This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 12.10 11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3
248.97805 56.26223 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -1 0 1 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 04 15.14 +05 04 03.3 12.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 12.23 11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4
254.20140 60.57599 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele -0 1 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 24 13.07 +06 14 40.4 12.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.11 11:09:46.19 +01:24:49.7
255.18351 54.57253 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 1 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:09:46.19 +01:24:49.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:09:46.19 +01:24:49.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 09 46.19 +01 24 49.7 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.28 10:43:43.24 +06:57:45.5
240.68641 53.61402 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -1 1 2 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:43:43.24 +06:57:45.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:43:43.24 +06:57:45.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 10 43 43.24 +06 57 45.5 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.39 10:52:47.77 +04:11:31.8
246.70988 53.57551 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -1 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:52:47.77 +04:11:31.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:52:47.77 +04:11:31.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 10 52 47.77 +04 11 31.8 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.57 11:18:44.85 +03:33:24.5
255.69189 57.66116 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -2 0 2 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:18:44.85 +03:33:24.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:18:44.85 +03:33:24.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 18 44.85 +03 33 24.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.78 10:59:54.74 +10:18:53.0
240.20377 58.82706 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa 0 1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:59:54.74 +10:18:53.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:59:54.74 +10:18:53.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 10 59 54.74 +10 18 53.0 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 13.77 11:05:30.26 +03:58:24.9
250.76459 55.71839 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:30.26 +03:58:24.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:30.26 +03:58:24.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 05 30.26 +03 58 24.9 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 14.04 11:37:33.87 +03:36:04.8
262.85417 60.58995 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda 0 1 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:33.87 +03:36:04.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:33.87 +03:36:04.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 37 33.87 +03 36 04.8 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 14.08 10:44:28.75 +07:25:56.9
240.24632 54.04840 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -1 1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:44:28.75 +07:25:56.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:44:28.75 +07:25:56.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 10 44 28.75 +07 25 56.9 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1800 2461178.6800 14.27 11:01:59.74 +08:45:30.6
243.16630 58.28159 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope -1 1 2 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:59.74 +08:45:30.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:59.74 +08:45:30.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1800* 11 01 59.74 +08 45 30.6 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6800,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1800 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461178.68034659 18.05.2026 04:19:31.945 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6378
Objects passed selection criteria: 6377
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6165.5
Average stars matched: 5893.25 (95.5843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:25:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461146.72985719 16.04.2026 05:30:49.661 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461178.68034659 18.05.2026 04:19:31.945 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 35
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30187
Objects passed selection criteria: 30129
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29106
Average stars matched: 27868.2 (95.7474 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:26:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.67962579
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g78ckz5ru4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OpMlkYeQeV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pag7sJV9OY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IG5xnb0bY1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1319 to 175.0599 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2736 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3349 out of 6014 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec +0.1921 to +11.6322 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0424 to 175.4602 deg, Dec 0.1921 to 11.6322 deg
Loaded 4379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3233 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g78ckz5ru4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=6014
Got 6014 stars (including 5628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=237 n_q2=269 n_q3=220 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OpMlkYeQeV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=235 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pag7sJV9OY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=6414
Got 6414 stars (including 6120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=248 n_q2=247 n_q3=232 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IG5xnb0bY1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, passed=6403
Got 6403 stars (including 6107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=241 n_q2=248 n_q3=235 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.132
ref2=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.050
new2=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.4285 worst_q_ratio=1.0975
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:15:18.14 +08:14:22.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:12:59.54 +08:03:47.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:33:01.18 +09:37:21.1: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:08:45.46 +08:51:12.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:07.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:15:18.14 +08:14:22.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:12:59.54 +08:03:47.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:33:01.18 +09:37:21.1: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:08:45.46 +08:51:12.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:07.6: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.2: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:28.79 +06:57:46.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2845 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:59.54 +08:03:47.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3719 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:18.14 +08:14:22.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3360 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:45.46 +08:51:12.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2138 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.18 +09:37:21.1: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4047 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:03.73 +05:49:07.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3159 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:37.64 +06:42:52.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3129 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:21.84 +01:09:26.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3346 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:08.73 +08:14:11.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:04:08.46 +07:06:58.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:08.73 +08:14:11.5: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:08.73 +08:14:11.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3763 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:04:08.46 +07:06:58.1: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:08.46 +07:06:58.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3776 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20622.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20615_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20615_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 20620_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 20622_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20623_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20623_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20624_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20625_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20626_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20627_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20627_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20629_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 20631_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 03293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.78 +05:27:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:04:15.14 +05:04:03.3
11:24:13.07 +06:14:40.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:37.871 +05:58:55.04
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:41.793 +06:00:22.67
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.065 +05:59:51.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLZlG8yj06
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aMaY0j7efw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zSAerHmgfa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M39HUL0Ca7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.669100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.669100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec +0.5959 to +11.2851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1320 to 175.0637 deg, Dec 0.5959 to 11.2851 deg
Loaded 3949 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 31020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec +0.1922 to +11.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 158.9765 to 175.4716 deg, Dec 0.1922 to 11.6821 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3126 out of 3432 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3432 out of 32625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zLZlG8yj06 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1265, passed=31002
Got 31002 stars (including 29705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=226 n_q2=276 n_q3=221 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aMaY0j7efw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1301, passed=32613
Got 32613 stars (including 31248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=239 n_q2=251 n_q3=241 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zSAerHmgfa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=857, passed=26856
Got 26856 stars (including 25970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=248 n_q2=247 n_q3=234 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M39HUL0Ca7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=857, passed=26765
Got 26765 stars (including 25884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=241 n_q2=251 n_q3=238 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-18-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0615.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232105_TTUQ1b1x1_1556295_9lLVFo4J/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:52:47.77 +04:11:31.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:18:44.85 +03:33:24.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:43:43.24 +06:57:45.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:09:46.19 +01:24:49.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:05:30.26 +03:58:24.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:33.87 +03:36:04.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:59:54.74 +10:18:53.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:32:22.18 +04:39:09.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:30:26.57 +05:22:30.6: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:52:47.77 +04:11:31.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:18:44.85 +03:33:24.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:43:43.24 +06:57:45.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:09:46.19 +01:24:49.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:44:28.75 +07:25:56.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:05:30.26 +03:58:24.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:59:54.74 +10:18:53.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:32:22.18 +04:39:09.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:33.87 +03:36:04.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:22.18 +04:39:09.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0581 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:30:26.57 +05:22:30.6: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:26.57 +05:22:30.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1215 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:44:28.75 +07:25:56.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:01:59.74 +08:45:30.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:06:14.31 +01:14:17.5: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:01:59.74 +08:45:30.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:06:14.31 +01:14:17.5: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:14.31 +01:14:17.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1402 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:33:17.63 +01:05:15.0: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:33:17.63 +01:05:15.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:17.63 +01:05:15.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4037 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:29:17.03 +07:19:47.4: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:29:17.03 +07:19:47.4: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:17.03 +07:19:47.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5676 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:48.75 +04:23:24.1: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:48.75 +04:23:24.1: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:48.75 +04:23:24.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6377 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:37:20.45 +06:20:02.5: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:37:20.45 +06:20:02.5: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:20.45 +06:20:02.5: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6315 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:39:06.12 +05:04:03.2: 15.35 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:39:06.12 +05:04:03.2: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:06.12 +05:04:03.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6614 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:21:12.70 +04:33:31.4: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:21:12.70 +04:33:31.4: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:12.70 +04:33:31.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8233 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:27:13.30 +10:08:29.9: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 11:20:17.77 +06:27:23.5: 15.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:27:13.30 +10:08:29.9: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:13.30 +10:08:29.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8045 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-30-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 10:47:07.56 +05:33:50.5: 15.85 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 11:20:17.77 +06:27:23.5: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:20:17.77 +06:27:23.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7772 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-42-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 10:47:07.56 +05:33:50.5: 15.91 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.88 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:47:07.56 +05:33:50.5: ref_mag=15.88 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.8187 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54602.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54501.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54530.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54482_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:45.02 +01:57:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54483_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54483_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:15.13 +05:04:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:13.05 +06:14:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54496_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:34.93 +06:07:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54497_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54497_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:23.84 +09:24:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54503_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54508_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54508_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.97 +03:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54513_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:55.08 +01:12:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54516_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54517_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54517_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54518_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54530_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
Preparing report for the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54537_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54541_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54543_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54549_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:56.30 +07:20:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54576_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54598_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54601_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54601_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54602_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 54602_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:07.56 +05:33:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.375 3858427919546483840 161.78165584473 +05.56367871397 15.6228 15.2185 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.375#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 16796_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:50.78 +05:27:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616
The candidate 05030_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0616 did not pass the final checks
