This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1911 2461178.6911 11.83 10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0
208.07698 59.98722 galactic LMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.511 Davida -2 1 3 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6911,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1911 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1911 2461178.6911 12.65 10:36:35.83 +22:40:48.5
213.69427 59.19478 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.416 Vaticana -2 0 2 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:36:35.83 +22:40:48.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:36:35.83 +22:40:48.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1912* 10 36 35.83 +22 40 48.5 12.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6911,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1911 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1911 2461178.6911 14.08 10:33:58.29 +21:35:04.7
215.39618 58.30568 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.508 Princetonia -2 -0 2 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:33:58.29 +21:35:04.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:33:58.29 +21:35:04.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1912* 10 33 58.29 +21 35 04.7 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6911,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1911 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.86515985 11.02.2026 08:45:39.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
First image: 2461082.86515985 11.02.2026 08:45:39.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Last image: 2461178.69137832 18.05.2026 04:35:25.087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5914
Objects passed selection criteria: 5912
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5620.75
Average stars matched: 5477.5 (97.4514 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111740 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:39:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.86515985 11.02.2026 08:45:39.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
First image: 2461082.86515985 11.02.2026 08:45:39.811 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Last image: 2461178.69137832 18.05.2026 04:35:25.087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31047
Objects passed selection criteria: 30971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29681.2
Average stars matched: 28672 (96.5997 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:40:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.69091740
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62
Second-epoch second image center 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X41pg69t9E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ryLinGEtBq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vw5SWflH3g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g32HJGvJtk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.4737 to 174.9511 deg, Dec +16.5070 to +27.2965 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.4737 to 174.9511 deg, Dec 16.5070 to 27.2965 deg
Loaded 4048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3143 out of 3296 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3296 out of 5979 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.919200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.919200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.4737 to 174.9511 deg, Dec +16.5070 to +27.2965 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.4737 to 174.9511 deg, Dec 16.5070 to 27.2965 deg
Loaded 4048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3143 out of 3296 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3296 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.4013 to 174.8052 deg, Dec +16.4600 to +27.2310 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.4013 to 174.8052 deg, Dec 16.4600 to 27.2310 deg
Loaded 4032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3153 out of 3261 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3261 out of 5697 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.4 pix Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X41pg69t9E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=209 n_q2=248 n_q3=230 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ryLinGEtBq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=334, passed=5697
Got 5697 stars (including 5355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=219 n_q2=263 n_q3=216 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits -region wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vw5SWflH3g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, passed=5500
Got 5500 stars (including 5164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=217 n_q2=245 n_q3=241 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g32HJGvJtk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, passed=5467
Got 5467 stars (including 5133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=217 n_q2=245 n_q3=239 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new1=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new2=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.177
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.179
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:14:13.42 +24:16:09.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:14:13.42 +24:16:09.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:13.42 +24:16:09.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4783 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
Preparing report for the candidate 20361_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 20415_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:37:12.40 +25:37:39.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:04:36.437 +21:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:04:49.057 +22:00:11.62
Second-epoch second image center 11:04:47.368 +22:00:40.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q6rwTn7Ckx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xK11xRp6DF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WN3P5Hh0WU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QKymtzVVFy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits and wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.4472 to 175.0133 deg, Dec +16.5070 to +27.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.4472 to 175.0133 deg, Dec 16.5070 to 27.2990 deg
Loaded 4078 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3045 out of 3329 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3329 out of 31291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.4472 to 175.0133 deg, Dec +16.5070 to +27.2990 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.4472 to 175.0133 deg, Dec 16.5070 to 27.2990 deg
Loaded 4078 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3045 out of 3329 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3329 out of 31291 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 28925 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 157.2995 to 174.8091 deg, Dec +16.4534 to +27.2447 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 157.2995 to 174.8091 deg, Dec 16.4534 to 27.2447 deg
Loaded 4059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3074 out of 3304 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3304 out of 28925 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.2 pix Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q6rwTn7Ckx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1166, passed=31271
Got 31271 stars (including 30054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=214 n_q2=245 n_q3=232 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits -region wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xK11xRp6DF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1083, passed=28899
Got 28899 stars (including 27785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28899 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=217 n_q2=264 n_q3=206 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits -region wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WN3P5Hh0WU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=961, passed=29725
Got 29725 stars (including 28719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=223 n_q2=244 n_q3=238 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QKymtzVVFy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=934, passed=29627
Got 29627 stars (including 28632 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=221 n_q2=246 n_q3=237 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-34-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0631.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_233702_TTUQ1b1x1_2210261_MoM71n5o/wcs_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:25:09.71 +19:26:03.5: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:36:35.83 +22:40:48.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:47:49.60 +26:46:13.7: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:16:17.57 +20:10:13.6: 15.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:09:25.37 +20:09:28.8: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:24:14.81 +25:40:40.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:33:58.29 +21:35:04.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:25:09.71 +19:26:03.5: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:36:35.83 +22:40:48.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:09.71 +19:26:03.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9053 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:47:49.60 +26:46:13.7: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:09:25.37 +20:09:28.8: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:16:17.57 +20:10:13.6: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:49.60 +26:46:13.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0791 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:25.37 +20:09:28.8: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7693 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:16:17.57 +20:10:13.6: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9694 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:38:56.28 +23:45:51.4: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:39:41.48 +26:08:37.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:38:56.28 +23:45:51.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:56.28 +23:45:51.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:33:58.29 +21:35:04.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:24:14.81 +25:40:40.2: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:14.81 +25:40:40.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0357 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:39:41.48 +26:08:37.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:41.48 +26:08:37.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6036 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:31:10.65 +25:37:15.2: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:30:36.50 +22:19:40.8: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:01:27.97 +25:21:37.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:36:31.57 +23:48:09.0: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:33:52.91 +19:25:43.8: 15.51 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:25:49.08 +26:14:15.7: 14.84 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:31:10.65 +25:37:15.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:30:36.50 +22:19:40.8: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:36.50 +22:19:40.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9410 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:01:27.97 +25:21:37.5: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:36:31.57 +23:48:09.0: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:27.97 +25:21:37.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.8406 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:31.57 +23:48:09.0: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9014 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:39:52.14 +26:12:01.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:33:54.37 +22:20:34.8: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:33:52.91 +19:25:43.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:52.91 +19:25:43.8: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.9907 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:39:52.14 +26:12:01.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:52.14 +26:12:01.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:25:49.08 +26:14:15.7: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:49.08 +26:14:15.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9159 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:33:54.37 +22:20:34.8: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:54.37 +22:20:34.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8889 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 11:14:29.17 +26:21:43.3: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:31:47.96 +22:26:24.8: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:33:54.68 +20:16:38.9: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:35:04.25 +19:59:39.9: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 11:14:29.17 +26:21:43.3: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:34:50.58 +18:44:53.0: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:31:47.96 +22:26:24.8: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:29.17 +26:21:43.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9939 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:47.96 +22:26:24.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8010 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:39:24.43 +20:21:08.9: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_02-45-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0391.fits at 10:42:13.39 +17:41:29.9: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:33:54.68 +20:16:38.9: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:54.68 +20:16:38.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8941 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:35:04.25 +19:59:39.9: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:04.25 +19:59:39.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8956 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:34:50.58 +18:44:53.0: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:34:50.58 +18:44:53.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7731 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:39:24.43 +20:21:08.9: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-10-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0217.fits at 10:42:13.39 +17:41:29.9: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:24.43 +20:21:08.9: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9661 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:13.39 +17:41:29.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9039 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52413.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52241.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51873_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 51873_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51882_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 51882_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51886_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 51886_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 51952_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:23.20 +22:21:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51968_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 51968_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:12.41 +25:37:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
Preparing report for the candidate 52051_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52148_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52148_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:56.18 +17:45:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52154_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:59.37 +18:22:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52200_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52210_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:34.95 +25:32:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52228_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52241_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
Preparing report for the candidate 52241_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52253_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:28.07 +23:20:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52313_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:30.81 +26:07:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52324_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:01.47 +25:07:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52391_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52401_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:33.09 +20:28:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52407_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52409_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:54.23 +18:37:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52413_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:10.65 +25:37:15.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52426_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52427_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52427_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:05.92 +17:32:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52435_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52460_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52468_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52475_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:08.00 +26:44:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52480_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52481_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52481_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52485_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52492_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52505_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52514_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:51.82 +25:44:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52537_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:50.66 +18:16:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52538_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52539_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:38.11 +24:09:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52551_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52580_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52592_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52640_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632
The candidate 52661_fd_Leo-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-35-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0632 did not pass the final checks