This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 10.44 20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4
40.65060 -25.12090 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -1 1 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8178,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3178 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 10.19 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7
46.41641 -27.73726 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" TV Aqr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 14.200 V 2452832.00000 398.500000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TV Aqr,2461179.8178,10.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TV Aqr 20260519.3178 10.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 13.79 20:51:13.73 -01:26:14.3
46.26156 -27.10280 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba 2 -1 2 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:51:13.73 -01:26:14.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:51:13.73 -01:26:14.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8178,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3178 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 11.97 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3
43.00728 -17.66138 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J201225+0034.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.110 V Y 0.440 V 2452875.60000 171.070938000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201225+0034.5,2461179.8178,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201225+0034.5 20260519.3178 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 11.40 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6
42.39929 -21.19971 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J202344-0137.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.450 V Y 0.650 V 2452738.70000 145.833328000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202344-0137.7,2461179.8178,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202344-0137.7 20260519.3178 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 12.66 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0
44.91731 -22.01771 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203108.21+000121.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.610 V 14.130 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203108.21+000121.9,2461179.8178,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203108.21+000121.9 20260519.3178 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3178 2461179.8178 11.76 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9
45.36528 -22.22755 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J203241+0016.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.990 V Y 0.450 V 2452415.40000 117.331528000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J203241+0016.8,2461179.8178,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J203241+0016.8 20260519.3178 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.95973562 26.03.2026 11:01:51.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
First image: 2461125.95973562 26.03.2026 11:01:51.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Last image: 2461179.81804066 19.05.2026 07:37:48.713 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 22
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9026
Objects passed selection criteria: 9018
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8624
Average stars matched: 8514.25 (98.7274 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 03:27:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.95973562 26.03.2026 11:01:51.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
First image: 2461125.95973562 26.03.2026 11:01:51.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Last image: 2461179.81804066 19.05.2026 07:37:48.713 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64298
Objects passed selection criteria: 64204
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58294.8
Average stars matched: 57181.2 (98.0899 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 03:30:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.81752933
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Image size: 938.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77
Second-epoch image center 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0673 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77
Second-epoch image center 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WauchKjRLG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jMdNbuwJtZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uNyZ8rq3ac
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RxkpDeGgR7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10736 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7103 to 316.4710 deg, Dec -7.3077 to +3.2529 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7103 to 316.4710 deg, Dec -7.3077 to 3.2529 deg
Loaded 10854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7824 out of 8080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8080 out of 10736 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.659800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.659800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10736 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7103 to 316.4710 deg, Dec -7.3077 to +3.2529 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7103 to 316.4710 deg, Dec -7.3077 to 3.2529 deg
Loaded 10854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7824 out of 8080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8080 out of 10736 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 8408 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7183 to 316.4871 deg, Dec -7.2702 to +3.2797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7183 to 316.4871 deg, Dec -7.2702 to 3.2797 deg
Loaded 10870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6698 out of 6856 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6856 out of 8408 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
14.2 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WauchKjRLG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=609, passed=10736
Got 10736 stars (including 10121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10736 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=242 n_q2=223 n_q3=245 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jMdNbuwJtZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=8408
Got 8408 stars (including 7961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.625 n_q1=242 n_q2=214 n_q3=251 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uNyZ8rq3ac (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, passed=7803
Got 7803 stars (including 7529 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=235 n_q2=163 n_q3=333 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RxkpDeGgR7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, passed=7775
Got 7775 stars (including 7498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=227 n_q2=166 n_q3=332 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.240
ref2=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.312
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.220
reference average sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.276
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.1: 10.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:23:54.78 +00:56:43.8: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:57.16 +01:57:40.8: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:14:44.81 +00:24:26.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:23:54.78 +00:56:43.8: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:54.78 +00:56:43.8: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2418 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.1: 10.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:57.16 +01:57:40.8: 12.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:29:01.89 -01:37:31.8: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:14:44.81 +00:24:26.7: 12.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3913 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.1: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0650 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:57.16 +01:57:40.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5718 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:44.81 +00:24:26.7: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5450 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:08:12.66 -01:09:28.9: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:19:24.89 +02:18:34.0: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:29:39.72 +00:56:15.3: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:29:01.89 -01:37:31.8: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:01.89 -01:37:31.8: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5202 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:08:12.66 -01:09:28.9: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:12.66 -01:09:28.9: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6281 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:24:30.64 +02:00:41.1: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:19:24.89 +02:18:34.0: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:24.89 +02:18:34.0: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7162 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:29:39.72 +00:56:15.3: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:39.72 +00:56:15.3: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6615 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:15:02.09 -01:30:35.9: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:24:30.64 +02:00:41.1: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:30.64 +02:00:41.1: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7799 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:15:02.09 -01:30:35.9: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:02.09 -01:30:35.9: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1140 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1915 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20270.