######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1002013 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1002013 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1941.1948
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 602.9198
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1941.9445
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 603.2407
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.64118
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T00:54:54.2679643' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T05:54:54.2679643' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.2464614236 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T05:55:04.1721798' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.2465760647 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997206195719 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999404150871 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.0936111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.859166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8273600810291 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 95.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)
Spent 0.676902 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T00:55:29.9913369' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T05:55:29.9913369' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.2468748959 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T05:55:39.8948735' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.2469895137 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997206296522 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999404181266 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 33.0425 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.868333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.82984926037663 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 95.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)
Spent 0.637137 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.74657716
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0614 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00352 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zn7URbjJ2J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OKgkFcAQPj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oMLKRawWRO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TJfYbivtUT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zn7URbjJ2J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OKgkFcAQPj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oMLKRawWRO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, passed=5587
Got 5587 stars (including 5274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5587 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=227 n_q2=283 n_q3=229 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TJfYbivtUT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, passed=5548
Got 5548 stars (including 5207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=226 n_q2=279 n_q3=230 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.182
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.297
reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 9.32 | 10:55:40.22 +71:52:07.9 | 1236 1274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:40.23 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 8.34 | 10:44:37.80 +68:46:31.8 | 1102 3229 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:37.81 +68:46:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 10.80 | 08:04:00.19 +73:24:29.8 | 8863 0631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.19 +73:24:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0614 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:33.756 +70:03:00.10
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:33.317 +70:02:47.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00352 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IrfAwlCO7O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JuxOhvrxFU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GljwQqPu7E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U7zAzWQRpQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
14.5 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IrfAwlCO7O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JuxOhvrxFU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GljwQqPu7E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=893, passed=28076
Got 28076 stars (including 27151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=234 n_q2=268 n_q3=234 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U7zAzWQRpQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=879, passed=28030
Got 28030 stars (including 27107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=231 n_q2=268 n_q3=235 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:31.93 +64:32:31.7: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:34:45.09 +69:51:30.2: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:31.93 +64:32:31.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:31.93 +64:32:31.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2811 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:37:19.50 +72:54:34.0: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:16:29.87 +64:31:07.8: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:34:45.09 +69:51:30.2: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:45.09 +69:51:30.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4416 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:16:29.87 +64:31:07.8: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:37:19.50 +72:54:34.0: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:29.87 +64:31:07.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8048 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:37:19.50 +72:54:34.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5195 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:05:35.13 +67:25:24.8: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:05:35.13 +67:25:24.8: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:05:35.13 +67:25:24.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7975 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65456_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65456_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 10.36 | 08:12:40.24 +68:32:04.8 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 10.79 | 09:30:56.49 +67:11:58.1 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65478_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65478_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 10.65 | 08:16:47.19 +71:49:24.4 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65490_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65490_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 11.10 | 10:25:10.30 +64:07:54.0 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65604_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65604_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 11.92 | 09:42:13.91 +65:32:19.5 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65614_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65614_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 11.87 | 09:49:45.66 +72:12:52.5 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65694_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65694_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.30 | 09:50:11.81 +73:09:52.2 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65716_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65716_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.30 | 09:22:24.67 +74:57:42.9 | 5520 0248 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65775_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65775_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.74 | 10:41:45.61 +72:44:39.7 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65776_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65776_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.57 | 09:38:19.16 +64:58:25.6 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65864_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65864_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.71 | 08:23:33.00 +72:23:20.6 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65897_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65897_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.78 | 08:46:07.45 +69:39:22.1 | 7411 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65908_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65908_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.09 | 10:42:02.80 +70:51:43.0 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 65910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 12.90 | 09:26:41.42 +66:08:35.6 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66004_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66004_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.40 | 10:43:48.99 +64:37:24.2 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66031_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66031_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.28 | 09:36:25.25 +70:45:23.2 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.24658 | 2461185.74658 | 13.35 | 10:11:31.99 +64:32:31.8 | 2334 6228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.23 | 10:11:31.87 +64:32:31.5 | 2334 6226 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66080_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66080_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.50 | 09:35:02.68 +72:51:53.1 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66090_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66090_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.54 | 11:07:09.54 +70:22:52.2 | 0352 1876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66092_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66092_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.31 | 08:46:53.66 +74:28:05.4 | 6954 0438 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 08:46:53.73 +74:28:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66093_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66093_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.72 | 10:46:42.32 +64:57:17.0 | 0193 5382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.55 | 09:21:39.51 +72:30:23.9 | 5551 1735 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66101_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66101_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.34 | 09:13:06.40 +69:38:50.2 | 6001 3449 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 09:13:06.44 +69:38:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66118_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66118_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.54 | 10:47:52.70 +65:28:27.9 | 0232 5057 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 10:47:52.64 +65:28:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66127_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66127_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.42 | 10:49:14.95 +65:56:08.5 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66141_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66141_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.24 | 08:50:44.14 +73:45:56.8 | 6853 0884 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 08:50:44.04 +73:45:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66143_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66143_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.81 | 10:37:54.81 +65:09:27.2 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66150_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66150_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.24658 | 2461185.74658 | 13.43 | 09:34:45.33 +69:51:31.1 | 4876 3315 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.45 | 09:34:44.86 +69:51:29.3 | 4876 3313 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66157_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66157_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.54 | 10:52:04.36 +69:48:03.0 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66165_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66165_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.88 | 11:04:46.09 +72:03:30.3 | 0884 0997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66172_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66172_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.47 | 08:32:11.37 +72:41:52.8 | 7761 1383 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 08:32:11.13 +72:41:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66188_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66188_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.24658 | 2461185.74658 | 13.45 | 08:37:19.45 +72:54:35.2 | 7510 1304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.64 | 08:37:19.56 +72:54:32.7 | 7510 1303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66210_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66210_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.56 | 08:20:06.75 +67:19:43.5 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66214_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66214_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.30 | 09:51:28.38 +66:56:37.4 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66216_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66216_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.63 | 11:14:57.69 +72:01:41.8 | 0438 0804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 11:14:57.82 +72:01:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66222_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66222_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.88 | 10:51:06.77 +67:29:07.2 | 0482 3839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66247_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66247_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.24658 | 2461185.74658 | 13.80 | 10:16:29.77 +64:31:09.0 | 2013 6176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.81 | 10:16:29.98 +64:31:06.7 | 2012 6174 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66279_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66279_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.93 | 10:49:30.23 +66:25:25.9 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66280_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66280_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.66 | 11:04:44.67 +69:02:17.3 | 0129 2673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66289_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66289_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.41 | 09:11:19.08 +75:11:06.4 | 5949 0102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 09:11:19.06 +75:11:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66314_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66314_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.90 | 10:53:21.68 +66:39:16.0 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66324_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66324_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.14 | 10:53:43.92 +67:32:00.6 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66326_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66326_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.85 | 10:27:36.41 +65:24:57.1 | 1452 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66339_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66339_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.09 | 10:39:05.94 +69:06:38.6 | 1455 3133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66347_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66347_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.72 | 10:30:04.64 +69:41:09.5 | 2019 2941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66353_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66353_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.18 | 11:06:04.09 +69:54:37.8 | 0284 2160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66355_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66355_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.12 | 10:00:28.10 +65:44:06.4 | 3159 5634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66378_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66378_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.24658 | 2461185.74658 | 13.78 | 09:05:35.16 +67:25:23.6 | 6486 4769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-54-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.81 | 09:05:35.10 +67:25:26.0 | 6486 4767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66392_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66392_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.85 | 10:41:57.30 +69:34:55.5 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66438_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66438_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.92 | 10:50:35.96 +68:30:10.6 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66450_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66450_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.92 | 10:50:52.14 +70:16:56.5 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66469_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66469_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.27 | 10:49:39.63 +73:47:23.7 | 1913 0287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66477_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66477_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.11 | 10:47:52.40 +72:32:29.2 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66489_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.18 | 09:18:26.55 +74:55:00.1 | 5676 0274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66492_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66492_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.07 | 08:41:05.34 +72:09:36.9 | 7420 1780 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66504_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66504_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.50 | 09:55:42.75 +71:29:22.2 | 3930 2237 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66505_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66505_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.09 | 10:59:13.61 +68:08:08.5 | 0193 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66512_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66512_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.29 | 10:17:49.40 +73:42:22.7 | 3193 0737 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66517_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66517_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 14.06 | 09:16:05.59 +67:19:44.3 | 5879 4851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66518_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 66518_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 13.73 | 08:15:41.80 +68:46:36.9 | 9133 3495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 10.64 | 08:04:00.20 +73:24:29.9 | 8863 0631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.20 +73:24:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 9.57 | 10:55:40.21 +71:52:07.8 | 1236 1274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:40.22 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.24699 | 2461185.74699 | 8.58 | 10:44:37.79 +68:46:31.7 | 1102 3229 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_005729_TTUQ1b1x1_2125010_DslhqoB0/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-55-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:37.81 +68:46:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.74657716 -observatory V36
04:59:05.42 +24:26:49.0 Mercury (-1.2mag)
06:30:59.77 +25:01:26.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:09:21.95 +12:19:19.6 Mars (1.3mag)
07:37:15.88 +21:58:03.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:44:58.84 +02:24:02.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:56:50.46 +20:15:38.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:09.11 +00:11:06.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:58.12 -22:59:46.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:36:33.52 -00:11:15.6 Moon (-10.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 25 01:01 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.74657716:
07:37:21.74 +21:57:49.2 Io (5.9mag)
07:37:21.49 +21:57:50.1 Europa (6.1mag)
07:36:59.77 +21:58:48.8 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:37:02.80 +21:58:31.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:38:24.46 +21:34:28.5 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:37:15.29 +21:58:04.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:38:43.87 +21:56:08.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:38:40.41 +22:17:18.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:44:25.14 +21:58:49.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:44:56.80 +02:23:47.1 Titan (8.7mag)
00:44:58.13 +02:24:18.1 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:45:19.72 +02:23:59.4 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:45:14.21 +02:23:58.6 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:45:57.54 +02:27:57.7 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 25 01:01 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.74657716:
17:16:17.68 -33:09:59.3 JWST
19:35:37.49 +07:14:33.6 Chandra
18:55:42.32 -14:20:18.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 25 01:01 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.74657716 -observatory V36
13:21:34.77 -27:09:24.2 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:35:44.03 +30:41:45.6 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:27:09.37 +01:18:35.3 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:26:40.49 +24:36:52.7 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:24:45.81 +15:23:39.8 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:51:26.21 -31:35:00.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:39:59.89 -68:17:13.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:44:01.56 +31:47:51.0 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:20:12.97 +14:28:48.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:36.90 +31:00:18.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:16:51.23 +26:50:46.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:20:22.84 +31:31:09.6 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:43:35.08 +03:09:36.8 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:36:54.90 +21:09:55.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:24:50.36 -11:02:36.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:09.06 +65:35:47.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:19:09.76 -05:27:47.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:43:13.66 +85:59:14.4 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:52:17.96 +63:54:19.1 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:25:22.32 +26:22:06.0 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:48:39.87 +12:06:04.5 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:08.87 +26:53:08.4 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:04:02.89 -17:18:08.8 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:52:46.47 +36:59:14.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:46:51.53 +53:21:40.5 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:23:01.36 -10:07:12.8 12.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:41:06.70 +04:36:07.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:34:26.35 +42:17:57.5 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:31.68 -09:25:05.8 16.2mag A/2026 E1
19:57:55.53 -08:07:19.9 9.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:19:11.11 -02:26:09.0 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:36.82 -00:51:50.9 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:50:42.24 -02:34:19.8 17.7mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:49:59.89 +23:42:03.4 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:30:15.49 +27:37:04.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:13:57.52 -07:23:57.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:40.84 +31:31:37.1 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:35:44.53 +15:14:50.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:48:55.59 +01:35:15.5 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:09:46.79 +28:49:07.2 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
02:04:57.49 +25:10:39.7 18.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:17:50.36 +33:19:52.7 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:26:23.61 +20:40:42.0 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:36:04.12 +18:12:49.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:05:41.95 +18:17:05.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:54:08.82 +19:40:10.6 12.9mag 141P/Machholz
04:56:50.67 +16:14:23.7 12.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:41:33.07 +13:29:33.9 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:47:29.95 -26:48:18.6 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:56:59.37 +17:48:26.9 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:25.42 -01:55:57.2 17.6mag 169P/NEAT
17:03:04.00 -09:26:23.8 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
07:02:53.63 +35:52:41.1 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:56:08.94 -08:08:00.8 16.8mag 260P/McNaught
03:27:37.83 +29:43:32.0 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
21:55:47.50 -28:40:35.3 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:22:15.12 +08:21:53.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:56:32.57 +21:03:22.1 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:37:14.26 +42:38:55.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 25 01:01 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 25 01:01 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 25 01:01 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:02:54.920 +52:50:36.73 AT 2026mwx 2026-04-19.86 21.51
12:33:02.940 +24:34:37.91 AT 2026mww 2026-04-15.87 21.01
16:40:46.740 +26:54:33.05 AT 2026mwv 2026-04-12.76 21.07
13:03:52.940 +23:49:42.82 AT 2026mwu 2026-04-03.87 20.84
17:45:23.200 +33:15:24.68 AT 2026mwt 2026-03-30.83 20.98
13:11:30.630 +21:00:44.67 AT 2026mws 2026-03-23.71 21.69
12:21:33.740 +27:53:15.15 AT 2026mwr 2026-03-23.70 21
14:26:34.570 +01:19:55.58 AT 2026mwq 2026-05-11.69 22.6
13:16:20.230 +02:48:58.63 AT 2026mwp 2026-05-03.68 21.84
13:17:52.545 -50:04:09.72 AT 2026mwo 2026-04-12.49 19.69
11:28:16.230 +42:22:52.41 AT 2026mwn 2026-05-12.89 19.9
11:41:30.831 -38:28:36.99 AT 2026mwm 2026-05-15.38 19.89
12:21:50.967 -07:22:18.86 AT 2026mwl 2026-05-10.42 20.48
11:55:49.750 -03:35:44.72 AT 2026mwk 2026-05-09.42 20.09
13:09:13.990 -35:00:02.50 AT 2026mwj 2026-05-15.42 19.65
17:41:09.150 +24:53:03.12 AT 2026mwi 2026-05-12.11 19.87
18:34:26.573 +28:07:34.91 AT 2026mwh 2026-05-12.12 19.72
10:37:55.222 +30:29:37.47 AT 2026mwg 2026-05-03.89 20.03
10:59:50.926 +31:45:28.48 AT 2026mwf 2026-05-16.90 20.34
11:12:52.387 +28:00:11.25 AT 2026mwe 2026-05-09.87 19.66
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 25 01:01 tns_transients_list.txt