This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1179 2461185.6179 13.35 07:20:29.14 +26:30:01.0
191.66492 17.70645 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 -1 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.14 +26:30:01.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.14 +26:30:01.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6179,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1179 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1179 2461185.6179 13.49 06:55:28.93 +28:47:17.4
187.24136 13.49453 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 4 -3 5 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:28.93 +28:47:17.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:28.93 +28:47:17.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6179,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1179 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461185.61816547 25.05.2026 02:49:59.497 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19349
Objects passed selection criteria: 19197
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12007.2
Average stars matched: 11423 (95.1342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 21:54:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461185.61816547 25.05.2026 02:49:59.497 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138517
Objects passed selection criteria: 138092
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90768
Average stars matched: 85143.5 (93.8034 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1901424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 21:57:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.61763251
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0579 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0704 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01306 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EAgJWqJtJ6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.moQejVjsiL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zRQVoiNl4I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YV13Ag1RH2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EAgJWqJtJ6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.moQejVjsiL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zRQVoiNl4I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, passed=5612
Got 5612 stars (including 5103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.831 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.922 n_q1=213 n_q2=283 n_q3=196 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YV13Ag1RH2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, passed=5886
Got 5886 stars (including 5374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.854 n_q1=218 n_q2=278 n_q3=203 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.642 worst_q_ratio=1.435
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.606 worst_q_ratio=1.409
reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0579 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0704 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:14.756 +30:01:15.81
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:17.313 +30:01:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01306 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WlC2Rlru02
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PaX8s6S5cF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ftch8Ob80i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9OPJn1jNxL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WlC2Rlru02 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 146353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=226 n_q2=248 n_q3=236 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PaX8s6S5cF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 145746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=221 n_q2=245 n_q3=238 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ftch8Ob80i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2317, passed=44362
Got 44362 stars (including 41987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.800 n_q1=224 n_q2=264 n_q3=229 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9OPJn1jNxL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2196, passed=45423
Got 45423 stars (including 43175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.825 n_q1=222 n_q2=265 n_q3=231 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_215211_TTUQ2b1x1_3996811_TSR4vmRJ/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:15:05.40 +26:01:19.3: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.5: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4157 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.14 +26:30:01.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:01.5: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:38.04 +29:46:18.9: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:15:05.40 +26:01:19.3: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:05.40 +26:01:19.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9598 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:28.93 +28:47:17.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:38.04 +29:46:18.9: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.14 +26:30:01.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:38.04 +29:46:18.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9076 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:01.5: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:28.53 +31:28:01.5: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0754 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:28.93 +28:47:17.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190249_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190249_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.40 +26:05:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190256_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190256_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.15 +26:53:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:35.30 +28:52:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:25.41 +29:37:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190263_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190263_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.49 +26:48:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 190267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:21.37 +27:08:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192114_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 192114_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:29.54 +30:24:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192146_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 192146_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.63 +33:41:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192252_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 192252_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.51 +33:55:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 193226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.91 +29:29:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193520_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 193520_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193725_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 193725_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.07 +29:45:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 193790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.79 +29:41:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193795_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 193795_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.17 +26:07:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.50 +32:29:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194231_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194231_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.52 +29:47:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194512_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194512_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.94 +29:19:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194531_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194531_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.80 +27:48:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194706_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194706_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.57 +26:22:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194868_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 194868_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.16 +27:14:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195042_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195042_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.91 +33:40:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195062_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195062_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.25 +27:38:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195104_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195104_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.46 +26:03:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195362_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:30.64 +25:55:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195559_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195559_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.64 +27:12:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195633_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195633_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.86 +26:10:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195664_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:55.40 +29:39:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.34 +32:38:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195889_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195889_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195910_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 195910_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196047_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 196047_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.84 +33:53:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196140_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 196140_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.45 +26:25:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196503_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 196503_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.54 +27:12:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 196697_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:05.70 +30:55:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196997_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 196997_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197343_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 197343_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.81 +33:20:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 197677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.59 +28:12:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197832_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 197832_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.67 +33:13:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198726_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 198726_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.20 +30:16:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.90 +26:59:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.36 +27:57:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.79 +28:30:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 178612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.93 +29:41:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks