This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 10.36 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9
237.76457 46.31111 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.7 Iris -2 1 2 10.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 15 41.04 +04 06 09.9 10.4 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,10.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 10.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 12.63 10:34:30.24 +02:36:24.6
243.81511 49.09332 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe -1 1 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:34:30.24 +02:36:24.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:34:30.24 +02:36:24.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 34 30.24 +02 36 24.6 12.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 13.05 10:31:41.92 +07:46:39.1
236.70625 51.68472 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea -2 1 2 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:31:41.92 +07:46:39.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:31:41.92 +07:46:39.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 31 41.92 +07 46 39.1 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 13.44 10:43:42.87 +06:57:48.8
240.68361 53.61337 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -1 1 2 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:43:42.87 +06:57:48.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:43:42.87 +06:57:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 43 42.87 +06 57 48.8 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 13.31 09:47:25.96 +09:26:15.5
226.13832 43.20609 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.67 Asia -0 1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:47:25.96 +09:26:15.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:47:25.96 +09:26:15.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 09 47 25.96 +09 26 15.5 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 13.71 10:21:21.35 +06:59:10.5
235.45776 49.12174 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga -2 1 2 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:21:21.35 +06:59:10.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:21:21.35 +06:59:10.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 21 21.35 +06 59 10.5 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 13.93 10:24:42.81 +04:05:59.1
239.74313 48.11784 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera -2 1 2 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:24:42.81 +04:05:59.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:24:42.81 +04:05:59.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 24 42.81 +04 05 59.1 13.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 14.29 10:44:28.20 +07:25:57.5
240.24376 54.04669 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -2 1 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:28.20 +07:25:57.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:28.20 +07:25:57.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 44 28.20 +07 25 57.5 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1675 2461178.6675 14.59 10:22:46.87 +09:38:48.3
232.27807 50.86129 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -3 1 3 15.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:22:46.87 +09:38:48.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:22:46.87 +09:38:48.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.1675* 10 22 46.87 +09 38 48.3 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6675,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1675 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461178.66773896 18.05.2026 04:01:22.646 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7168
Objects passed selection criteria: 7167
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6948.75
Average stars matched: 6654.75 (95.769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:05:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461178.66773896 18.05.2026 04:01:22.646 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 52
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36376
Objects passed selection criteria: 36295
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35264.2
Average stars matched: 33581 (95.2268 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 23:06:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.66725662
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01232 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m9kqoKuXzP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wIQ5IY4WOJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pokzwUqbpi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EYsbPhYB89
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec +0.1984 to +11.5941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec 0.1984 to 11.5941 deg
Loaded 5210 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3754 out of 3927 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3927 out of 6613 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.m9kqoKuXzP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=6928
Got 6928 stars (including 6481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=213 n_q2=231 n_q3=223 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wIQ5IY4WOJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6613
Got 6613 stars (including 6136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=220 n_q2=207 n_q3=235 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pokzwUqbpi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=347, passed=7239
Got 7239 stars (including 6884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=232 n_q2=222 n_q3=225 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EYsbPhYB89 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=7203
Got 7203 stars (including 6824 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.214 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=230 n_q2=224 n_q3=228 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new1=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.081
new2=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.3655 worst_q_ratio=1.1535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:35.20 +05:38:57.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:07.68 +05:16:58.2: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:14:08.24 +07:26:08.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:18:23.32 +05:59:51.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:00:38.62 +08:23:51.2: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:35.20 +05:38:57.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:18.97 +03:45:31.9: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:35.20 +05:38:57.4: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2185 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:14:08.24 +07:26:08.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.3553 delta=2.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:39.67 +06:41:42.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3238 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:08.24 +07:26:08.8: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3601 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:07.68 +05:16:58.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:07.68 +05:16:58.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3400 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:00:38.62 +08:23:51.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:18:23.32 +05:59:51.9: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:38.62 +08:23:51.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3074 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:23.32 +05:59:51.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3447 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:14.51 +07:02:06.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:18.97 +03:45:31.9: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:18.97 +03:45:31.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3243 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:06.02 +04:21:00.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3277 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:14.51 +07:02:06.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:14.51 +07:02:06.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3527 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:08.25 +06:22:41.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:40:19.30 +10:35:42.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:08:31.58 +06:38:21.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:08.25 +06:22:41.0: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:08.25 +06:22:41.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3947 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:40:19.30 +10:35:42.5: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:19.30 +10:35:42.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3588 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:08:31.58 +06:38:21.2: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:31.58 +06:38:21.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3667 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 20590_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20591_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:35.14 +05:05:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20596_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20597_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:59.68 +05:47:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20598_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20599_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20600_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20600_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:26.52 +05:34:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20601_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20602_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20603_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20605_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20606_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20607_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20609_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 20610_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:15:41.04 +04:06:09.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:16.692 +05:59:08.56
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:15.233 +05:59:47.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01232 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kDux5Lq8Yx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UzzoRXTDzJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uDY313Upsv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dn3NwMsFB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.665200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.665200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 39278 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec +0.1788 to +11.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec 0.1788 to 11.6671 deg
Loaded 5262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3705 out of 4075 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4075 out of 39278 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.4 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kDux5Lq8Yx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1564, passed=36403
Got 36403 stars (including 34801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=211 n_q2=241 n_q3=205 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UzzoRXTDzJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1637, passed=39258
Got 39258 stars (including 37533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=221 n_q2=212 n_q3=225 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uDY313Upsv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1211, passed=33360
Got 33360 stars (including 32112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=232 n_q2=220 n_q3=222 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3dn3NwMsFB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1202, passed=33037
Got 33037 stars (including 31792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.211 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=232 n_q2=220 n_q3=223 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-00-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0597.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230307_TTUQ1b1x1_1025204_Ucw7kBIL/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:01.89 +06:16:18.4: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:30:39.85 +09:22:56.3: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:34:30.24 +02:36:24.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:19:00.51 +01:00:53.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:42:30.10 +05:02:31.1: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:43:42.87 +06:57:48.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:47:25.96 +09:26:15.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:20:22.27 +08:41:40.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:31:41.92 +07:46:39.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:42:30.10 +05:02:31.1: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:34:30.24 +02:36:24.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:01.89 +06:16:18.4: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:30:39.85 +09:22:56.3: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:19:00.51 +01:00:53.0: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:30.10 +05:02:31.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2555 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:01.89 +06:16:18.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6368 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:39.85 +09:22:56.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3591 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:00.51 +01:00:53.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7806 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:21:21.35 +06:59:10.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:22.27 +08:41:40.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:43:42.87 +06:57:48.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:22.27 +08:41:40.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6741 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:31:41.92 +07:46:39.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:47:25.96 +09:26:15.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:21:21.35 +06:59:10.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:54:24.73 +03:20:54.7: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:48.33 +06:01:16.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:36:26.30 +07:04:38.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:48.33 +06:01:16.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:24:42.81 +04:05:59.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:54:24.73 +03:20:54.7: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:48.33 +06:01:16.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8920 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:24.73 +03:20:54.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5616 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:26.30 +07:04:38.8: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:26.30 +07:04:38.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1157 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:24:42.81 +04:05:59.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:28.20 +07:25:57.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:38:07.68 +03:28:39.5: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:28.20 +07:25:57.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:46:53.13 +06:00:41.4: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:38:07.68 +03:28:39.5: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:07.68 +03:28:39.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3873 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:44:10.34 +05:05:42.0: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:46:53.13 +06:00:41.4: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:53.13 +06:00:41.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5364 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:10.34 +05:05:42.0: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:10.34 +05:05:42.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6269 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:36:59.32 +05:16:54.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:41:11.05 +08:34:15.8: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:21:16.57 +01:27:13.4: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:59.32 +05:16:54.8: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:59.32 +05:16:54.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6271 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:41:11.05 +08:34:15.8: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:11.05 +08:34:15.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7234 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:21:16.57 +01:27:13.4: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:16.57 +01:27:13.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4552 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:36:43.49 +09:59:14.0: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:49:00.68 +01:20:42.0: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:22:46.87 +09:38:48.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:43.49 +09:59:14.0: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:49:00.68 +01:20:42.0: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:43.49 +09:59:14.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7263 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:00.68 +01:20:42.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5627 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:22:46.87 +09:38:48.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:28:11.01 +05:53:20.8: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 09:48:31.34 +07:59:21.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:28:11.01 +05:53:20.8: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:11.01 +05:53:20.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8056 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:48:31.34 +07:59:21.6: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:48:31.34 +07:59:21.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7984 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55992.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55865_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55865_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55866_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55866_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55868_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55868_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55869_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55869_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:55.08 +05:16:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55872_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55872_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55873_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55873_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:22.37 +06:02:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55874_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55874_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:35.18 +05:05:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55882_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55882_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:17.26 +02:07:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55886_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55886_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:28.20 +08:34:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55887_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55887_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55892_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55892_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55897_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55897_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55901_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55901_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55906_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55906_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:37.42 +07:19:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55908_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55908_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55910_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55910_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55911_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55911_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55912_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55912_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:34.95 +09:14:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55914_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55914_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55915_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55915_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:06.48 +09:22:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55920_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55920_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55924_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55924_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:55.17 +06:58:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55925_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55925_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55927_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55927_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55929_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55929_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:45.50 +05:25:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55937_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55937_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55938_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55938_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55942_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55942_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:55.73 +03:40:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55947_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55947_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55954_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55954_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:48.54 +08:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55961_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55961_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55967_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55967_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55978_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55978_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55986_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55986_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55990_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 55990_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55992_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
Preparing report for the candidate 55992_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56010_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 56010_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:50.04 +02:42:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56012_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 56012_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56050_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 56050_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56054_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 56054_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:03.50 +10:47:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35035_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598
The candidate 35035_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_23-01-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0598 did not pass the final checks
