This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1828 2461185.6828 11.37 18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2
23.37593 3.15256 galactic Sct Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 3 -2 4 11.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6828,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1828 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1828 2461185.6828 13.79 17:47:25.62 +01:31:21.7
26.87192 14.91495 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.780 Armenia 2 -2 3 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:47:25.62 +01:31:21.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:47:25.62 +01:31:21.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6828,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1828 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461185.68302098 25.05.2026 04:23:23.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6809
Objects passed selection criteria: 6803
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5958.25
Average stars matched: 5848.5 (98.158 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 23:33:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461185.68302098 25.05.2026 04:23:23.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70154
Objects passed selection criteria: 70027
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62562.5
Average stars matched: 60389.2 (96.5263 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1858588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 23:36:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.68250171
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01017 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HeX4KNjUCZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PZ8rtXvLNj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ngzXyrrupK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xpko8ECtqY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to +3.7460 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to 3.7460 deg
Loaded 6269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4104 out of 4265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4265 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HeX4KNjUCZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, passed=7172
Got 7172 stars (including 6656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=194 n_q2=138 n_q3=323 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PZ8rtXvLNj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=190 n_q2=142 n_q3=322 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ngzXyrrupK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, passed=4823
Got 4823 stars (including 4525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4823 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=187 n_q2=138 n_q3=334 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.482
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xpko8ECtqY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=4778
Got 4778 stars (including 4465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=189 n_q2=138 n_q3=333 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.083
ref2=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.086
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.482
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.297
reference average sigma_overall=0.4485 worst_q_ratio=1.0845
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20404_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:40.88 +02:55:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20419_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:00.74 -06:50:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20421_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 20421_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20422_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.35 +01:59:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20424_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:59.47 +02:15:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20425_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:01.60 +02:34:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02027_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 02027_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:52.61 -02:25:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:22:36.34 -07:02:00.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.730 -01:59:54.35
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:02.158 -01:59:24.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01017 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mijBuFUZ53
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OYGmaJMmHE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HleBCiHOSR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vfka3TWspe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.478700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.478700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 77640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to +3.7673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to 3.7673 deg
Loaded 6321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4094 out of 4757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4757 out of 77640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mijBuFUZ53 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4817, passed=77247
Got 77247 stars (including 72311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=198 n_q2=154 n_q3=300 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OYGmaJMmHE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4938, passed=77627
Got 77627 stars (including 72566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=194 n_q2=152 n_q3=296 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HleBCiHOSR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1936, passed=47792
Got 47792 stars (including 45772 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=190 n_q2=141 n_q3=328 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.337
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vfka3TWspe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1940, passed=49350
Got 49350 stars (including 47313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49350 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=196 n_q2=141 n_q3=324 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.437
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_233132_TTUQ1b1x1_1995007_9Lg0BNbR/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:48:01.79 +00:18:01.0: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:00:34.24 -00:19:50.1: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:56:41.57 +00:25:11.2: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:48:01.79 +00:18:01.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:01.79 +00:18:01.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9582 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:56:41.57 +00:25:11.2: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:00:34.24 -00:19:50.1: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:41.57 +00:25:11.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4936 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:34.24 -00:19:50.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9008 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:05:08.40 +02:45:30.2: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:16:34.45 -00:56:55.7: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:40:00.90 -00:39:19.6: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:05:08.40 +02:45:30.2: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:01:17.52 +01:44:58.7: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:52:18.61 -00:14:12.4: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:08.40 +02:45:30.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1947 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:16:34.45 -00:56:55.7: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:34.45 -00:56:55.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1549 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:40:00.90 -00:39:19.6: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:00.90 -00:39:19.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3288 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:52:18.61 -00:14:12.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:01:17.52 +01:44:58.7: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:17.52 +01:44:58.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4550 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:18.61 -00:14:12.4: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4047 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:00:57.09 -00:38:19.9: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:51:21.05 +02:54:39.8: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:47:25.62 +01:31:21.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:50:47.15 -03:55:31.1: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:00:17.25 -01:41:04.6: 13.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:00:57.09 -00:38:19.9: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:56:09.64 +00:21:09.5: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:57.09 -00:38:19.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7718 delta=-1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:51:21.05 +02:54:39.8: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:21.05 +02:54:39.8: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0303 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:47:25.62 +01:31:21.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:50:47.15 -03:55:31.1: 13.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:47.15 -03:55:31.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0784 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:00:17.25 -01:41:04.6: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:17.25 -01:41:04.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1342 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:56:09.64 +00:21:09.5: 15.09 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:09.64 +00:21:09.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4003 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95350_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95350_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:07.99 -03:26:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95351_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95351_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95354_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95354_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:32.04 -02:27:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95358_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95358_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:51.02 +00:25:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95360_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95360_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95361_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95361_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.95 -01:25:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95365_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95365_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95372_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95372_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:40.90 +02:55:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95394_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95394_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:36.32 -07:01:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95409_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95409_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:30.98 +00:04:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95417_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95417_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:50.11 +02:55:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95421_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95421_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:30.74 +02:46:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95441_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95441_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:11.10 +02:02:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95448_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95448_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:23.94 -02:04:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95449_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95449_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:31.92 -01:54:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95459_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95459_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:41.30 -01:42:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95460_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95460_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:56.36 -01:01:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95468_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95468_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.45 +00:52:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95471_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95471_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.41 -02:32:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.49 -06:50:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95476_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95476_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:37.49 -00:17:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95489_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95489_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.70 +01:42:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95497_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95497_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:00.90 +01:17:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95498_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95498_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:10.93 +01:26:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95513_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95513_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:29.20 +02:47:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95518_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95518_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:26.04 +03:06:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95519_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95519_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:36.21 -00:26:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95525_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95525_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:47.88 +01:07:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95526_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95526_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.47 +00:04:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95539_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95539_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:10.74 +02:15:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95547_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95547_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:37.57 -06:22:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:31.32 +01:00:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95555_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95555_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:53.26 -05:14:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95556_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95556_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95559_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95559_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.70 +02:36:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95561_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95561_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:11.06 -00:43:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95572_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95572_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.85 -05:58:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95592_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95592_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:35.60 -03:55:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95593_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95593_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:16.92 -00:28:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95599_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95599_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:58.17 +00:18:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95604_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95604_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:21.23 -00:22:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95606_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95606_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:59.63 -04:10:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95607_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95607_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95608_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95608_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:21.09 +02:21:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95610_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95610_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:59.49 -04:24:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95611_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95611_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:24.79 +02:31:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95612_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 95612_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95625_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95625_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:11.67 -05:31:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95627_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95627_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95663_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95663_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95677_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95677_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95680_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95680_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.88 -01:37:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95706_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 95706_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 67232_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:45.74 +01:57:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.35 +01:59:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88384_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 88384_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:59.55 +01:37:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:00.23 +00:32:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91670_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 91670_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:08.82 +02:51:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12918_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 12918_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:53.26 -04:13:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71010_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 71010_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.97 +01:08:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89800_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 89800_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:06.19 -04:47:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58926_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 58926_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:45.63 +00:55:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04078_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 04078_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:00.71 -06:50:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:52.62 -02:25:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40629_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 40629_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-23-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks