######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 352796 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 352796 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 987.4033
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 506.6989
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 987.8926
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 507.4376
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.19904
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T23:30:00.9390944' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-18T04:30:00.9390944' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61178.1875108681 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-18T04:30:10.8430213' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61178.1876254976 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.999341734783 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.0000073872823 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.5147222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.501944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40034672364903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -3.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 16.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 890.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits :)
Spent 0.855299 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T23:30:44.8950019' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-18T04:30:44.8950019' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61178.1880196179 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-18T04:30:54.7981467' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61178.1881342363 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.999341752526 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.000007395358 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3875 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.518333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40339998453858 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -3.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 16.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 890.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits :)
Spent 0.733539 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.68762661
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0556 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00988 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hh2bHRiDQj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ou2R8CUO20
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zE8xQHiwwn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lsd2DkghLC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Hh2bHRiDQj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ou2R8CUO20 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=208 n_q2=265 n_q3=262 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zE8xQHiwwn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, passed=7269
Got 7269 stars (including 6892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=230 n_q2=268 n_q3=243 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.006
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lsd2DkghLC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=408, passed=7158
Got 7158 stars (including 6741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=229 n_q2=271 n_q3=245 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.006
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:35:16.01 +49:08:23.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:12:39.40 +46:44:12.0: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:01:44.20 +42:19:31.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:01:44.20 +42:19:31.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:35:16.01 +49:08:23.8: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:12:39.40 +46:44:12.0: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:35:16.01 +49:08:23.8: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4450 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:01:44.20 +42:19:31.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5065 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:39.40 +46:44:12.0: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9100 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 20602_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 11.45 | 09:08:47.96 +42:09:21.3 | 7736 5574 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.93 +42:09:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20694_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 20694_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 11.91 | 10:12:39.31 +46:44:13.1 | 1081 2302 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 11.90 | 10:12:39.49 +46:44:10.9 | 1078 2306 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20819_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 20819_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 12.44 | 09:35:16.00 +49:08:23.5 | 5012 1308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 12.45 | 09:35:16.01 +49:08:24.1 | 5009 1313 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 20836_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 12.51 | 09:01:44.20 +42:19:31.4 | 8535 5443 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 12.51 | 09:01:44.21 +42:19:31.9 | 8531 5448 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0556 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:21.780 +45:59:31.45
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:19.845 +46:00:00.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00988 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GSrELm0O1F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3xwt8FR1k9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q5uUyl9sDN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SMvqnPbATp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
15.4 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GSrELm0O1F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=208 n_q2=259 n_q3=261 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3xwt8FR1k9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q5uUyl9sDN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1384, passed=37438
Got 37438 stars (including 36001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=230 n_q2=272 n_q3=246 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SMvqnPbATp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1431, passed=38316
Got 38316 stars (including 36822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38316 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=232 n_q2=272 n_q3=249 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:14:48.97 +46:58:11.2: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:56:47.26 +48:47:31.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:33:43.02 +47:30:50.4: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:06.98 +42:15:42.3: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:52:01.82 +47:41:10.9: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:14:49.43 +46:38:18.0: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:29:50.75 +46:06:50.6: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:14:48.97 +46:58:11.2: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:56:47.26 +48:47:31.2: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:06.98 +42:15:42.3: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:33:43.02 +47:30:50.4: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:48.97 +46:58:11.2: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2100 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:56:47.26 +48:47:31.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8298 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:06.98 +42:15:42.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2852 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:43.02 +47:30:50.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1264 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:55:31.22 +46:57:58.2: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:05:39.98 +47:32:54.1: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:58:10.48 +43:45:47.2: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:29:50.75 +46:06:50.6: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:14:49.43 +46:38:18.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:52:01.82 +47:41:10.9: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:50.75 +46:06:50.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5330 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:14:49.43 +46:38:18.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0634 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:52:01.82 +47:41:10.9: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6851 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:55:31.22 +46:57:58.2: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:58:10.48 +43:45:47.2: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:05:39.98 +47:32:54.1: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:31.22 +46:57:58.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7418 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:58:10.48 +43:45:47.2: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6468 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:39.98 +47:32:54.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6360 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:08:59.95 +45:05:11.6: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:17:04.17 +46:59:13.3: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:08:46.83 +41:26:13.4: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:16:12.37 +43:52:10.0: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:18:14.22 +48:30:55.5: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:08:59.95 +45:05:11.6: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:17:04.17 +46:59:13.3: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:08:59.95 +45:05:11.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8950 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:04.17 +46:59:13.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8554 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:18:14.22 +48:30:55.5: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:08:46.83 +41:26:13.4: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:16:12.37 +43:52:10.0: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:14.22 +48:30:55.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7724 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:46.83 +41:26:13.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9911 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:12.37 +43:52:10.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9974 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53077_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 11.71 | 10:18:52.45 +46:46:24.3 | 0439 2163 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 10:18:52.45 +46:46:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53542_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 13.29 | 10:00:06.96 +42:15:42.0 | 2006 5188 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.28 | 10:00:07.01 +42:15:42.7 | 2002 5193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53548_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.28 | 09:05:24.21 +48:33:40.3 | 7976 1684 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:05:24.22 +48:33:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53719_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.52 | 08:56:24.52 +45:45:50.4 | 8996 3330 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:24.48 +45:45:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53846_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.74 | 09:24:02.89 +50:55:39.1 | 6139 0271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:24:02.82 +50:55:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53873_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 13.83 | 09:56:47.27 +48:47:31.1 | 2870 1319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.83 | 09:56:47.24 +48:47:31.3 | 2867 1324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53876_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53876_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.81 | 09:29:54.29 +46:11:08.8 | 5464 3117 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:29:54.29 +46:11:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 53897_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 13.87 | 09:44:57.57 +43:14:49.5 | 3744 4781 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:57.60 +43:14:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.17 | 10:14:49.02 +46:58:11.5 | 0884 2122 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.27 | 10:14:48.92 +46:58:10.9 | 0880 2127 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54106_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54106_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.11 | 09:33:43.01 +47:30:49.8 | 5113 2296 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.14 | 09:33:43.04 +47:30:51.0 | 5109 2300 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54121_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.09 | 09:14:49.40 +46:38:17.6 | 7040 2866 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.04 | 09:14:49.46 +46:38:18.3 | 7037 2870 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.39 | 09:22:31.42 +45:00:53.1 | 6221 3845 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:22:31.44 +45:00:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54422_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54422_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.44 | 09:01:07.98 +47:48:17.1 | 8430 2122 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:01:08.02 +47:48:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54431_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54431_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.46 | 09:29:50.77 +46:06:49.4 | 5472 3156 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.66 | 09:29:50.73 +46:06:51.8 | 5468 3160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54483_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54483_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.55 | 09:57:33.52 +45:33:51.1 | 2543 3247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:57:33.56 +45:33:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54534_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.60 | 09:52:01.94 +47:41:10.4 | 3268 2040 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.84 | 09:52:01.70 +47:41:11.4 | 3265 2044 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54578_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.69 | 09:55:31.18 +46:57:58.8 | 2863 2430 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.85 | 09:55:31.25 +46:57:57.6 | 2860 2434 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54615_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54615_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.67 | 09:58:10.54 +43:45:47.1 | 2341 4313 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.63 | 09:58:10.42 +43:45:47.3 | 2338 4318 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54697_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54697_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.77 | 10:05:40.03 +47:32:53.6 | 1877 1937 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.55 | 10:05:39.93 +47:32:54.6 | 1874 1941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54737_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54737_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.86 | 09:04:32.05 +42:03:32.1 | 8221 5622 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:04:32.05 +42:03:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54768_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.68 | 09:43:03.88 +43:50:05.0 | 3980 4445 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:43:03.89 +43:50:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54775_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54775_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.85 | 10:17:04.06 +46:59:13.2 | 0654 2068 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.86 | 10:17:04.28 +46:59:13.5 | 0650 2072 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54806_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54806_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.85 | 09:08:59.88 +45:05:11.7 | 7671 3793 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.97 | 09:09:00.01 +45:05:11.5 | 7667 3798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54871_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54871_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 15.00 | 10:16:12.36 +43:52:10.6 | 0390 3947 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.99 | 10:16:12.38 +43:52:09.3 | 0386 3952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.99 | 10:08:46.77 +41:26:12.6 | 0956 5547 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.99 | 10:08:46.90 +41:26:14.2 | 0952 5551 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54917_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 54917_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.18763 | 2461178.68763 | 14.98 | 10:18:14.11 +48:30:54.0 | 0711 1132 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0625.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 14.69 | 10:18:14.32 +48:30:57.0 | 0708 1136 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626
The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 18.18814 | 2461178.68814 | 11.56 | 09:08:47.98 +42:09:21.4 | 7736 5574 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233131_TTUQ1b1x1_1859953_MBTAQEXB/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-30-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0626.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.96 +42:09:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.68762661 -observatory V36
03:55:54.37 +21:09:36.3 Mercury (-2.0mag)
05:53:50.13 +24:59:53.8 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:49:10.19 +10:26:10.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:31:59.53 +22:09:36.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:27.80 +02:09:28.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:07.39 +20:10:30.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:31.56 +00:07:23.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:08.91 -22:57:44.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:54:41.64 +26:53:36.5 Moon (-8.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 17 23:33 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.68762661:
07:32:05.77 +22:09:21.8 Io (5.9mag)
07:32:06.12 +22:09:21.2 Europa (6.1mag)
07:31:43.60 +22:10:19.6 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:32:27.05 +22:08:31.1 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:33:34.05 +21:46:53.9 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:32:02.88 +22:09:28.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:33:59.60 +22:11:26.7 Elara (17.5mag)
07:32:58.74 +22:32:39.0 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:39:24.22 +22:09:56.8 Carme (18.7mag)
00:42:27.90 +02:09:56.9 Titan (8.7mag)
00:42:28.41 +02:09:23.9 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:42:32.51 +02:08:13.7 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:42:25.86 +02:09:08.6 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:43:34.33 +02:14:20.4 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 17 23:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.68762661:
17:09:01.91 -31:23:21.7 JWST
15:50:03.33 +53:14:06.7 Chandra
08:14:26.53 -43:36:53.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 17 23:33 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.68762661 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
13:28:34.91 -27:51:38.2 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:23:37.42 +30:50:51.9 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:33:40.16 +00:55:29.7 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:15:22.39 +24:19:52.1 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:33:11.00 +21:19:10.2 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:01.24 -31:01:37.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:33:25.16 -68:27:22.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:41:35.71 +31:43:10.5 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:47.32 +13:54:53.7 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:50.02 +30:40:47.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:08:08.01 +26:44:46.9 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:16:13.15 +31:41:53.8 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:40:29.51 +02:41:24.5 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:40:54.38 +20:49:28.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:27:50.32 -11:05:52.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:46.41 -07:30:39.1 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:14:57.94 +65:05:24.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:33:52.00 -04:57:48.0 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:27:29.97 +87:16:52.1 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:44:07.86 +63:45:06.8 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:13:41.92 +25:25:56.1 12.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:54:35.22 +11:14:03.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:13.35 +24:42:31.2 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:57:01.36 -18:04:49.7 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:46:05.19 +38:18:58.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:57:42.00 +53:24:54.1 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:04:51.98 -09:22:06.1 11.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:35.43 +04:27:19.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:19:41.99 +41:37:42.6 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:56.15 -12:54:26.2 16.1mag A/2026 E1
19:44:41.95 -08:12:35.1 9.9mag 10P/Tempel
14:23:23.89 -01:17:00.2 16.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:05.35 -00:52:57.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:46:26.99 -02:36:37.2 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:38:56.56 +22:39:36.7 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:15:19.39 +29:27:45.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:06:43.25 -08:00:51.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:36:33.79 +30:11:39.6 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:19:03.46 +14:07:21.6 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:31:40.78 -00:13:16.8 15.1mag 88P/Howell
03:47:19.62 +27:45:02.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:01:47.21 +33:19:45.4 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:14:46.68 +23:47:08.9 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:24:31.06 +17:36:53.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:51:33.12 +17:45:47.4 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:18:42.44 +19:36:59.4 12.1mag 141P/Machholz
04:22:02.16 +14:56:38.6 12.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:03:52.81 +11:36:13.4 10.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:42:10.21 -27:59:51.2 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:35:20.71 +14:30:51.1 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:31:17.98 -03:30:22.6 17.9mag 169P/NEAT
17:08:09.19 -10:06:51.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:46:43.84 +35:55:14.5 17.2mag 240P/NEAT
23:38:04.21 -10:47:26.2 17.0mag 260P/McNaught
03:10:05.28 +28:11:22.8 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
15:26:10.52 +08:20:11.2 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:51:37.08 +21:10:25.3 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:25:48.22 +43:06:15.0 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 17 23:33 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 17 23:33 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 17 23:33 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:34:03.642 +49:57:51.24 AT 2026mfx 2026-04-30.36 20.27
14:34:05.244 +09:55:34.18 AT 2026mfw 2026-05-06.35 20.77
00:45:05.656 +20:36:01.96 AT 2026mfv 2026-05-11.49 18.4889
23:13:56.047 +28:34:02.89 AT 2026mfu 2026-05-11.48 20.0674
21:29:58.778 +00:05:56.39 AT 2026mft 2026-05-11.47 19.8386
18:01:13.229 +10:03:03.38 AT 2026mfs 2026-05-08.43 20.2663
16:43:28.522 -11:16:06.15 AT 2026mfr 2026-05-08.35 19.7589
00:41:59.717 +50:47:29.07 AT 2026mfq 2026-05-07.49 19.4349
15:37:14.906 -12:09:25.69 AT 2026mfp 2026-05-07.37 20.2224
13:49:34.329 -03:03:36.93 AT 2026mfo 2026-05-07.29 20.3793
18:46:53.611 -51:14:17.28 AT 2026mfn 2026-05-09.66 19.6
19:08:51.668 -48:32:04.79 SN 2026mfm 2026-05-09.71 17.86
19:37:11.200 -44:20:46.81 SN 2026mfl 2026-05-09.71 18.81
19:44:56.756 -43:03:59.26 AT 2026mfk 2026-05-09.71 19.45
20:07:09.779 -55:24:02.93 AT 2026mfj 2026-05-09.74 19.73
21:34:20.625 -53:28:23.12 AT 2026mfi 2026-05-05.76 19.54
21:46:07.248 -56:40:38.39 AT 2026mfh 2026-05-05.76 18.9
10:48:27.292 +32:35:39.15 AT 2026mfg 2026-05-05.88 19.78
11:15:35.886 +40:46:38.37 AT 2026mff 2026-05-09.89 19.57
10:38:50.771 +39:13:06.38 AT 2026mfe 2026-05-02.18 19.3692
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 17 23:33 tns_transients_list.txt