This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1182 2461185.6182 12.45 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5
186.91754 7.61553 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 3384314214980296064
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.020 G 16.050 G F
The object was found in astcheck.196 Philomela 6 0 6 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3384314214980296064,2461185.6182,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3384314214980296064 20260525.1182 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1182 2461185.6182 13.24 07:20:29.17 +26:30:00.6
191.66508 17.70652 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 -1 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.17 +26:30:00.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.17 +26:30:00.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6182,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1182 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1182 2461185.6182 13.31 06:55:28.87 +28:47:18.6
187.24095 13.49447 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 3 -1 3 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:28.87 +28:47:18.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:28.87 +28:47:18.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6182,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1182 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1182 2461185.6182 13.66 07:35:21.41 +30:22:33.6
189.04278 22.13671 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 1 0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:21.41 +30:22:33.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:21.41 +30:22:33.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6182,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1182 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461185.61844840 25.05.2026 02:50:23.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22804
Objects passed selection criteria: 22678
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15056.2
Average stars matched: 14630.5 (97.1723 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 21:53:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461185.61844840 25.05.2026 02:50:23.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 153682
Objects passed selection criteria: 153308
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109514
Average stars matched: 105223 (96.082 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2175984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 21:57:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.61791605
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0254 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0210 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5lpKg09MVu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hdxob3RFZA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ctBRpWyUBv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QLBBfMe8Q7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5lpKg09MVu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hdxob3RFZA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ctBRpWyUBv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=558, passed=6085
Got 6085 stars (including 5517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.472 n_q1=213 n_q2=249 n_q3=238 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QLBBfMe8Q7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=6271
Got 6271 stars (including 5682 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=216 n_q2=250 n_q3=235 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.192
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.109
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.196
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.188
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31413_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 31413_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.40 +31:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 31449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.63 +25:21:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 31644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.61 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.66 +27:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.31 +33:22:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.08 +30:16:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0254 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0210 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:07.258 +30:00:02.04
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:04.788 +30:00:33.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlMnvuQ2zf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X5vrpmxLLW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3hq3MTLV0u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yL1Vy4eE8Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XlMnvuQ2zf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=226 n_q2=249 n_q3=235 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X5vrpmxLLW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=222 n_q2=245 n_q3=237 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3hq3MTLV0u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1956, passed=52527
Got 52527 stars (including 50495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=219 n_q2=255 n_q3=244 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yL1Vy4eE8Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2138, passed=53527
Got 53527 stars (including 51308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53527 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=220 n_q2=255 n_q3=240 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-49-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215135_TTUQ1b1x1_3989622_QgXZLnvf/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5: 15.38 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:02:22.66 +25:21:05.9: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:30:50.25 +26:34:21.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.4485 delta=2.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:19:56.38 +32:14:55.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:02:22.66 +25:21:05.9: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:22.66 +25:21:05.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5824 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:19:56.38 +32:14:55.5: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:56.38 +32:14:55.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8969 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:34.66 +29:50:27.1: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:13.21 +30:08:40.9: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:15:42.00 +31:22:26.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:03.57 +32:44:39.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:34.66 +29:50:27.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:13.21 +30:08:40.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:34.66 +29:50:27.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1714 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:13.21 +30:08:40.9: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1277 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:15:42.00 +31:22:26.4: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:42.00 +31:22:26.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2191 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.17 +26:30:00.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:28.87 +28:47:18.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:03.57 +32:44:39.6: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:03.57 +32:44:39.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1262 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:21.41 +30:22:33.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:28.87 +28:47:18.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.17 +26:30:00.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:15.20 +26:58:36.8: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:21.41 +30:22:33.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:15.20 +26:58:36.8: 13.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:15.20 +26:58:36.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4409 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193148.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193975.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192068_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192068_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:26.65 +32:18:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192080_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192080_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.48 +26:33:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192082_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192082_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.17 +27:36:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192152_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192152_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.63 +25:21:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192170_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192170_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.63 +24:47:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192319_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192319_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.01 +31:52:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192341_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192341_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.11 +27:55:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192456_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192456_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.94 +34:13:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192560_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192560_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.63 +33:41:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:29.55 +30:24:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.50 +27:49:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192589_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192589_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.40 +33:55:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192705_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192705_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:59.71 +31:46:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192743_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192743_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.91 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.82 +29:41:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.59 +25:15:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 192957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:05.27 +34:00:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.88 +29:19:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.00 +29:45:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.16 +27:38:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:07.62 +35:04:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193125_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193125_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.11 +28:18:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193130_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:10.17 +34:10:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 193148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:39.56 +31:31:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.92 +28:00:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193162_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:27.91 +31:40:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:39.26 +27:46:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193176_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.49 +29:47:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.22 +25:15:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193206_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193206_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193240_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193240_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.69 +27:48:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.51 +32:29:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193255_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193255_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.73 +33:40:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193291_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193291_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:44.88 +32:52:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:36.89 +31:10:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193322_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193322_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.65 +29:42:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193351_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193351_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:26.38 +31:30:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193365_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.02 +32:48:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193367_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193367_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.46 +26:03:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193389_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193389_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.07 +27:14:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.48 +26:22:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.58 +29:16:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.36 +28:00:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193430_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193476_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.36 +26:25:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193516_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193516_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:17.65 +35:04:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193535_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193535_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.53 +27:12:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193569_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193569_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.15 +32:21:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193581_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193581_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.65 +27:12:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:55.35 +29:39:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193605_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193605_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:31.39 +27:26:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193613_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.31 +32:38:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193636_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193636_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.67 +30:33:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193644_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.08 +26:07:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193661_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193661_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193717_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193717_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:30.38 +29:44:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193723_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193723_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.51 +33:49:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193779_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193779_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:30.39 +29:58:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.78 +25:33:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.70 +29:43:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.96 +25:27:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.39 +28:23:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.08 +34:14:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193888_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 193888_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.72 +33:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 193975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193997_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 193997_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:46.89 +31:55:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194027_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194027_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.73 +33:53:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 194037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194057_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194057_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:21.00 +30:56:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194099_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194099_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:30.17 +32:31:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.64 +29:44:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194172_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.68 +32:24:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194192_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194192_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 194221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.29 +30:38:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.66 +27:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.60 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:48.00 +26:59:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:42.52 +30:34:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.09 +30:16:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.41 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_21-50-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks