######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1223747 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1223747 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1117.9463
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 509.9474
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1118.3277
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 508.5005
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.48978
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T23:04:29.4096841' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T04:04:29.4096841' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61180.1697848262 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T04:04:39.3097315' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61180.1698994096 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.999394293235 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997523537534 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.5866666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.216666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.33236620962148 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29407 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29407 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 288.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits :)
Spent 0.524059 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T23:05:08.9012190' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T04:05:08.9012190' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61180.1702419096 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T04:05:18.8028897' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61180.1703565046 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.999394305639 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997523560966 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.4716666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.223333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.33472430687216 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29407 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29407 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 288.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits :)
Spent 0.528952 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.66990057
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0569 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00721 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aY7Vl7k6TA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BBIskzVPHx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dyKt6O1hcI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T58AAnwShZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
4.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
4.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aY7Vl7k6TA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BBIskzVPHx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=208 n_q2=265 n_q3=262 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dyKt6O1hcI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, passed=6970
Got 6970 stars (including 6709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=233 n_q2=258 n_q3=249 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T58AAnwShZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, passed=6956
Got 6956 stars (including 6705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6956 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=230 n_q2=258 n_q3=250 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.241
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.157
reference average sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:01:44.24 +42:19:31.9: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:01:44.24 +42:19:31.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:01:44.24 +42:19:31.9: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4414 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20573_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20573_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 11.13 | 09:08:47.93 +42:09:22.4 | 7738 5590 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.92 +42:09:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20842_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20842_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 12.46 | 09:01:44.23 +42:19:32.3 | 8528 5464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 12.43 | 09:01:44.24 +42:19:31.4 | 8533 5464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0569 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:18.471 +46:01:34.68
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:20.953 +46:01:32.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00721 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y0rAmYgkJg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.llyIE4o9mn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nRo4tfExUD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SVJ4pkhYqG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
3.9 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
3.9 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.y0rAmYgkJg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=208 n_q2=259 n_q3=261 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.llyIE4o9mn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nRo4tfExUD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1290, passed=27498
Got 27498 stars (including 26196 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=227 n_q2=263 n_q3=251 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SVJ4pkhYqG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=1225, passed=27362
Got 27362 stars (including 26118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=227 n_q2=259 n_q3=252 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:54:24.51 +47:07:22.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:14:49.52 +46:38:17.9: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:18:25.81 +48:06:20.4: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:53:53.71 +48:11:19.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:51:37.58 +48:38:47.0: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:02:00.92 +42:16:53.1: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:06.95 +42:15:41.9: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:30.1: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:02:00.92 +42:16:53.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:02:00.92 +42:16:53.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8611 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:18:25.81 +48:06:20.4: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:51:37.58 +48:38:47.0: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:25.81 +48:06:20.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2936 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:37.58 +48:38:47.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4358 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:54:24.51 +47:07:22.7: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:30.1: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:14:49.52 +46:38:17.9: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:54:24.51 +47:07:22.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8074 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:30.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7505 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:14:49.52 +46:38:17.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1781 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:53:53.71 +48:11:19.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:06.95 +42:15:41.9: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:53:53.71 +48:11:19.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8574 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:06.95 +42:15:41.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2454 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:54:17.73 +48:28:57.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:54:17.73 +48:28:57.0: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:54:17.73 +48:28:57.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5751 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.44 | 08:51:37.67 +48:38:46.2 | 9366 1559 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 14.43 | 08:51:37.49 +48:38:47.8 | 9370 1558 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52869_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.41 | 10:18:25.82 +48:06:23.5 | 0637 1391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 14.24 | 10:18:25.79 +48:06:17.3 | 0641 1393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52877_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.13 | 09:02:01.01 +42:16:51.5 | 8498 5493 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.75 | 09:02:00.83 +42:16:54.7 | 8503 5492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52878_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.02 | 08:53:53.67 +48:11:17.9 | 9156 1856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.77 | 08:53:53.74 +48:11:21.1 | 9160 1855 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52879_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.00 | 08:54:24.39 +47:07:23.1 | 9149 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.72 | 08:54:24.63 +47:07:22.4 | 9153 2506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53542_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 13.20 | 10:00:06.90 +42:15:41.0 | 1998 5209 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.29 | 10:00:07.00 +42:15:42.8 | 2003 5208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53746_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.28 | 08:56:24.80 +45:45:52.0 | 8998 3345 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:24.85 +45:45:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53920_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 13.80 | 10:08:29.00 +41:45:31.1 | 1013 5378 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.71 | 10:08:29.15 +41:45:29.1 | 1017 5379 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53955_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53955_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.61 | 09:44:57.78 +43:14:46.7 | 3744 4797 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:57.74 +43:14:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54359_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 14.13 | 09:14:49.60 +46:38:17.7 | 7033 2886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 14.25 | 09:14:49.45 +46:38:18.0 | 7038 2886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42157_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 42157_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 6.56 | 09:03:37.76 +47:09:24.2 | 8192 2542 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:03:37.77 +47:09:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06656_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 06656_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 6.61 | 09:00:37.37 +41:46:54.7 | 8677 5791 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:00:37.38 +41:46:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36163_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 36163_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.16990 | 2461180.66990 | 13.53 | 08:54:17.66 +48:28:57.2 | 9102 1680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-04-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.63 | 08:54:17.80 +48:28:56.9 | 9106 1680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 11.20 | 09:08:47.94 +42:09:22.4 | 7738 5590 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.93 +42:09:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38898_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 38898_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.45 | 09:29:12.68 +48:40:07.6 | 5595 1640 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40168_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 40168_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 13.22 | 08:54:12.59 +47:26:30.6 | 9160 2311 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19599_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 19599_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 7.02 | 09:28:40.21 +45:36:06.0 | 5581 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:28:40.21 +45:36:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20580_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 6.95 | 09:48:35.49 +46:01:16.3 | 3513 3095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:35.49 +46:01:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 38233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17036 | 2461180.67036 | 6.55 | 08:59:11.45 +48:02:27.1 | 8623 1982 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_230553_TTUQ1b1x1_167019_MYwb19kC/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_23-05-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits |
**** FOUND 08:59:11.45 +48:02:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.66990057 -observatory V36
04:13:47.36 +22:17:33.3 Mercury (-1.7mag)
06:04:17.39 +25:03:55.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:54:49.82 +10:58:33.8 Mars (1.3mag)
07:33:26.58 +22:06:29.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:11.29 +02:13:41.8 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:36.32 +20:11:57.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:42.57 +00:08:29.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:06.44 -22:58:17.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:07:19.00 +25:45:21.6 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 19 23:07 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.66990057:
07:33:34.49 +22:06:09.1 Io (5.9mag)
07:33:18.62 +22:06:49.6 Europa (6.1mag)
07:33:36.68 +22:06:08.5 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:33:58.90 +22:05:05.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:34:53.84 +21:43:29.3 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:33:28.70 +22:06:25.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:35:18.01 +22:07:15.7 Elara (17.5mag)
07:34:33.01 +22:28:28.7 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:40:47.05 +22:06:57.3 Carme (18.7mag)
00:43:03.97 +02:14:08.4 Titan (8.7mag)
00:43:14.26 +02:13:53.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:43:20.88 +02:12:45.4 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:43:16.62 +02:13:17.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:44:15.66 +02:18:18.1 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 19 23:07 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.66990057:
17:11:23.70 -31:55:14.8 JWST
21:06:49.92 -21:31:24.4 Chandra
08:11:36.46 -42:53:11.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 19 23:07 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.66990057 -observatory V36
13:26:27.41 -27:40:09.5 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:26:58.82 +30:48:36.9 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:31:50.99 +01:02:51.8 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:18:32.27 +24:24:57.1 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:47:54.99 +19:45:40.6 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:53:24.13 -31:10:57.9 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:35:14.81 -68:24:18.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:42:16.06 +31:44:27.3 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:05.25 +14:04:53.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:49.36 +30:46:20.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:10:34.85 +26:46:36.3 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:17:20.71 +31:39:04.6 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:41:19.68 +02:49:39.8 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:39:49.21 +20:55:39.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:26:59.32 -11:04:49.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:41.22 -07:17:45.6 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:15:25.92 +65:13:59.8 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:29:53.78 -05:05:40.8 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:10:50.13 +86:56:35.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:46:21.06 +63:47:29.3 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:17:01.23 +25:42:39.2 12.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:52:55.42 +11:29:13.0 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:44.29 +25:19:09.4 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:58:59.36 -17:51:20.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:47:57.80 +37:56:16.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:54:16.58 +53:25:38.2 16.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:10:47.99 -09:38:10.9 11.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:07.59 +04:30:12.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:23:56.33 +41:49:30.3 15.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:24.04 -11:53:04.7 16.2mag A/2026 E1
19:48:25.60 -08:10:07.9 9.8mag 10P/Tempel
14:22:02.66 -01:36:17.3 17.1mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:11.32 -00:52:21.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:47:34.43 -02:35:22.0 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:42:02.96 +22:57:22.5 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:19:30.25 +28:57:06.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:08:47.73 -07:50:08.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:42:43.60 +30:35:35.8 16.4mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:23:43.46 +14:26:46.9 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:36:36.02 +00:17:48.1 15.2mag 88P/Howell
03:53:36.19 +28:04:16.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:06:15.30 +33:20:22.4 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:18:00.33 +22:54:35.6 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:27:45.25 +17:47:15.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:55:31.49 +17:55:03.0 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:28:50.13 +19:40:33.5 12.3mag 141P/Machholz
04:31:56.74 +15:20:52.6 12.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:14:28.38 +12:09:57.1 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:43:40.41 -27:39:14.3 17.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:41:21.94 +15:27:11.4 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:17.55 -03:04:50.0 17.8mag 169P/NEAT
17:06:47.54 -09:54:50.8 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:51:16.18 +35:55:10.6 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:43:07.96 -10:03:33.5 16.9mag 260P/McNaught
03:14:56.85 +28:37:45.0 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
21:01:58.24 -34:03:09.2 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:25:03.65 +08:21:19.7 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:52:58.06 +21:08:36.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:29:00.30 +42:58:40.9 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 19 23:07 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 19 23:07 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 19 23:07 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
07:10:35.982 -68:41:17.89 AT 2026mli 2026-05-12.97 19.219
17:52:46.431 +47:52:46.86 AT 2026mlh 2026-05-08.38 20.1882
14:13:17.140 -79:34:21.34 SN 2026mlg 2026-05-13.16 19.098
13:01:56.482 -31:45:10.71 SN 2026mlf 2026-05-12.13 19.007
07:54:45.643 -77:42:34.01 AT 2026mle 2026-05-13.07 19.016
20:30:20.180 -54:23:56.77 AT 2026mld 2026-05-13.27 18.409
22:04:13.307 -62:36:12.13 AT 2026mlc 2026-05-13.37 18.826
05:26:12.032 -40:06:08.32 AT 2026mlb 2026-05-13.00 18.67
19:42:54.081 +00:48:22.14 AT 2026mla 2026-05-13.45 19.82
19:30:52.401 +01:28:25.46 AT 2026mkz 2026-05-10.43 18.98
19:16:53.816 +07:01:58.07 AT 2026mky 2026-05-13.38 19.79
18:26:55.952 +08:19:11.34 AT 2026mkx 2026-05-09.34 18.11
18:46:00.564 +05:06:38.95 AT 2026mkw 2026-05-08.40 19.71
14:09:28.410 +14:24:05.48 AT 2026mkv 2026-05-13.26 20.45
10:19:49.459 +35:57:58.03 AT 2026mku 2026-05-08.16 20.5914
08:06:09.530 +34:06:49.84 AT 2026mkt 2026-05-09.16 19.864
10:53:32.277 +43:02:13.19 AT 2026mks 2026-05-08.20 19.7954
18:01:16.824 +61:44:43.86 AT 2026mkr 2026-05-11.93 20.08
18:17:49.524 +02:21:23.22 AT 2026mkq 2026-05-09.38 19.93
18:01:57.479 +12:50:56.84 AT 2026mkp 2026-05-12.38 20.49
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 19 23:07 tns_transients_list.txt