:54.5: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:43.42 -17:04:35.3: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0322 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:29.42 -17:51:54.5: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5022 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:27:06.99 -15:47:47.6: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:27:35.21 -14:56:48.4: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:07:05.60 -15:27:09.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:48:40.73 -21:58:58.6: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:27:06.99 -15:47:47.6: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:27:35.21 -14:56:48.4: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:07:05.60 -15:27:09.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:06.99 -15:47:47.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3721 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:35.21 -14:56:48.4: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3851 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:19:50.60 -17:15:05.8: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:24:28.15 -19:56:37.5: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:34:45.07 -17:47:40.4: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:48:40.73 -21:58:58.6: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:44:30.46 -16:45:09.3: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:23:00.13 -19:18:48.8: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:19:50.60 -17:15:05.8: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:24:28.15 -19:56:37.5: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:50.60 -17:15:05.8: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0669 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:34:45.07 -17:47:40.4: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:28.15 -19:56:37.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1314 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:45.07 -17:47:40.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2806 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:44:30.46 -16:45:09.3: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:30.46 -16:45:09.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3262 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:12:34.50 -19:20:57.5: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:01:22.73 -18:07:28.7: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:35:44.25 -17:41:51.1: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:23:00.13 -19:18:48.8: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:00.13 -19:18:48.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2868 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:12:34.50 -19:20:57.5: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:34.50 -19:20:57.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4387 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:01:22.73 -18:07:28.7: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:35:44.25 -17:41:51.1: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:22.73 -18:07:28.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4103 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:44.25 -17:41:51.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4539 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:18:22.51 -19:30:10.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:14:55.74 -16:44:23.6: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:18:22.51 -19:30:10.1: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:29:38.88 -15:31:57.3: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:14:55.74 -16:44:23.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:55.74 -16:44:23.6: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4842 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:17:24.81 -21:01:13.7: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:29:38.88 -15:31:57.3: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:38.88 -15:31:57.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3393 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:36:22.92 -21:49:08.0: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:17:24.81 -21:01:13.7: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:24.81 -21:01:13.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5932 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:24:20.20 -14:41:38.5: 13.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:47:17.29 -22:41:44.3: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:11:10.34 -16:58:46.7: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:36:22.92 -21:49:08.0: 13.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:22.92 -21:49:08.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6932 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:24:20.20 -14:41:38.5: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:20.20 -14:41:38.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6346 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:47:17.29 -22:41:44.3: 14.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:17.29 -22:41:44.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8480 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:38:36.78 -21:56:19.7: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:11:10.34 -16:58:46.7: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:26:23.18 -14:19:53.4: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:10.34 -16:58:46.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6473 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:38:36.78 -21:56:19.7: 13.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:36.78 -21:56:19.7: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7020 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:26:23.18 -14:19:53.4: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:39:45.90 -18:45:20.3: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:23.18 -14:19:53.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6656 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:48:45.57 -20:17:08.9: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:42:16.07 -15:54:12.1: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:48:45.57 -20:17:08.9: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:45.57 -20:17:08.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8740 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:39:45.90 -18:45:20.3: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:45.90 -18:45:20.3: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8794 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:42:16.07 -15:54:12.1: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:16.07 -15:54:12.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9790 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:53:49.98 -18:44:59.4: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:36:55.91 -21:58:50.3: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:36:28.60 -20:49:41.7: 14.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:53:49.98 -18:44:59.4: 13.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:49.98 -18:44:59.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9255 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:57:07.99 -14:19:38.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:40:43.30 -22:31:11.9: 14.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:36:55.91 -21:58:50.3: 13.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:55.91 -21:58:50.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0103 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:37:36.48 -16:28:46.0: 14.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:36:28.60 -20:49:41.7: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:28.60 -20:49:41.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0620 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:37:05.53 -21:27:53.4: 14.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:57:07.99 -14:19:38.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:40:43.30 -22:31:11.9: 14.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:43.30 -22:31:11.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0302 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:37:36.48 -16:28:46.0: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:36.48 -16:28:46.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1117 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:37:05.53 -21:27:53.4: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:05.53 -21:27:53.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9958 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:39:39.51 -20:26:44.9: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:43:39.27 -19:43:00.1: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:50:24.71 -22:40:08.1: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:36:20.66 -21:17:36.0: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:39:39.51 -20:26:44.9: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:39.51 -20:26:44.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0461 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:42:30.66 -22:25:03.9: 14.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:43:39.27 -19:43:00.1: 14.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:39.27 -19:43:00.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9675 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:50:24.71 -22:40:08.1: 14.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:24.71 -22:40:08.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9976 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:44:11.56 -13:03:58.1: 14.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:36:20.66 -21:17:36.0: 14.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:20.66 -21:17:36.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1073 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:42:30.66 -22:25:03.9: 14.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:30.66 -22:25:03.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2008 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:38:00.25 -21:53:58.4: 14.68 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:44:11.56 -13:03:58.1: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:11.56 -13:03:58.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1161 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:49:14.04 -16:46:41.7: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:38:00.25 -21:53:58.4: 14.73 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:50:13.04 -13:25:55.9: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:00.25 -21:53:58.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1454 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:49:14.04 -16:46:41.7: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:37:56.59 -17:52:34.1: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:14.04 -16:46:41.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1057 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:50:13.04 -13:25:55.9: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:43:32.94 -13:07:20.1: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:13.04 -13:25:55.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1673 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:37:56.59 -17:52:34.1: 14.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:56.59 -17:52:34.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0941 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:42:48.80 -19:23:12.9: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:29:07.44 -16:15:16.1: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:43:32.94 -13:07:20.1: 13.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:32.94 -13:07:20.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1433 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:42:48.80 -19:23:12.9: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:48.80 -19:23:12.9: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1311 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:00:03.48 -12:59:04.6: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:21:41.48 -17:31:26.5: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:29:07.44 -16:15:16.1: 14.63 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:07.44 -16:15:16.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0162 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:02:44.94 -21:12:14.4: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:00:03.48 -12:59:04.6: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:03.48 -12:59:04.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1756 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:21:41.48 -17:31:26.5: 14.17 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:41.48 -17:31:26.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1603 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:46:38.14 -18:36:44.7: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:02:44.94 -21:12:14.4: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:44.94 -21:12:14.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2711 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:47:46.85 -16:23:26.7: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:23:14.57 -14:30:45.9: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:46:38.14 -18:36:44.7: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:38.14 -18:36:44.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3506 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:47:46.85 -16:23:26.7: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:07:34.86 -14:27:54.7: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:46.85 -16:23:26.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2999 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:23:14.57 -14:30:45.9: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:20:41.78 -19:20:11.7: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 15:21:36.58 -13:59:44.5: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:07:34.86 -14:27:54.7: 14.92 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:07:34.86 -14:27:54.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4571 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:20:41.78 -19:20:11.7: 14.93 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:41.78 -19:20:11.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2838 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-53-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits at 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 15:21:36.58 -13:59:44.5: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:36.58 -13:59:44.