######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Leo-01-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 211523 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 211523 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 470.5140 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8452 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1025.5635 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 514.6216 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1025.6097 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 514.0986 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.17967 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-18T23:03:05.7389903' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-19T04:03:05.7389903' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61179.1688164119 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-19T04:03:15.6394211' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61179.1689310069 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.996219367918 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999382982303 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 51.5586111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 276.998055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.27590949010855 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 15.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits :) Spent 0.598968 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-18T23:03:54.9720117' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-19T04:03:54.9720117' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61179.16938625 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-19T04:04:04.8739869' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61179.169500845 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.996219372633 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999382998581 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 51.3933333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 277.083611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.27883449652283 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 15.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 17.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits :) Spent 0.603535 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.66893215 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01425 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oYIvNAA7CZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mwmZFoldQq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mj7ZoYbmEw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Al7tKln3k Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.2059 to +35.3397 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.2059 to 35.3397 deg Loaded 5551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3994 out of 4263 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7299 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.2 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 4.0 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 4.0 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.oYIvNAA7CZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, passed=7322 Got 7322 stars (including 6763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=239 n_q2=209 n_q3=226 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mwmZFoldQq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, passed=7299 Got 7299 stars (including 6711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7139 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=245 n_q2=211 n_q3=224 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mj7ZoYbmEw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=7358 Got 7358 stars (including 7052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7195 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7195 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=231 n_q2=218 n_q3=200 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0Al7tKln3k (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, passed=7366 Got 7366 stars (including 7053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7366 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7209 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7208 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=231 n_q2=215 n_q3=201 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.162 ref2=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.125 new1=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.219 new2=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.186 reference average sigma_overall=0.4105 worst_q_ratio=1.1435 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:06:08.11 +29:01:25.8: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:58:12.00 +28:25:09.6: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:13:58.92 +24:50:32.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:06:08.11 +29:01:25.8: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:58:12.00 +28:25:09.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:13:58.92 +24:50:32.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:58.92 +24:50:32.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:58:12.00 +28:25:09.6: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4782 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:08.11 +29:01:25.8: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7999 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20341_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20341_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 10:26:31.25 +34:18:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20342_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 12.29 10:26:31.25 +34:18:36.7 1670 0286 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 11.79 10:06:08.11 +29:01:25.8 3972 3734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20603_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 11.81 10:06:08.11 +29:01:25.8 3979 3729 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 12.35 10:13:58.94 +24:50:32.3 2708 6173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20632_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20632_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 12.37 10:13:58.90 +24:50:32.0 2715 6167 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 12.48 09:58:11.99 +28:25:09.6 4994 4166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20636_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20636_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 12.48 09:58:12.01 +28:25:09.6 5000 4160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.80 +34:14:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 07076_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 12.47 09:39:25.84 +34:14:51.2 7548 0726 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.19 +34:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 06231_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 7.76 09:53:43.18 +34:55:33.9 5778 0266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 Second-epoch image center 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:11.490 +30:00:33.20 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:14.186 +29:59:55.71 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01425 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JUT2Dewr7B Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wr5pCOKJ81 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WK5c7eIG7x Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qHapXd4pLI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Discovery image 3 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 7.79 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.0 6781 0553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 38198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.1770 to +35.3601 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.1770 to 35.3601 deg Loaded 5577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3842 out of 4322 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38198 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 3.7 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 3.7 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.JUT2Dewr7B (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1809, passed=38184 Got 38184 stars (including 36309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38184 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37521 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37520 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37518 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=238 n_q2=210 n_q3=224 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wr5pCOKJ81 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1825, passed=38173 Got 38173 stars (including 36282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38173 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37463 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37462 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=243 n_q2=211 n_q3=218 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WK5c7eIG7x (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1112, passed=28028 Got 28028 stars (including 26892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28028 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=224 n_q2=210 n_q3=201 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qHapXd4pLI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1106, passed=28031 Got 28031 stars (including 26894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28031 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27335 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=228 n_q2=212 n_q3=199 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:27:01.28 +29:40:16.0: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:32:55.98 +26:54:33.8: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:27:31.73 +34:42:13.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:01:29.93 +28:33:21.5: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:09:14.82 +33:12:17.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:24:58.35 +31:00:08.6: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:23:02.11 +33:13:32.8: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:20:12.05 +25:25:13.7: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:32:55.98 +26:54:33.8: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:27:01.28 +29:40:16.0: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:01.28 +29:40:16.0: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3838 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:55.98 +26:54:33.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6403 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:27:31.73 +34:42:13.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:27:31.73 +34:42:13.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:24:58.35 +31:00:08.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:09:14.82 +33:12:17.2: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:01:29.93 +28:33:21.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:24:58.35 +31:00:08.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1860 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:23:02.11 +33:13:32.8: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:14.82 +33:12:17.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9969 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:29.93 +28:33:21.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6997 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:02.11 +33:13:32.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6702 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:20:12.05 +25:25:13.7: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:12.05 +25:25:13.7: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1928 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52572_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 14.79 09:32:56.00 +26:54:32.2 8356 5189 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52577_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.58 09:32:55.97 +26:54:35.3 8362 5182 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 14.69 10:23:02.02 +33:13:33.4 2029 1002 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52579_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.65 10:23:02.21 +33:13:32.1 2034 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 14.34 09:24:58.29 +31:00:05.7 9405 2695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52581_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.10 09:24:58.40 +31:00:11.5 9411 2688 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:26:55.46 +33:27:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52615_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.05 10:26:55.48 +33:27:09.0 1558 0799 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 9.67 09:27:31.74 +34:42:13.3 9047 0442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 52638_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 9.67 09:27:31.73 +34:42:13.4 9053 0436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 10.32 10:27:01.25 +29:40:16.5 1266 3081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53166_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 10.46 10:27:01.31 +29:40:15.6 1273 3076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:20:25.35 +25:41:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53252_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 13.58 10:20:25.41 +25:41:01.8 1883 5576 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 13.69 10:01:29.92 +28:33:21.2 4563 4058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53357_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 13.71 10:01:29.94 +28:33:21.8 4569 4052 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 13.92 10:09:14.66 +33:12:17.1 3767 1190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53387_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.10 10:09:14.98 +33:12:17.3 3773 1184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:44:01.95 +25:18:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53449_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53449_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 13.99 09:44:01.97 +25:18:52.8 6831 6122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:28:03.18 +25:56:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53468_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53468_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 13.90 09:28:03.22 +25:56:35.8 9037 5776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Discovery image 1 2026 05 19.16893 2461179.66893 14.19 10:20:11.91 +25:25:13.5 1890 5745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53825_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53825_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.19 10:20:12.20 +25:25:13.9 1896 5739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:31:01.57 +27:21:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 25373_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 14.93 10:31:01.59 +27:21:48.6 0563 4402 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.82 +34:14:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 23757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 12.49 09:39:25.85 +34:14:50.9 7548 0726 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.20 +34:55:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 24770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 7.75 09:53:43.19 +34:55:33.8 5778 0266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461179.66893215 -observatory V36 04:04:45.01 +21:44:21.9 Mercury (-1.8mag) 05:59:00.69 +25:02:14.6 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:51:58.26 +10:42:15.8 Mars (1.3mag) 07:32:42.44 +22:08:04.