This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 12.71 16:34:38.40 -05:11:37.4
10.75169 27.18788 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 -2 2 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:34:38.40 -05:11:37.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:34:38.40 -05:11:37.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7802,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2802 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 13.47 16:40:37.96 -03:54:31.9
12.87898 26.65530 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 1 -1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:40:37.96 -03:54:31.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:40:37.96 -03:54:31.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7802,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2802 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 13.90 16:47:28.09 -02:11:10.4
15.52390 26.13891 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia 1 -2 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:28.09 -02:11:10.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:28.09 -02:11:10.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7802,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2802 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 14.06 16:10:24.42 +03:12:27.8
15.14747 36.85187 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.491 Carina 1 -1 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:10:24.42 +03:12:27.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:10:24.42 +03:12:27.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2802* 16 10 24.42 +03 12 27.8 14.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7802,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2802 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 12.29 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1
9.21319 27.99738 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V2060 Oph
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.900 V 2452830.00000 296.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2060 Oph,2461178.7802,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2060 Oph 20260518.2802 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 12.03 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8
4.91449 31.76438 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V2049 Oph
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.700 pg 15.000 pg 2429770.00000 93.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2049 Oph,2461178.7802,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2049 Oph 20260518.2802 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2802 2461178.7802 8.18 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7
9.95890 34.61676 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" DX Ser
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 pg 12.400 pg 2433880.00000 360.000000000000 M5-M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7: 9.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7: 9.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.17 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2802* 16 08 34.86 -01 32 14.7 8.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DX Ser,2461178.7802,8.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DX Ser 20260518.2802 8.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461178.78043793 18.05.2026 06:43:39.837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 40
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9186
Objects passed selection criteria: 9184
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8841.75
Average stars matched: 8619.75 (97.4892 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:59:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461093.98419880 22.02.2026 11:37:04.776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461178.78043793 18.05.2026 06:43:39.837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55499
Objects passed selection criteria: 55394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 50773.5
Average stars matched: 49348.2 (97.1929 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 02:01:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.77992192
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0217 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ycW26zOIx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.odDd1f6guT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jFfVKnFMzu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6qtZJ9WV9q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to +3.3001 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to 3.3001 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4387 out of 4611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4611 out of 9904 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to +3.3001 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3823 to 252.2025 deg, Dec -7.2902 to 3.3001 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4387 out of 4611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4611 out of 9904 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0420 to 252.4955 deg, Dec -7.7609 to +3.8299 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0420 to 252.4955 deg, Dec -7.7609 to 3.8299 deg
Loaded 5975 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4461 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4461 out of 8941 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 39 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.4 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
4.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
4.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3ycW26zOIx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=620, passed=9902
Got 9902 stars (including 9264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=204 n_q2=224 n_q3=221 n_q4=319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.odDd1f6guT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, passed=8941
Got 8941 stars (including 8375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=221 n_q2=230 n_q3=210 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.536
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jFfVKnFMzu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=8437
Got 8437 stars (including 8090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=212 n_q2=198 n_q3=237 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6qtZJ9WV9q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=8359
Got 8359 stars (including 8014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=209 n_q2=203 n_q3=236 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.169
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.536
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.327
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.379
reference average sigma_overall=0.3685 worst_q_ratio=1.3525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:57.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:56:56.51 +01:18:10.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:28:28.65 +00:38:08.7: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:38:00.79 -01:04:41.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:31:20.34 -05:15:59.0: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:04:18.27 +03:02:49.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:12:22.21 +01:40:28.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:06:19.71 +02:05:46.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:57.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:31:20.34 -05:15:59.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:56:56.51 +01:18:10.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:28:28.65 +00:38:08.7: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:38:00.79 -01:04:41.6: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:00.73 -01:52:57.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0567 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:56.51 +01:18:10.2: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0455 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:20.34 -05:15:59.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7506 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:28.65 +00:38:08.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9885 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:00.79 -01:04:41.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2564 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:12:22.21 +01:40:28.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:06:19.71 +02:05:46.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:22.21 +01:40:28.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1050 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:04:18.27 +03:02:49.0: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:19.71 +02:05:46.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2077 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:18.27 +03:02:49.0: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0395 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:03:30.31 +02:46:43.7: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:26:47.07 +01:43:11.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:12:31.41 -00:56:08.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:02:43.79 +01:34:55.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:10:33.00 +00:22:12.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:03:30.31 +02:46:43.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:26:47.07 +01:43:11.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:25:28.36 +00:07:17.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:30.31 +02:46:43.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2634 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:47.07 +01:43:11.4: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2608 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:27:16.26 -02:32:36.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:22:37.50 +00:24:37.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:48:21.53 +00:36:02.