This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 11.62 16:55:00.00 -14:01:26.5
5.98639 18.03263 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:00.00 -14:01:26.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:00.00 -14:01:26.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 11.89 16:48:29.65 -08:28:44.2
9.88275 22.49808 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 -0 0 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:29.65 -08:28:44.2: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:29.65 -08:28:44.2: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 12.20 17:13:25.41 -07:29:48.9
14.33119 17.84688 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:13:25.41 -07:29:48.9: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:13:25.41 -07:29:48.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 12.98 17:17:18.08 -10:39:47.6
12.05672 15.35854 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 -0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:17:18.08 -10:39:47.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:17:18.08 -10:39:47.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.2180* 17 17 18.08 -10 39 47.6 13.0 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 13.42 17:06:40.95 -11:25:49.4
9.91654 17.13497 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:40.95 -11:25:49.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:40.95 -11:25:49.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2180 2461180.7180 13.94 16:48:29.36 -12:03:51.9
6.71392 20.45800 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 -1 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:29.36 -12:03:51.9: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:29.36 -12:03:51.9: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7180,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2180 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461180.71825916 20.05.2026 05:14:07.591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3861
Objects passed selection criteria: 3850
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3239.25
Average stars matched: 3164.75 (97.7001 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:21:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461180.71825916 20.05.2026 05:14:07.591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39509
Objects passed selection criteria: 39451
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35630.5
Average stars matched: 34277.8 (96.2034 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:23:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.71777800
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.URAi0iB9Gg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuS20xnxZJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8q76E9BKwE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bk9VCIjPnF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.URAi0iB9Gg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=183 n_q2=350 n_q3=215 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PuS20xnxZJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=180 n_q2=353 n_q3=214 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8q76E9BKwE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=195, passed=3304
Got 3304 stars (including 3102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=194 n_q2=296 n_q3=238 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bk9VCIjPnF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, passed=3187
Got 3187 stars (including 2996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.858 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.700 n_q1=206 n_q2=297 n_q3=221 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.628 worst_q_ratio=1.241
ref2=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.587 worst_q_ratio=1.156
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.585 worst_q_ratio=1.300
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.644 worst_q_ratio=1.332
reference average sigma_overall=0.6075 worst_q_ratio=1.1985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20282_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 20282_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.05 -09:57:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.69 -10:50:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.79 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.243 -09:59:48.04
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.644 -09:59:27.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNCgTuhvND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M2UwWCt1H3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOyXpng1QE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZWBF01twPO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.433700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.433700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NNCgTuhvND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.663 n_q1=195 n_q2=361 n_q3=190 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M2UwWCt1H3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=195 n_q2=358 n_q3=190 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yOyXpng1QE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1253, passed=36579
Got 36579 stars (including 35274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36579 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.738 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.631 n_q1=204 n_q2=301 n_q3=218 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZWBF01twPO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1192, passed=36533
Got 36533 stars (including 35288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.704 n_q1=214 n_q2=301 n_q3=206 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-13-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_001718_TTUQ2b1x1_2519665_zWrwfvB9/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:14.78 -09:11:28.0: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:00:30.82 -12:15:49.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:55.99 -12:28:08.2: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:10:09.31 -10:49:41.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:51.39 -09:49:10.6: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:14.81 -06:15:40.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:20.63 -07:06:46.3: 13.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:58:46.36 -05:56:29.2: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:55:00.00 -14:01:26.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:55.99 -12:28:08.2: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:14.78 -09:11:28.0: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:00:30.82 -12:15:49.3: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:51.39 -09:49:10.6: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:51.39 -09:49:10.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4761 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:30.82 -12:15:49.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5924 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:55.99 -12:28:08.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1641 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:14.78 -09:11:28.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4186 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:10:09.31 -10:49:41.9: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:20.63 -07:06:46.3: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:58:46.36 -05:56:29.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:09.31 -10:49:41.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2115 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:14.81 -06:15:40.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:20.63 -07:06:46.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8779 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:46.36 -05:56:29.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7815 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:14.81 -06:15:40.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7286 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:29.65 -08:28:44.2: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:55:00.00 -14:01:26.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:29.65 -08:28:44.2: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:07:15.42 -08:35:01.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:13:25.41 -07:29:48.9: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:17:18.08 -10:39:47.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:40.95 -11:25:49.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:05.9: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:46:00.20 -07:03:02.7: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:08:20.23 -05:51:22.5: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:07:15.42 -08:35:01.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:13:25.41 -07:29:48.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:15.42 -08:35:01.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5416 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:17:18.08 -10:39:47.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:05.9: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:40.95 -11:25:49.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:42.66 -14:00:05.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3467 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:46:00.20 -07:03:02.7: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:00.20 -07:03:02.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6378 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:08:20.23 -05:51:22.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:20.23 -05:51:22.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6667 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:16.68 -08:18:18.4: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:14.70 -06:48:29.2: 14.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:16.68 -08:18:18.4: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:14.70 -06:48:29.2: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:16.68 -08:18:18.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9127 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:14.70 -06:48:29.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1023 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:52.53 -06:32:43.2: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:53.35 -07:10:17.7: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:29.36 -12:03:51.9: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:52.53 -06:32:43.2: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:52.53 -06:32:43.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0038 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:53.35 -07:10:17.7: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:53.35 -07:10:17.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2143 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:29.36 -12:03:51.9: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:17.79 -07:33:08.4: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:46:28.37 -05:51:30.8: 15.17 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:17.79 -07:33:08.4: 14.82 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:46:28.37 -05:51:30.8: 14.74 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:17.79 -07:33:08.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1515 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:28.37 -05:51:30.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.2381 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:37.86 -09:25:13.2: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:29.88 -06:03:39.3: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:37.86 -09:25:13.2: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:37.86 -09:25:13.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1263 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:29.88 -06:03:39.3: 14.66 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:29.88 -06:03:39.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2389 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:26.50 -05:59:42.4: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:04.14 -06:41:37.1: 14.59 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:26.50 -05:59:42.4: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:04.14 -06:41:37.1: 14.76 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:26.50 -05:59:42.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2745 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:04.14 -06:41:37.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3324 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:50.91 -07:01:53.8: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:30.09 -09:28:02.9: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:50.91 -07:01:53.8: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:50.91 -07:01:53.