This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.1239 2461178.6239 13.17 07:26:39.83 +22:07:23.5
196.47057 17.33431 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 2 1 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:39.83 +22:07:23.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:39.83 +22:07:23.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6239,7.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1239 7.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461178.62414392 18.05.2026 02:58:36.035 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13612
Objects passed selection criteria: 13594
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13587.8
Average stars matched: 12435.5 (91.5199 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 22:29:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461178.62414392 18.05.2026 02:58:36.035 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 94869
Objects passed selection criteria: 94686
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 95641.2
Average stars matched: 87492.8 (91.4801 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1901552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 22:32:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.62364429
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01152 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OZ9tUb8S0c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h9dNRMukgn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KNtgaBG6ID
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JINNBvJQAK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OZ9tUb8S0c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=221 n_q2=248 n_q3=257 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h9dNRMukgn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=167 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KNtgaBG6ID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=948, passed=14221
Got 14221 stars (including 13262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14221 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.751 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.662 n_q1=182 n_q2=284 n_q3=197 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JINNBvJQAK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=923, passed=14363
Got 14363 stars (including 13427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.740 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=177 n_q2=284 n_q3=198 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.067
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.305
reference average sigma_overall=0.4035 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:05.9: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:05.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:58.89 +25:26:05.9: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7613 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 34567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 34570_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 34571_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 34572_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 30957_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.34 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:55.193 +21:59:08.39
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:53.789 +21:58:31.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01152 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.30K3X0ruLF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WQSTaqsN42
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9uDGJSDXHW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dyu7OAKMRm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.30K3X0ruLF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=17863, passed=153644
Got 153644 stars (including 135507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=234 n_q2=237 n_q3=245 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WQSTaqsN42 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 133510 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=183 n_q2=265 n_q3=224 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9uDGJSDXHW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=6402, passed=88326
Got 88326 stars (including 81828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=189 n_q2=273 n_q3=216 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dyu7OAKMRm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=6650, passed=88725
Got 88725 stars (including 81959 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=196 n_q2=274 n_q3=215 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-57-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1384.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_220144_TTUQ2b1x1_2770971_R9r9xvze/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:06.04 +19:59:54.3: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:02.51 +24:27:31.3: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:01.31 +20:29:30.0: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:38:47.44 +18:23:00.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:22.72 +24:39:20.8: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:39:39.07 +22:41:48.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:45.99 +24:13:28.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:02.51 +24:27:31.3: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:06.04 +19:59:54.3: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:02.51 +24:27:31.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2271 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:10.04 +23:48:42.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:06.04 +19:59:54.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9743 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.31 +20:29:30.0: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:47.44 +18:23:00.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:01.31 +20:29:30.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1974 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:45.99 +24:13:28.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:39.07 +22:41:48.5: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:22.72 +24:39:20.8: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:01.28 +19:41:49.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:47.44 +18:23:00.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7833 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:45.99 +24:13:28.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4337 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:39.07 +22:41:48.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0026 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:22.72 +24:39:20.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6755 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:10.04 +23:48:42.1: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:10.04 +23:48:42.1: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8563 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.28 +19:41:49.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.28 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8296 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:02:58.95 +25:26:05.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:39.83 +22:07:23.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:58.95 +25:26:05.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:58.95 +25:26:05.9: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8724 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:39.83 +22:07:23.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:37:13.51 +17:46:51.1: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:37:13.51 +17:46:51.1: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:13.51 +17:46:51.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6359 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:50.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.1: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:21.94 +25:44:36.9: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:50.5: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:12.03 +26:11:50.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8475 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.1: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.15 +21:05:54.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8062 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:27.94 +24:22:25.4: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:21.94 +25:44:36.9: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:21.94 +25:44:36.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8065 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:27.94 +24:22:25.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:27.94 +24:22:25.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8355 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:26:45.14 +23:50:53.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:55.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.22 +19:51:30.9: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:45.14 +23:50:53.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:45.14 +23:50:53.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0432 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.22 +19:51:30.9: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:40.66 +24:58:27.6: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.22 +19:51:30.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1053 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:55.4: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:56.17 +23:55:38.7: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:49.11 +20:17:55.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2104 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:34:29.24 +25:13:53.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:56.17 +23:55:38.7: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:56.17 +23:55:38.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3219 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:40.66 +24:58:27.6: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:40.66 +24:58:27.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3474 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:29.24 +25:13:53.0: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:29.24 +25:13:53.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2442 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:59.92 +20:18:51.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:59.92 +20:18:51.4: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:18.55 +21:01:12.7: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:59.92 +20:18:51.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3147 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:23:54.83 +23:28:19.8: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:41.81 +23:13:45.5: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:18.55 +21:01:12.7: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:18.55 +21:01:12.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5075 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:54.83 +23:28:19.8: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:41.81 +23:13:45.5: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:54.83 +23:28:19.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5858 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:41.81 +23:13:45.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5367 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195618.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195469_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195469_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:01.59 +19:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195481_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195483_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195501_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195501_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.89 +17:52:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195509_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195513_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.87 +19:06:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195523_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.00 +24:41:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:56.60 +24:56:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195534_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195534_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 195537_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 195538_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195563_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195563_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.25 +24:07:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195569_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.14 +22:38:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195595_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195595_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195602_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195602_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.80 +23:56:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195609_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.66 +22:17:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.36 +21:47:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195617_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195617_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.83 +25:33:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
Preparing report for the candidate 195618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195623_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.34 +24:32:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195629_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.44 +21:31:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195630_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.50 +20:30:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195632_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.38 +24:26:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195636_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195636_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.85 +18:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195649_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.68 +20:31:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.49 +20:05:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195657_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.02 +20:06:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195675_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.83 +24:19:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195680_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195680_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.70 +20:16:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195681_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195681_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.19 +24:08:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195684_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.91 +24:17:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195686_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195686_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.58 +24:24:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195687_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195687_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.57 +22:40:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195688_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.95 +18:10:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195690_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.63 +19:03:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195692_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.75 +21:28:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.65 +19:09:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.52 +25:10:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195702_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.63 +20:00:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195707_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:38.10 +20:47:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.07 +22:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195711_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:30.99 +19:26:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195725_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.28 +22:57:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195727_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195727_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195728_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195728_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195730_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.77 +23:02:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195738_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195738_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.80 +20:49:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195740_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:38.03 +19:20:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195741_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.93 +22:53:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195742_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195742_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:12.05 +21:26:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.74 +21:21:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195754_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.09 +25:27:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195757_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.45 +18:18:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.41 +18:53:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195770_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195770_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.59 +25:49:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195773_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195773_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:59.15 +25:56:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195774_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:37.96 +24:18:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.67 +17:39:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195777_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.12 +21:35:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.91 +26:08:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.55 +20:49:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195786_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.53 +21:32:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195792_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:03.33 +17:51:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195797_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:37.62 +23:35:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195798_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195798_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:24.09 +24:47:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195804_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195812_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195812_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.11 +22:26:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.80 +24:30:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195835_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.06 +20:09:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195861_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.65 +25:44:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195868_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195876_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:05.59 +19:15:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:22.96 +19:59:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195899_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195899_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:57.39 +20:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195900_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195911_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.19 +24:26:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.79 +20:41:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195955_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195975_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 195983_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385
The candidate 165521_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_21-58-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1385 did not pass the final checks
