This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2140 2461180.7140 11.46 16:38:08.26 -22:39:53.5
356.26064 15.99068 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 2 -0 2 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:38:08.26 -22:39:53.5: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:38:08.26 -22:39:53.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7140,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2140 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2140 2461180.7140 12.22 16:33:22.52 -25:00:30.6
353.66813 15.32219 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 0 -3 3 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.52 -25:00:30.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.52 -25:00:30.6: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7140,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2140 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2140 2461180.7140 13.08 15:54:14.07 -26:16:41.3
346.29056 20.82259 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.678 Fredegundis 2 -1 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:14.07 -26:16:41.3: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:14.07 -26:16:41.3: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7140,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2140 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2140 2461180.7140 12.25 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0
343.51900 19.87331 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J154824.85-284331.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.260 V 14.600 V 2457115.70000 169.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0: 13.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0: 13.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J154824.85-284331.6,2461180.7140,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J154824.85-284331.6 20260520.2140 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2140 2461180.7140 12.41 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4
346.47493 18.00463 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1328 Sco
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 14.300 V 85.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4: 13.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4: 13.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1328 Sco,2461180.7140,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1328 Sco 20260520.2140 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461180.71440307 20.05.2026 05:08:34.425 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5261
Objects passed selection criteria: 5260
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4482.25
Average stars matched: 4450.25 (99.2861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:14:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461180.71440307 20.05.2026 05:08:34.425 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 81
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55129
Objects passed selection criteria: 55063
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46601.8
Average stars matched: 45849.2 (98.3853 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 159828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:17:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.71366802
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0573 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0533 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01035 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2kE23aB8f0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6Tc5pzFctG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SMNIFCmWw2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bf3iObHqk8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.627400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.627400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Loaded 8596 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4065 out of 4156 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4156 out of 5296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.0 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2kE23aB8f0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=6377
Got 6377 stars (including 5785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=284 n_q2=266 n_q3=255 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6Tc5pzFctG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=5296
Got 5296 stars (including 4896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=285 n_q2=243 n_q3=276 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SMNIFCmWw2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=202, passed=3190
Got 3190 stars (including 2986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=356 n_q2=143 n_q3=289 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.693
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bf3iObHqk8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=3183
Got 3183 stars (including 2981 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=346 n_q2=130 n_q3=338 n_q4=146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.310
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.693
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.410
reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.3035
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:04:53.72 -20:53:55.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:04:53.72 -20:53:55.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20100.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20100_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20100_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:53.72 -20:53:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.922 6243989305642554496 241.22366325162 -20.89852144449 10.0142 9.5695 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.922#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20103_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20103_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.19 -22:56:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20106_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20106_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.67 -26:54:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20108_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20108_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.67 -25:08:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20109_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.58 -23:03:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20116_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20116_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:53.77 -26:48:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.12 -24:06:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20026_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20026_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.31 -22:53:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0573 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0533 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:22.889 -26:01:54.69
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:20.229 -26:02:04.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01035 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJLVrcGubz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6XG2vQrOIM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f9Zw0T1n6u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nmuzW4ELRs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.413100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.413100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 56523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Loaded 8686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6533 out of 7007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7007 out of 56523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fJLVrcGubz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3556, passed=70421
Got 70421 stars (including 66735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=299 n_q2=278 n_q3=240 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6XG2vQrOIM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2201, passed=56517
Got 56517 stars (including 54204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=293 n_q2=251 n_q3=269 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f9Zw0T1n6u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=886, passed=30520
Got 30520 stars (including 29581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30520 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=339 n_q2=142 n_q3=311 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.542
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nmuzW4ELRs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=891, passed=30254
Got 30254 stars (including 29316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=336 n_q2=126 n_q3=354 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.487
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-07-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_000908_TTUQ1b1x1_2067918_aECC6626/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:38:08.26 -22:39:53.5: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:02:39.50 -25:41:39.1: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:05:11.51 -24:02:55.5: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:36:21.33 -23:40:41.1: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:46:36.88 -22:57:30.6: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:38:08.26 -22:39:53.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:09:22.87 -26:17:42.0: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:02:39.50 -25:41:39.1: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:36:21.33 -23:40:41.1: 12.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:05:11.51 -24:02:55.5: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:39.50 -25:41:39.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7619 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:21.33 -23:40:41.1: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0085 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:11.51 -24:02:55.5: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2817 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.52 -25:00:30.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:46:36.88 -22:57:30.6: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:36.88 -22:57:30.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9158 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:09:22.87 -26:17:42.0: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:22.87 -26:17:42.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2017 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.52 -25:00:30.6: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:18:19.50 -23:17:44.0: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:23.65 -26:17:46.2: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:04:39.07 -25:01:39.4: 13.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:18:19.50 -23:17:44.0: 12.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:05:29.45 -23:46:18.9: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:19.50 -23:17:44.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7297 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:51:21.61 -20:39:01.9: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:23.65 -26:17:46.2: 12.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:23.65 -26:17:46.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6564 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:04:39.07 -25:01:39.4: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:39.07 -25:01:39.4: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8619 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:37.51 -20:23:09.4: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:51:21.61 -20:39:01.9: 13.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:37:57.58 -21:15:58.7: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:21.61 -20:39:01.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5627 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:05:29.45 -23:46:18.9: 12.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:29.45 -23:46:18.9: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7868 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:37.51 -20:23:09.4: 14.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:14.07 -26:16:41.3: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:37.51 -20:23:09.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5905 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:37:57.58 -21:15:58.7: 13.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:57.58 -21:15:58.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1654 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:30.65 -20:34:04.1: 14.58 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:14.07 -26:16:41.3: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:40:21.61 -22:13:24.5: 13.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:28:09.52 -21:10:08.2: 14.65 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:30.65 -20:34:04.1: 14.08 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:30.65 -20:34:04.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.7019 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:40:21.61 -22:13:24.5: 14.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:21.61 -22:13:24.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2358 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:41:30.10 -22:18:09.4: 14.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:45.73 -20:26:01.4: 14.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:53:22.53 -20:53:13.9: 14.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:28:09.52 -21:10:08.2: 14.40 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:28:09.52 -21:10:08.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.5418 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:34:59.96 -22:48:32.2: 14.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:41:30.10 -22:18:09.4: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:45.73 -20:26:01.4: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:30.10 -22:18:09.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3045 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:45.73 -20:26:01.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8172 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:53:22.53 -20:53:13.9: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:40.70 -20:22:46.6: 14.78 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:22.53 -20:53:13.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7921 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:58.87 -21:06:43.6: 14.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:34:59.96 -22:48:32.2: 14.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:34:59.96 -22:48:32.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3007 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:40.70 -20:22:46.6: 13.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:40.70 -20:22:46.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7615 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:58.87 -21:06:43.6: 14.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:58.87 -21:06:43.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4989 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:52:43.47 -20:45:22.7: 14.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:39:35.46 -22:31:53.5: 14.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:14:27.98 -24:19:35.1: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:52:43.47 -20:45:22.7: 13.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:39:35.46 -22:31:53.5: 14.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:43.47 -20:45:22.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7740 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:35.46 -22:31:53.5: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4621 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:29:46.28 -21:56:55.9: 14.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:22:10.17 -24:09:06.3: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:17:04.17 -23:29:13.7: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:14:27.98 -24:19:35.1: 14.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:27.98 -24:19:35.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3824 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:29:46.28 -21:56:55.9: 14.67 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:21:52.53 -22:18:44.0: 14.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:46.28 -21:56:55.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6377 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:07:22.38 -26:13:00.2: 13.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:22:10.17 -24:09:06.3: 14.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:10.17 -24:09:06.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5938 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:17:04.17 -23:29:13.7: 14.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:04.17 -23:29:13.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7222 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:21:52.53 -22:18:44.0: 14.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:52.53 -22:18:44.0: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7156 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:07:22.38 -26:13:00.2: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:22.38 -26:13:00.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5194 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0: 13.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0: 13.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:48:25.02 -28:43:32.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2477 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4: 13.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4: 13.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:03:31.90 -28:12:07.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4013 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82991.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83013.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23978.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82764_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82764_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:20.15 -24:25:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82765_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82765_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:14.65 -21:16:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82770_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82770_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82773_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82773_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82774_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82774_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82775_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82775_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82807_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82807_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82828_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82828_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:33.39 -26:10:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82836_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82836_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.40 -25:39:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82842_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82842_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.65 -27:03:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82847_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82847_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.11 -25:42:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82853_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82853_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82856_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82856_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.39 -29:15:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82864_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82864_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.20 -24:53:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82882_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82882_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:49.55 -23:08:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82904_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82904_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.34 -25:11:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82906_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82906_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82908_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82908_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:52.06 -24:29:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82913_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82913_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.62 -25:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82916_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82916_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:09.12 -25:56:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82917_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82917_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.89 -27:54:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82921_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82921_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.38 -23:11:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82931_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82931_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82932_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82932_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82939_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82939_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82940_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82940_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:39.24 -22:11:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82948_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82948_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82953_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82953_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:05.46 -23:25:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82958_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82958_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82959_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82959_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82960_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 82960_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82961_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82961_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:16.46 -20:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82967_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82967_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82971_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82971_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82974_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82974_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:17.24 -30:14:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82987_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82987_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:18.21 -22:11:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82991_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82991_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:09.52 -21:10:08.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.615 6052378131528623360 247.03923234905 -21.16875150110 12.9082 11.6418 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.615#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82995_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 82995_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:21.93 -21:32:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83004_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83004_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83013_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83013_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:59.96 -22:48:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.418 6051228252821608064 248.74995571747 -22.80891726719 13.5353 12.5579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.418#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83017_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83017_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83021_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83021_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83027_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83027_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:29.26 -22:50:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83029_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83029_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83044_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83044_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:15.26 -21:29:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83062_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83062_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83070_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83070_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83072_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83072_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83089_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83099_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 83099_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15933_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 15933_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.59 -23:03:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 34125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.22 -27:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.78 -23:46:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.67 -26:54:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 35497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:31.76 -26:55:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.27 -22:53:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23978_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 23978_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07400_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 07400_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:56.73 -30:22:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48553_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 48553_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.68 -25:08:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36519_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 36519_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:37.62 -26:45:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69173_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 69173_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:22.06 -24:18:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.14 -22:56:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.13 -24:06:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.57 -23:40:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-08-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks