This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1742490-014654,2461177.9504,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1742490-014654 20260517.4504 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4504 2461177.9504 13.13 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5
26.58954 12.51617 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J175524.45+000947.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.640 g Y 0.830 g 2459312.59700 481.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5: 14.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J175524.45+000947.0,2461177.9504,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J175524.45+000947.0 20260517.4504 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4504 2461177.9504 13.09 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9
26.49581 11.18482 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" FASTT 1055
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.330 RF Y 0.100 RF
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.4504* 17 59 56.80 +00 32 22.9 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FASTT 1055,2461177.9504,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FASTT 1055 20260517.4504 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461177.95079383 17.05.2026 10:48:58.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6888
Objects passed selection criteria: 6868
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5242
Average stars matched: 4864.25 (92.7938 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 06:56:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461177.95079383 17.05.2026 10:48:58.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68803
Objects passed selection criteria: 68636
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52340.5
Average stars matched: 48402.8 (92.4767 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 07:00:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.95007697
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GGc4pppHNL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.syDso4OYKg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vKrT5KKqbx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sXffJGyKSH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to +3.7460 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to 3.7460 deg
Loaded 6269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4104 out of 4265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4265 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GGc4pppHNL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, passed=7172
Got 7172 stars (including 6656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=194 n_q2=137 n_q3=324 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.syDso4OYKg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=191 n_q2=141 n_q3=322 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vKrT5KKqbx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=5566
Got 5566 stars (including 5107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.959 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.947 n_q1=309 n_q2=290 n_q3=146 n_q4=167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.412
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sXffJGyKSH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=450, passed=5289
Got 5289 stars (including 4838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.014 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.977 n_q1=308 n_q2=290 n_q3=146 n_q4=167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.434
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.126
ref2=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits sigma_overall=0.679 worst_q_ratio=1.412
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits sigma_overall=0.707 worst_q_ratio=1.434
reference average sigma_overall=0.4495 worst_q_ratio=1.1065
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:13.7: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:01:14.79 -02:53:40.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:06:14.46 -04:03:49.3: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:13.7: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:01:14.79 -02:53:40.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:06:14.46 -04:03:49.3: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:13.7: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7366 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:14.79 -02:53:40.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5299 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:14.46 -04:03:49.3: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6657 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20898_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 20898_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.40 +01:59:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20993_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 20993_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:59.31 +02:15:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21149_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21149_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:22.77 +00:34:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21189_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21189_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21204_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21204_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:16.89 -01:43:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21301_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21301_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21316_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21316_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:28.04 +02:04:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21377_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 21377_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.749 -02:00:25.50
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:01.668 -01:59:54.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h19UXeQdtL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PD1LrcIGXA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tjat7gnds2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iNyh1CDiNs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.478700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.478700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 77640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to +3.7673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to 3.7673 deg
Loaded 6321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4094 out of 4757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4757 out of 77640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h19UXeQdtL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4817, passed=77247
Got 77247 stars (including 72311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=198 n_q2=154 n_q3=300 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PD1LrcIGXA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4938, passed=77627
Got 77627 stars (including 72566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=194 n_q2=152 n_q3=296 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tjat7gnds2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3362, passed=43959
Got 43959 stars (including 40548 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.892 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.902 n_q1=334 n_q2=258 n_q3=168 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.351
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iNyh1CDiNs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2830, passed=41254
Got 41254 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.885 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.892 n_q1=328 n_q2=257 n_q3=166 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1337.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_064033_TTUQ2b1x1_960907_lDlU7An1/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:52:00.82 -05:34:57.6: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:01:22.85 +01:28:46.2: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:52:00.82 -05:34:57.6: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:00.82 -05:34:57.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0964 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:01:22.85 +01:28:46.2: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:22.85 +01:28:46.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8713 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:18:18.65 +01:17:37.3: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:18:18.65 +01:17:37.3: 14.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:18.65 +01:17:37.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8499 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:52:15.79 +01:20:14.3: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:09:29.67 +00:53:15.1: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:11:04.04 -02:12:46.3: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:52:15.79 +01:20:14.3: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:15.79 +01:20:14.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8744 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:11:04.04 -02:12:46.3: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:04.04 -02:12:46.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9650 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:09:29.67 +00:53:15.1: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:29.67 +00:53:15.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8958 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:45:22.72 +01:07:15.6: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:45:22.72 +01:07:15.6: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:22.72 +01:07:15.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9689 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5: 14.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:55:24.46 +00:09:45.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1372 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:59:56.80 -00:32:22.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0872 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74157.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94449_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 94449_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94451_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 94451_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:59.74 +02:14:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94458_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 94458_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96720_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 96720_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.43 -02:32:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97682_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 97682_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:37.54 -02:14:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97832_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 97832_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.30 +00:52:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98136_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 98136_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.31 +00:04:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98310_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 98310_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:31.23 +01:00:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98851_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 98851_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.06 +01:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99621_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 99621_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:05.32 -01:14:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99711_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 99711_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:17.36 +01:45:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99852_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 99852_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:31.28 -00:22:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99927_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 99927_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.72 -05:58:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100068_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100068_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:16.97 -00:28:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100596_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100596_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:59.65 -04:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100671_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100671_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:11.61 -05:30:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100865_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100865_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100891_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 100891_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.83 -01:37:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101027_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101027_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:57.08 +01:36:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101228_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101228_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:59.42 -04:24:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101232_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101232_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:49.94 -01:45:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101371_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101371_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:06.23 -05:11:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101431_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101431_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101589_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
Preparing report for the candidate 101589_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101641_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101641_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101803_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 101803_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47340_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 47340_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:40.07 +01:38:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50012_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 50012_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:01.12 +00:39:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70351_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 70351_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:52.79 -02:25:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88241_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 88241_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:59.47 +01:37:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:00.17 +00:32:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 49806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:22.81 +00:34:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.41 +01:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75283_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 75283_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:54.80 +00:00:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74157_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
Preparing report for the candidate 74157_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15221_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 15221_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:16.08 -03:53:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76744_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
Preparing report for the candidate 76744_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17439_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 17439_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:19.41 -03:30:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46827_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 46827_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:31.02 +02:09:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55180_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338
The candidate 55180_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-48-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1338 did not pass the final checks