This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2840 2461179.7840 14.08 14:36:38.37 -01:48:29.0
348.33569 51.54303 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 6 2 6 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:38.37 -01:48:29.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:36:38.37 -01:48:29.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.2840* 14 36 38.37 -01 48 29.0 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7840,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2840 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2840 2461179.7840 14.37 14:48:19.93 +01:14:28.8
355.13479 51.85105 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 2 -0 2 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:19.93 +01:14:28.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:19.93 +01:14:28.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.2840* 14 48 19.93 +01 14 28.8 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7840,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2840 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2840 2461179.7840 14.55 14:29:13.10 -05:03:45.6
342.88731 50.06817 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 2 -1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:13.10 -05:03:45.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:13.10 -05:03:45.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.2840* 14 29 13.10 -05 03 45.6 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7840,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2840 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2840 2461179.7840 14.57 14:43:04.69 -02:37:33.1
349.45989 49.88489 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 2 -1 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:04.69 -02:37:33.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:04.69 -02:37:33.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.2840* 14 43 04.69 -02 37 33.1 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7840,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2840 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2840 2461179.7840 14.69 14:25:15.86 -02:28:48.8
343.99749 52.74449 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3002 Delasalle 1 -1 1 15.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:25:15.86 -02:28:48.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:25:15.86 -02:28:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.2840* 14 25 15.86 -02 28 48.8 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7840,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2840 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461179.78426345 19.05.2026 06:49:10.362 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5122
Objects passed selection criteria: 5120
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5033.25
Average stars matched: 4914 (97.6308 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:25:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461179.78426345 19.05.2026 06:49:10.362 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31811
Objects passed selection criteria: 31762
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31177.8
Average stars matched: 30199.5 (96.8623 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:26:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.78373737
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0300 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0224 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LLx63ukNSl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ObqUGmEzHh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bcr6zXt3TW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.26QJ81lO9L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LLx63ukNSl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ObqUGmEzHh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=261 n_q2=207 n_q3=204 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bcr6zXt3TW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=6201
Got 6201 stars (including 5849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=259 n_q2=204 n_q3=204 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.392
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.26QJ81lO9L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=6208
Got 6208 stars (including 5863 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=261 n_q2=204 n_q3=206 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.399
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.392
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.347
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.2585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:14.81 -05:24:01.6: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:29.89 -00:24:08.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:14.81 -05:24:01.6: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:29.89 -00:24:08.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:14.81 -05:24:01.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0371 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:29.89 -00:24:08.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3015 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 20334_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 20338_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:07.26 -00:32:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 20339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0300 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0224 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.263 -01:59:50.51
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:18.654 -02:00:24.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01101 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r74noebaZe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aVbV0Nriye
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oBlcV9wPnj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RogU0qrUj9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r74noebaZe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aVbV0Nriye (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1833, passed=36031
Got 36031 stars (including 34149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=275 n_q2=191 n_q3=213 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oBlcV9wPnj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1626, passed=35164
Got 35164 stars (including 33495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35164 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=275 n_q2=194 n_q3=209 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RogU0qrUj9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1659, passed=35100
Got 35100 stars (including 33386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=276 n_q2=192 n_q3=213 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-48-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_040728_TTUQ2b1x1_3542519_2od7JeUy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:22:29.51 +00:48:53.0: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:21.73 -04:42:28.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:28:58.49 +00:33:00.4: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:58.54 -06:00:12.6: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:52.66 -05:20:20.7: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:57.1: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:38.37 -01:48:29.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:19.93 +01:14:28.8: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.21 -02:20:37.3: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:03.85 -03:16:39.6: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:21.73 -04:42:28.2: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:58.54 -06:00:12.6: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:21.73 -04:42:28.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3270 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:22:29.51 +00:48:53.0: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:28:58.49 +00:33:00.4: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:58.54 -06:00:12.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4220 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:29.51 +00:48:53.0: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3983 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:52.66 -05:20:20.7: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:58.49 +00:33:00.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7548 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:52.66 -05:20:20.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.6681 delta=-2.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:57.1: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:57.60 -02:19:57.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4762 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:19.93 +01:14:28.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.21 -02:20:37.3: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:03.85 -03:16:39.6: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:36:38.37 -01:48:29.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.21 -02:20:37.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4369 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:03.85 -03:16:39.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4455 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:24.90 -05:33:32.4: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:52.80 +00:25:09.7: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:29.93 -04:10:17.9: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:13.10 -05:03:45.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:04.69 -02:37:33.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:02.43 +00:14:39.0: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.18 -00:38:16.7: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:49.06 -05:44:04.8: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:20:24.90 -05:33:32.4: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:24.90 -05:33:32.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6045 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:13.10 -05:03:45.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:29.93 -04:10:17.9: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:52.80 +00:25:09.7: 15.13 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:29.93 -04:10:17.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4956 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:52.80 +00:25:09.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6342 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:04.69 -02:37:33.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:02.43 +00:14:39.0: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:02.43 +00:14:39.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6388 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:49.06 -05:44:04.8: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.18 -00:38:16.7: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:49.06 -05:44:04.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7402 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.18 -00:38:16.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7018 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:09.13 -05:27:56.3: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:25.9: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:27.33 -05:41:21.5: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:17.14 -00:42:37.5: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:09.13 -05:27:56.3: 15.01 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:15.53 -00:44:45.9: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:09.13 -05:27:56.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5171 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:53.42 +01:49:13.9: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:25.9: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:27.33 -05:41:21.5: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:17.44 -05:44:25.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5196 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:27.33 -05:41:21.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6580 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:17.14 -00:42:37.5: 15.13 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:17.14 -00:42:37.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7938 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:15.53 -00:44:45.9: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:15.53 -00:44:45.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6171 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:53.42 +01:49:13.9: 15.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:53.42 +01:49:13.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7449 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:03.54 +01:56:11.2: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:24.39 +00:35:01.5: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:03.54 +01:56:11.2: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:24.39 +00:35:01.5: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:03.54 +01:56:11.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8065 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:25:15.86 -02:28:48.