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3546 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:30.09 -09:28:02.9: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:30.09 -09:28:02.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1077 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:04.86 -05:54:54.4: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:50.94 -05:49:59.0: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:50.94 -05:49:59.0: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:04.86 -05:54:54.4: 14.37 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:50.94 -05:49:59.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2553 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:04.86 -05:54:54.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3144 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:52.66 -07:50:38.1: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:01:27.46 -13:08:10.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:09.50 -07:57:28.3: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:04.54 -07:00:31.5: 14.93 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:52.66 -07:50:38.1: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:52.66 -07:50:38.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3695 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:01:27.46 -13:08:10.6: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:27.46 -13:08:10.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1896 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:09.50 -07:57:28.3: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:09.50 -07:57:28.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1023 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:04.54 -07:00:31.5: 15.29 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:04.54 -07:00:31.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.4598 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:59:27.40 -12:52:01.5: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:58:08.69 -11:47:11.7: 15.18 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:31.71 -10:23:13.1: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:59:27.40 -12:52:01.5: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:27.40 -12:52:01.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2115 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:58:08.69 -11:47:11.7: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:08.69 -11:47:11.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3240 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:10:06.48 -07:28:10.1: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:31.71 -10:23:13.1: 15.13 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:31.71 -10:23:13.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4245 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:10:06.48 -07:28:10.1: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:06.48 -07:28:10.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4858 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:23.27 -06:54:32.5: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:36.69 -11:50:38.2: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:00:29.15 -12:07:19.6: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:23.27 -06:54:32.5: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:23.27 -06:54:32.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3566 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:36.69 -11:50:38.2: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:36.69 -11:50:38.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2661 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:35.71 -09:11:48.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:00:29.15 -12:07:19.6: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:29.15 -12:07:19.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2943 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:35.71 -09:11:48.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:35.71 -09:11:48.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:04:00.96 -10:58:53.6: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:11:10.92 -10:11:16.0: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:04:00.96 -10:58:53.6: 14.96 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:11:10.92 -10:11:16.0: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:00.96 -10:58:53.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4796 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:10.92 -10:11:16.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4217 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71936_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71936_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:04.91 -09:58:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71939_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71939_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71950_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71950_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:18.00 -09:23:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71956_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71956_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71961_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71966_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 71966_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.08 -12:50:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71989_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 71989_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71991_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 71991_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72003_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 72003_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72019_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72019_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72033_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72033_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:11.79 -08:24:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72042_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72042_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.66 -06:11:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72052_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 72052_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:06.59 -08:26:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72065_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72065_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.49 -12:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72075_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72075_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.48 -14:09:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72098_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72098_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.99 -06:45:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72113_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72113_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 72125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72131_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72131_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72139_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72139_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.63 -07:33:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72140_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72140_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.05 -12:40:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72143_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72143_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.29 -13:55:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:33.63 -10:48:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72170_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72170_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:57.37 -06:46:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72184_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72184_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72195_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.63 -07:11:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.31 -08:12:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72249_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72249_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.99 -08:33:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72251_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72251_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.17 -12:16:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72252_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.69 -11:28:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72264_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72264_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72265_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72265_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72276_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 72276_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72281_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72281_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72295_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72295_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72320_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72320_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72326_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72326_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72343_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72343_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72346_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72346_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72350_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72350_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72366_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72366_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72370_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72370_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:08.60 -07:06:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72388_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72388_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.45 -10:23:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72394_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72394_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72414_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72414_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72415_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72415_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72428_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72428_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72433_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72433_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72446_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72446_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72452_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72452_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:58.66 -08:50:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72471_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72471_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72475_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72475_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72480_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72480_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72494_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72494_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72499_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72499_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72500_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72500_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72536_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72536_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72549_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 72549_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.34 -09:32:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.28 -12:51:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.54 -11:50:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:30.30 -11:28:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.28 -07:07:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.73 -08:16:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-20_00-14-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
