This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 10.68 15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7
344.43458 28.19144 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 2 -1 2 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,10.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 10.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 12.69 14:55:19.96 -22:11:44.4
337.24462 32.29489 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 2 -1 2 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:55:19.96 -22:11:44.4: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:55:19.96 -22:11:44.4: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 13.49 15:23:53.94 -20:55:08.8
344.37984 29.42298 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 3 -2 4 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:23:53.94 -20:55:08.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:23:53.94 -20:55:08.8: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 13.65 15:47:17.69 -21:29:33.5
348.58131 25.40297 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.229 Adelinda 1 -0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:47:17.69 -21:29:33.5: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:17.69 -21:29:33.5: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 13.69 15:30:04.59 -24:07:02.1
343.34857 26.04219 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.541 Deborah 2 0 2 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:30:04.59 -24:07:02.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:30:04.59 -24:07:02.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1938 2461178.6938 13.99 15:12:35.91 -25:34:33.3
338.82998 27.28449 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.568 Cheruskia 2 -1 2 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:12:35.91 -25:34:33.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:12:35.91 -25:34:33.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6938,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1938 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461178.69414536 18.05.2026 04:39:24.159 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7020
Objects passed selection criteria: 7020
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6737.25
Average stars matched: 6478.25 (96.1557 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:44:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461178.69414536 18.05.2026 04:39:24.159 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55125
Objects passed selection criteria: 55003
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51495.8
Average stars matched: 49873.8 (96.8502 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 156540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:46:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.69337049
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0747 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0845 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.INqE7CP6vU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GnthkqizFh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gu23KIt3C0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AhZCR3Ky2a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Loaded 7407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5126 out of 5277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5277 out of 7308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.8 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
2.9 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.4 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.INqE7CP6vU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=570, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=209 n_q2=212 n_q3=296 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GnthkqizFh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=7308
Got 7308 stars (including 6831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=219 n_q2=256 n_q3=251 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gu23KIt3C0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=6301
Got 6301 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6301 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=254 n_q2=261 n_q3=234 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AhZCR3Ky2a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, passed=6318
Got 6318 stars (including 5987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=249 n_q2=261 n_q3=240 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.245
ref2=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.581 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new1=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.507 worst_q_ratio=1.223
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:25:36.73 -26:01:27.4: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:23:14.64 -26:24:12.5: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:48:00.36 -25:49:11.2: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:38:08.08 -28:10:30.6: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:18:09.91 -26:27:47.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:00:42.51 -20:34:25.0: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:11:38.78 -28:25:32.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:19:37.12 -25:13:50.2: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:00:42.51 -20:34:25.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:42.51 -20:34:25.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:14:58.90 -24:38:24.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:48:00.36 -25:49:11.2: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:18:09.91 -26:27:47.6: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:38:08.08 -28:10:30.6: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:25:36.73 -26:01:27.4: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:23:14.64 -26:24:12.5: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:00.36 -25:49:11.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4562 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:11:38.78 -28:25:32.9: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:19:37.12 -25:13:50.2: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:09.91 -26:27:47.6: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6227 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:08.08 -28:10:30.6: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5043 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:36.73 -26:01:27.4: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5422 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:14.64 -26:24:12.5: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6287 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:38.78 -28:25:32.9: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5933 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:37.12 -25:13:50.2: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5360 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:14:58.90 -24:38:24.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:58.90 -24:38:24.9: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6311 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20931_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 20931_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20937_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20937_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20939_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20939_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:52.47 -25:20:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20942_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20944_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20944_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20945_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20945_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20947_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20947_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20948_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20948_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20950_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20950_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20955_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 20955_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 06318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:46.27 -30:14:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:27:24.44 -21:50:31.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0747 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0845 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:27.086 -25:59:51.29
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:24.456 -26:00:27.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V3VjMK76ID
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4uRZMe6ZU4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NGcd6j5TI7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SH6tilhdOf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Loaded 7433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5759 out of 6269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6269 out of 57360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.5 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
2.6 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.6 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V3VjMK76ID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2899, passed=62803
Got 62803 stars (including 59788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=213 n_q2=212 n_q3=289 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4uRZMe6ZU4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2875, passed=57345
Got 57345 stars (including 54370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=226 n_q2=247 n_q3=263 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NGcd6j5TI7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1556, passed=43725
Got 43725 stars (including 42113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=247 n_q2=249 n_q3=247 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SH6tilhdOf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1571, passed=43494
Got 43494 stars (including 41871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=240 n_q2=251 n_q3=247 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-38-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0635.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_234103_TTUQ1b1x1_2322005_UxesQHLk/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:47:45.07 -26:58:50.6: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:51:22.10 -27:56:15.7: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:55:19.96 -22:11:44.4: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:45:07.79 -23:53:01.9: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:46:27.88 -26:47:13.6: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:25.95 -21:00:53.0: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:10:36.18 -21:16:19.3: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:41:51.76 -27:36:01.6: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:51:22.10 -27:56:15.7: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:55:19.96 -22:11:44.4: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:45.07 -26:58:50.6: 12.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:46:27.88 -26:47:13.6: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:25.95 -21:00:53.0: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:45:07.79 -23:53:01.9: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:10:36.18 -21:16:19.3: 13.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:22.10 -27:56:15.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0001 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:45.07 -26:58:50.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2945 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:27.88 -26:47:13.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5505 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:25.95 -21:00:53.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7570 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:07.79 -23:53:01.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4683 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:36.18 -21:16:19.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9117 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:41:51.76 -27:36:01.6: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:51.76 -27:36:01.6: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6626 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:23:53.94 -20:55:08.8: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:49:25.26 -24:02:11.1: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:43:24.02 -26:55:29.8: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:33:22.87 -27:09:39.8: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:47:42.52 -29:44:57.7: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:47:17.69 -21:29:33.5: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:56:18.77 -21:20:38.9: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:23:53.94 -20:55:08.8: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:49:25.26 -24:02:11.1: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:43:24.02 -26:55:29.8: 13.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:25.26 -24:02:11.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4551 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:24.02 -26:55:29.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4101 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:42.52 -29:44:57.7: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:42.52 -29:44:57.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0234 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:33:22.87 -27:09:39.8: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:22.87 -27:09:39.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2483 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:30:04.59 -24:07:02.1: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:17.69 -21:29:33.5: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:56:18.77 -21:20:38.9: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:51:14.15 -24:43:37.0: 14.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:18.77 -21:20:38.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9988 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:30:04.59 -24:07:02.1: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:51:14.15 -24:43:37.0: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:50:09.08 -21:44:55.7: 14.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:50:04.24 -21:22:53.6: 14.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:14.15 -24:43:37.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9679 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:54:11.68 -20:52:28.0: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:12:35.91 -25:34:33.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:50:19.48 -29:10:48.9: 14.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:50:04.24 -21:22:53.6: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:04.24 -21:22:53.6: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1216 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:11.68 -20:52:28.0: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:12:35.91 -25:34:33.3: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:50:09.08 -21:44:55.7: 14.68 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:11.68 -20:52:28.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0807 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:09.08 -21:44:55.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.0372 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:50:19.48 -29:10:48.9: 14.42 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:19.48 -29:10:48.9: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9610 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:52:22.68 -21:13:28.3: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:49:47.94 -21:06:05.4: 14.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:49:40.44 -21:59:57.5: 14.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:05:37.35 -22:58:20.8: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:52:22.68 -21:13:28.3: 14.46 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:22.68 -21:13:28.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1259 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:05:37.35 -22:58:20.8: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:37.35 -22:58:20.8: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1923 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:49:40.44 -21:59:57.5: 13.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:49:47.94 -21:06:05.4: 14.96 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:47.94 -21:06:05.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1557 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:49:07.80 -22:33:21.9: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:40.44 -21:59:57.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9613 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:08:01.45 -23:07:31.9: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:49:07.80 -22:33:21.9: 14.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:07.80 -22:33:21.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8515 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:45:53.45 -24:31:41.1: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:59:40.93 -22:47:43.4: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:43:36.56 -24:10:47.5: 14.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:08:01.45 -23:07:31.9: 15.18 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:01.45 -23:07:31.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1891 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:45:53.45 -24:31:41.1: 13.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:43:36.56 -24:10:47.5: 14.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:59:40.93 -22:47:43.4: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:53.45 -24:31:41.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9275 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:40.93 -22:47:43.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1749 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:36.56 -24:10:47.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1436 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:47:06.50 -28:11:05.3: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:47:06.50 -28:11:05.3: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:06.50 -28:11:05.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4382 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:48:00.27 -26:48:33.1: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:47:34.17 -26:40:07.9: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:48:00.27 -26:48:33.1: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:00.27 -26:48:33.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6268 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:49:21.75 -27:41:48.3: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:47:34.17 -26:40:07.9: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:34.17 -26:40:07.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9096 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:49:21.75 -27:41:48.3: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:21.75 -27:41:48.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8647 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78749.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78862.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78692_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78692_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78697_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78697_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78702_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78702_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78703_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78703_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78704_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78704_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:45:59.88 -30:12:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78707_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78707_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78710_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78710_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:24.45 -21:50:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78746_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78746_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78749_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 78749_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78752_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78752_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:44.31 -23:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78759_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78759_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.03 -29:15:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78760_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78760_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:19.76 -29:45:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78763_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78763_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78772_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78772_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:07.32 -23:38:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78778_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78778_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.47 -25:17:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78787_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78787_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.57 -27:54:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78795_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78795_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:19.79 -20:37:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78800_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78800_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78801_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78801_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:09.33 -26:27:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78802_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78802_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78808_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 78808_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78812_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78812_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78813_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78813_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78820_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78820_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:10.68 -22:55:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78834_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78834_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:24.47 -25:36:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78848_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 78848_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78849_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78849_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:43.38 -25:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78855_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78855_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:03.14 -26:11:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78860_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78860_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78862_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 78862_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78879_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78879_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78885_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78885_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78886_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78886_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78895_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78895_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78897_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
Preparing report for the candidate 78897_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78908_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78908_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78911_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78911_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78918_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78918_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78926_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78926_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78937_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78937_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78941_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78941_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78996_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 78996_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73033_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 73033_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:56.86 -29:24:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:14.58 -29:23:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:55.44 -29:17:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72929_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72929_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:23.29 -29:24:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72927_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72927_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72913_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72913_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:49:27.91 -30:12:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72901_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72901_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 72899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40998_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636
The candidate 40998_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-39-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0636 did not pass the final checks