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20159_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20159_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.88 -00:54:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 20170_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20189_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20198_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20198_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20207_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20207_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:12.07 -02:39:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20226_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20234_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20234_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.85 -04:25:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20265_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.267 4229165446384929152 305.93338660438 -01.62773110476 10.5611 9.2649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.267#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:14.69 -00:23:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20298_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20311_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20314_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20329_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 20334_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05534_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 05534_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:50.63 -01:36:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03127_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 03127_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:25.00 -04:05:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01130_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 01130_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.09 -06:09:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 05596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05526_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 05526_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02085_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 02085_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:00.57 -05:10:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:53:42.15 -01:38:07.7
20:34:32.66 -04:53:46.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Image size: 938.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77
Second-epoch image center 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0673 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.126 -02:01:50.77
Second-epoch image center 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:40.870 -02:00:56.31
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:38.148 -02:00:54.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01135 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits &> /tmp/tmp.948TRYC4Rt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tuvYABWc9B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1fbgk76fbG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OgujpX0JCw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76980 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.6959 to 316.4725 deg, Dec -7.3104 to +3.2538 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.6959 to 316.4725 deg, Dec -7.3104 to 3.2538 deg
Loaded 10870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8581 out of 9781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9781 out of 76980 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.487900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.487900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76980 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.6959 to 316.4725 deg, Dec -7.3104 to +3.2538 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.6959 to 316.4725 deg, Dec -7.3104 to 3.2538 deg
Loaded 10870 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8581 out of 9781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9781 out of 76980 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 64347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7146 to 316.4911 deg, Dec -7.2815 to +3.2836 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7146 to 316.4911 deg, Dec -7.2815 to 3.2836 deg
Loaded 10888 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8875 out of 9794 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9794 out of 64347 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
14.4 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.948TRYC4Rt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5065, passed=76968
Got 76968 stars (including 71806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=243 n_q2=216 n_q3=242 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tuvYABWc9B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3448, passed=64340
Got 64340 stars (including 60804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.636 n_q1=244 n_q2=208 n_q3=248 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1fbgk76fbG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2111, passed=46855
Got 46855 stars (including 44694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=228 n_q2=162 n_q3=331 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OgujpX0JCw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2045, passed=46824
Got 46824 stars (including 44733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=230 n_q2=164 n_q3=326 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0334.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_032056_TTUQ1b1x1_3489078_j4L7xFXU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:15:07.47 -01:53:56.6: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:33.84 -01:51:24.3: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:11:46.67 -02:05:27.9: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:18:29.89 +00:20:47.8: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:54.34 +02:51:10.1: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:21:10.83 +02:05:02.4: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:30:41.44 +02:57:52.9: 13.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:09:32.50 +01:48:05.0: 13.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:26:54.62 +02:23:11.8: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:15:07.47 -01:53:56.6: 13.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:07.47 -01:53:56.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3152 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:09:32.50 +01:48:05.0: 13.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:32.50 +01:48:05.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4900 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:30:41.44 +02:57:52.9: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:11:46.67 -02:05:27.9: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:32.28 -07:17:52.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:26:54.62 +02:23:11.8: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:41.44 +02:57:52.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5566 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:18:29.89 +00:20:47.8: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:46.67 -02:05:27.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7374 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:54.34 +02:51:10.1: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:33.84 -01:51:24.3: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:21:10.83 +02:05:02.4: 13.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:54.62 +02:23:11.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3834 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:29.89 +00:20:47.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8888 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:54.34 +02:51:10.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3555 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:33.84 -01:51:24.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4690 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:10.83 +02:05:02.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3325 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:32.6: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:53.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.0: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:20:00.08 +03:07:41.3: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:07:38.65 +00:15:02.7: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:53.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.59 -07:16:53.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:20:00.08 +03:07:41.3: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.0: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:32.6: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:27:53.38 -05:39:34.8: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:11:12.42 -00:08:40.8: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:02.12 +03:08:23.0: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2323 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:32.6: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7989 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:00.08 +03:07:41.3: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1746 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:26:20.91 +02:56:38.5: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:07:38.65 +00:15:02.7: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:34:23.67 -00:27:19.4: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:38.65 +00:15:02.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1844 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:11:12.42 -00:08:40.8: 12.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.42 -00:08:40.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7173 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:13:34.34 +01:59:36.2: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:26:20.91 +02:56:38.5: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:34:23.67 -00:27:19.4: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:27:53.38 -05:39:34.8: 12.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:23.67 -00:27:19.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5879 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.91 +02:56:38.5: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8803 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.38 -05:39:34.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3783 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:48:19.76 -04:37:40.0: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:13:34.34 +01:59:36.2: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:34.34 +01:59:36.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8671 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:48:19.76 -04:37:40.0: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:19.76 -04:37:40.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3487 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:06:49.98 +00:20:47.3: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:20:40.54 +02:32:51.7: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:36:41.49 -02:35:08.5: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:23.0: 13.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:06:49.98 +00:20:47.3: 12.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:36:41.49 -02:35:08.5: 12.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:49.98 +00:20:47.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0643 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:41.49 -02:35:08.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6184 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:14:53.18 +01:04:59.7: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:07:56.00 +00:30:43.8: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:20:40.54 +02:32:51.7: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:40.54 +02:32:51.7: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0000 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:11.63 +00:22:06.7: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:23.0: 13.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:15.70 +02:19:03.8: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:23.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0317 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:33.73 -01:26:43.6: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:07:56.00 +00:30:43.8: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:14:53.18 +01:04:59.7: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:56.00 +00:30:43.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1542 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:53.18 +01:04:59.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2097 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:11.63 +00:22:06.7: 13.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:16.75 -02:21:10.4: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:11.63 +00:22:06.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0639 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:15.70 +02:19:03.8: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.70 +02:19:03.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2445 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:33.73 -01:26:43.6: 13.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:33.73 -01:26:43.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1504 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:16.75 -02:21:10.4: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:16.75 -02:21:10.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0670 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:26:43.07 +01:03:37.1: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:09:26.20 +02:02:13.2: 13.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:08:56.71 -01:41:20.8: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:09:26.20 +02:02:13.2: 13.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:26.20 +02:02:13.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4016 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:13:34.40 +01:19:29.2: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:26:43.07 +01:03:37.1: 13.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:43.07 +01:03:37.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2065 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:08:56.71 -01:41:20.8: 13.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:56.71 -01:41:20.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4109 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:07:15.22 -01:23:16.9: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:08:45.59 -00:10:08.3: 13.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:35.65 +01:48:02.8: 13.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:13:34.40 +01:19:29.2: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:34.40 +01:19:29.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4205 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:14:54.49 -02:40:47.2: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:05:08.56 +03:04:52.5: 14.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:35.65 +01:48:02.8: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:07:15.22 -01:23:16.9: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:35.65 +01:48:02.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6226 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:08:45.59 -00:10:08.3: 14.38 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:07:15.96 +03:08:48.2: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:15.22 -01:23:16.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5483 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:45.59 -00:10:08.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5556 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:14:54.49 -02:40:47.2: 13.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:54.49 -02:40:47.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5022 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:05:08.56 +03:04:52.5: 14.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:08.56 +03:04:52.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7877 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:11:20.60 +02:55:41.5: 14.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:07:15.96 +03:08:48.2: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:10:39.60 -00:56:42.6: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:15.96 +03:08:48.2: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8076 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:07:33.81 +02:44:16.1: 14.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:10:39.60 -00:56:42.6: 14.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:11:20.60 +02:55:41.5: 14.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:20.60 +02:55:41.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8084 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:39.60 -00:56:42.6: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6314 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:04:52.97 +01:44:05.3: 14.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:07:33.81 +02:44:16.1: 14.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:33.81 +02:44:16.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8661 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:21.88 +02:40:35.9: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:06:06.96 +02:42:24.4: 14.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:20:41.74 -00:31:22.6: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:04:52.97 +01:44:05.3: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:52.97 +01:44:05.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8762 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:21.88 +02:40:35.9: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:21.88 +02:40:35.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7676 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:06:06.96 +02:42:24.4: 14.42 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:06:08.76 +02:59:40.7: 14.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:06.96 +02:42:24.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0173 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:20:41.74 -00:31:22.6: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:41.74 -00:31:22.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6700 delta=-0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:29.42 +01:44:46.3: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:17:37.47 +02:57:14.5: 14.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:20:17.50 +02:19:16.4: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:06:08.76 +02:59:40.7: 14.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:08.76 +02:59:40.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9786 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:13:28.02 +00:50:25.7: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:29.42 +01:44:46.3: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:29.42 +01:44:46.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8842 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:17:37.47 +02:57:14.5: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:37.47 +02:57:14.5: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8025 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:24:35.43 +02:42:16.7: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:51:13.73 -01:26:14.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:14:56.40 +00:17:18.8: 14.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:20:17.50 +02:19:16.4: 14.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:19:09.80 +01:09:49.5: 14.71 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:13:28.02 +00:50:25.7: 14.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:17.50 +02:19:16.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0280 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:28.02 +00:50:25.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0791 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:24:35.43 +02:42:16.7: 14.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:14:56.40 +00:17:18.8: 14.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:51:13.73 -01:26:14.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:35.43 +02:42:16.7: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0177 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:56.40 +00:17:18.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9457 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:19:09.80 +01:09:49.5: 14.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:09.80 +01:09:49.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1824 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:59:31.33 -06:44:41.3: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:12:25.19 +00:34:26.3: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9789 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:59:31.33 -06:44:41.3: 13.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:31.33 -06:44:41.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6482 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:08.33 +00:01:21.0: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.6591 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:44.08 -01:37:40.6: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4032 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_06-01-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0674.fits at 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-29_05-43-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits at 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:32:41.27 +00:16:47.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7507 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37720.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72286.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91014.