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:24.39 +00:35:01.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7748 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:43.42 +02:13:46.2: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:05.20 -05:33:04.0: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:07.48 -01:27:23.7: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:43.42 +02:13:46.2: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:25:15.86 -02:28:48.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:43.42 +02:13:46.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8487 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:07.48 -01:27:23.7: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:07.48 -01:27:23.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8235 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:05.20 -05:33:04.0: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:05.20 -05:33:04.0: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8202 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:12.74 -01:16:22.8: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:42.19 +00:34:10.5: 15.63 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:42.19 +00:34:10.5: 15.34 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:35.94 -05:11:32.9: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:42.19 +00:34:10.5: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.8409 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:12.74 -01:16:22.8: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:12.74 -01:16:22.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6464 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:00.15 -05:53:55.2: 15.37 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:24.49 -05:12:43.8: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:35.94 -05:11:32.9: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:35.94 -05:11:32.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8418 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:00.15 -05:53:55.2: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:00.15 -05:53:55.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7520 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:24.49 -05:12:43.8: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:24.49 -05:12:43.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8381 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:17.09 +02:09:25.4: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:03.17 +00:24:08.8: 15.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:17.09 +02:09:25.4: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:25:14.94 +01:32:51.7: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:17.09 +02:09:25.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9210 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:03.17 +00:24:08.8: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:03.17 +00:24:08.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9479 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:40.07 -06:13:15.3: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:05.82 +00:28:35.7: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:25:14.94 +01:32:51.7: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:14.94 +01:32:51.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7741 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:40.07 -06:13:15.3: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:40.07 -06:13:15.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8163 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:05.82 +00:28:35.7: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:05.82 +00:28:35.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8671 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:59.33 -00:25:28.5: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:24:10.44 -04:36:09.5: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:59.33 -00:25:28.5: 15.41 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:24:10.44 -04:36:09.5: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:45.17 -01:33:25.7: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:59.33 -00:25:28.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9207 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:10.44 -04:36:09.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6172 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:25.90 +01:35:02.0: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:52.54 -05:42:27.4: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:45.17 -01:33:25.7: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:45.17 -01:33:25.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8408 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:25.90 +01:35:02.0: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:25.90 +01:35:02.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8774 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:52.54 -05:42:27.4: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:52.54 -05:42:27.4: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8169 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:31.69 -03:33:56.8: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:41.3: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:41.3: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:31.69 -03:33:56.8: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:37.09 -00:45:35.1: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:15.55 -03:51:41.3: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7840 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:31.69 -03:33:56.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8669 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:58.24 -05:19:51.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:56.41 -04:56:29.6: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:37.09 -00:45:35.1: 15.39 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:37.09 -00:45:35.1: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9272 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:58.24 -05:19:51.3: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:58.24 -05:19:51.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8892 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:00.62 -05:14:00.7: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:56.41 -04:56:29.6: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:56.41 -04:56:29.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7598 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:18.06 +00:10:17.7: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:34.83 +01:07:01.3: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:12.32 +01:34:18.6: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:00.62 -05:14:00.7: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:00.62 -05:14:00.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8968 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:18.06 +00:10:17.7: 15.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:42:12.32 +01:34:18.6: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:18.06 +00:10:17.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9720 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:12.32 +01:34:18.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9915 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:34.83 +01:07:01.3: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:52.99 +01:05:06.0: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:07.18 -03:48:55.3: 15.37 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:34.83 +01:07:01.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9636 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:03.00 +00:34:26.8: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:55.97 -05:17:08.6: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:52.99 +01:05:06.0: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:07.18 -03:48:55.3: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:24.63 -05:18:05.3: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:52.99 +01:05:06.0: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9090 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:26.03 -04:49:52.6: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:03.00 +00:34:26.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:07.18 -03:48:55.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8701 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:03.00 +00:34:26.8: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9402 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:35:55.97 -05:17:08.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:55.97 -05:17:08.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7885 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:24.63 -05:18:05.3: 15.19 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:26.03 -04:49:52.6: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:24.63 -05:18:05.3: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9009 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:26.03 -04:49:52.6: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8694 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52489.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52676.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52397_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52399_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52401_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:34.43 -03:33:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52411_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52412_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52412_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:21.24 -03:07:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.27 -04:32:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52452_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52452_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.25 -04:19:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52468_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:52.55 -03:30:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52489_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52529_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52538_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52553_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52554_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52559_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52563_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52577_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52585_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52591_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52595_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52606_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52634_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52648_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52652_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52657_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52657_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52660_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52661_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52663_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52669_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:05.72 +01:50:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52676_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52676_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52685_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52686_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52693_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52697_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52707_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52712_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52713_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52715_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52719_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52723_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52727_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52730_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52734_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52742_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52750_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52766_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52769_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52774_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52774_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52780_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52786_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52788_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52789_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52809_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52811_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52814_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52815_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52820_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 52823_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_01-49-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks