This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1580 2461179.6580 14.06 08:09:18.19 +28:35:30.7
193.47301 28.59666 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -1 -1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:18.19 +28:35:30.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:18.19 +28:35:30.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6580,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1580 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1580 2461179.6580 14.61 08:24:35.05 +29:10:38.2
193.91006 31.97130 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.186 Celuta -2 -1 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:35.05 +29:10:38.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:35.05 +29:10:38.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6580,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1580 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1580 2461179.6580 13.56 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1
189.45057 29.37890 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -0 -4 4 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6580,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1580 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461179.65818637 19.05.2026 03:47:37.302 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9855
Objects passed selection criteria: 9845
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8930
Average stars matched: 8749.5 (97.9787 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:55:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461179.65818637 19.05.2026 03:47:37.302 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58791
Objects passed selection criteria: 58649
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53178.2
Average stars matched: 51647.2 (97.121 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 163760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:57:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.65771485
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XazRdWVcec
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7EOeGDNs2K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5eQwiCmXv6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3G4AgZavlq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XazRdWVcec (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=222 n_q2=286 n_q3=200 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7EOeGDNs2K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=225 n_q2=287 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5eQwiCmXv6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=571, passed=10236
Got 10236 stars (including 9658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.636 n_q1=217 n_q2=294 n_q3=202 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3G4AgZavlq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=652, passed=10243
Got 10243 stars (including 9585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.658 n_q1=221 n_q2=295 n_q3=196 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.407
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.393
ref2=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.324
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.343
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.407
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.3585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:16.02 +30:12:33.8: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:16.02 +30:12:33.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:16.02 +30:12:33.8: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3322 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20661_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 20661_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:09.910 +30:01:19.31
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:10.551 +30:01:54.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQwIstBfe6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B90iW7hrRs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UBosIGRrvm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rMAf1hQB8F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DQwIstBfe6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6475, passed=84020
Got 84020 stars (including 77437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=232 n_q2=288 n_q3=192 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B90iW7hrRs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6514, passed=84110
Got 84110 stars (including 77507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=231 n_q2=290 n_q3=190 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UBosIGRrvm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3584, passed=54569
Got 54569 stars (including 50934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=243 n_q2=266 n_q3=209 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rMAf1hQB8F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3388, passed=54339
Got 54339 stars (including 50903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=242 n_q2=265 n_q3=209 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-46-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_225309_TTUQ2b1x1_2912182_umvfpt4p/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:34.13 +28:40:55.9: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:58:39.63 +26:45:53.7: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:11.60 +32:23:01.2: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:35.63 +32:47:31.0: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:41.63 +27:33:53.4: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:02.98 +33:33:07.6: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:23.96 +31:18:34.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:58:39.63 +26:45:53.7: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:39.63 +26:45:53.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3721 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:34.13 +28:40:55.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:41.63 +27:33:53.4: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:34.13 +28:40:55.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0706 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:35.63 +32:47:31.0: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:41.63 +27:33:53.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9476 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:35.63 +32:47:31.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6574 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:11.60 +32:23:01.2: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:23.96 +31:18:34.3: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:02.98 +33:33:07.6: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:11.60 +32:23:01.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1919 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:23.96 +31:18:34.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4763 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:02.98 +33:33:07.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5363 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:19.28 +27:54:51.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:49.05 +25:47:13.5: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:47.69 +26:57:38.0: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:19.28 +27:54:51.8: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:07:46.07 +26:54:54.0: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:19.28 +27:54:51.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6391 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:49.05 +25:47:13.5: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:49.05 +25:47:13.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7334 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:01.35 +29:51:48.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.78 +30:13:15.3: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:47.69 +26:57:38.0: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:11.80 +25:45:35.2: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:47.69 +26:57:38.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8297 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:07:46.07 +26:54:54.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:46.07 +26:54:54.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9346 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:09:18.19 +28:35:30.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:01.35 +29:51:48.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:01.35 +29:51:48.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0445 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.78 +30:13:15.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.78 +30:13:15.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9248 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:11.80 +25:45:35.2: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:11.80 +25:45:35.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0608 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:36.43 +29:15:46.8: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:24.92 +28:50:25.9: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:22.35 +28:17:43.4: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:09:18.19 +28:35:30.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:01.45 +26:50:29.3: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:04.92 +30:50:53.6: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:36.43 +29:15:46.8: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:21:01.89 +27:22:08.3: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:36.43 +29:15:46.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1305 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:24.92 +28:50:25.9: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:24.92 +28:50:25.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3827 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:22.35 +28:17:43.4: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:22.35 +28:17:43.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2119 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:22:15.79 +26:01:57.8: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:01.45 +26:50:29.3: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:01.45 +26:50:29.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2672 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:04.92 +30:50:53.6: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:04.92 +30:50:53.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2593 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:21:01.89 +27:22:08.3: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:21:01.89 +27:22:08.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3022 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:22:15.79 +26:01:57.8: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:22:15.79 +26:01:57.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4485 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:20.00 +27:34:41.8: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:18.79 +26:23:05.9: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:26:27.83 +29:33:11.6: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:15.77 +26:59:20.4: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:08.70 +30:44:03.5: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:07.27 +27:03:26.6: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:35.61 +27:44:45.6: 14.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:20.00 +27:34:41.8: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:20.00 +27:34:41.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3399 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:18.79 +26:23:05.9: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:18.79 +26:23:05.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5315 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:26:27.83 +29:33:11.6: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:27.83 +29:33:11.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6848 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:44.87 +28:59:38.5: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:15.77 +26:59:20.4: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:15.77 +26:59:20.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8395 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:08.70 +30:44:03.5: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:43.91 +26:58:21.8: 15.91 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:08.70 +30:44:03.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6876 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:07.27 +27:03:26.6: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:35.61 +27:44:45.6: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:07.27 +27:03:26.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8021 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:10:35.61 +27:44:45.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7474 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:44.87 +28:59:38.5: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:44.87 +28:59:38.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7612 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:43.91 +26:58:21.8: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:35.05 +29:10:38.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:27:56.45 +25:56:07.3: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:43.91 +26:58:21.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7939 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:51.72 +27:25:20.0: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:30:49.69 +29:10:19.7: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:12.05 +26:03:15.6: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:50.27 +26:45:43.0: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:47.78 +27:04:49.0: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:27:56.45 +25:56:07.3: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:35.05 +29:10:38.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:27:56.45 +25:56:07.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7729 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:51.72 +27:25:20.0: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:51.72 +27:25:20.