This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2412 2461178.7412 13.09 13:26:11.96 +08:25:15.9
328.27704 69.56398 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.369 Aeria 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:26:11.96 +08:25:15.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:26:11.96 +08:25:15.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2413* 13 26 11.96 +08 25 15.9 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7412,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2412 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2412 2461178.7412 13.63 13:50:03.36 +06:25:20.6
339.50630 65.04470 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.593 Titania 2 -0 2 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:03.36 +06:25:20.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:03.36 +06:25:20.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2413* 13 50 03.36 +06 25 20.6 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7412,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2412 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2412 2461178.7412 14.25 13:39:43.49 +10:03:41.3
338.91908 69.48579 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.888 Parysatis 2 -0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:39:43.49 +10:03:41.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:39:43.49 +10:03:41.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7412,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2412 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
First image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Last image: 2461178.74148380 18.05.2026 05:47:34.200 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5817
Objects passed selection criteria: 5815
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5652.75
Average stars matched: 5492 (97.1563 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:03:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
First image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Last image: 2461178.74148380 18.05.2026 05:47:34.200 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33799
Objects passed selection criteria: 33712
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32831
Average stars matched: 31079.2 (94.6643 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:04:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.74100804
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0609 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c5eAzv0kEQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nWLEWGEaAo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Rd44gYsUj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CjA2dtV2Aw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec +0.6474 to +11.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec 0.6474 to 11.2864 deg
Loaded 4020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3440 out of 5924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec +0.6474 to +11.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec 0.6474 to 11.2864 deg
Loaded 4020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3440 out of 5924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec +0.2173 to +11.6259 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec 0.2173 to 11.6259 deg
Loaded 4449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3353 out of 3481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3481 out of 5986 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.c5eAzv0kEQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5924
Got 5924 stars (including 5536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=234 n_q2=242 n_q3=242 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nWLEWGEaAo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=5986
Got 5986 stars (including 5594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=244 n_q2=232 n_q3=250 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4Rd44gYsUj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=301, passed=5480
Got 5480 stars (including 5173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=244 n_q2=231 n_q3=252 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CjA2dtV2Aw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=5368
Got 5368 stars (including 5029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=242 n_q2=230 n_q3=254 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.069
ref2=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new1=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.255
new2=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.155
reference average sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.1205
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0609 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:01.504 +06:00:20.23
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:02.413 +06:00:50.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DAx7fiutLl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6jNVfNp09M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vCQ9FsrC8p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S3QZwQ9U5I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec +0.6245 to +11.2913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec 0.6245 to 11.2913 deg
Loaded 4036 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3220 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 32817 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec +0.6245 to +11.2913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec 0.6245 to 11.2913 deg
Loaded 4036 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3220 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 32817 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 34813 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec +0.1968 to +11.6784 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec 0.1968 to 11.6784 deg
Loaded 4490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3267 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 34813 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.1 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DAx7fiutLl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1293, passed=32790
Got 32790 stars (including 31464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=227 n_q2=252 n_q3=237 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6jNVfNp09M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1275, passed=34792
Got 34792 stars (including 33449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=239 n_q2=229 n_q3=250 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vCQ9FsrC8p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=968, passed=32138
Got 32138 stars (including 31105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32138 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=248 n_q2=230 n_q3=247 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S3QZwQ9U5I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1018, passed=32583
Got 32583 stars (including 31504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=245 n_q2=227 n_q3=256 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-46-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0711.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_005307_TTUQ1b1x1_3935601_DvsVCNf6/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:39.54 +02:51:29.9: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:59.77 +03:45:25.4: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:26:11.96 +08:25:15.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:31.49 +07:11:27.4: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:54:09.81 +10:23:15.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:12.71 +09:53:33.5: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:03.17 +03:58:14.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:36.22 +07:23:45.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:03.36 +06:25:20.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:39.54 +02:51:29.9: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:39.54 +02:51:29.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8024 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:59.77 +03:45:25.4: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:54:09.81 +10:23:15.2: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:31.49 +07:11:27.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:26:11.96 +08:25:15.9: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:59.77 +03:45:25.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5440 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:12.71 +09:53:33.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:54:09.81 +10:23:15.2: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0471 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:31.49 +07:11:27.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4144 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:12.71 +09:53:33.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9887 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:03.17 +03:58:14.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:36.22 +07:23:45.9: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:03.17 +03:58:14.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9754 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:03.36 +06:25:20.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:36.22 +07:23:45.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9863 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:39:43.49 +10:03:41.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:02:52.75 +08:39:56.6: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:49:58.27 +09:39:23.5: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:00:26.79 +07:02:11.6: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:39:43.49 +10:03:41.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:16:37.32 +08:23:00.8: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:57:49.71 +04:20:45.0: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:17.06 +08:30:45.7: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:02:52.75 +08:39:56.6: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:52.75 +08:39:56.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4005 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:49:58.27 +09:39:23.5: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:58.27 +09:39:23.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3743 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:00:26.79 +07:02:11.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:26.79 +07:02:11.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3989 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:16:37.32 +08:23:00.8: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:49.71 +04:20:45.0: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:37.32 +08:23:00.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2711 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:17.06 +08:30:45.7: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:49.71 +04:20:45.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5208 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:17.06 +08:30:45.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5780 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:53:24.41 +09:06:35.4: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:10:43.46 +03:10:26.4: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:10:02.73 +05:25:57.6: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:24.71 +07:14:05.4: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:53:24.41 +09:06:35.4: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:53:24.41 +09:06:35.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4982 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:10:31.79 +06:15:12.4: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:01.32 +10:24:13.9: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:10:43.46 +03:10:26.4: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:10:02.73 +05:25:57.6: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:24.71 +07:14:05.4: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:43.46 +03:10:26.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7692 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:02.73 +05:25:57.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6621 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:24.71 +07:14:05.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6934 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:13:59.59 +07:46:16.3: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:10:31.79 +06:15:12.4: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:31.79 +06:15:12.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8908 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:01.32 +10:24:13.9: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:01.32 +10:24:13.9: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7422 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:31.04 +00:57:01.1: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:13:59.59 +07:46:16.3: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:59.59 +07:46:16.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7940 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:57:26.25 +04:48:15.2: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.6: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:31.04 +00:57:01.1: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:31.04 +00:57:01.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6722 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:47.17 +05:05:05.0: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:41.28 +05:55:03.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:26.25 +04:48:15.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:26.25 +04:48:15.2: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7380 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.6: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.6: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7031 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:58.82 +08:20:50.4: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:47.17 +05:05:05.0: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:47.17 +05:05:05.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7667 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:41.28 +05:55:03.1: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:41.28 +05:55:03.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6427 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:25.36 +03:18:59.9: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:55:38.72 +04:59:06.3: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:58.82 +08:20:50.4: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:58.82 +08:20:50.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9077 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:25.36 +03:18:59.9: 15.49 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:58:39.85 +09:17:10.3: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:04.21 +02:32:26.9: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:25.36 +03:18:59.9: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8719 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:55:38.72 +04:59:06.3: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:38.72 +04:59:06.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7654 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:07:19.96 +10:10:04.0: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:07.09 +06:14:33.1: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:04.21 +02:32:26.9: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:58:39.85 +09:17:10.3: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:04.21 +02:32:26.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9089 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:39.85 +09:17:10.3: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9492 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:00:09.18 +04:04:51.4: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:19.96 +10:10:04.0: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:19.96 +10:10:04.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8661 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:07.09 +06:14:33.1: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:07.09 +06:14:33.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8536 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:14:22.10 +09:23:53.2: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:37.97 +02:06:31.8: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:00:09.18 +04:04:51.4: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:09.18 +04:04:51.4: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9331 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:14:22.10 +09:23:53.2: 15.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:33:30.97 +09:20:37.4: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:37.97 +02:06:31.8: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:17:27.54 +03:13:02.2: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:22.10 +09:23:53.2: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7717 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:37.97 +02:06:31.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8985 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:14:54.83 +09:51:40.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:22:30.29 +10:49:22.5: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:17:27.54 +03:13:02.2: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:33:30.97 +09:20:37.4: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:27.54 +03:13:02.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7841 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:30.97 +09:20:37.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8122 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:12:46.13 +02:01:20.1: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:14:54.83 +09:51:40.8: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:54.83 +09:51:40.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9051 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:22:30.29 +10:49:22.5: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:30.29 +10:49:22.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8338 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:26:32.87 +09:55:56.3: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:20:58.88 +10:14:51.8: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:12:46.13 +02:01:20.1: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:46.13 +02:01:20.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8506 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:20:58.88 +10:14:51.8: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:26:32.87 +09:55:56.3: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:18:44.77 +06:21:49.8: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:13:02.83 +09:57:36.6: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:58.88 +10:14:51.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8378 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:26:32.87 +09:55:56.3: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8975 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:15:24.19 +08:48:23.5: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:13:36.96 +03:45:05.9: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:18:44.77 +06:21:49.8: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:13:02.83 +09:57:36.6: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:44.77 +06:21:49.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9165 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:02.83 +09:57:36.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9016 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:15:24.19 +08:48:23.5: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:24.19 +08:48:23.5: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9615 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:13:36.96 +03:45:05.9: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:36.96 +03:45:05.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7509 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55168.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55109_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55109_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:32:24.25 +11:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55110_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55110_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55111_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55111_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:31:28.54 +11:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55112_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55112_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55113_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55113_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:12:31.83 +10:05:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55114_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55114_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55130_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55130_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55136_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55136_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55141_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
Preparing report for the candidate 55141_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55146_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55146_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:07.38 +10:34:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55151_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
Preparing report for the candidate 55151_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55155_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55155_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55158_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55158_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55161_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55161_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:38:46.94 +09:57:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55166_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55166_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:22.32 +09:30:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55168_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
Preparing report for the candidate 55168_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55171_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55171_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55172_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55172_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:11:26.15 +08:23:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55178_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55179_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55179_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:47:08.81 +02:43:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55181_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55181_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55182_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55182_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55183_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55183_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55191_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55191_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:49.80 +03:03:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55194_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55194_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55195_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55195_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:41:11.37 +10:36:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55199_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55199_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55203_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55203_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55205_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55205_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55206_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55206_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55208_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55208_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55209_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55209_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55211_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55211_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:00.73 +01:29:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55212_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55212_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55213_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55213_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55216_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55216_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:39:16.06 +09:22:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55223_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55223_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55224_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55224_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55227_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55227_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:54.11 +02:14:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55230_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55230_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55233_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55233_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55234_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55234_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:39.76 +08:11:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55235_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55235_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55238_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55238_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55242_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55242_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55244_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55244_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55245_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55245_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55248_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55248_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55252_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55252_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55256_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55256_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55259_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55259_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55268_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55268_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55292_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55292_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55307_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55307_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55336_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55336_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55338_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55338_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55351_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55351_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55352_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55352_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55369_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55369_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55393_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55393_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55395_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55395_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55404_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55404_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55421_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712
The candidate 55421_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-47-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0712 did not pass the final checks