This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2394 2461179.7394 12.60 17:06:28.92 -28:57:51.1
355.19388 7.09107 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 2 0 2 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:28.92 -28:57:51.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:28.92 -28:57:51.1: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7394,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2394 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2394 2461179.7394 13.16 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2
358.46707 11.78934 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 2 0 2 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2: 15.20 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2: 14.48 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7394,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2394 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2394 2461179.7394 13.03 17:10:47.89 -26:38:49.1
357.64955 7.68240 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 1 0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:47.89 -26:38:49.1: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:47.89 -26:38:49.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7394,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2394 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2394 2461179.7394 13.51 17:19:12.38 -24:22:15.8
0.62762 7.43226 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 4111011858171646080
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
20.080 G 20.540 G 0.625120000000
The object was found in astcheck.425 Cornelia 1 1 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:12.38 -24:22:15.8: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:12.38 -24:22:15.8: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4111011858171646080,2461179.7394,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4111011858171646080 20260519.2394 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2394 2461179.7394 12.40 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2
0.23251 10.84417 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 1 2 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7394,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2394 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461179.73961741 19.05.2026 05:44:52.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7493
Objects passed selection criteria: 7490
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6459.5
Average stars matched: 6276.25 (97.1631 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:51:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461179.73961741 19.05.2026 05:44:52.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 162
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83437
Objects passed selection criteria: 83341
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 77909.8
Average stars matched: 75459.8 (96.8553 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1952100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:55:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.73920191
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00418 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6BROxVted8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pQYFJA5tj5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCjMNuJsUD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BUgmwqvLiw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Loaded 11826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7072 out of 7305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7305 out of 10448 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.2 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6BROxVted8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=894, passed=11434
Got 11434 stars (including 10527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.985 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.822 n_q1=277 n_q2=292 n_q3=182 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pQYFJA5tj5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, passed=10448
Got 10448 stars (including 9823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=304 n_q2=261 n_q3=197 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oCjMNuJsUD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, passed=6294
Got 6294 stars (including 5917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.809 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.791 n_q1=298 n_q2=233 n_q3=201 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BUgmwqvLiw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, passed=6339
Got 6339 stars (including 5962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.805 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.828 n_q1=287 n_q2=235 n_q3=208 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.638 worst_q_ratio=1.543
ref2=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.307
new1=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.622 worst_q_ratio=1.301
new2=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.633 worst_q_ratio=1.308
reference average sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.425
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (920 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20721_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 20721_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.75 -27:02:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0146 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:47.489 -25:59:53.77
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:46.429 -25:59:49.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00418 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VRWlo9HstF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XFzGLV1InN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w4U2pmCyFi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tvguJk5VQN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.584200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.584200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Loaded 11895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8453 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 109163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 124 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VRWlo9HstF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=11806, passed=128268
Got 128268 stars (including 116305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.896 n_q1=284 n_q2=290 n_q3=171 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XFzGLV1InN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=7684, passed=109157
Got 109157 stars (including 101310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=291 n_q2=254 n_q3=207 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w4U2pmCyFi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4027, passed=73242
Got 73242 stars (including 69100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.740 n_q1=302 n_q2=217 n_q3=210 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tvguJk5VQN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=4197, passed=74511
Got 74511 stars (including 70206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.820 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.816 n_q1=297 n_q2=223 n_q3=208 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_044733_TTUQ2b1x1_1893502_DD6snUku/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:55.64 -24:19:41.6: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:22.49 -27:57:31.3: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:27:00.42 -25:44:58.1: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:21:35.76 -24:14:28.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:05:01.66 -26:20:52.8: 13.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:35.89 -26:20:02.3: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:08.89 -23:24:12.3: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:50:23.45 -28:05:42.3: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:59:24.60 -26:14:32.2: 13.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:09:00.25 -26:55:31.4: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:05:01.66 -26:20:52.8: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:01.66 -26:20:52.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2574 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:27:00.42 -25:44:58.1: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:22.49 -27:57:31.3: 13.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:21:35.76 -24:14:28.0: 13.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:55.64 -24:19:41.6: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:08.89 -23:24:12.3: 14.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:35.89 -26:20:02.3: 13.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:50:23.45 -28:05:42.3: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:00.42 -25:44:58.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6711 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:22.49 -27:57:31.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2807 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:35.76 -24:14:28.0: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4937 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:55.64 -24:19:41.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3842 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:08.89 -23:24:12.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8197 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:35.89 -26:20:02.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1996 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:23.45 -28:05:42.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6875 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:59:24.60 -26:14:32.2: 13.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:24.60 -26:14:32.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6874 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:09:00.25 -26:55:31.4: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:00.25 -26:55:31.4: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2230 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:47:16.83 -27:12:05.7: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:05:19.83 -25:26:55.4: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:15.02 -29:56:47.8: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:21:55.34 -24:16:47.5: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:50.13 -26:38:50.9: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:52:51.48 -29:13:04.4: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:54.57 -28:39:54.0: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:53.54 -29:16:44.8: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:43.48 -28:47:27.4: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:47:16.83 -27:12:05.7: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:16.83 -27:12:05.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1905 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:50.13 -26:38:50.9: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:21:55.34 -24:16:47.5: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:15.02 -29:56:47.8: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:05:19.83 -25:26:55.4: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:50.13 -26:38:50.9: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7746 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:55.34 -24:16:47.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7393 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:15.02 -29:56:47.8: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7817 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:19.83 -25:26:55.4: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0388 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:52:51.48 -29:13:04.4: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:51.48 -29:13:04.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6903 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:54.57 -28:39:54.0: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:52:15.62 -26:40:39.2: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:54.57 -28:39:54.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7357 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:53.54 -29:16:44.8: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:43.48 -28:47:27.4: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:53.54 -29:16:44.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4951 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:43.48 -28:47:27.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5655 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:52:15.62 -26:40:39.2: 12.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:15.62 -26:40:39.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5075 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:50:36.49 -26:46:38.3: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:11.70 -27:57:24.1: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:28.92 -28:57:51.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:50:36.49 -26:46:38.3: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:36.49 -26:46:38.3: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2879 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:11.70 -27:57:24.1: 12.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:56.86 -27:15:09.3: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:11.70 -27:57:24.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4318 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:29.33 -27:58:34.6: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2: 15.20 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:52:16.30 -28:36:45.9: 12.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:02:32.04 -26:14:17.9: 13.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:28.92 -28:57:51.1: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:56.86 -27:15:09.3: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:56.86 -27:15:09.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9177 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:29.33 -27:58:34.6: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:29.33 -27:58:34.6: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7948 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2: 14.48 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:58:16.04 -23:34:09.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.1318 delta=1.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:02:32.04 -26:14:17.9: 13.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:52:16.30 -28:36:45.9: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:32.04 -26:14:17.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9901 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:16.30 -28:36:45.9: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8756 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:51.93 -29:32:17.7: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:47.89 -26:38:49.1: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:01.86 -28:10:16.1: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:51.93 -29:32:17.7: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:47.89 -26:38:49.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:51.93 -29:32:17.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8953 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:21.57 -28:59:28.7: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:01.86 -28:10:16.1: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:01.86 -28:10:16.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2369 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:21.57 -28:59:28.7: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:21.57 -28:59:28.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0633 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:47.56 -29:46:03.6: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:25:14.14 -28:08:07.2: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:12.38 -24:22:15.8: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:02.89 -29:20:14.3: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:47.56 -29:46:03.6: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:47.56 -29:46:03.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3623 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:57:05.80 -29:19:49.0: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:35:27.81 -27:17:54.4: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:25:14.14 -28:08:07.2: 13.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:14.14 -28:08:07.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3251 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:12.38 -24:22:15.8: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:02.89 -29:20:14.3: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:02.89 -29:20:14.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3055 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:57:05.80 -29:19:49.0: 14.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:05.80 -29:19:49.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5775 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:35:27.81 -27:17:54.4: 14.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:27.81 -27:17:54.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.4782 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:47:55.46 -26:54:42.3: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:49:50.30 -29:25:20.6: 13.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:47:55.46 -26:54:42.3: 13.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:55.46 -26:54:42.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6412 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:49:50.30 -29:25:20.6: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:50.30 -29:25:20.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6489 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:09:34.30 -23:24:01.0: 14.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:55.26 -26:44:32.3: 13.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:02:16.05 -26:47:11.5: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:09:34.30 -23:24:01.0: 13.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:34.30 -23:24:01.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8702 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:55.26 -26:44:32.3: 14.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:14:43.88 -24:49:23.3: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:55.26 -26:44:32.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7018 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:11.59 -27:32:46.6: 14.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:02:16.05 -26:47:11.5: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:16.05 -26:47:11.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7655 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:14:43.88 -24:49:23.3: 14.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:43.88 -24:49:23.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7908 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:11.59 -27:32:46.6: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:11.59 -27:32:46.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7497 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:29.20 -26:13:09.6: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:03.52 -26:07:33.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:16:57.53 -23:10:30.8: 14.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:29.20 -26:13:09.6: 14.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:29.20 -26:13:09.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8519 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:03.52 -26:07:33.7: 14.62 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:03.52 -26:07:33.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.8279 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:16:57.53 -23:10:30.8: 14.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:10:14.44 -26:16:06.8: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:57.53 -23:10:30.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0265 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:10:14.44 -26:16:06.8: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:14.44 -26:16:06.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0723 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:06:02.21 -22:43:56.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4055 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147148.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146754_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146754_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146756_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146756_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146760_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146760_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146803_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146803_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:01.95 -27:58:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146808_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146819_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.09 -30:10:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146827_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146827_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146830_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.23 -30:03:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146832_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146838_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:53.45 -26:34:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146839_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146839_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146842_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146842_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146847_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146848_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146852_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146852_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146853_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:59.30 -29:50:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146858_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146858_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146892_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146892_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146932_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146932_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146946_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146946_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146978_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 146978_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:39.45 -27:40:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147019_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147019_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.24 -24:53:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147040_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147040_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.42 -22:43:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147053_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147053_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147058_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147058_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:28.52 -27:46:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147070_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147070_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:14.63 -29:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147082_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147082_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.04 -27:45:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147086_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147086_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147087_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147087_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:11.20 -21:56:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147106_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147106_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:44.76 -29:34:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147114_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147114_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:51.89 -30:05:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 147148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147151_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147151_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:24.58 -26:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147153_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147153_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:07.09 -28:14:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147158_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147158_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147173_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147173_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:32.67 -29:55:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147182_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.48 -27:57:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147187_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147187_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147191_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147191_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147209_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147209_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147218_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 147218_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:58.21 -29:24:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147232_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147232_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:01.05 -22:29:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147236_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147236_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.56 -26:53:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147241_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147241_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:00.00 -25:43:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147250_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147250_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:10.02 -30:12:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147253_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147253_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:20.30 -28:29:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147257_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147257_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147268_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147268_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.28 -22:41:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147279_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147279_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:30.43 -28:39:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147318_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147318_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:17.61 -26:32:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147322_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147322_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:30.31 -25:12:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147327_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147327_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147328_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147328_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.46 -22:40:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147329_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147329_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.01 -27:34:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147339_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147339_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:50.59 -24:51:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147346_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147346_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:22.09 -28:22:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.65 -21:44:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147368_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147368_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:30.53 -28:45:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147379_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:54.22 -29:52:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147389_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147389_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:17.04 -29:15:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147399_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147399_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:24.29 -28:16:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147425_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147425_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:34.49 -26:07:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:35.90 -22:43:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147429_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147429_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147434_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147434_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:59.10 -30:11:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147445_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147445_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:22.76 -21:40:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147446_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147446_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147447_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147447_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:11.51 -26:00:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147457_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 147457_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147464_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147464_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147467_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147467_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147472_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147481_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147481_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147482_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147482_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:22.36 -29:08:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147485_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147485_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147494_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147494_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147509_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147509_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147513_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147513_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:47.61 -22:39:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147532_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147532_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147533_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147533_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147541_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147541_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:30.95 -28:06:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147542_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147542_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147547_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147547_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147569_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147569_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147576_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147576_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:31.38 -25:28:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147578_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147578_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:36.85 -23:27:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147600_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147600_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147601_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147601_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147619_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147619_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147627_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 147627_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69963_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 69963_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143559_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 143559_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:03.05 -25:34:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.54 -22:44:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:12.53 -28:42:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.75 -27:02:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62119_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 62119_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:41.23 -26:50:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.16 -25:42:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:16.67 -24:13:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 54807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.15 -27:29:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:18.47 -25:34:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140183_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140183_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.76 -23:00:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140130_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140130_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:50.07 -23:11:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:10.91 -22:04:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:52.71 -27:57:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:40.17 -27:26:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.23 -22:01:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104777_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 104777_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 30301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:19.71 -28:54:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:16.20 -26:56:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:39.69 -23:45:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-44-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
