This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 10.21 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8
40.65114 -25.12088 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno -0 -1 1 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8228,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3228 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 10.85 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1
37.96369 -21.78578 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2018058-053306
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.483 R1 Y 0.398 R1 53.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2018058-053306,2461179.8228,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2018058-053306 20260519.3228 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 9.37 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7
34.45806 -25.37034 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6904540462422485504 | 20:25:20.28 -10:01:06.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.3228* 20 25 20.71 -10 01 04.7 9.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6904540462422485504,2461179.8228,9.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6904540462422485504 20260519.3228 9.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 12.27 20:54:22.55 -09:57:46.1
38.03123 -31.79408 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys 1 -1 1 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:54:22.55 -09:57:46.1: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:54:22.55 -09:57:46.1: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8228,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3228 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 13.26 20:23:02.09 -07:06:33.4
37.05646 -23.58291 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina -2 -0 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:23:02.09 -07:06:33.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:23:02.09 -07:06:33.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8228,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3228 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3228 2461179.8228 11.83 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1
35.48821 -25.83755 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J2028407-092254
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.585 R1 Y 0.330 R1 89.000000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.3228* 20 28 40.86 -09 22 52.1 11.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2028407-092254,2461179.8228,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2028407-092254 20260519.3228 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
First image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Last image: 2461179.82320096 19.05.2026 07:45:14.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8040
Objects passed selection criteria: 8027
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6789
Average stars matched: 6625.25 (97.588 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 03:27:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
First image: 2461125.97108189 26.03.2026 11:18:11.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Last image: 2461179.82320096 19.05.2026 07:45:14.563 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57480
Objects passed selection criteria: 57367
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47092.8
Average stars matched: 45414.8 (96.4368 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 03:30:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.82248771
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lk6vBhW1UI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e8KZcPiA4c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YDmPsLsTdL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zyPnUWFCIF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 9314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6261 out of 6434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6434 out of 8342 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.622100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.622100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4945 to 316.6343 deg, Dec -15.2768 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 9314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6261 out of 6434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6434 out of 8342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 8370 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4944 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4944 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6671 deg
Loaded 9315 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6287 out of 6449 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6449 out of 8370 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lk6vBhW1UI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=8342
Got 8342 stars (including 7863 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=234 n_q2=193 n_q3=267 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e8KZcPiA4c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=464, passed=8370
Got 8370 stars (including 7896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=236 n_q2=192 n_q3=273 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YDmPsLsTdL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=167, passed=5266
Got 5266 stars (including 5097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=244 n_q2=136 n_q3=341 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.521
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zyPnUWFCIF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, passed=5329
Got 5329 stars (including 5150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=243 n_q2=137 n_q3=341 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.579
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits sigma_overall=0.505 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.521
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.579
reference average sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.2125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:27.0: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:14:06.60 -04:50:24.1: 9.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:07:14.87 -07:18:26.8: 10.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:27.0: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:14:06.60 -04:50:24.1: 9.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.95 -06:08:27.0: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9284 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:06.60 -04:50:24.1: ref_mag=9.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4001 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:07:14.87 -07:18:26.8: 10.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:14.87 -07:18:26.8: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3214 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8448 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.3654 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07269.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20468_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20468_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20469_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20477_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20477_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.07 -06:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20508_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20508_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:26.76 -08:05:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20514_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20514_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:00.49 -05:10:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 20522_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20566_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20566_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:41.55 -06:21:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04494_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 04494_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:27.31 -09:14:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 07269_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03962_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 03962_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:25:20.71 -10:01:04.7
20:18:05.84 -05:33:07.1
20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:18.108 -10:00:22.01
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.806 -10:00:06.62
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.751 -10:00:38.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zWRnY0hrLq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IV8XBjsvSX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m2hqpB2m2N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KaJKciwILl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7527 out of 8327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8327 out of 62226 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.440000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.440000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4584 to 316.6523 deg, Dec -15.2810 to -4.6636 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7527 out of 8327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8327 out of 62226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 62427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4574 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2743 to -4.6552 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4574 to 316.6348 deg, Dec -15.2743 to -4.6552 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7544 out of 8328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8328 out of 62427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
14.5 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zWRnY0hrLq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3361, passed=62212
Got 62212 stars (including 58779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=242 n_q2=197 n_q3=250 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IV8XBjsvSX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3361, passed=62415
Got 62415 stars (including 58979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=239 n_q2=192 n_q3=253 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m2hqpB2m2N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1095, passed=32280
Got 32280 stars (including 31148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=239 n_q2=130 n_q3=349 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.484
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KaJKciwILl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1131, passed=32987
Got 32987 stars (including 31818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=244 n_q2=132 n_q3=348 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.688
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-44-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_032457_TTUQ1b1x1_3923754_A7fhmcTR/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:10:28.44 -06:07:26.1: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 21:00:43.14 -13:46:30.5: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:09:48.14 -05:14:40.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:04:00.63 -09:06:28.9: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:26:20.96 -06:08:26.7: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:27:53.39 -05:39:36.1: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:14:06.62 -04:50:24.2: 9.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:10:28.44 -06:07:26.1: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:28.44 -06:07:26.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6749 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 21:00:43.14 -13:46:30.5: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:26:20.96 -06:08:26.7: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:43.14 -13:46:30.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7054 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.96 -06:08:26.7: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2869 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:04:00.63 -09:06:28.9: 11.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:09:48.14 -05:14:40.0: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:00.63 -09:06:28.9: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8381 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:48.14 -05:14:40.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8367 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:27:53.39 -05:39:36.1: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.39 -05:39:36.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4017 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:14:06.62 -04:50:24.2: 9.50 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:06.62 -04:50:24.2: ref_mag=9.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7174 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:12:44.91 -07:33:48.0: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:53:45.92 -15:14:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:53:45.92 -15:14:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:45.92 -15:14:22.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:12:44.91 -07:33:48.0: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:44.91 -07:33:48.0: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4862 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:54:45.19 -08:54:15.8: 12.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:10:04.92 -08:08:01.2: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:05:01.08 -11:57:06.4: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:30:08.11 -05:32:13.5: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:15:52.73 -04:57:25.8: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 21:05:39.86 -08:24:45.8: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:54:45.19 -08:54:15.8: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:54:22.55 -09:57:46.1: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:45.19 -08:54:15.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1043 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:10:04.92 -08:08:01.2: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:05:01.08 -11:57:06.4: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:04.92 -08:08:01.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6956 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:30:08.11 -05:32:13.5: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:01.08 -11:57:06.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6244 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:08.11 -05:32:13.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7069 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:15:52.73 -04:57:25.8: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:52.73 -04:57:25.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9020 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 21:05:39.86 -08:24:45.8: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:39.86 -08:24:45.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2293 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:54:22.55 -09:57:46.1: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:30:32.85 -05:24:46.7: 13.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:30:32.85 -05:24:46.7: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:32.85 -05:24:46.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0439 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:27:07.76 -04:49:16.2: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:17:43.85 -05:47:29.7: 13.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:23:02.09 -07:06:33.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:17:43.85 -05:47:29.7: 13.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:43.85 -05:47:29.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7826 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:27:07.76 -04:49:16.2: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:07.76 -04:49:16.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2519 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:23:02.09 -07:06:33.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0689.fits at 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-18-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0690.fits at 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:28:40.86 -09:22:52.1: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8270 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31883.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77762_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77762_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77764_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77764_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77818_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77818_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:32.71 -04:53:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77868_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77868_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:41.56 -06:21:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77899_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77987_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 77987_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78130_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78130_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.63 -12:35:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78160_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78160_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78161_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78161_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:19.36 -12:24:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78168_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78168_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78226_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78226_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78236_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78236_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78267_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78267_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78270_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78270_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.27 -07:01:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78310_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78310_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78330_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78330_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78350_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 78350_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78352_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78352_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:23.82 -05:36:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78391_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78391_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:57.93 -05:56:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78514_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78514_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78571_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 78571_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78686_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 78686_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01148_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 01148_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:00.98 -14:46:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60495_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 60495_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:26.75 -08:05:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 37687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:00.50 -05:10:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61001_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 61001_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:18.87 -08:15:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 27633_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:20.69 -10:01:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57296_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 57296_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:24.05 -07:25:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32138_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 32138_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:27.31 -09:14:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
Preparing report for the candidate 31883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20985_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 20985_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:26.42 -11:08:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 21794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:26.28 -11:00:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51281_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 51281_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.07 -06:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30426_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 30426_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:40.37 -09:29:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12344_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 12344_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:50:41.94 -12:32:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33851_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 33851_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:39.16 -08:59:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10342_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 10342_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:40.12 -12:45:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00966_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 00966_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:16.33 -14:57:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11663_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 11663_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.70 -12:32:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28904_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 28904_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:53.35 -09:41:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12020_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337
The candidate 12020_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-45-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks