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:58:53.35 -00:44:05.7: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:02:43.79 +01:34:55.4: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:43.79 +01:34:55.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3460 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:25:28.36 +00:07:17.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:12:31.41 -00:56:08.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:10:33.00 +00:22:12.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:28.36 +00:07:17.7: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3273 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:31.41 -00:56:08.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2651 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:33.00 +00:22:12.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2757 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:27:16.26 -02:32:36.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:58:22.34 +00:53:47.8: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:16.26 -02:32:36.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3369 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:58:53.35 -00:44:05.7: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:22:37.50 +00:24:37.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:53.35 -00:44:05.7: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3720 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:48:21.53 +00:36:02.5: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:37.50 +00:24:37.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3608 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:21.53 +00:36:02.5: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3531 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:58:22.34 +00:53:47.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:22.34 +00:53:47.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3251 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20618_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20630_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.12 +02:10:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.13 -00:18:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20643_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:39.94 -05:08:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20650_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.18 +01:57:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20655_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20655_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.80 -03:50:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20672_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20672_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20682_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20682_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20688_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20688_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20690_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20690_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20691_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:37.25 -01:15:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20697_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20698_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.13 -06:11:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20709_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20709_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:15.15 -00:58:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:15.42 +01:49:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20723_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20723_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20726_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20726_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20729_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20729_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20733_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20733_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20734_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20734_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:27.57 +02:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20737_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:48.02 +01:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20738_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:01.78 -01:48:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:16.97 +00:54:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20742_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20745_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20745_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20748_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20749_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20750_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20750_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:15.00 +01:09:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20751_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20751_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20752_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20752_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:23.61 +01:16:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20755_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20755_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:46.64 +01:08:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 20757_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:14.87 +03:05:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01224_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 01224_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:42.79 -05:46:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07266_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 07266_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:52.68 +01:01:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00519_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 00519_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.19 -06:40:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:06.106 -01:59:42.92
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0217 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.453 -01:59:52.37
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.136 -01:59:22.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01081 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.arRFbsvwGR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits &> /tmp/tmp.InG299ENSu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSEfXmdX5J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvttjJ0SYU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66692 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to +3.3005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to 3.3005 deg
Loaded 5183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4101 out of 4649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4649 out of 66692 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.841400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.841400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66692 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to +3.3005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.3802 to 252.2055 deg, Dec -7.2920 to 3.3005 deg
Loaded 5183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4101 out of 4649 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4649 out of 66692 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 57783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0235 to 252.5090 deg, Dec -7.8273 to +3.8411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0235 to 252.5090 deg, Dec -7.8273 to 3.8411 deg
Loaded 6018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4021 out of 4523 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4523 out of 57783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
3.8 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
3.8 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.arRFbsvwGR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3339, passed=66677
Got 66677 stars (including 63218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.228 n_q1=203 n_q2=222 n_q3=226 n_q4=319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.InG299ENSu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3390, passed=57763
Got 57763 stars (including 54306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 471 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=220 n_q2=230 n_q3=203 n_q4=320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.455
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gSEfXmdX5J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2379, passed=40320
Got 40320 stars (including 37904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40320 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=204 n_q2=192 n_q3=243 n_q4=322 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JvttjJ0SYU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2377, passed=40324
Got 40324 stars (including 37917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=201 n_q2=194 n_q3=241 n_q4=325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.389
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-42-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0773.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_015706_TTUQ1b1x1_1159542_9jf93eJf/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:26.84 +01:17:25.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:35:20.47 +00:29:43.7: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:19:15.97 -03:52:47.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:14:57.64 -02:03:04.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:14:30.62 +02:00:54.8: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:54:00.73 +02:10:22.5: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:50:27.66 -01:53:18.1: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:39:03.26 +00:30:57.7: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:46:56.66 -05:50:20.5: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:47:08.32 -05:52:12.3: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:26.84 +01:17:25.7: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:35:20.47 +00:29:43.7: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:26.84 +01:17:25.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:20.47 +00:29:43.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2003 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:19:15.97 -03:52:47.3: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:50:27.66 -01:53:18.1: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:14:30.62 +02:00:54.8: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:54:00.73 +02:10:22.5: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:15.97 -03:52:47.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6005 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:27.66 -01:53:18.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6992 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:46:56.66 -05:50:20.5: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:14:57.64 -02:03:04.9: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:30.62 +02:00:54.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1922 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:00.73 +02:10:22.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3189 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:39:03.26 +00:30:57.7: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:56.66 -05:50:20.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5921 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:57.64 -02:03:04.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8400 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:03.26 +00:30:57.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3025 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:47:08.32 -05:52:12.3: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:08.32 -05:52:12.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6833 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:06:36.27 -05:11:23.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:40:33.11 -07:06:07.8: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:20:49.78 -06:56:39.5: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:14.44 -04:09:00.2: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 15:52:19.27 -04:55:28.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:29.78 +00:11:52.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:34:38.40 -05:11:37.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:06:36.27 -05:11:23.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:40:33.11 -07:06:07.8: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:36.27 -05:11:23.2: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4261 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:33.11 -07:06:07.8: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5150 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:20:49.78 -06:56:39.5: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:14.44 -04:09:00.2: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:49.78 -06:56:39.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5733 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 15:52:19.27 -04:55:28.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:14.44 -04:09:00.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5725 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:19.27 -04:55:28.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2077 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:13.31 -01:59:19.6: 13.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:40:37.96 -03:54:31.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:34:38.40 -05:11:37.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:29.78 +00:11:52.6: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:29.78 +00:11:52.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:34.19 +00:03:48.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:13.31 -01:59:19.6: 13.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:13.31 -01:59:19.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0998 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:40:37.96 -03:54:31.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:10:24.42 +03:12:27.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:28.09 -02:11:10.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:02.53 +01:23:21.3: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:00.30 +02:33:00.8: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:46:38.83 -00:09:04.8: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:34.19 +00:03:48.5: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.19 +00:03:48.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7759 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:14.55 -02:44:00.9: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:10:24.42 +03:12:27.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:46:38.83 -00:09:04.8: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:28.09 -02:11:10.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:38.83 -00:09:04.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2170 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:02.53 +01:23:21.3: 14.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:00.30 +02:33:00.8: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:02.53 +01:23:21.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3935 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:00.30 +02:33:00.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5169 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:48:25.93 +01:26:00.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:14.55 -02:44:00.9: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:14.55 -02:44:00.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3178 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:25.69 +00:42:54.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:48:25.93 +01:26:00.3: 14.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:25.93 +01:26:00.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:28:35.24 +00:36:15.5: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:04.25 +02:36:27.3: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:47:18.21 -02:35:42.2: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:04.25 +02:36:27.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:04.25 +02:36:27.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:25.69 +00:42:54.5: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:25.69 +00:42:54.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5634 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:28:35.24 +00:36:15.5: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:47:18.21 -02:35:42.2: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:18.21 -02:35:42.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4623 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:35.24 +00:36:15.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4831 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:37.54 -07:26:50.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:37.54 -07:26:50.8: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:37.54 -07:26:50.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:41:52.45 -07:25:08.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:44:50.83 -07:28:16.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:20.75 -05:16:09.1: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:41:52.45 -07:25:08.7: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:52.45 -07:25:08.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:28:51.11 -05:51:25.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2875 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:11.11 -07:26:01.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:44:50.83 -07:28:16.9: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:50.83 -07:28:16.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:20.75 -05:16:09.1: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:20.75 -05:16:09.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3990 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:07:45.52 -06:37:36.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0230 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:11.11 -07:26:01.7: 13.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:11.11 -07:26:01.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:41:56.13 -07:20:15.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:43:58.60 -07:20:13.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:34.68 -07:26:39.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:41:56.13 -07:20:15.8: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:56.13 -07:20:15.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:43:58.60 -07:20:13.0: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:58.60 -07:20:13.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:34.68 -07:26:39.1: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.68 -07:26:39.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:40:25.97 -07:19:51.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:45:33.24 -07:10:25.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:46:09.86 -07:16:36.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:40:25.97 -07:19:51.9: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:25.97 -07:19:51.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:45:33.24 -07:10:25.8: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:33.24 -07:10:25.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:46:09.86 -07:16:36.9: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:09.86 -07:16:36.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_05-37-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0572.fits at 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7: 9.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_06-19-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0505.fits at 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7: 9.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:08:34.86 -01:32:14.7: ref_mag=9.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.1782 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03639.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07867.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81363_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81363_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81364_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81364_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81368_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81368_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:11.89 +02:15:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81370_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81370_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81379_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81379_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81381_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81381_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81387_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81387_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81388_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81388_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81389_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81389_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81392_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81392_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81394_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81394_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81399_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81399_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81406_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81406_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81407_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81407_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81408_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81408_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81413_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81413_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:40.09 -06:15:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81414_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81414_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:13.30 -06:26:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81415_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81415_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:39.08 -05:34:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81419_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81419_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81422_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81422_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:44.72 -06:16:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81507_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81507_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.13 -06:11:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81523_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81523_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81567_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 81567_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81575_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81575_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.39 +02:13:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81627_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81627_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81685_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81685_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:16.72 -01:59:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81699_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 81699_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81751_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81751_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81764_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 81764_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81768_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 81768_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81862_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81862_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81891_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81891_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81919_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81919_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81939_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81939_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81955_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81955_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81962_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81962_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81969_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81969_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81979_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 81979_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21502_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 21502_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:37.11 -03:25:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05946_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 05946_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:45.58 -06:07:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05053_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 05053_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:44.70 -06:17:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05974_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 05974_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:59.81 -06:08:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13169_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 13169_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:19.43 -04:41:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21341_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 21341_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:50.71 -03:28:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 16708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:56.64 -04:13:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18110_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 18110_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:55.40 -03:57:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18864_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 18864_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:20.69 -03:41:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 22996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:28.17 -03:17:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07342_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 07342_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:35.03 -05:58:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03049_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 03049_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.20 -06:40:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07867_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 07867_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11122_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 11122_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:04.51 -05:18:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 06561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:25.44 -06:06:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03639_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 03639_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78094_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 78094_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50997_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 50997_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.12 +02:10:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77936_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77936_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77883_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77883_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36231_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 36231_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:37.25 -01:15:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77783_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77783_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:33.76 +03:13:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77564_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77564_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77192_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 77192_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 08064_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:42.79 -05:46:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33494_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
Preparing report for the candidate 33494_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 57826_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:52.68 +01:01:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 65276_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:08.14 -00:18:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 11803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:39.94 -05:08:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 28181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:04.45 -02:28:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03326_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774
The candidate 03326_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0774 did not pass the final checks
