This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6212,7.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1212 7.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6212,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1212 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6212,7.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1212 7.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1212 2461180.6212 13.17 07:29:40.83 +22:03:07.2
196.82348 17.95101 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 1 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:40.83 +22:03:07.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:40.83 +22:03:07.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6212,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1212 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6212,8.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1212 8.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461180.62150366 20.05.2026 02:54:47.916 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12692
Objects passed selection criteria: 12642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11702.2
Average stars matched: 10548 (90.1365 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:01:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461180.62150366 20.05.2026 02:54:47.916 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90818
Objects passed selection criteria: 90584
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82909.8
Average stars matched: 74836.8 (90.2629 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1891172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:04:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.62099307
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0370 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00797 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dcjKmvWKzW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MHHtiTLBoM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJehsVfxHe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tzf2ypVVgH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dcjKmvWKzW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=221 n_q2=248 n_q3=257 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MHHtiTLBoM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=167 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qJehsVfxHe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=808, passed=8511
Got 8511 stars (including 7699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.861 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.794 n_q1=205 n_q2=248 n_q3=218 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tzf2ypVVgH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=791, passed=8532
Got 8532 stars (including 7735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8532 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.852 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.834 n_q1=208 n_q2=249 n_q3=216 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.067
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.393
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits sigma_overall=0.644 worst_q_ratio=1.323
reference average sigma_overall=0.4035 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 34569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34580_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 34580_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.40 +23:26:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0370 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:04.527 +22:00:04.75
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:04.110 +22:00:32.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00797 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.to7cukaznl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JeVnBlJPTe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PlsZ5wJ9eZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n57VEAyC9m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
25.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.to7cukaznl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=245 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JeVnBlJPTe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=183 n_q2=265 n_q3=224 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PlsZ5wJ9eZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=6, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3552, passed=53081
Got 53081 stars (including 49465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=235 n_q2=230 n_q3=242 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n57VEAyC9m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=8, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3607, passed=53800
Got 53800 stars (including 50132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.683 n_q1=232 n_q2=228 n_q3=247 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_215927_TTUQ2b1x1_2508341_kXvWpb48/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:53.31 +25:02:16.7: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:56.84 +22:06:50.7: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:19.08 +25:55:37.2: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:53.31 +25:02:16.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:53.31 +25:02:16.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0365 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:56.84 +22:06:50.7: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:56.84 +22:06:50.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7882 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:11.80 +22:12:53.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:22.09 +18:38:31.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:40.83 +22:03:07.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:39.55 +23:47:16.2: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:19.08 +25:55:37.2: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:19.08 +25:55:37.2: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7803 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:11.80 +22:12:53.3: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:11.80 +22:12:53.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2857 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:30:04.24 +18:36:02.1: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:40.83 +22:03:07.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:22.09 +18:38:31.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:39.55 +23:47:16.2: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:22.09 +18:38:31.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0118 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:39.55 +23:47:16.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3391 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:22.88 +20:41:47.4: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.24 +18:36:02.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.24 +18:36:02.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2398 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:22.88 +20:41:47.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:22.88 +20:41:47.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3419 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:13.49 +17:46:49.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:13.49 +17:46:49.7: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:13.49 +17:46:49.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5572 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195458_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195458_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195472_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:37.65 +19:32:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195478_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 195481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195535_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.30 +24:07:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195548_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195556_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.32 +24:55:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195562_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.39 +25:56:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.17 +22:10:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.51 +21:18:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195579_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.80 +23:56:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195601_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195601_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.38 +24:32:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195604_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195604_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.66 +22:17:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195612_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:19.51 +21:35:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195616_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.56 +24:54:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195624_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.45 +21:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195627_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195637_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195637_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.41 +24:26:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195645_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195645_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.35 +20:30:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195652_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.17 +18:14:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.33 +21:47:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.90 +18:51:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195663_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195663_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:01.10 +23:54:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195669_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.16 +24:39:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.09 +18:51:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195673_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195673_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.48 +20:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:41.88 +20:52:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195694_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195696_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.70 +19:56:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.51 +20:26:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195710_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.99 +22:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195715_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195715_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:31.58 +25:24:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195719_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.92 +24:19:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195734_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.62 +19:09:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195742_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195742_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:05.32 +24:19:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195748_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195748_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.69 +24:24:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.89 +22:53:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195759_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195759_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.44 +18:53:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 195789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.14 +21:26:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks