This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 11.67 16:50:08.41 -08:33:09.2
10.06307 22.11966 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 1 -0 1 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:08.41 -08:33:09.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:08.41 -08:33:09.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 11.76 16:56:26.42 -14:06:54.8
6.11887 17.69438 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:26.42 -14:06:54.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:26.42 -14:06:54.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 12.29 17:14:53.30 -07:44:39.3
14.31038 17.40809 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:53.30 -07:44:39.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:53.30 -07:44:39.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 13.10 17:18:49.37 -10:37:17.1
12.29947 15.06421 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 -0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:49.37 -10:37:17.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:49.37 -10:37:17.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1843* 17 18 49.37 -10 37 17.1 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 13.62 17:08:09.82 -11:26:09.5
10.11969 16.82836 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:08:09.82 -11:26:09.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:08:09.82 -11:26:09.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1843 2461178.6843 14.11 16:50:29.52 -12:04:58.3
6.99841 20.04715 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 -1 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:29.52 -12:04:58.3: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:29.52 -12:04:58.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6843,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1843 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461178.68453740 18.05.2026 04:25:34.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3863
Objects passed selection criteria: 3852
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3386.75
Average stars matched: 3313.5 (97.8372 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:41:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461178.68453740 18.05.2026 04:25:34.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38982
Objects passed selection criteria: 38931
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35722.8
Average stars matched: 34515.8 (96.6212 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:43:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.68405390
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Image size: 938.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01187 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iLGQyRxtHu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3lhmtxOxWi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jcjiC5XxtT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oiFWp2YbfC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.672700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.672700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iLGQyRxtHu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=183 n_q2=350 n_q3=215 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3lhmtxOxWi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=180 n_q2=353 n_q3=214 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jcjiC5XxtT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=3676
Got 3676 stars (including 3470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.746 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=189 n_q2=327 n_q3=229 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oiFWp2YbfC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=206, passed=3711
Got 3711 stars (including 3499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=192 n_q2=323 n_q3=231 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.628 worst_q_ratio=1.241
ref2=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.587 worst_q_ratio=1.156
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits sigma_overall=0.597 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.281
reference average sigma_overall=0.6075 worst_q_ratio=1.1985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.81 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Image size: 938.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Image size: 938.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.240 -10:00:00.02
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:32.439 -09:59:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01187 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EKtkyOVmDW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gj2Gg1QOSb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o4bYrZwegn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FuKxgF71SC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.433700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.433700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EKtkyOVmDW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.663 n_q1=195 n_q2=361 n_q3=190 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gj2Gg1QOSb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=195 n_q2=358 n_q3=190 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o4bYrZwegn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1422, passed=38144
Got 38144 stars (including 36663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.704 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=202 n_q2=335 n_q3=205 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FuKxgF71SC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1409, passed=38094
Got 38094 stars (including 36632 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.559 n_q1=197 n_q2=335 n_q3=207 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-24-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1480.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_233944_TTUQ2b1x1_2299309_ieYyQm3N/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:12:48.17 -08:01:52.4: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:19.54 -07:57:46.7: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:46:29.66 -10:57:34.3: 14.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:20:40.43 -11:46:08.1: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:37.64 -10:49:55.4: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:08.41 -08:33:09.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:26.42 -14:06:54.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:53.30 -07:44:39.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:46:29.66 -10:57:34.3: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:08.41 -08:33:09.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:19.54 -07:57:46.7: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:26.42 -14:06:54.8: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:20:40.43 -11:46:08.1: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:12:48.17 -08:01:52.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:29.66 -10:57:34.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1748 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:37.64 -10:49:55.4: 13.98 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:19.54 -07:57:46.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6812 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:40.43 -11:46:08.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0303 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:48.17 -08:01:52.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9511 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:37.64 -10:49:55.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1276 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:49.37 -10:37:17.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:53.30 -07:44:39.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:49.37 -10:37:17.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:42.61 -14:00:06.3: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:08:09.82 -11:26:09.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:52.64 -06:32:40.9: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:27.09 -12:15:35.5: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:42.61 -14:00:06.3: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:42.61 -14:00:06.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3557 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:08:09.82 -11:26:09.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:50:29.52 -12:04:58.3: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:56.41 -07:01:54.1: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:52.64 -06:32:40.9: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:27.09 -12:15:35.5: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:52.64 -06:32:40.9: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9904 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:27.09 -12:15:35.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0650 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:56.41 -07:01:54.1: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:50:29.52 -12:04:58.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:56.41 -07:01:54.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2137 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:17.27 -06:59:49.2: 14.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:17.27 -06:59:49.2: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:17.27 -06:59:49.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0922 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:18:42.97 -08:25:58.1: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:06:58.90 -09:10:47.3: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:18:42.97 -08:25:58.1: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:06:58.90 -09:10:47.3: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:42.97 -08:25:58.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2406 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:58.90 -09:10:47.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:46:17.92 -12:21:03.8: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:14:08.07 -09:58:56.7: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:14:08.07 -09:58:56.7: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:46:17.92 -12:21:03.8: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:08.07 -09:58:56.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2866 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:17.92 -12:21:03.8: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1653 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:04:01.97 -11:37:23.9: 15.29 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:04:01.97 -11:37:23.9: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:01.97 -11:37:23.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4641 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71985.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72002.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72069.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71932_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71932_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71935_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71935_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71939_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71939_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:47.42 -13:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71942_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71942_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:41.50 -09:26:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71953_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71953_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 71962_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.06 -12:50:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 71980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71985_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 71985_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 72002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.50 -14:09:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72041_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72041_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.54 -12:29:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72064_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72064_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.76 -06:11:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72069_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 72069_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:43.28 -10:14:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72087_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72087_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72121_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 72121_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72137_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72137_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.87 -06:45:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.02 -14:00:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72156_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72156_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.15 -12:40:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72170_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72170_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:10.03 -13:55:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.38 -13:55:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72199_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72203_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72214_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.66 -07:11:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72221_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
Preparing report for the candidate 72221_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72234_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72234_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72245_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72245_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72250_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.24 -13:37:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72257_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72257_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72267_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72267_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:08.65 -07:06:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72270_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72270_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72277_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72307_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72307_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72311_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 72311_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.88 -12:09:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.82 -10:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.32 -12:51:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.23 -07:07:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:30.24 -11:28:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67899_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 67899_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:41.28 -09:25:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.79 -08:16:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69808_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 69808_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:28.20 -12:56:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.35 -09:32:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481
The candidate 68692_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-25-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1481 did not pass the final checks
