This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1330 2461185.6330 13.76 07:44:24.50 +29:13:25.5
190.92460 23.61230 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.146 Lucina 0 -2 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:24.50 +29:13:25.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:24.50 +29:13:25.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6330,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1330 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1330 2461185.6330 13.55 07:35:23.24 +30:22:23.9
189.04789 22.14202 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 0 -1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:35:23.24 +30:22:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:35:23.24 +30:22:23.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6330,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1330 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1330 2461185.6330 14.20 08:17:46.73 +31:38:08.3
190.67570 31.19353 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -2 -2 3 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:17:46.73 +31:38:08.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:17:46.73 +31:38:08.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6330,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1330 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1330 2461185.6330 14.38 08:18:38.29 +28:05:37.5
194.70542 30.41782 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -2 -1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:38.29 +28:05:37.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:38.29 +28:05:37.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6330,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1330 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SDSS J080846.19+313106.0,2461185.6330,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SDSS J080846.19+313106.0 20260525.1330 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461185.63322187 25.05.2026 03:11:40.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13943
Objects passed selection criteria: 13900
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10609.5
Average stars matched: 10362.5 (97.6719 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 22:30:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461185.63322187 25.05.2026 03:11:40.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78272
Objects passed selection criteria: 78083
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 64848
Average stars matched: 62823.5 (96.8781 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1993404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 22:32:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.63268353
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00947 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AbQpLa9Cxc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GiNKVMiOGc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RDR3noY2nv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XYwQ3DbSHW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AbQpLa9Cxc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=222 n_q2=286 n_q3=200 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GiNKVMiOGc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=225 n_q2=287 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RDR3noY2nv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=6744
Got 6744 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=203 n_q2=270 n_q3=237 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XYwQ3DbSHW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, passed=6773
Got 6773 stars (including 6318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6773 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=206 n_q2=269 n_q3=234 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.016
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.393
ref2=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.324
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.016
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.3585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:07.659 +30:00:52.69
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:06.353 +30:00:23.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00947 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NXdBbwNquu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xjqZlsBfdZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U30R3ShAmL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ANRMzAob2g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NXdBbwNquu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=233 n_q2=286 n_q3=193 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xjqZlsBfdZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=230 n_q2=290 n_q3=191 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U30R3ShAmL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1591, passed=46494
Got 46494 stars (including 44812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=216 n_q2=265 n_q3=229 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ANRMzAob2g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1714, passed=46666
Got 46666 stars (including 44870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=219 n_q2=260 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-10-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_222733_TTUQ1b1x1_444785_PdMP6fPb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:14.75 +30:50:14.1: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:27:22.29 +31:33:47.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:14.75 +30:50:14.1: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:14.75 +30:50:14.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4468 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:27:22.29 +31:33:47.0: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:22.29 +31:33:47.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5964 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.90 +31:46:25.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2932 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:36.19 +25:32:12.2: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:25.93 +26:46:30.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:36.19 +25:32:12.2: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:40.75 +28:18:40.4: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:36.19 +25:32:12.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3942 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:25.93 +26:46:30.3: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:25.93 +26:46:30.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1873 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:50.26 +27:00:51.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:40.75 +28:18:40.4: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:40.75 +28:18:40.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3420 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:50.26 +27:00:51.5: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:50.26 +27:00:51.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6458 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:07.46 +28:31:37.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:55.58 +30:15:36.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:26.47 +28:42:59.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:07.46 +28:31:37.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:07.46 +28:31:37.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6154 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:55.58 +30:15:36.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:04.22 +32:25:54.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:35:23.24 +30:22:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:44:24.50 +29:13:25.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:55.58 +30:15:36.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8696 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:05:36.66 +28:16:37.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:26.47 +28:42:59.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:26.47 +28:42:59.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7206 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:23:34.94 +25:04:06.7: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:35:23.24 +30:22:23.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:05:36.66 +28:16:37.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:04.22 +32:25:54.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:44:24.50 +29:13:25.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:48.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:05:36.66 +28:16:37.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7813 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:04.22 +32:25:54.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8657 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:23:34.94 +25:04:06.7: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:34.94 +25:04:06.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9101 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:28:12.36 +33:29:30.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:31:37.69 +34:12:15.2: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:48.4: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:48.71 +28:07:53.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:54.10 +29:37:48.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9145 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:31:37.69 +34:12:15.2: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:28:12.36 +33:29:30.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:37.69 +34:12:15.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6216 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:12.36 +33:29:30.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5581 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:55:52.80 +34:21:59.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:48.71 +28:07:53.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:48.71 +28:07:53.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9262 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:55:52.80 +34:21:59.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:30:53.62 +30:04:38.7: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:55:52.80 +34:21:59.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8765 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.67 +30:13:15.3: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:17:46.73 +31:38:08.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:30:53.62 +30:04:38.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:53.62 +30:04:38.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7688 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.67 +30:13:15.3: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.67 +30:13:15.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9719 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:38.29 +28:05:37.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:17:46.73 +31:38:08.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:38.29 +28:05:37.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:10.20 +34:24:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:41.50 +30:29:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100543_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:13.64 +34:16:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:49.21 +31:33:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100547_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100547_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100551_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:47.71 +27:35:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100623_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100623_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.74 +27:22:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.06 +31:52:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100705_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100705_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.07 +34:13:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100748_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100748_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.77 +27:17:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100769_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100769_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.05 +27:36:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100827_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100827_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.70 +25:46:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100845_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100845_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:06.40 +28:21:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:37.08 +26:45:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100883_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100883_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.53 +26:14:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100909_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100909_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.10 +32:14:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100914_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:00.20 +26:26:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100937_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100937_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.91 +26:43:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100961_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100961_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:37.24 +32:27:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100989_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 100989_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.66 +29:49:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101006_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101006_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.20 +33:29:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101019_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101019_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.32 +25:56:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101033_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101033_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.86 +31:51:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101044_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101044_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.49 +29:28:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101060_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101060_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.76 +34:00:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101066_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101066_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.81 +30:20:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101072_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101072_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:55.93 +31:10:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101073_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101073_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.89 +31:29:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101083_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101083_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.88 +28:49:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101092_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101092_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:00.38 +34:23:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101101_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101101_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101143_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101143_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:05.94 +27:04:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101147_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101147_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101148_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101148_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.28 +25:57:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101151_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101151_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.13 +32:21:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101157_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101157_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:41.98 +30:25:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101158_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101158_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.47 +27:14:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101162_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101162_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.97 +26:41:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101168_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101168_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.35 +25:02:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101175_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101175_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.57 +28:34:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101182_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101182_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.41 +27:05:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101184_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101184_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:33.32 +30:37:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:03.84 +31:35:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101212_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101212_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:23.62 +33:12:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101241_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101241_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:54.09 +26:56:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:06.91 +28:01:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101256_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101256_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101258_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:26.99 +25:58:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101260_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101260_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.42 +26:48:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101269_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101269_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:56.99 +26:00:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:55.32 +26:51:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101292_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101292_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:30.51 +30:45:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101306_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101306_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.62 +33:27:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:05.85 +34:53:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:26.55 +26:33:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:01.33 +25:18:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:53.56 +28:30:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.84 +34:08:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101368_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101368_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:05.97 +33:23:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101389_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101389_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101408_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101408_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:34.54 +27:12:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:49.22 +29:44:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101418_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101418_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.04 +27:54:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101420_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101420_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:45.48 +25:43:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.76 +27:56:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101435_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101435_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:29.16 +25:13:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101442_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 101442_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101455_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101455_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101457_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101457_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101464_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 101464_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101465_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101465_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.04 +28:01:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101480_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101480_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101487_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101487_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.71 +27:30:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101489_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101489_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101517_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101517_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:55.03 +25:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101553_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101567_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101567_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:10.24 +34:18:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101600_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101600_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:39.00 +34:56:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101605_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101605_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:12.38 +32:59:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101616_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101616_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101618_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101618_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.62 +30:36:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101629_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101629_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101649_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101649_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:01.82 +32:55:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101669_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101669_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.47 +32:11:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 101707_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101741_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101741_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:47.37 +29:01:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101747_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101747_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.58 +30:13:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101787_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 101787_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101795_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 101795_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:44.39 +32:43:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101801_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 101801_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.76 +26:47:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:27.41 +30:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045
The candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_22-11-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0045 did not pass the final checks
