This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2152 2461180.7152 10.26 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6
357.98140 17.00166 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 2 -1 2 10.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7152,10.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2152 10.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2152 2461180.7152 11.82 16:55:00.17 -14:01:27.1
5.98666 18.03197 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 2 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:00.17 -14:01:27.1: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:00.17 -14:01:27.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7152,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2152 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2152 2461180.7152 11.98 16:38:08.19 -22:39:53.9
356.26038 15.99081 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 2 -1 2 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:08.19 -22:39:53.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:08.19 -22:39:53.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7152,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2152 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2152 2461180.7152 13.24 17:14:14.74 -15:29:07.6
7.45865 13.36635 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.159 Aemilia 1 -3 3 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:14.74 -15:29:07.6: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:14.74 -15:29:07.6: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7152,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2152 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2152 2461180.7152 13.94 16:37:03.38 -15:39:11.9
1.87168 20.55808 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 2 0 2 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:03.38 -15:39:11.9: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:03.38 -15:39:11.9: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7152,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2152 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461180.71550663 20.05.2026 05:10:09.773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6385
Objects passed selection criteria: 6382
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5389
Average stars matched: 5005.75 (92.8883 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:13:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461180.71550663 20.05.2026 05:10:09.773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 71616
Objects passed selection criteria: 71527
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61753.2
Average stars matched: 56169.5 (90.958 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1859760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:16:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.71487968
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0823 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0833 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01228 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j8eaXg4UfG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SGEdh33YD9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B76uMJ7fwA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hGVaoef5TX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.617200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.617200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j8eaXg4UfG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=163 n_q2=379 n_q3=154 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SGEdh33YD9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B76uMJ7fwA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=177, passed=3890
Got 3890 stars (including 3710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=195 n_q2=277 n_q3=165 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hGVaoef5TX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=156, passed=3511
Got 3511 stars (including 3345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=211 n_q2=233 n_q3=177 n_q4=323 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.617 worst_q_ratio=1.232
ref2=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.101
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.069
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.148
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21506_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 21506_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21508_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 21508_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:16.25 -22:52:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 21513_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.54 -14:35:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21518_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 21518_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.93 -17:20:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.22 -17:09:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.99 -20:12:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.52 -18:48:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0823 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0833 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:23.266 -18:02:27.68
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:26.099 -18:02:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01228 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XNpQ1LHUis
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lhkx6pBKqf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1GuEeeXyxo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LOKI7kVMwp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XNpQ1LHUis (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lhkx6pBKqf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5325, passed=90947
Got 90947 stars (including 85457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=182 n_q2=325 n_q3=175 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1GuEeeXyxo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1342, passed=42328
Got 42328 stars (including 40919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=193 n_q2=264 n_q3=173 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LOKI7kVMwp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1113, passed=39070
Got 39070 stars (including 37898 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=203 n_q2=228 n_q3=183 n_q4=330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-09-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_001053_TTUQ1b1x1_2234924_Ri3RJqwu/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:08.19 -22:39:53.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:22.30 -17:54:01.7: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:00.17 -14:01:27.1: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:04.95 -16:40:37.7: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:08.19 -22:39:53.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:13.45 -14:56:14.7: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:22.30 -17:54:01.7: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:00.17 -14:01:27.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:22.30 -17:54:01.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2042 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:13.45 -14:56:14.7: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:04.95 -16:40:37.7: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:13.45 -14:56:14.7: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5593 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:04.95 -16:40:37.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2155 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:25.19 -17:28:33.0: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:25.19 -17:28:33.0: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:25.19 -17:28:33.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8344 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:14.74 -15:29:07.6: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:16.20 -15:22:47.5: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:14.74 -15:29:07.6: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:16.20 -15:22:47.5: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:16.20 -15:22:47.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5995 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:03.38 -15:39:11.9: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:40.40 -16:38:16.3: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:18.46 -14:25:02.9: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:34.68 -15:56:05.9: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:03.38 -15:39:11.9: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:40.40 -16:38:16.3: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:40.40 -16:38:16.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1365 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:18.46 -14:25:02.9: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:18.46 -14:25:02.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0695 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:34.68 -15:56:05.9: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:34.68 -15:56:05.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1148 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:41.36 -14:14:58.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:41.36 -14:14:58.4: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:41.36 -14:14:58.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108163_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:16.05 -15:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108165_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108165_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:04.93 -15:08:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108181_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108181_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108185_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108185_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:23.99 -22:48:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108189_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108189_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:13.79 -20:44:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:16.25 -22:52:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108199_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108199_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:54.63 -22:47:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 108209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108225_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 108225_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108227_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108227_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:54.97 -13:29:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108229_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108229_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.45 -20:44:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108235_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108235_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:17.37 -22:52:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108245_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108245_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.49 -16:08:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:06.16 -21:13:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108262_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108262_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:11.82 -22:45:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108268_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108268_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.50 -18:21:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108275_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108275_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:57.56 -22:49:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108309_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108309_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:24.11 -16:12:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:58.70 -19:37:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:47.22 -20:30:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108317_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108317_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.16 -14:20:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108326_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108326_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108329_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108329_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:36.26 -16:49:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108333_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108333_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:47.83 -20:52:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108343_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108343_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.38 -20:05:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108344_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108344_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:16.41 -12:48:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108346_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108346_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:34.19 -16:44:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:09.03 -15:54:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108362_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.67 -21:44:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108366_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108366_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.31 -20:30:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108368_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108368_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:29.66 -16:41:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108370_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108370_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.38 -13:55:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108372_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108372_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:04.92 -16:39:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108377_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 108377_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.13 -19:06:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108382_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108382_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108389_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108389_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:10.09 -13:55:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108397_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108397_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:04.22 -14:02:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.10 -22:42:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108416_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108416_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.17 -16:35:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108419_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108419_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.73 -14:40:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.52 -18:06:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108436_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 108436_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108439_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108439_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:19.42 -15:23:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108448_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108448_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:32.60 -16:23:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108450_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108450_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108452_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108452_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:00.28 -16:22:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108463_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108463_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 108466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.94 -19:08:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.51 -18:48:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:49.13 -17:14:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.11 -16:58:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98923_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 98923_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:29.18 -18:41:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.51 -14:09:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.37 -15:27:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.99 -20:12:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.23 -17:09:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.88 -17:54:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 91355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.76 -18:32:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:05.67 -19:40:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.54 -18:05:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98135_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 98135_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.22 -19:53:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:15.99 -18:56:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90880_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 90880_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.05 -20:59:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16217_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 16217_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:24.90 -20:41:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.98 -21:07:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69995_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 69995_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:05.56 -15:26:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 90241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.13 -20:30:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 90161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:45.44 -15:48:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47842_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 47842_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:44.38 -17:15:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:20.11 -19:22:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 64188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.54 -14:35:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28438_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 28438_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:02.50 -19:27:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88848_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 88848_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.83 -23:11:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.92 -17:20:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.12 -22:01:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks