This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1436 2461179.6436 13.19 07:11:43.85 +26:43:39.9
190.66579 15.98414 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 -0 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:43.85 +26:43:39.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:43.85 +26:43:39.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6436,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1436 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1436 2461179.6436 13.21 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0
186.03439 11.67004 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 4 2 4 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6436,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1436 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1436 2461179.6436 13.74 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2
186.86046 14.38015 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.590 V 15.190 V 2458506.07350 82.613077300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1,2461179.6436,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065831.41+292851.1 20260519.1436 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1436 2461179.6436 13.48 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9
187.81331 12.10333 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.050 V 14.830 V 2458384.59020 122.506970400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0,2461179.6436,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065045.04+274237.0 20260519.1436 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461179.64385626 19.05.2026 03:26:59.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20644
Objects passed selection criteria: 20525
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14888.5
Average stars matched: 13932 (93.5756 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:31:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461179.64385626 19.05.2026 03:26:59.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 56 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 145848
Objects passed selection criteria: 145445
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 106706
Average stars matched: 98984 (92.7631 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1905784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:35:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.64331426
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01266 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9kM6P5Xyl8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IkfDnkzWZ5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZO7ZtFsXT7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vovclOHtRq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9kM6P5Xyl8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IkfDnkzWZ5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZO7ZtFsXT7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=784, passed=13165
Got 13165 stars (including 12377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.780 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.878 n_q1=218 n_q2=280 n_q3=208 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.459
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vovclOHtRq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=760, passed=13169
Got 13169 stars (including 12400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13169 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.851 n_q1=221 n_q2=278 n_q3=208 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.421
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.459
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.599 worst_q_ratio=1.421
reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 32220_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.84 +27:59:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 32892_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.59 +33:55:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33256_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 33256_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:44.12 +29:29:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.19 +30:16:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.37 +27:57:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:14.817 +30:03:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:16.808 +30:02:31.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01266 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GQBHPf9p7k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NHR0HpxKak
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VwrvSffUF9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.829Y88LVAa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 119 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GQBHPf9p7k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 146353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=226 n_q2=248 n_q3=236 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NHR0HpxKak (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 145746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=221 n_q2=245 n_q3=238 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VwrvSffUF9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6466, passed=83631
Got 83631 stars (including 77062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.783 n_q1=227 n_q2=269 n_q3=231 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.829Y88LVAa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=6470, passed=83092
Got 83092 stars (including 76534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.798 n_q1=223 n_q2=260 n_q3=240 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-12_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_222908_TTUQ2b1x1_2009951_g74DRkq9/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:31.03 +30:38:03.3: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:47.68 +29:43:55.5: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:31.03 +30:38:03.3: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:31.03 +30:38:03.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1164 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:47.68 +29:43:55.5: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:47.68 +29:43:55.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5663 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:28.50 +31:28:02.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:43.85 +26:43:39.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:48.63 +28:29:27.9: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:28.50 +31:28:02.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:28.50 +31:28:02.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0665 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:48.63 +28:29:27.9: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:43.85 +26:43:39.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:48.63 +28:29:27.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2864 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:27.06 +30:49:38.5: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:45:39.99 +29:06:48.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2086 delta=1.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:27.06 +30:49:38.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:27.06 +30:49:38.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4859 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:56.32 +26:45:57.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:16:15.06 +31:43:15.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:56.32 +26:45:57.8: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:56.32 +26:45:57.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7815 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:16:15.06 +31:43:15.6: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:15.06 +31:43:15.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8513 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:02:27.50 +27:59:34.0: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:33.94 +26:14:35.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:02:27.50 +27:59:34.0: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:20:29.07 +26:43:11.9: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:27.50 +27:59:34.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8748 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:33.94 +26:14:35.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:33.94 +26:14:35.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5243 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:20:29.07 +26:43:11.9: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:29.07 +26:43:11.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9910 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:22.39 +29:16:52.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:50.33 +30:29:49.5: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:22.39 +29:16:52.9: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:22.39 +29:16:52.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9450 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:50.33 +30:29:49.5: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:50.33 +30:29:49.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9993 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:05:25.19 +32:38:49.6: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:52.90 +29:39:25.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:05:25.19 +32:38:49.6: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:25.19 +32:38:49.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0492 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:16:45.66 +28:51:38.1: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:05.99 +29:53:50.7: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:13:06.01 +33:38:27.8: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:52.90 +29:39:25.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:52.90 +29:39:25.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9315 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:16:45.66 +28:51:38.1: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:45.66 +28:51:38.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3312 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:05.99 +29:53:50.7: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:05.99 +29:53:50.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1521 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:13:06.01 +33:38:27.8: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:06.01 +33:38:27.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1664 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:58:31.42 +29:28:51.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7377 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:45.10 +27:42:37.9: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4842 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190265_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190265_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:54.98 +31:14:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190280_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190280_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:02.70 +28:30:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190283_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.30 +26:05:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190284_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190284_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:44.00 +31:07:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:57.16 +27:55:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190286_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190286_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190289_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190289_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:47.84 +26:38:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190293_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 190293_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.11 +27:35:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191975_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 191975_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:29.59 +30:24:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192217_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192217_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.64 +33:41:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192702_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 192702_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.94 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.51 +29:47:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194487_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194487_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.53 +32:29:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194667_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194667_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.24 +27:38:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194720_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194720_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.11 +27:14:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 194847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.72 +27:48:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195425_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195425_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.55 +27:12:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195738_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195738_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195772_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 195772_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.97 +27:12:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196184_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196184_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:55.36 +29:39:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.62 +33:53:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 196254_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196653_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196653_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.65 +30:33:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196768_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 196768_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197099_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197099_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.56 +26:19:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:27.97 +32:38:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197197_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 197197_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:22.60 +26:58:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197208_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197208_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:46.92 +31:55:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197300_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197300_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.53 +28:12:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197373_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197373_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197487_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197487_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:05.42 +27:52:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197692_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197692_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.36 +30:38:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197707_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197707_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.78 +29:43:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197727_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197727_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.23 +26:54:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197938_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197938_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.10 +27:02:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197943_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 197943_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.53 +25:49:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198034_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198034_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:09.97 +33:21:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198160_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198160_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.80 +31:22:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198172_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198172_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:31.39 +29:02:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198356_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198356_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.27 +26:04:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198422_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198422_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:26.82 +27:59:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198638_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198638_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.47 +26:19:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198847_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.67 +29:44:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198874_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 198874_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.30 +27:44:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199006_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199006_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:43.79 +31:08:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199035_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199035_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:08.28 +29:41:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199103_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199103_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:14.25 +29:10:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199107_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199107_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.74 +27:10:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199148_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199148_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.06 +31:07:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199211_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199211_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.88 +32:46:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199235_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199235_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:38.09 +31:13:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:31.39 +27:14:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199249_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199249_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.64 +25:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199312_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199312_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.87 +31:14:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199371_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199371_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.60 +28:32:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199382_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199382_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199434_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199434_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:13.78 +32:44:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199623_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199623_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:16.86 +26:37:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199684_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199684_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.41 +33:42:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199695_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199695_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.42 +27:43:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199735_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199735_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.31 +28:54:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199763_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199763_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.91 +30:56:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199772_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199772_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.42 +26:47:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199821_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199821_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199924_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.63 +25:49:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199958_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 199958_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.74 +32:22:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200267_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200322_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200322_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:13.07 +34:12:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200425_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200425_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:12.04 +26:20:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200474_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200474_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:44.22 +25:53:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200595_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200595_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:18.93 +29:12:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.73 +28:13:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200634_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200634_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200643_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200643_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200909_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 200909_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.45 +31:36:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201011_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201011_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.12 +28:25:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201285_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201308_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201308_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:08.36 +27:27:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201317_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201317_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.86 +26:28:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201327_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201327_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.51 +27:40:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201333_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201333_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201340_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201340_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:39.09 +28:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201441_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201441_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201483_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201483_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:01.79 +28:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201551_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201551_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.61 +29:56:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201572_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201572_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.88 +30:35:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201776_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201776_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:25.02 +31:04:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201790_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.03 +29:53:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201824_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 201824_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:01.18 +27:13:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202057_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202057_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.87 +27:21:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202186_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:56.64 +34:10:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202567_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202567_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:20.34 +25:53:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202629_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202629_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:46.92 +30:28:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202665_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202665_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:36.21 +32:49:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202869_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202869_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202935_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 202935_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203088_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203088_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:43.94 +31:28:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203144_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203144_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:48.87 +31:28:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203150_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203150_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203221_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203221_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:04.23 +28:04:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203228_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203311_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 203311_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204163_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 204163_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:23.05 +31:41:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204401_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 204401_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.94 +27:40:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204823_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 204823_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:17.86 +31:46:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:29.57 +31:24:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:01.74 +31:18:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.85 +26:59:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.38 +27:57:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.78 +28:30:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.19 +30:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.74 +25:58:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 178612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.96 +29:41:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 52073_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_22-26-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks