This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2428 2461178.7428 12.41 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3
355.29161 6.96266 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 3 -0 3 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3: 14.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3: 14.43 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7428,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2428 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2428 2461178.7428 12.67 17:11:30.15 -26:38:22.7
357.74796 7.55867 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 1 1 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:30.15 -26:38:22.7: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:30.15 -26:38:22.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7428,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2428 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2428 2461178.7428 12.87 17:06:42.62 -22:43:18.7
0.33330 10.72407 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 1 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:42.62 -22:43:18.7: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:42.62 -22:43:18.7: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7428,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2428 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2428 2461178.7428 13.26 16:59:06.79 -23:32:51.7
358.60316 11.64693 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 0 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:59:06.79 -23:32:51.7: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:59:06.79 -23:32:51.7: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7428,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2428 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2428 2461178.7428 13.95 17:19:56.41 -24:21:26.3
0.73400 7.30192 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.425 Cornelia 4 -1 4 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:56.41 -24:21:26.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:56.41 -24:21:26.3: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7428,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2428 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461178.74310838 18.05.2026 05:49:54.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7466
Objects passed selection criteria: 7462
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6101
Average stars matched: 5916.5 (96.9759 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:15:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461118.94973911 19.03.2026 10:47:27.459 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461178.74310838 18.05.2026 05:49:54.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 81613
Objects passed selection criteria: 81517
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74202.2
Average stars matched: 71839.2 (96.8155 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1948236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:19:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.74245611
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.51KvRALmX2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dIZpRcPi3P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NmmuGoxJVc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ILKwmOaBPO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0424 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2975 to -20.4648 deg
Loaded 11333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7330 out of 7692 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7692 out of 11434 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.7244 to 267.9414 deg, Dec -31.5299 to -20.1054 deg
Loaded 11826 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7072 out of 7305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7305 out of 10448 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.2 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.51KvRALmX2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=894, passed=11434
Got 11434 stars (including 10527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.985 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.822 n_q1=277 n_q2=292 n_q3=182 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dIZpRcPi3P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, passed=10448
Got 10448 stars (including 9823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=304 n_q2=261 n_q3=197 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NmmuGoxJVc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=5243
Got 5243 stars (including 4971 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.977 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.735 n_q1=296 n_q2=216 n_q3=219 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.531
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ILKwmOaBPO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, passed=5378
Got 5378 stars (including 5093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5378 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.924 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.753 n_q1=297 n_q2=214 n_q3=225 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.638 worst_q_ratio=1.543
ref2=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.307
new1=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits sigma_overall=0.639 worst_q_ratio=1.531
new2=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits sigma_overall=0.668 worst_q_ratio=1.383
reference average sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.425
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564_astrometric_residuals.png (921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20733_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 20733_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.78 -27:02:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:47.272 -26:00:40.45
Second-epoch image center 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:42.557 -26:00:12.88
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:44.570 -25:59:40.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01182 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TL5KnmiveW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iL91aqhngN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eFN5cD2XDS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ee7gm9sQ7h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.584200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.584200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 128283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0047 to 268.2082 deg, Dec -31.2994 to -20.4316 deg
Loaded 11378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7909 out of 9675 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9675 out of 128283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 109163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.6942 to 267.9448 deg, Dec -31.5317 to -20.0498 deg
Loaded 11895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8453 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 109163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TL5KnmiveW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=11806, passed=128268
Got 128268 stars (including 116305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.896 n_q1=284 n_q2=290 n_q3=171 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iL91aqhngN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=7684, passed=109157
Got 109157 stars (including 101310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=291 n_q2=254 n_q3=207 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eFN5cD2XDS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3292, passed=64746
Got 64746 stars (including 61369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.908 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.760 n_q1=305 n_q2=210 n_q3=210 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ee7gm9sQ7h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3470, passed=66271
Got 66271 stars (including 62717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.841 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.743 n_q1=302 n_q2=217 n_q3=209 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-48-58_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1564.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_011143_TTUQ2b1x1_1468911_KX6qWx9P/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:02:08.81 -28:54:26.5: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:54:16.11 -24:15:08.3: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:19.55 -25:33:08.5: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:12.96 -28:49:35.3: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:21:59.84 -23:39:30.3: 13.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:22:11.65 -25:29:58.2: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:42.28 -23:29:52.4: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:02:08.81 -28:54:26.5: 13.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:08.81 -28:54:26.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0593 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:54:16.11 -24:15:08.3: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:47.62 -28:26:41.5: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:16.11 -24:15:08.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4906 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:19.55 -25:33:08.5: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:21:59.84 -23:39:30.3: 13.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:22:11.65 -25:29:58.2: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:19.55 -25:33:08.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3776 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:59.84 -23:39:30.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5840 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:12.96 -28:49:35.3: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:11.65 -25:29:58.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2053 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:54.56 -28:39:54.9: 12.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:12.96 -28:49:35.3: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0831 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:42.28 -23:29:52.4: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:42.28 -23:29:52.4: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9087 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:54.93 -28:50:17.4: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:47.62 -28:26:41.5: 12.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:47.62 -28:26:41.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8314 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:54.56 -28:39:54.9: 12.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:54.56 -28:39:54.9: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8054 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:35.79 -26:20:04.1: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:54.93 -28:50:17.4: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:38.98 -26:30:56.6: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:50.18 -26:38:51.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:54.93 -28:50:17.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8222 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:20.04 -23:19:19.6: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:21:55.31 -24:16:47.6: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:57.98 -24:46:47.2: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:35.79 -26:20:04.1: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:35.79 -26:20:04.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9781 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:50.18 -26:38:51.2: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:38.98 -26:30:56.6: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:50.18 -26:38:51.2: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7923 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:38.98 -26:30:56.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7768 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:20.04 -23:19:19.6: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:20.04 -23:19:19.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7403 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:21:55.31 -24:16:47.6: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:55.31 -24:16:47.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6428 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:57.98 -24:46:47.2: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:57.98 -24:46:47.2: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2234 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:50:36.55 -26:46:38.5: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:33:33.80 -29:18:58.4: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:50:36.55 -26:46:38.5: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:03:26.47 -30:08:01.7: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:36.55 -26:46:38.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2587 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3: 14.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:33:33.80 -29:18:58.4: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:33.80 -29:18:58.4: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0681 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:11:30.15 -26:38:22.7: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:58:46.04 -29:16:05.4: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:03:26.47 -30:08:01.7: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3: 14.43 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:26.47 -30:08:01.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4182 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:07:13.06 -28:57:44.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.4014 delta=1.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:58:21.45 -26:46:59.6: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:00:56.75 -27:15:11.3: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:06:42.62 -22:43:18.7: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:11:30.15 -26:38:22.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:58:46.04 -29:16:05.4: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:46.04 -29:16:05.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7101 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:58:21.45 -26:46:59.6: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:21.45 -26:46:59.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7877 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:00:56.75 -27:15:11.3: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:56.75 -27:15:11.3: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8001 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:06:42.62 -22:43:18.7: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:12:29.22 -27:58:35.4: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:07:51.87 -29:32:17.1: 13.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:12:29.22 -27:58:35.4: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:29.22 -27:58:35.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7997 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:07:51.87 -29:32:17.1: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:51.87 -29:32:17.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8487 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:59:06.79 -23:32:51.7: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:59:06.79 -23:32:51.7: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 16:55:01.85 -28:10:16.9: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:26:09.87 -28:57:43.5: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:08:24.29 -29:18:47.3: 14.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:04:52.13 -27:00:09.0: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 16:55:01.85 -28:10:16.9: 13.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:01.85 -28:10:16.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2467 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:01:26.13 -26:45:04.2: 13.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:26:09.87 -28:57:43.5: 13.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:09.87 -28:57:43.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2834 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:08:24.29 -29:18:47.3: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:24.29 -29:18:47.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4785 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:04:52.13 -27:00:09.0: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:52.13 -27:00:09.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5040 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:30:05.65 -29:24:43.4: 13.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:01:26.13 -26:45:04.2: 13.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:26.13 -26:45:04.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2475 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:30:05.65 -29:24:43.4: 13.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:05.65 -29:24:43.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1439 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-47-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 17:19:56.41 -24:21:26.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-12-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0134.fits at 17:19:56.41 -24:21:26.3: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147150.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147319.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146745_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146750_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:00.82 -26:14:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146751_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146760_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146760_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146771_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146771_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146784_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146791_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:31.25 -29:30:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146793_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:39.67 -26:17:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146798_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146798_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:52.92 -21:58:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146801_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146805_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146806_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146806_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:30.35 -24:00:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146811_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146816_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146817_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:46.72 -27:59:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146822_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:59.67 -29:50:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146823_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146824_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146828_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:38.05 -28:12:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146840_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146843_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:08.27 -24:54:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146973_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146973_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:39.47 -27:40:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146998_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 146998_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.24 -24:53:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147013_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147013_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147029_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147029_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.38 -22:43:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:28.51 -27:46:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147049_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147049_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147058_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147058_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:14.72 -29:31:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147068_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147068_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:49.98 -27:45:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147076_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147076_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147098_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147098_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:00.17 -21:58:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147107_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
Preparing report for the candidate 147107_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147112_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147112_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:44.77 -29:34:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147123_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147123_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:51.93 -30:05:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147140_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147140_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:24.67 -26:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147150_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
Preparing report for the candidate 147150_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147155_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147155_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:58.82 -28:33:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147165_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147167_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147167_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147169_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147169_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:50.54 -27:57:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147170_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147170_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147174_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
Preparing report for the candidate 147174_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147181_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147181_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:32.74 -29:55:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147187_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147187_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:58.17 -29:24:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147192_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147192_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:00.09 -25:43:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147232_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147232_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147243_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147243_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.09 -22:41:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147246_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147246_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:00.95 -22:29:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147257_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147257_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:07.11 -28:14:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147261_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147261_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.54 -26:53:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147263_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:17.05 -29:15:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147295_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147295_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:20.26 -28:29:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147319_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
Preparing report for the candidate 147319_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147343_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147343_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.74 -21:44:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147344_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147344_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.04 -27:34:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147347_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147347_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:22.89 -21:40:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147352_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147352_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:24.30 -28:16:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147354_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147354_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:22.05 -28:22:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147358_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:33.52 -28:42:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147378_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147378_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:34.47 -26:07:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147380_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147380_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.48 -22:40:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147385_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147385_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147390_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147390_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:17.53 -26:32:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147392_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147392_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:50.60 -24:51:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147395_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147395_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:11.50 -26:00:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147409_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147409_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147410_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147410_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147413_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147413_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147418_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147418_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:31.42 -25:28:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147423_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147423_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147431_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147431_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147445_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 147445_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:22.36 -29:08:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147462_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
Preparing report for the candidate 147462_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143559_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 143559_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:02.99 -25:34:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.57 -22:44:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140130_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140130_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:50.08 -23:11:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140183_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140183_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.75 -23:00:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 54807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.20 -27:29:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140903_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:16.76 -24:13:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77986_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 77986_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:06.75 -25:35:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 59225_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.78 -27:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 141401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.20 -25:42:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 141132_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:12.53 -28:42:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140201_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:18.44 -25:34:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 140033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:10.92 -22:04:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 139980_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:52.66 -27:57:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 139779_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:40.10 -27:26:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 99727_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.21 -22:01:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 120031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:39.65 -23:45:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 30301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:19.71 -28:54:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 59524_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:16.17 -26:57:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565
The candidate 30432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-49-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1565 did not pass the final checks