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:49.43 +02:11:34.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:55:21.70 +20:11:13.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:37.05 +00:07:56.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:07.74 -22:58:00.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 06:01:01.19 +27:21:06.3 Moon (-8.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 18 23:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461179.66893215: 07:32:36.65 +22:08:18.9 Io (5.9mag) 07:32:52.00 +22:07:38.2 Europa (6.1mag) 07:32:37.39 +22:08:23.6 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:33:14.41 +22:06:45.0 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:34:13.37 +21:45:13.1 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:32:41.86 +22:08:05.4 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:34:38.27 +22:09:23.2 Elara (17.5mag) 07:33:45.24 +22:30:35.9 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:40:05.05 +22:08:28.7 Carme (18.7mag) 00:42:45.52 +02:12:03.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:42:54.93 +02:11:32.7 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:42:56.57 +02:10:28.7 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:42:51.12 +02:11:11.4 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:43:54.89 +02:16:18.9 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 18 23:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461179.66893215: 17:10:15.42 -31:39:07.4 JWST 18:04:21.31 +34:12:05.1 Chandra 18:08:37.90 -34:56:02.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 18 23:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461179.66893215 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:27:30.95 -27:46:00.1 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:25:16.84 +30:49:47.0 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:32:46.25 +00:59:13.4 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:16:56.33 +24:22:24.9 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:40:29.64 +20:33:37.5 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:53:43.51 -31:06:14.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:34:19.32 -68:25:50.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:41:55.63 +31:43:48.1 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:22:26.63 +13:59:53.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:49.97 +30:43:32.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:09:20.71 +26:45:41.9 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:16:46.34 +31:40:31.2 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:40:54.16 +02:45:31.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:40:22.32 +20:52:34.4 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:27:25.05 -11:05:20.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:43.55 -07:24:13.3 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:15:12.56 +65:09:39.7 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:31:55.06 -05:01:38.7 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 14:18:43.08 +87:07:01.1 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:45:13.35 +63:46:16.2 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:15:20.85 +25:34:18.6 12.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:53:45.84 +11:21:36.9 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:21:59.53 +25:00:38.9 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:57:59.73 -17:58:06.9 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:47:00.92 +38:07:42.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:55:58.01 +53:25:26.9 16.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:07:54.25 -09:30:30.2 11.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:42:21.37 +04:28:47.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:21:48.47 +41:43:36.0 15.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:11:39.41 -12:23:49.0 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:46:32.77 -08:11:17.0 9.9mag 10P/Tempel 14:22:42.69 -01:26:32.0 17.0mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:08.01 -00:52:38.0 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:46:59.97 -02:35:56.4 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:40:28.85 +22:48:25.6 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:17:23.49 +29:12:38.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:07:45.12 -07:55:31.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:39:36.57 +30:23:39.3 16.4mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:21:21.97 +14:17:01.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:34:07.38 +00:02:09.8 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:50:25.85 +27:54:40.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 06:03:59.68 +33:20:07.1 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:16:22.34 +23:21:06.8 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:26:07.15 +17:42:03.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:53:31.11 +17:50:25.2 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:23:44.24 +19:39:01.7 12.2mag 141P/Machholz 04:26:57.21 +15:08:52.4 12.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 03:09:07.41 +11:53:05.6 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:42:54.89 -27:49:35.9 17.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:38:19.20 +14:58:49.1 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:31:48.09 -03:17:49.3 17.9mag 169P/NEAT 17:07:29.21 -10:00:51.1 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:48:58.65 +35:55:16.6 17.3mag 240P/NEAT 23:40:34.50 -10:25:48.2 16.9mag 260P/McNaught 03:12:29.23 +28:24:28.9 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 20:51:07.41 -34:53:16.0 18.0mag 320P/McNaught 15:25:37.36 +08:20:49.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:52:16.94 +21:09:32.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:27:23.25 +43:02:30.7 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 18 23:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 18 23:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 18 23:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:43:27.294 +20:46:08.47 AT 2026mhz 2026-02-07.38 20.217 15:37:36.960 +02:16:24.20 AT 2026mhy 2026-04-24.43 20.6382 14:15:34.017 -22:43:04.24 AT 2026mhx 2026-04-23.38 20.2188 15:22:29.741 -26:23:50.21 AT 2026mhw 2026-05-08.36 20.2311 13:34:55.030 -00:25:52.51 AT 2026mhv 2026-05-10.25 19.1402 11:22:09.706 +12:47:13.66 AT 2026mhu 2026-04-24.30 20.3449 20:20:23.379 +07:46:49.08 AT 2026mht 2026-04-30.47 19.6721 08:27:02.282 +00:27:29.83 AT 2026mhs 2026-05-12.24 18.939 12:53:20.434 +01:16:18.94 AT 2026mhr 2026-05-12.30 21.7223 12:49:30.411 +08:36:12.24 AT 2026mhq 2026-05-12.30 21.1933 12:22:12.364 +06:56:59.37 AT 2026mhp 2026-05-12.30 21.8537 20:07:38.301 -21:07:06.40 SN 2026mho 2026-05-12.32 17.836 16:44:31.651 -27:15:18.38 AT 2026mhn 2026-05-11.41 15.84 12:31:40.397 +12:02:10.48 AT 2026mhm 2026-05-12.30 22.8338 12:37:30.959 +06:08:31.05 AT 2026mhl 2026-05-12.30 22.3669 12:34:35.570 +08:18:50.21 AT 2026mhk 2026-05-12.30 21.84 12:36:01.607 +08:36:08.68 AT 2026mhj 2026-05-12.55 18.5 11:09:54.439 -08:13:27.08 AT 2026mhi 2026-01-19.57 21.48 13:19:11.113 +22:17:17.66 AT 2026mhh 2026-04-23.31 20.83 15:01:31.197 -09:59:45.89 AT 2026mhg 2026-04-25.45 20.23 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 18 23:35 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 05 19.16950 2461179.66950 7.83 09:45:34.49 +34:30:39.0 6781 0553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233251_TTUQ1b1x1_100646_qMHelTFz/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-03-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