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89415_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89415_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89420_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89420_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89422_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89422_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89429_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89429_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89430_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89430_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89433_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89433_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89436_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89436_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89438_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89438_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89532_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89532_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:32.67 -04:53:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89550_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89550_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89564_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89564_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89591_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89591_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.85 -04:25:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89697_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89697_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89708_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89708_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89724_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89724_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:10.71 +01:45:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89728_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89728_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89749_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89749_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:00.49 -01:41:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89777_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89777_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89906_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89906_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.70 -03:51:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89929_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89929_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:46.42 +02:59:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89998_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 89998_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90023_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90023_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90029_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90029_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90058_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90058_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90093_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90093_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90117_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90117_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90124_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90124_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90159_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90159_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90162_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90162_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90172_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90172_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90186_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90186_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90229_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90229_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90303_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90303_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90363_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90363_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90379_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90379_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:20.37 +02:37:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90391_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90432_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90432_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90473_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90473_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90475_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90475_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:58.45 -01:27:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90479_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90479_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90541_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90541_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:59.75 -04:39:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90586_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90586_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90606_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90606_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90623_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90623_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90641_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90641_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90655_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90655_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90717_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90717_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90722_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90722_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:41.77 +02:26:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90737_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90737_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90772_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90772_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90810_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90810_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90840_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90840_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90842_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90842_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:00.30 +01:30:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90847_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90847_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:22.62 +01:59:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90854_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90854_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90856_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90856_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90893_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90893_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90912_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90912_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90931_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90931_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:58.99 +01:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90967_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90967_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90990_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90990_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90994_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 90994_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91004_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 91004_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91014_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 91014_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37834_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 37834_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:50.63 -01:36:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37456_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 37456_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:42.14 -01:38:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70730_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 70730_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71523_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 71523_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:31.73 +00:25:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19237_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 19237_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:25.01 -04:05:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39327_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 39327_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.52 -01:31:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03105_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 03105_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37720_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 37720_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 29424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:12.08 -02:39:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05920_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 05920_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.09 -06:09:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73635_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 73635_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51630_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 51630_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:23.97 -00:49:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49954_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 49954_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:45.66 +02:22:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76142_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 76142_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:14.69 -00:23:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36372_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 36372_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.02 -01:49:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72286_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
Preparing report for the candidate 72286_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58175_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 58175_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.87 -00:54:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12009_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 12009_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:00.44 -05:10:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12496_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335
The candidate 12496_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_02-37-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0335 did not pass the final checks
