This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2357 2461179.7357 11.86 16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5
357.68464 28.44463 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 1 -1 2 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7357,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2357 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2357 2461179.7357 12.73 16:03:48.49 -08:15:10.3
2.70299 31.52296 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 2 -1 2 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:48.49 -08:15:10.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:48.49 -08:15:10.3: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7357,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2357 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2357 2461179.7357 12.98 16:33:52.01 -05:08:33.5
10.67756 27.37583 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 -2 2 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:52.01 -05:08:33.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:52.01 -05:08:33.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7357,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2357 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2357 2461179.7357 13.08 15:53:07.81 -13:30:20.2
356.08428 30.05880 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 1 -2 2 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:53:07.81 -13:30:20.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:53:07.81 -13:30:20.2: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7357,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2357 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.2357 2461179.7357 13.90 16:42:09.47 -14:34:23.9
3.58355 20.22985 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia 2 -3 4 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:09.47 -14:34:23.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:09.47 -14:34:23.9: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.7357,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.2357 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461179.73597922 19.05.2026 05:39:38.605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7098
Objects passed selection criteria: 7098
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6610.25
Average stars matched: 6494 (98.2414 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 01:08:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461179.73597922 19.05.2026 05:39:38.605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46482
Objects passed selection criteria: 46409
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45583.2
Average stars matched: 45063.2 (98.8592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 01:10:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.73544422
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0364 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01387 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z3lbnv6fI1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8doKD49DtH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9080xXuy8x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jSkawvrz0z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Loaded 4791 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3538 out of 3621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3621 out of 5066 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z3lbnv6fI1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=7719
Got 7719 stars (including 7254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=262 n_q2=215 n_q3=262 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8doKD49DtH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=5066
Got 5066 stars (including 4773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=279 n_q2=221 n_q3=254 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9080xXuy8x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, passed=6868
Got 6868 stars (including 6604 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.212 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=267 n_q2=214 n_q3=268 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jSkawvrz0z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=266, passed=6939
Got 6939 stars (including 6663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6939 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=264 n_q2=213 n_q3=273 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.096
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.174
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.322
reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.135
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:21.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:43.94 -10:53:07.1: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:60.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.6: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.5: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:21.68 -12:11:58.8: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:43.56 -11:53:35.3: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:10:52.04 -11:13:46.0: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:43.94 -10:53:07.1: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:21.9: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:43.94 -10:53:07.1: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9728 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:58.95 -14:57:21.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9416 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.6: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.5: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:60.0: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:21.68 -12:11:58.8: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.6: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8946 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.5: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8755 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:21.68 -12:11:58.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9459 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:20.39 -05:15:60.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7559 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:43.56 -11:53:35.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:43.56 -11:53:35.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9921 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:10:52.04 -11:13:46.0: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:52.04 -11:13:46.0: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0206 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.5: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:41.30 -10:10:27.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0565 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:38.80 -05:46:01.6: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:12.95 -08:37:14.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.4: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:50.57 -08:52:48.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:08:49.77 -07:04:19.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:38.80 -05:46:01.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:38.80 -05:46:01.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0229 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:12.95 -08:37:14.0: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:33.57 -10:11:37.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0391 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:12.95 -08:37:14.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0367 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.4: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0801 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0841 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:50.57 -08:52:48.5: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:50.57 -08:52:48.5: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1189 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:08:49.77 -07:04:19.1: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.2: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:49.77 -07:04:19.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1019 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:31.16 -09:06:24.2: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0940 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.4: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:36.92 -10:31:42.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.4: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:43.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:48.57 -06:18:38.4: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1196 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:15.23 -08:36:58.3: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:10.51 -10:25:13.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:07.37 -10:59:34.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:26.21 -07:32:51.0: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:40.78 -11:03:36.0: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:58:16.74 -06:54:28.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:36.92 -10:31:42.8: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:36.92 -10:31:42.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1368 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:43.2: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:43.2: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1624 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:15.23 -08:36:58.3: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:26.21 -07:32:51.0: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:07.37 -10:59:34.1: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:40.78 -11:03:36.0: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:15.23 -08:36:58.3: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1579 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:10.51 -10:25:13.5: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:58:16.74 -06:54:28.5: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:07.37 -10:59:34.1: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1517 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:26.21 -07:32:51.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2001 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:40.78 -11:03:36.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1553 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:10.51 -10:25:13.5: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1301 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:16.74 -06:54:28.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1889 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:37.07 -07:55:35.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:56.7: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:37.07 -07:55:35.8: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:37.07 -07:55:35.8: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1487 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:25.03 -08:55:48.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:22.97 -08:46:12.1: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:17.34 -10:24:59.9: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:56.7: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:56.7: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1829 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:25.03 -08:55:48.6: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:22.97 -08:46:12.1: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:17.34 -10:24:59.9: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:25.03 -08:55:48.6: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1771 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:22.97 -08:46:12.1: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1853 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:17.34 -10:24:59.9: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1554 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20053_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20053_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.40 -07:42:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20127_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20127_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:44.26 -13:06:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20138_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:19.16 -12:47:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20149_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 20149_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20152_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20152_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20159_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20159_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20162_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20162_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20165_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20168_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20168_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20170_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:27.39 -11:46:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20174_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20174_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20175_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20175_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20176_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20176_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20177_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:50.95 -06:52:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20182_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20182_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20183_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20183_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:08.68 -09:34:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:47.86 -06:41:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20190_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20191_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20194_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20202_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20202_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:40.31 -08:07:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20204_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20204_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20205_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20205_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.32 -08:26:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20211_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20211_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:31.87 -10:26:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20212_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:29.38 -06:19:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20215_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20216_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20217_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20218_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20220_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20223_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20225_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20225_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20226_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20227_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:17.11 -12:36:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20235_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:31.03 -09:59:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:01:54.49 -13:33:27.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0364 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:03.435 -09:59:40.12
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:00.832 -09:59:08.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01387 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7DvvLqFGNw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvnO6pTKhC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UX1sawsPGX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S79lE4WJ2l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 40555 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Loaded 4815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3958 out of 4238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4238 out of 40555 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7DvvLqFGNw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2730, passed=62428
Got 62428 stars (including 59597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62428 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=269 n_q2=218 n_q3=263 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pvnO6pTKhC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1580, passed=40542
Got 40542 stars (including 38911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.552 n_q1=281 n_q2=231 n_q3=232 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UX1sawsPGX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1627, passed=39929
Got 39929 stars (including 38248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=264 n_q2=206 n_q3=278 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S79lE4WJ2l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1651, passed=40632
Got 40632 stars (including 38941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=261 n_q2=209 n_q3=279 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-38-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_010453_TTUQ1b1x1_2535500_NLGXgYHJ/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:30.56 -12:48:59.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:48.49 -08:15:10.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:07.30 -10:42:48.5: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:51.20 -09:01:04.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:53:57.09 -14:36:25.6: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:20.90 -08:56:23.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:52.01 -05:08:33.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:53:07.81 -13:30:20.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:19:02.83 -07:20:01.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:51.20 -09:01:04.8: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:48.49 -08:15:10.3: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:07.30 -10:42:48.5: 13.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:30.56 -12:48:59.9: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:51.20 -09:01:04.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7601 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:53:57.09 -14:36:25.6: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:20.90 -08:56:23.2: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:07.30 -10:42:48.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9516 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:30.56 -12:48:59.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9816 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:57.09 -14:36:25.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2342 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:20.90 -08:56:23.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8625 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:53:07.81 -13:30:20.2: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:52.01 -05:08:33.5: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:19:02.83 -07:20:01.2: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:02.83 -07:20:01.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2099 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:46.6: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:01.60 -08:47:00.6: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:54.15 -10:36:53.8: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:09.47 -14:34:23.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:58.42 -07:07:14.0: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:46.6: 14.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:01.60 -08:47:00.6: 13.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.13 -07:06:46.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0512 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:01.60 -08:47:00.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1164 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:54.15 -10:36:53.8: 15.04 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:09.47 -14:34:23.9: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:54.15 -10:36:53.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2043 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:58.42 -07:07:14.0: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:58.42 -07:07:14.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1517 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:31.30 -07:25:49.7: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:49:49.13 -06:29:18.8: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:31.30 -07:25:49.7: 14.61 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:45:02.29 -05:49:14.2: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:54.95 -06:31:51.7: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:31.30 -07:25:49.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2772 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:49:49.13 -06:29:18.8: 14.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:49.13 -06:29:18.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2743 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:52.51 -06:24:48.5: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:19.41 -06:56:39.1: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:45:02.29 -05:49:14.2: 14.86 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:02.29 -05:49:14.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2971 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:54.95 -06:31:51.7: 14.85 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:54.95 -06:31:51.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.4406 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:52.51 -06:24:48.5: 14.87 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:52.51 -06:24:48.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:19.41 -06:56:39.1: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.41 -06:56:39.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4493 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:56.39 -07:52:49.8: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:25.12 -06:27:38.4: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:04.45 -06:19:21.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:44.04 -05:21:38.0: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:56.39 -07:52:49.8: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:25.12 -06:27:38.4: 14.75 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:56.39 -07:52:49.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4212 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:25.12 -06:27:38.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6304 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:48.38 -07:00:49.8: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:36:16.19 -05:54:51.8: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:44.04 -05:21:38.0: 14.96 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:04.45 -06:19:21.2: 14.65 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:44.04 -05:21:38.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5689 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:04.45 -06:19:21.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4643 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:48.38 -07:00:49.8: 14.74 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:36:16.19 -05:54:51.8: 14.72 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:48.38 -07:00:49.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5868 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:16.19 -05:54:51.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6154 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:58.34 -09:44:47.1: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:41.48 -06:31:31.7: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:32:22.46 -09:52:07.8: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:10.46 -07:24:04.7: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:58.34 -09:44:47.1: 15.07 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:58.34 -09:44:47.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6406 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:41.48 -06:31:31.7: 14.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:41.48 -06:31:31.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6903 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:37.09 -07:28:30.9: 15.44 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:12:30.50 -05:40:21.8: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:32:22.46 -09:52:07.8: 14.74 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:10.46 -07:24:04.7: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:22.46 -09:52:07.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4318 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:10.46 -07:24:04.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7082 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:37.09 -07:28:30.9: 14.83 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:37.09 -07:28:30.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5345 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:12:30.50 -05:40:21.8: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:30.50 -05:40:21.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7123 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:04.63 -06:14:26.2: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:28.50 -05:24:00.6: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:42.05 -09:05:51.0: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:20.22 -06:57:43.2: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:04.63 -06:14:26.2: 14.84 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:04.63 -06:14:26.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7514 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:28.50 -05:24:00.6: 14.98 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:28.50 -05:24:00.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7175 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:26:22.13 -10:57:17.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:20.22 -06:57:43.2: 14.82 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:42.05 -09:05:51.0: 14.99 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:20.22 -06:57:43.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7463 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:42.05 -09:05:51.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7589 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:26:22.13 -10:57:17.6: 15.07 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:22.13 -10:57:17.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.7100 delta=-1.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73187.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73793.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72905_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72905_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72907_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72907_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:22.51 -12:36:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72908_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72908_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72910_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72910_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:38.95 -12:19:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72914_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 72914_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73047_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73047_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:54.50 -13:33:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73118_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73118_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.32 -06:11:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73187_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 73187_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 73228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 73325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73350_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73350_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73357_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73357_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.37 -14:40:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73423_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73423_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:19.98 -10:46:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73455_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73455_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:32.33 -11:18:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73508_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73508_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:41.68 -08:21:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73678_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73678_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73739_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73739_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73740_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73740_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73772_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73772_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:10.38 -14:08:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73773_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73773_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.92 -06:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:32.14 -07:26:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73793_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
Preparing report for the candidate 73793_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73796_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73796_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:03.72 -11:30:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:22.31 -04:59:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73838_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73838_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73844_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73844_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73847_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73847_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73873_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73873_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73886_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73886_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73894_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73894_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73912_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73971_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73971_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73973_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73973_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73986_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73986_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73988_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73988_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73989_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73989_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73999_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 73999_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74001_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 74001_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 74004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74011_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 74011_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74034_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 74034_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74055_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 74055_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.40 -07:42:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04483_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 04483_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:53.27 -14:23:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199
The candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-39-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0199 did not pass the final checks