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2698 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-21-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0182.fits at 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:40:22.48 -17:39:28.2: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8315 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56635.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56323_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56323_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56324_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56324_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56325_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56325_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56327_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56327_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56329_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56329_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:07.83 -14:52:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56331_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56331_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56332_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56332_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:05.21 -13:32:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56339_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56339_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56340_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56340_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:26.22 -15:09:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56343_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56343_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:32.72 -13:49:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56344_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56344_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:00.98 -22:22:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56345_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56345_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56346_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56346_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:32.95 -14:13:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56347_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56347_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56350_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56350_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56352_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56352_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56353_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56353_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56354_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56354_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:36.54 -22:05:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56356_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56356_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:02.99 -14:32:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56358_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56358_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:33.24 -18:59:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56362_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56362_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56366_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56366_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56371_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56371_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56372_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56372_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56375_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56375_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56376_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 56376_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56395_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56395_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:19.59 -17:04:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56396_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 56396_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56398_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56398_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:05.91 -14:14:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56400_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56400_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56401_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56401_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56402_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56402_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:14.54 -21:58:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56403_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56403_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56404_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56404_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56405_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56405_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56408_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56408_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56410_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56410_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56412_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56412_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:10.28 -16:41:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56416_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56416_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56417_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56417_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:37.09 -15:03:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56421_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56421_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56423_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56423_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56424_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56424_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56425_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56425_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56426_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 56426_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:41.11 -20:05:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56428_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56428_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56429_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56429_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56430_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56430_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56431_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56431_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56434_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56434_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56435_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56435_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56437_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56437_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56443_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56443_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:54.59 -15:20:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56445_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56445_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:10:23.99 -13:43:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56446_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56446_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56450_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56450_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:33.99 -15:24:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56458_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56458_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56459_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56459_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56460_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56460_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56461_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56461_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56463_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56463_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56466_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56466_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56471_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56471_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56478_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56478_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56481_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56481_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56485_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56490_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56490_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:40.87 -14:53:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56491_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56491_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56497_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56497_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:34:36.68 -14:08:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56502_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56502_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56506_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56506_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56509_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 56509_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56511_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56511_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56512_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56512_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56516_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56516_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56520_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56520_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56525_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56525_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:12.17 -13:42:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56526_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56526_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56527_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56527_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56528_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56528_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56531_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56531_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:22.11 -20:58:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56534_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56534_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56536_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56536_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56539_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56539_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56540_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56540_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56542_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56542_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56545_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56545_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56546_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56546_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56547_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56547_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56552_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56552_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56558_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56558_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56560_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56560_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56573_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56573_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56577_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56577_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56585_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56585_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56590_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56590_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56591_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56591_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56615_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56615_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56635_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56635_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.57 -14:30:45.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.259 6266004277208679936 230.81054845017 -14.51306351067 14.2589 13.0250 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.259#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56652_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56652_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56658_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56658_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56669_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56669_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56696_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 56696_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
Preparing report for the candidate 20562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42582_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 42582_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.31 -20:19:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15292_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 15292_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:39.38 -16:19:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14881_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 14881_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:47.83 -16:09:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39578_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219
The candidate 39578_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_01-10-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks