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7668 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:30:49.69 +29:10:19.7: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:49.69 +29:10:19.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9443 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:20.98 +26:13:18.1: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:12.05 +26:03:15.6: 15.79 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:12.05 +26:03:15.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8197 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:13.25 +27:45:38.6: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:50.27 +26:45:43.0: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:47.78 +27:04:49.0: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:50.27 +26:45:43.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8446 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:47.78 +27:04:49.0: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8144 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:20.98 +26:13:18.1: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:20.98 +26:13:18.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7013 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:27.71 +30:46:14.7: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:13.25 +27:45:38.6: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:13.25 +27:45:38.6: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9653 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:25:11.88 +32:40:40.6: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:04:22.97 +27:52:06.2: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:13:08.32 +26:33:40.2: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:34.02 +26:48:43.0: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:27.71 +30:46:14.7: 15.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:27.71 +30:46:14.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9545 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:25:11.88 +32:40:40.6: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:11.88 +32:40:40.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7630 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:04:22.97 +27:52:06.2: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:04:22.97 +27:52:06.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8171 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:13:08.32 +26:33:40.2: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:34.02 +26:48:43.0: 15.46 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:13:08.32 +26:33:40.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9022 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:34.02 +26:48:43.0: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8515 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:08:13.80 +32:11:19.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5664 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98820_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98820_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98821_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98821_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98824_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98824_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98833_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98833_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98837_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:42.64 +27:43:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98838_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98838_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98841_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98841_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:20.50 +28:15:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98928_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98928_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.75 +27:17:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98953_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98953_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.71 +25:46:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98961_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98961_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.62 +26:14:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98978_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 98978_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.94 +26:43:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99031_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99031_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.87 +30:20:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99037_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99037_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.95 +28:49:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:25.97 +26:46:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99046_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99046_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.99 +31:29:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99050_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99050_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.56 +28:34:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99056_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99056_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:56.05 +31:10:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99065_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99065_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:05.96 +27:04:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99074_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99074_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.54 +27:14:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99085_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99085_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:50.32 +27:00:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99106_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99106_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99136_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99136_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.01 +26:00:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99137_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99137_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99140_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99140_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:54.24 +26:56:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99141_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99141_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.88 +27:56:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99151_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99151_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.11 +27:54:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99159_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99159_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:53.60 +28:30:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99184_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99184_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:40.68 +27:30:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99186_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99186_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:54.09 +29:37:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99192_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99192_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:26.42 +28:42:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99211_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99211_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.96 +30:53:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99220_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99220_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:48.61 +26:19:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99229_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99229_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.53 +32:29:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99233_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99233_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99236_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99236_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99242_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99242_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99244_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99244_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.05 +28:00:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99252_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99252_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:12.61 +26:11:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99254_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99254_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:31.34 +26:08:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99262_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99262_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99265_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 99265_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99291_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99291_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:05.50 +31:43:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99294_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99294_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:47.18 +32:00:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99312_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99312_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99315_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99315_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99319_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99319_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.65 +32:11:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99324_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99324_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99325_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99325_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99337_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99345_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99365_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99365_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99371_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99371_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.75 +30:36:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99386_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99386_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.64 +30:13:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99387_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99387_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99401_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99401_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:21.95 +27:05:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99424_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99424_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99439_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99439_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99458_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99458_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.09 +30:39:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99476_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99476_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99479_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99479_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99499_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99499_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99502_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99502_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99509_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99509_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99512_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99512_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:28.06 +31:35:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99513_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99513_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99514_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99514_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99515_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 99515_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99518_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99518_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99529_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99529_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99549_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99549_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99550_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99550_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99556_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99556_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99557_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99557_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99561_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99561_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99566_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99566_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99573_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99573_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99575_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99575_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99585_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99585_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99639_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99639_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99657_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 99657_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22611_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 22611_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-47-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks